|
Conceptual
Recommendations
In order to
accommodate the diverse subject matter and various stakeholders within
Urban Ecology, a collection of case studies would require:
:: a complex
search-engine
:: a
combination of projects, articles, images, and critical analysis
:: a level of
familiarity and accessibility for professionals and the public alike
:: a level of
authority derived either from an editorial filter or popular consensus
With these
requirements in mind, two existing platforms - iTunes and Wikipedia - have
the potential to serve as conceptual models for an Urban Ecology case study
collection.
|
iTUNES MODEL
|
Gaining more and more popularity every day,
Apple has
created in iTunes a search-engine that can cross reference and sort a
tremendous amount of information. Though it is used primarily for audio
content, the prototype could be altered to include downloadable PDF's,
images and links. Just as music is searched by artist's name, song
title, genre, and keyword, Urban Ecology case studies and articles
could be searched by designer/planner, geographic location, project
name, project type or keyword. Authorship and intellectual property
rights could be protected under this model, however it would require a
tremendous amount of editorial effort in selecting case studies,
positioning comparisons, and formatting all entries for consistency.
Note in the second image that Stanford University is already experimenting with
the iTunes interface for its own expansion on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
WIKIPEDIA MODEL
|
Wikipedia is an open-source online encyclopedia that relies on its
users to contribute, update and edit its content. A self-updatable
database such as this would be most successful if it was limited to
specific project case studies; emphasis would thus be placed on users'
analysis and experience with particular projects rather than
unregulated nomination of "favorites". (Articles and website
links could be submitted in a different section of the site.) This
democratic compiling of collaborative information might lack the
authority of analyses written by experts in the field of Urban Ecology,
however the prototype would be much easier to build up with the
involvement of professionals, students and knowledgeable citizens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Return to Top)
|
|
|