1 00:00:00 --> 00:00:01 2 00:00:01 --> 00:00:02 The following content is provided under a Creative 3 00:00:02 --> 00:00:03 creative commons license. 4 00:00:03 --> 00:00:07 Your support will help MIT Open Courseware continue to offer 5 00:00:07 --> 00:00:10 high quality educational resources for free. 6 00:00:10 --> 00:00:13 To make a donation or view additional materials from 7 00:00:13 --> 00:00:16 hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare 8 00:00:16 --> 00:00:18 at ocw.mit.edu. 9 00:00:18 --> 00:00:23 PROFESSOR: Last few lectures, and we started to see some of 10 00:00:23 --> 00:00:27 the consequences and looked at simple changes, transformations 11 00:00:27 --> 00:00:31 of expansion and mixtures of liquids and gases. 12 00:00:31 --> 00:00:34 And saw how in the framework of statistical mechanics, we could 13 00:00:34 --> 00:00:38 derive the thermodynamic results that you saw before, 14 00:00:38 --> 00:00:39 based on an empirical framework. 15 00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 On the thermodynamic framework we've been 16 00:00:41 --> 00:00:42 working with all term. 17 00:00:42 --> 00:00:45 But you saw them derived from a microscopic perspective. 18 00:00:45 --> 00:00:50 Now what I want to do is move to examples that are more 19 00:00:50 --> 00:00:52 commonly encountered in chemistry. 20 00:00:52 --> 00:00:55 One that we did last time actually was very common, 21 00:00:55 --> 00:00:58 or is at least a prototype for something common. 22 00:00:58 --> 00:01:02 That is we looked at what would be a simple model for a polymer 23 00:01:02 --> 00:01:05 with different configurations available to it. 24 00:01:05 --> 00:01:08 And just tried to understand what the basic thermodynamics 25 00:01:08 --> 00:01:09 is that it would exhibit. 26 00:01:09 --> 00:01:12 What the heat capacities would be in various limiting cases. 27 00:01:12 --> 00:01:14 High and low temperature. 28 00:01:14 --> 00:01:16 I want to continue that today. 29 00:01:16 --> 00:01:18 But for an even more common case. 30 00:01:18 --> 00:01:23 So the model that I want to lay out is indicated on 31 00:01:23 --> 00:01:25 your notes for today. 32 00:01:25 --> 00:01:30 And essentially, you could look at it as double stranded DNA. 33 00:01:30 --> 00:01:33 Any kind of polymer with a whole variety of 34 00:01:33 --> 00:01:34 configurations. 35 00:01:34 --> 00:01:38 Ultimately what's going to matter is what is the 36 00:01:38 --> 00:01:42 set of energy levels available to the system. 37 00:01:42 --> 00:01:44 And so here's what it looks like. 38 00:01:44 --> 00:01:48 The way I've tried to depict it. 39 00:01:48 --> 00:01:57 I'm imagining something like, covalently bonded chains that 40 00:01:57 --> 00:01:58 have links between them. 41 00:01:58 --> 00:02:03 So of course, it's reminiscent of DNA with hydrogen bonding 42 00:02:03 --> 00:02:05 between the strands. 43 00:02:05 --> 00:02:09 And the idea in this simple model is that you can 44 00:02:09 --> 00:02:13 have various numbers of these hydrogen bonds. 45 00:02:13 --> 00:02:15 So this is the case that would be the most 46 00:02:15 --> 00:02:16 energetically stable. 47 00:02:16 --> 00:02:20 That is, all the available hydrogen bonds are formed 48 00:02:20 --> 00:02:22 between neighboring pairs. 49 00:02:22 --> 00:02:26 So this would be our lowest energy. 50 00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 Now let's starts breaking some hydrogen bonds. 51 00:02:29 --> 00:02:33 And what I'm imagining is they break starting at one end 52 00:02:33 --> 00:02:35 and working their way down. 53 00:02:35 --> 00:02:52 So the next highest energy state would be like this. 54 00:02:52 --> 00:02:54 So now these are still hydrogen bonded. 55 00:02:54 --> 00:02:55 This is not. 56 00:02:55 --> 00:02:58 And there's a cost in energy for breaking 57 00:02:58 --> 00:03:01 that hydrogen bond. 58 00:03:01 --> 00:03:04 We'll call it epsilon zero. 59 00:03:04 --> 00:03:06 It's a positive number. 60 00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 So that this is higher energy than this. 61 00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 And now we'll go to the next one, which could 62 00:03:11 --> 00:03:17 have two broken bonds. 63 00:03:17 --> 00:03:26 Broken hydrogen bonds. 64 00:03:26 --> 00:03:27 And so on. 65 00:03:27 --> 00:03:29 And if we imagine that this is very long, there may be many 66 00:03:29 --> 00:03:31 many, members of the chain. 67 00:03:31 --> 00:03:35 Then of course this sequence of structures with corresponding 68 00:03:35 --> 00:03:39 energies might go on for a very long way. 69 00:03:39 --> 00:03:42 So this is a simple construction that gives 70 00:03:42 --> 00:03:47 us a set of states with distinct energies. 71 00:03:47 --> 00:03:56 And so we have a series of configurational energy levels. 72 00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 They're evenly spaced in this model. 73 00:03:59 --> 00:04:09 So there's zero, E zero, two E zero. 74 00:04:09 --> 00:04:15 And so on. 75 00:04:15 --> 00:04:18 So those are available energy states. 76 00:04:18 --> 00:04:21 And now, just based on that simple model, we should be 77 00:04:21 --> 00:04:23 able to figure out all the thermodynamics. 78 00:04:23 --> 00:04:25 We should should be able to figure out what the 79 00:04:25 --> 00:04:28 equilibrium energy is at a particular temperature. 80 00:04:28 --> 00:04:30 What the average energy is. 81 00:04:30 --> 00:04:33 And so forth. 82 00:04:33 --> 00:04:39 And we can do it in a straightforward way. 83 00:04:39 --> 00:04:47 So we'll start with our molecular partition 84 00:04:47 --> 00:04:50 function, as always. 85 00:04:50 --> 00:04:53 So it's q configurational. 86 00:04:53 --> 00:04:57 And it's just a sum over our available states with their 87 00:04:57 --> 00:04:59 associated Boltzmann factors. 88 00:04:59 --> 00:05:05 So sum over n of e to the minus En over kT. 89 00:05:05 --> 00:05:10 Now the way I've modeled this, there are no degeneracies. 90 00:05:10 --> 00:05:14 Each energy level has just one microscopic state of the 91 00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 molecule corresponding to it. 92 00:05:16 --> 00:05:20 So there are no molecular degeneracies. 93 00:05:20 --> 00:05:22 Turns out we'll be able to put this into a simple form. 94 00:05:22 --> 00:05:28 So the first thing is, let's approximate that we could take 95 00:05:28 --> 00:05:31 the sum -- not to some finite level, which would be the case 96 00:05:31 --> 00:05:34 if there's a finite number of elements in the chain. 97 00:05:34 --> 00:05:48 But all the way through infinity. 98 00:05:48 --> 00:05:52 And the idea here is the following. 99 00:05:52 --> 00:05:56 We'll assume that the chain at least has a great many members. 100 00:05:56 --> 00:05:58 Even if it's finite. 101 00:05:58 --> 00:06:04 And then at some point, this becomes a really small number. 102 00:06:04 --> 00:06:07 Even if epsilon naught, the energy of one of the 103 00:06:07 --> 00:06:09 bonds, is less than kT. 104 00:06:09 --> 00:06:13 Once we multiply it by a very large number n, it becomes 105 00:06:13 --> 00:06:15 very much greater than kT. 106 00:06:15 --> 00:06:19 So the underlying assumption here is, well there will not 107 00:06:19 --> 00:06:22 be a significant number of molecules in the highest 108 00:06:22 --> 00:06:24 energy state anyway. 109 00:06:24 --> 00:06:30 In other words, the terms higher than a finite but large 110 00:06:30 --> 00:06:34 value of n between there and infinity are going to be so 111 00:06:34 --> 00:06:38 small that those terms will contribute negligibly 112 00:06:38 --> 00:06:40 to the sum anyway. 113 00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 And on that basis, we could make this approximation. 114 00:06:43 --> 00:06:45 And the incentive to make this approximation and carry the sum 115 00:06:45 --> 00:06:49 to infinity is that then we can put this in what turns out to 116 00:06:49 --> 00:06:52 be a very simple closed form. 117 00:06:52 --> 00:06:56 So now if we just write out a few of the individual terms in 118 00:06:56 --> 00:07:02 the sum, it's one plus e to the minus epsilon zero over kT. 119 00:07:02 --> 00:07:08 Plus e to the minus epsilon zero over kT. 120 00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 I'll write this as squared. e to the minus two 121 00:07:10 --> 00:07:12 epsilon zero over k t. 122 00:07:12 --> 00:07:13 And so on. 123 00:07:13 --> 00:07:19 So this has the form of a sum that looks like one plus x, 124 00:07:19 --> 00:07:21 plus x squared, and so on. 125 00:07:21 --> 00:07:25 And because the sum goes to infinity, we can simply write 126 00:07:25 --> 00:07:30 it as one over one minus x. 127 00:07:30 --> 00:07:32 Sort of a very simple result. 128 00:07:32 --> 00:07:38 And now putting this back into x, it's one over one minus e to 129 00:07:38 --> 00:07:43 the minus epsilon zero over kT. 130 00:07:43 --> 00:07:45 That's our q zero. 131 00:07:45 --> 00:07:51 Our molecular partition function. 132 00:07:51 --> 00:07:53 So this model yields a particularly simple 133 00:07:53 --> 00:07:55 result for q zero. 134 00:07:55 --> 00:07:59 And then everything else follows from there. 135 00:07:59 --> 00:08:11 So then we can write the canonical partition 136 00:08:11 --> 00:08:13 function capital Qn. 137 00:08:13 --> 00:08:21 It's just q configurational to the capital Nth power, where 138 00:08:21 --> 00:08:25 capital N is the total number of these molecules. 139 00:08:25 --> 00:08:29 So it's just one over one minus e to the minus epsilon 140 00:08:29 --> 00:08:35 over kT to the Nth power. 141 00:08:35 --> 00:08:38 And then we can start writing out the results for the various 142 00:08:38 --> 00:08:39 thermodynamic properties. 143 00:08:39 --> 00:08:54 So A configurational is minus NkT, log q configurational. 144 00:08:54 --> 00:09:02 That is, remember, A is minus kT log capital Q. 145 00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 And this is just going to come straight out. 146 00:09:05 --> 00:09:10 So it's minus NkT log of little q. 147 00:09:10 --> 00:09:16 Minus NkT, log of one over one minus e to the 148 00:09:16 --> 00:09:19 minus epsilon over kT. 149 00:09:19 --> 00:09:26 Or positive NkT, log of one minus e to the 150 00:09:26 --> 00:09:30 minus epsilon over kT. 151 00:09:30 --> 00:09:35 So a pretty simple form for the Helmholtz free energy. 152 00:09:35 --> 00:09:37 And I'm not going to write out all of the individuals 153 00:09:37 --> 00:09:40 thermodynamic terms, but I'll write a few of them. 154 00:09:40 --> 00:09:46 So mu, the chemical potential for these configurations, 155 00:09:46 --> 00:09:46 is just dA/dN. 156 00:09:46 --> 00:09:53 157 00:09:53 --> 00:09:54 With T and V constant. 158 00:09:54 --> 00:09:57 And so the only capital N dependence, the only dependence 159 00:09:57 --> 00:10:00 on the number of molecules is multiplicative. 160 00:10:00 --> 00:10:03 Right here. 161 00:10:03 --> 00:10:08 So this just gives us kT log of one minus e to the minus 162 00:10:08 --> 00:10:10 epsilon naught over kT. 163 00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 And the important point to realize here that we mentioned 164 00:10:12 --> 00:10:15 last time too, in the examples we considered then, especially 165 00:10:15 --> 00:10:21 the last one, is that because the only place that N 166 00:10:21 --> 00:10:26 figures in is as a multiplicative factor. 167 00:10:26 --> 00:10:29 What this is telling us is that we just have a chemical 168 00:10:29 --> 00:10:33 potential, of Helmholtz free energy per molecule. 169 00:10:33 --> 00:10:35 The molecules are all independent. 170 00:10:35 --> 00:10:39 The total energy doesn't depend on any interaction between this 171 00:10:39 --> 00:10:42 molecule and its neighbor somewhere else. 172 00:10:42 --> 00:10:45 So terms like this are simply additive. 173 00:10:45 --> 00:10:48 So if we work out the chemical potential, it's just 174 00:10:48 --> 00:10:56 one over N times A. 175 00:10:56 --> 00:11:04 And I'll just write the result for u configurational. 176 00:11:04 --> 00:11:08 Because I do want to look at the heat capacity. 177 00:11:08 --> 00:11:22 So it's Nk T squared, d log of little q configurational / dT. 178 00:11:22 --> 00:11:25 With N and V held constant. 179 00:11:25 --> 00:11:31 And it turns out to just be N epsilon zero. 180 00:11:31 --> 00:11:40 One over E zero over kT minus one. 181 00:11:40 --> 00:11:43 So now we can look at the heat capacity. 182 00:11:43 --> 00:11:49 Cv configurational. 183 00:11:49 --> 00:11:54 So it's du configurational / dT. 184 00:11:54 --> 00:11:57 With constant N and V. 185 00:11:57 --> 00:12:02 And taking this derivative with respect to temperature. 186 00:12:02 --> 00:12:05 Gives us an expression of the following form. 187 00:12:05 --> 00:12:16 It's Nk epsilon zero over k T squared. e to the E zero over 188 00:12:16 --> 00:12:24 kT, over e to the E zero over kT minus one squared. 189 00:12:24 --> 00:12:27 Just taking the derivative in the usual way. 190 00:12:27 --> 00:12:31 Now, this looks kind of complicated for 191 00:12:31 --> 00:12:33 the heat capacity. 192 00:12:33 --> 00:12:36 But let's take a look, just like we did last time for the 193 00:12:36 --> 00:12:39 simpler case that we treated then, let's take a look at the 194 00:12:39 --> 00:12:42 high and low temperature limits of what happens to 195 00:12:42 --> 00:12:44 the heat capacity. 196 00:12:44 --> 00:12:59 So at high temperature, well we can start by just 197 00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 looking at the energy. 198 00:13:01 --> 00:13:03 That has a form that's fairly simple. 199 00:13:03 --> 00:13:07 So when temperature is large, this is small, and we 200 00:13:07 --> 00:13:09 can Taylor expand it. 201 00:13:09 --> 00:13:11 So then we're just going to have one plus epsilon 202 00:13:11 --> 00:13:14 zero over kT minus one. 203 00:13:14 --> 00:13:16 Which means the ones will cancel. 204 00:13:16 --> 00:13:18 And we end up with a fairly simple result. 205 00:13:18 --> 00:13:24 So u configurational, in that case, is just NkT. 206 00:13:24 --> 00:13:28 207 00:13:28 --> 00:13:31 The epsilon zeroes are going to cancel also. 208 00:13:31 --> 00:13:34 And what that says is that the heat capacity -- and of course 209 00:13:34 --> 00:13:36 we could take the limit of this, but we can just take the 210 00:13:36 --> 00:13:40 derivative of this with respect to temperature more easily. 211 00:13:40 --> 00:13:45 So Cv configurational. 212 00:13:45 --> 00:13:47 It's just N times k. 213 00:13:47 --> 00:13:50 In other words, the heat capacity in the high 214 00:13:50 --> 00:13:53 temperature limit is a constant. 215 00:13:53 --> 00:13:56 Last time we treated a simpler case, where there were only 216 00:13:56 --> 00:14:01 four configurations altogether available, to this sort of 217 00:14:01 --> 00:14:04 simple polymer model that we drew. 218 00:14:04 --> 00:14:08 Unlike this present model where we're saying there are 219 00:14:08 --> 00:14:12 essentially infinite number of configurations and different 220 00:14:12 --> 00:14:14 energies available. 221 00:14:14 --> 00:14:17 So many that the highest ones we're never even going to 222 00:14:17 --> 00:14:21 access, because they'll be much higher than kT. 223 00:14:21 --> 00:14:25 Here it's different, so now we have -- You know before, when 224 00:14:25 --> 00:14:29 we had a limited number of total states, remember what 225 00:14:29 --> 00:14:32 happened in the heat capacity at high temperature. 226 00:14:32 --> 00:14:34 What was the limiting case? 227 00:14:34 --> 00:14:36 Finite number of states. 228 00:14:36 --> 00:14:41 What's the heat capacity at high temperature? 229 00:14:41 --> 00:14:45 This is going to be on the exam. 230 00:14:45 --> 00:14:47 What's the heat capacity at high temperature, if there's 231 00:14:47 --> 00:14:49 a finite number of states available? 232 00:14:49 --> 00:14:50 STUDENT: Zero. 233 00:14:50 --> 00:14:52 PROFESSOR: It's zero. 234 00:14:52 --> 00:14:57 What was the low temperature limit of the heat capacity? 235 00:14:57 --> 00:14:57 STUDENT: Zero. 236 00:14:57 --> 00:14:58 PROFESSOR: It was also zero. 237 00:14:58 --> 00:14:59 Right. 238 00:14:59 --> 00:15:11 And the idea was for a system with a finite number of states. 239 00:15:11 --> 00:15:15 The idea was -- so let's say, the way we had it before, there 240 00:15:15 --> 00:15:16 was one state with energy zero. 241 00:15:16 --> 00:15:20 And we had three states with some energy epsilon zero. 242 00:15:20 --> 00:15:21 And that was it. 243 00:15:21 --> 00:15:24 Those were all the molecular states available. 244 00:15:24 --> 00:15:27 So we looked at the two cases. 245 00:15:27 --> 00:15:30 In one case, when the high temperature limit where kT 246 00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 is much bigger than any of this stuff. 247 00:15:33 --> 00:15:38 In that limit, the molecules are just equally likely to 248 00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 be in any of these states. 249 00:15:40 --> 00:15:43 Because there's much, much more thermal energy than 250 00:15:43 --> 00:15:44 this energy difference. 251 00:15:44 --> 00:15:45 And the molecules are constantly getting kicked 252 00:15:45 --> 00:15:48 around by the available thermal energy. 253 00:15:48 --> 00:15:52 So if you raise the temperature a little bit more, it 254 00:15:52 --> 00:15:53 doesn't make any difference. 255 00:15:53 --> 00:15:55 The molecules already are evenly distributed 256 00:15:55 --> 00:15:57 among the states. 257 00:15:57 --> 00:16:00 There's no additional configurational energy. 258 00:16:00 --> 00:16:03 So du/dT is zero. 259 00:16:03 --> 00:16:06 It can't increase any more. 260 00:16:06 --> 00:16:08 So in that case, the high temperature limiting 261 00:16:08 --> 00:16:11 heat capacity is zero. 262 00:16:11 --> 00:16:21 And in the other case -- In the low temperature limit, now 263 00:16:21 --> 00:16:22 let's say kT is really low. 264 00:16:22 --> 00:16:24 It's much less than epsilon zero. 265 00:16:24 --> 00:16:26 So now we'll redraw this as zero. 266 00:16:26 --> 00:16:36 And put the epsilon zero states up here. 267 00:16:36 --> 00:16:39 And kT is here. 268 00:16:39 --> 00:16:43 Well when it's like this, the temperature is so low that 269 00:16:43 --> 00:16:46 there's not nearly enough thermal energy to populate 270 00:16:46 --> 00:16:47 any of these states. 271 00:16:47 --> 00:16:48 And if you change the temperature by a little 272 00:16:48 --> 00:16:51 bit, it's still not enough thermal energy to populate 273 00:16:51 --> 00:16:52 any of these states. 274 00:16:52 --> 00:16:55 So once again, du/dT is zero. 275 00:16:55 --> 00:16:57 You change the temperature and the configurational 276 00:16:57 --> 00:16:59 energy doesn't change. 277 00:16:59 --> 00:17:02 So the heat capacity is zero again. 278 00:17:02 --> 00:17:06 This is why it's so informative to measure heat capacities. 279 00:17:06 --> 00:17:10 Because you can learn an awful lot about the intrinsic 280 00:17:10 --> 00:17:12 structure of the material. 281 00:17:12 --> 00:17:14 What are the energy levels available to it? 282 00:17:14 --> 00:17:15 What do they do? 283 00:17:15 --> 00:17:18 You can learn a tremendous amount about that by 284 00:17:18 --> 00:17:20 making measurements of the heat capacity. 285 00:17:20 --> 00:17:24 Well, now we're in a different case. 286 00:17:24 --> 00:17:30 We have a whole set of evenly spaced energy levels. 287 00:17:30 --> 00:17:33 Never ends. 288 00:17:33 --> 00:17:36 So now let's look at the high temperature limit. 289 00:17:36 --> 00:17:38 But we're never in a limit that's higher than the 290 00:17:38 --> 00:17:43 highest level, because we're assuming it goes on forever. 291 00:17:43 --> 00:17:45 So it's up here somewhere. 292 00:17:45 --> 00:17:47 There's kT. 293 00:17:47 --> 00:17:48 So what happens? 294 00:17:48 --> 00:17:52 Well if you raise the temperature, there still are 295 00:17:52 --> 00:17:54 higher lying levels that can be populated, and that 296 00:17:54 --> 00:17:56 will get populated. 297 00:17:56 --> 00:17:59 So du/dT isn't going to be zero in the high temperature 298 00:17:59 --> 00:18:00 limit, in this case. 299 00:18:00 --> 00:18:04 But it stops changing at some point. 300 00:18:04 --> 00:18:08 Because nothing's very different about this than 301 00:18:08 --> 00:18:12 having kT be, let's say, up here or up here. 302 00:18:12 --> 00:18:15 So in the high temperature limit, yes, the energy does 303 00:18:15 --> 00:18:17 change with temperature. 304 00:18:17 --> 00:18:22 But it changes in the same way at any temperature. 305 00:18:22 --> 00:18:25 In other words, the energy is just linearly varying 306 00:18:25 --> 00:18:26 with temperature. 307 00:18:26 --> 00:18:30 And the heat capacity is a constant. du/dT doesn't change 308 00:18:30 --> 00:18:34 anymore, once you're in the high temperature limit. 309 00:18:34 --> 00:18:38 Now without me writing any expression on the board, what's 310 00:18:38 --> 00:18:40 the low temperature limit of the heat capacity going 311 00:18:40 --> 00:18:45 to be in this case? 312 00:18:45 --> 00:18:46 Going to be on the exam. 313 00:18:46 --> 00:18:48 STUDENT: Zero? 314 00:18:48 --> 00:18:51 PROFESSOR: Zero, that's still going to be the same, right? 315 00:18:51 --> 00:18:55 Put kT way down here. 316 00:18:55 --> 00:18:57 That's just like this, right? 317 00:18:57 --> 00:19:01 Not near enough energy to populate even though lowest, 318 00:19:01 --> 00:19:04 you know, the first level above the ground state. 319 00:19:04 --> 00:19:07 Change the temperature a little bit, still not enough thermal 320 00:19:07 --> 00:19:08 energy to get up there. 321 00:19:08 --> 00:19:10 So the energy doesn't change with temperature in that 322 00:19:10 --> 00:19:12 low temperature limit. 323 00:19:12 --> 00:19:15 So you can immediately see what's going to happen 324 00:19:15 --> 00:19:33 at low temperature. 325 00:19:33 --> 00:19:35 Any questions? 326 00:19:35 --> 00:19:35 Yeah? 327 00:19:35 --> 00:19:42 STUDENT: [UNINTELLIGIBLE] 328 00:19:42 --> 00:19:43 will still be n k t, and then it's just -- [UNINTELLIGIBLE] 329 00:19:43 --> 00:19:45 PROFESSOR: So, of course, that's a limiting 330 00:19:45 --> 00:19:48 case here, right? 331 00:19:48 --> 00:19:51 That happened because in the limit of high temperature, 332 00:19:51 --> 00:19:54 then this exponent is really small, right? 333 00:19:54 --> 00:19:56 So then you can Taylor expand it. 334 00:19:56 --> 00:19:59 In the limit of low temperature, this 335 00:19:59 --> 00:20:02 is really big. 336 00:20:02 --> 00:20:04 This is nearly zero. 337 00:20:04 --> 00:20:09 So e epsilon zero is much bigger than kT in that case. 338 00:20:09 --> 00:20:10 This is big. 339 00:20:10 --> 00:20:13 This is negligible, right? 340 00:20:13 --> 00:20:14 Oh. 341 00:20:14 --> 00:20:19 Wait a minute. 342 00:20:19 --> 00:20:24 Something's making me real unhappy. 343 00:20:24 --> 00:20:42 I can't have this right. 344 00:20:42 --> 00:20:43 Ah. 345 00:20:43 --> 00:20:46 Yes. 346 00:20:46 --> 00:20:50 It needs to be zero, is what it needs to be. 347 00:20:50 --> 00:20:51 What am I thinking? 348 00:20:51 --> 00:20:51 Of course. 349 00:20:51 --> 00:20:52 It's one over a huge number. 350 00:20:52 --> 00:20:54 It's zero. 351 00:20:54 --> 00:20:55 OK. 352 00:20:55 --> 00:20:58 So of course you can't expanded it. 353 00:20:58 --> 00:21:01 It's just, this is much bigger than this. 354 00:21:01 --> 00:21:03 This is an enormous number at that point. 355 00:21:03 --> 00:21:07 So in other words, what it's saying is the configurational 356 00:21:07 --> 00:21:11 energy is zero, because everything is stuck 357 00:21:11 --> 00:21:13 in the ground state. 358 00:21:13 --> 00:21:15 And it stays zero if you vary the temperature. 359 00:21:15 --> 00:21:19 So you get the zero limiting value for the heat capacity, 360 00:21:19 --> 00:21:23 and the energy itself is also zero. 361 00:21:23 --> 00:21:26 Other questions? 362 00:21:26 --> 00:21:32 OK. 363 00:21:32 --> 00:21:37 Let me just make a few comments about the entropy. 364 00:21:37 --> 00:21:42 So I didn't write it out before. 365 00:21:42 --> 00:21:47 And I'm tempted not to do it again, but I 366 00:21:47 --> 00:21:57 suppose I'll do it. 367 00:21:57 --> 00:22:02 So it turns out to be Nk, minus log of one minus e to the 368 00:22:02 --> 00:22:07 minus epsilon zero over kT. 369 00:22:07 --> 00:22:10 Plus epsilon zero over kT. 370 00:22:10 --> 00:22:19 Over e to the epsilon zero over kT, minus one. 371 00:22:19 --> 00:22:24 And this comes from combining the terms for A and u. 372 00:22:24 --> 00:22:29 It comes from minus A over T. 373 00:22:29 --> 00:22:36 Plus u over T. 374 00:22:36 --> 00:22:41 And what I want to do is look at its limiting cases also. 375 00:22:41 --> 00:22:44 In particular, what happens here in the limit of 376 00:22:44 --> 00:22:58 high temperature. 377 00:22:58 --> 00:23:05 And what happens turns out to be k log kT over epsilon 378 00:23:05 --> 00:23:10 zero to the Nth power. 379 00:23:10 --> 00:23:16 Or put the N over here. 380 00:23:16 --> 00:23:19 OK. 381 00:23:19 --> 00:23:24 And what this is telling us about is the number 382 00:23:24 --> 00:23:26 of available states. 383 00:23:26 --> 00:23:31 Roughly, how many states are there that are accessible to 384 00:23:31 --> 00:23:34 the system at some temperature. 385 00:23:34 --> 00:23:38 So in other words, think of it as -- let's put the N back 386 00:23:38 --> 00:23:43 there. k log of kT over epsilon zero to the Nth power. 387 00:23:43 --> 00:23:47 And think of it as k log capital omega. 388 00:23:47 --> 00:23:49 Where that would be the degeneracy. 389 00:23:49 --> 00:23:52 Now all the states are in equal energy, but remember for the 390 00:23:52 --> 00:23:57 whole system, remember we discussed this before. 391 00:23:57 --> 00:24:00 How you have a very, very narrow distribution of system 392 00:24:00 --> 00:24:05 energy states at equilibrium. 393 00:24:05 --> 00:24:08 So you can think of this as the degeneracy of the system states 394 00:24:08 --> 00:24:11 that are actually going to exist at a particular 395 00:24:11 --> 00:24:16 temperature. 396 00:24:16 --> 00:24:28 So if we look at the limiting value of the partition 397 00:24:28 --> 00:24:34 function, it's just kT over omega. 398 00:24:34 --> 00:24:46 Or the same thing for capital Q. kT over epsilon zero, sorry. 399 00:24:46 --> 00:24:48 To the Nth power. 400 00:24:48 --> 00:24:51 So you have a very simple expression. 401 00:24:51 --> 00:24:54 And so again, what this is doing, is it's giving us a 402 00:24:54 --> 00:24:57 measure of about how many states are available. 403 00:24:57 --> 00:24:59 And it's particularly informative to look at 404 00:24:59 --> 00:25:03 that for the molecular partition function. 405 00:25:03 --> 00:25:13 What it's telling us is, if I look at kT over epsilon. 406 00:25:13 --> 00:25:15 And these levels, remember, are evenly spaced. 407 00:25:15 --> 00:25:19 So here's epsilon zero, two epsilon zero, three 408 00:25:19 --> 00:25:22 epsilon zero, and so on. 409 00:25:22 --> 00:25:27 It says, you know, if kT is about ten times bigger 410 00:25:27 --> 00:25:30 than epsilon zero. 411 00:25:30 --> 00:25:34 So this is ten. 412 00:25:34 --> 00:25:38 It's telling us, roughly how many states does the system 413 00:25:38 --> 00:25:40 have thermal access to. 414 00:25:40 --> 00:25:42 The molecular state. 415 00:25:42 --> 00:25:45 It has about ten states. 416 00:25:45 --> 00:25:50 So going over to our picture of the set of structures, you 417 00:25:50 --> 00:25:54 could have anywhere up to about ten bonds broken. 418 00:25:54 --> 00:25:59 Now, the individual molecules are going to be in a 419 00:25:59 --> 00:26:01 whole range of states. 420 00:26:01 --> 00:26:03 Some of them will have fewer than that, and some of them 421 00:26:03 --> 00:26:06 will have more than that number of bonds broken. 422 00:26:06 --> 00:26:12 But on average, it's going to be about that number. 423 00:26:12 --> 00:26:15 And then, if you look at the whole system, the number 424 00:26:15 --> 00:26:19 of states available, of course it's astronomical. 425 00:26:19 --> 00:26:23 Because you have to take each molecule, and say, well it 426 00:26:23 --> 00:26:26 could be in any one of something on the 427 00:26:26 --> 00:26:28 order of ten states. 428 00:26:28 --> 00:26:30 And then whole set of N other molecules can be in the 429 00:26:30 --> 00:26:33 states they might be in. 430 00:26:33 --> 00:26:34 Change the first one, and do it again. 431 00:26:34 --> 00:26:40 So you have this astronomical number of system states. 432 00:26:40 --> 00:26:46 But remember, like we discussed once before, it'll turn out 433 00:26:46 --> 00:26:49 that although the individual molecule states vary 434 00:26:49 --> 00:26:54 considerably with energy, the system states, which are 435 00:26:54 --> 00:26:57 averaging over some astronomical number of 436 00:26:57 --> 00:27:01 molecules, where capital N is something like ten to the 24th. 437 00:27:01 --> 00:27:06 Once you average over that many individual molecules, you find 438 00:27:06 --> 00:27:10 that there's very, very little fluctuation in the energy. 439 00:27:10 --> 00:27:12 In the system energy. 440 00:27:12 --> 00:27:16 The individual molecule energies vary considerably. 441 00:27:16 --> 00:27:21 Realistically the variation of the molecular energies -- that 442 00:27:21 --> 00:27:23 variation is going to be comparable to the 443 00:27:23 --> 00:27:25 energy itself. 444 00:27:25 --> 00:27:27 To the average energy. 445 00:27:27 --> 00:27:30 So if the average energy is roughly you know, the ten 446 00:27:30 --> 00:27:33 epsilon zero, you say okay, how much might it vary? 447 00:27:33 --> 00:27:35 Well, there are going to be some molecules that have only a 448 00:27:35 --> 00:27:37 couple of bonds broken, and some that might have 449 00:27:37 --> 00:27:39 20 bonds broken. 450 00:27:39 --> 00:27:41 The variation will be on the same order of magnitude 451 00:27:41 --> 00:27:44 as the average itself. 452 00:27:44 --> 00:27:49 But then you average over capital N of them. 453 00:27:49 --> 00:27:51 And then you immediately discover that there's very, 454 00:27:51 --> 00:27:54 very, very little variation. 455 00:27:54 --> 00:28:04 And in particular, what happens then, is, you know, for 456 00:28:04 --> 00:28:14 molecular average energy, epsilon zero, and variance, or 457 00:28:14 --> 00:28:22 standard deviation about the same magnitude. 458 00:28:22 --> 00:28:29 System average energy is u, and it's going to 459 00:28:29 --> 00:28:31 be capital N times. 460 00:28:31 --> 00:28:37 Well let's say that -- average -- Oh sorry, let me not 461 00:28:37 --> 00:28:38 put the zero There. 462 00:28:38 --> 00:28:41 It's just average energy. 463 00:28:41 --> 00:28:44 And the system average energy is just N times 464 00:28:44 --> 00:28:48 the molecular energy. 465 00:28:48 --> 00:28:56 But the system variance is going to be on the order of the 466 00:28:56 --> 00:29:02 square root of N times epsilon. 467 00:29:02 --> 00:29:03 If you've done statistics, then you've seen 468 00:29:03 --> 00:29:05 that sort of result. 469 00:29:05 --> 00:29:09 You do a bunch of samplings a capital N number of samplings, 470 00:29:09 --> 00:29:15 and the variation looks like the square root of that number. 471 00:29:15 --> 00:29:18 So what ends up happening then, if you look at the relative 472 00:29:18 --> 00:29:20 variation, you might look and then say, well it's pretty big. 473 00:29:20 --> 00:29:21 This is ten to the 12, right? 474 00:29:21 --> 00:29:23 It's still a huge variance. 475 00:29:23 --> 00:29:47 But let's compare it to the average. 476 00:29:47 --> 00:29:50 So this is ten to the 24th. 477 00:29:50 --> 00:29:51 This is ten to the 12th. 478 00:29:51 --> 00:29:54 It's on the order of ten to the minus 12. 479 00:29:54 --> 00:30:00 An incredibly tiny fractional variation in the system energy. 480 00:30:00 --> 00:30:03 You could never -- There would be no practical 481 00:30:03 --> 00:30:04 way to measure it. 482 00:30:04 --> 00:30:06 And of course that is consistent with what 483 00:30:06 --> 00:30:07 you would expect. 484 00:30:07 --> 00:30:12 If you say let's measure the configurational energy of a 485 00:30:12 --> 00:30:15 bunch of molecules in a liquid solution, or molecules in 486 00:30:15 --> 00:30:16 a gas floating around. 487 00:30:16 --> 00:30:21 And it's a mole of them, that total average energy is not 488 00:30:21 --> 00:30:24 going to fluctuate significantly, even though 489 00:30:24 --> 00:30:27 individual molecules that you pick out of that whole system 490 00:30:27 --> 00:30:30 might have quite widely varying energies. 491 00:30:30 --> 00:30:34 And that's the point. 492 00:30:34 --> 00:30:37 So it's an incredibly small variation. 493 00:30:37 --> 00:30:39 Now you can derive this. 494 00:30:39 --> 00:30:40 I didn't derive this, of course. 495 00:30:40 --> 00:30:43 I asserted that this is the case. 496 00:30:43 --> 00:30:45 And it's probably familiar to some of you if you've 497 00:30:45 --> 00:30:47 seen some statistics. 498 00:30:47 --> 00:30:49 But the way you would derive it is, you know in addition to 499 00:30:49 --> 00:30:52 calculating the average energy, the average of E, you can 500 00:30:52 --> 00:30:55 also calculate the average of the energy squared. 501 00:30:55 --> 00:30:58 And you can calculate the standard deviation that way. 502 00:30:58 --> 00:31:01 You calculate the average of E squared. 503 00:31:01 --> 00:31:05 And then you minus the average of E, the quantity squared. 504 00:31:05 --> 00:31:06 Take the square root. 505 00:31:06 --> 00:31:09 That's your root mean square. 506 00:31:09 --> 00:31:13 And that's what leads to this result. 507 00:31:13 --> 00:31:17 So it's pretty straight forward to calculate it also. 508 00:31:17 --> 00:31:17 Alright. 509 00:31:17 --> 00:31:21 So any questions about just the extent of variation of the 510 00:31:21 --> 00:31:27 individual molecule energies or the system energies? 511 00:31:27 --> 00:31:28 Okay. 512 00:31:28 --> 00:31:42 Then, now what I'd like to do is look at another kind of 513 00:31:42 --> 00:31:46 energy that's going to turn out to have exactly the same set of 514 00:31:46 --> 00:31:50 levels that we just derived from this simple model. 515 00:31:50 --> 00:31:52 And some of you may have seen this before. 516 00:31:52 --> 00:31:55 Many of you may not have. 517 00:31:55 --> 00:31:57 And for right now, I'll just assert it. 518 00:31:57 --> 00:32:00 But it will illustrate why this is so useful. 519 00:32:00 --> 00:32:06 It turns out that if I've got molecular vibrations -- you 520 00:32:06 --> 00:32:08 know, there's nitrogen and oxygen in the air. 521 00:32:08 --> 00:32:11 If I look at those nitrogen vibrational energy levels. 522 00:32:11 --> 00:32:14 Or oxygen energy levels. 523 00:32:14 --> 00:32:17 They look like this. 524 00:32:17 --> 00:32:23 Evenly spaced, non degenerate energy levels. 525 00:32:23 --> 00:32:26 So the model that we've constructed here, based on this 526 00:32:26 --> 00:32:34 simple two-chain polymer, actually gives us a set of 527 00:32:34 --> 00:32:38 energy levels that maps directly onto the vibrational 528 00:32:38 --> 00:32:40 energy levels of a molecule. 529 00:32:40 --> 00:32:50 So all the results that we've just seen apply, not just for 530 00:32:50 --> 00:32:59 conformations of a polymer, but for vibrations of a molecule. 531 00:32:59 --> 00:33:03 So everywhere where it says configurational, you can 532 00:33:03 --> 00:33:08 just write in vibrational. 533 00:33:08 --> 00:33:11 And you'll still be right. because of course, what matters 534 00:33:11 --> 00:33:15 is what are the states that are available to the system, and 535 00:33:15 --> 00:33:17 what are their energies? 536 00:33:17 --> 00:33:19 After that, the formalism of statistical mechanics 537 00:33:19 --> 00:33:22 takes over, and calculates partition functions and 538 00:33:22 --> 00:33:24 thermodynamic functions. 539 00:33:24 --> 00:33:28 The input into that is states. 540 00:33:28 --> 00:33:29 And their energies. 541 00:33:29 --> 00:33:36 Well, we have the exact same set of states and energies. 542 00:33:36 --> 00:33:41 So we immediately arrive at a super important case and its 543 00:33:41 --> 00:33:46 results for molecular vibrations. 544 00:33:46 --> 00:33:51 And not only molecular vibrations, but vibrations 545 00:33:51 --> 00:33:57 of a crystal lattice. 546 00:33:57 --> 00:34:00 Acoustic vibrations of a glass. 547 00:34:00 --> 00:34:02 Or even a liquid. 548 00:34:02 --> 00:34:07 So there's an enormously wide ranging set of results that 549 00:34:07 --> 00:34:13 we've derived by starting at this simple picture. 550 00:34:13 --> 00:34:15 And when you take quantum mechanics, you'll see that 551 00:34:15 --> 00:34:19 indeed you do get this set of evenly spaced energy levels. 552 00:34:19 --> 00:34:21 You may well have seen the results before, and you'll 553 00:34:21 --> 00:34:24 see it derived there. 554 00:34:24 --> 00:34:25 OK. 555 00:34:25 --> 00:34:31 Given that, then I want to talk a little bit further 556 00:34:31 --> 00:34:33 about the heat capacity. 557 00:34:33 --> 00:34:39 So we've seen the limiting cases for the heat capacity. 558 00:34:39 --> 00:34:42 Namely, the low temperature limit is zero. 559 00:34:42 --> 00:34:45 That's the case whenever you have quantized levels. 560 00:34:45 --> 00:34:49 You can always get kT lower by far than the 561 00:34:49 --> 00:34:52 lowest excited state. 562 00:34:52 --> 00:34:54 So that everything is stuck in the ground state. 563 00:34:54 --> 00:34:56 How low that is depends on how far apart the 564 00:34:56 --> 00:34:57 states are spaced. 565 00:34:57 --> 00:34:59 But there's got to be some temperature somewhere 566 00:34:59 --> 00:35:02 that's down there. 567 00:35:02 --> 00:35:16 So we've seen the heat capacity limiting cases. 568 00:35:16 --> 00:35:36 Let me just sort of draw them again. 569 00:35:36 --> 00:35:41 So here's kT much less than epsilon zero. 570 00:35:41 --> 00:35:46 And up here, kT is much bigger than epsilon zero. 571 00:35:46 --> 00:35:50 Now I'm just going to sketch the full temperature 572 00:35:50 --> 00:35:50 dependence. 573 00:35:50 --> 00:35:52 In other words, I'm going to connect those two 574 00:35:52 --> 00:35:56 limits that we've seen. 575 00:35:56 --> 00:36:14 So here's what that looks like. 576 00:36:14 --> 00:36:20 And I'll write it as vibrational. 577 00:36:20 --> 00:36:25 So we know it's got to be zero at the low temperature limit. 578 00:36:25 --> 00:36:30 And we know that it's this constant value in the 579 00:36:30 --> 00:36:31 high temperature limit. 580 00:36:31 --> 00:36:33 It's Nk. 581 00:36:33 --> 00:36:40 And in some way, it smoothly connects. 582 00:36:40 --> 00:36:43 And if you look at the actual scale, here -- so here's 583 00:36:43 --> 00:36:47 kT over epsilon zero. 584 00:36:47 --> 00:36:48 Here's the limit of low temperature. 585 00:36:48 --> 00:36:53 Actually, you don't have to be very high above epsilon zero to 586 00:36:53 --> 00:36:55 be in in this high temperature limit. 587 00:36:55 --> 00:37:00 So if you look at the plot that's on your notes, this is 588 00:37:00 --> 00:37:02 already -- it's not quite leveling off precisely. 589 00:37:02 --> 00:37:04 But it's already pretty close. 590 00:37:04 --> 00:37:10 When kT is just two times epsilon zero. 591 00:37:10 --> 00:37:22 It's already almost at the limiting case. 592 00:37:22 --> 00:37:24 Now this has tremendous significance. 593 00:37:24 --> 00:37:30 So a long time before quantum mechanics was developed, people 594 00:37:30 --> 00:37:34 made measurements of the heat capacities of materials. 595 00:37:34 --> 00:37:37 And they were familiar with the fact that when you got to 596 00:37:37 --> 00:37:41 ordinary temperature -- room temperature, the heat capacity 597 00:37:41 --> 00:37:45 was temperature independent. 598 00:37:45 --> 00:37:49 And that was understandable for reasons we'll discuss shortly. 599 00:37:49 --> 00:37:55 Basically, in that case, the heat capacity -- it's not just 600 00:37:55 --> 00:37:58 Nk for one vibrational mode. 601 00:37:58 --> 00:38:01 Of course, that's what I describe for a single 602 00:38:01 --> 00:38:03 vibrational mode of, say, a molecule. 603 00:38:03 --> 00:38:06 If you have a crystal lattice with N atoms in it. 604 00:38:06 --> 00:38:08 Let's say it's an atomic crystal. 605 00:38:08 --> 00:38:10 Each atom has three degrees of freedom. 606 00:38:10 --> 00:38:14 It can move in each of three independent directions. 607 00:38:14 --> 00:38:15 And there are N of those atoms. 608 00:38:15 --> 00:38:18 There are 3N total degrees of freedom. 609 00:38:18 --> 00:38:23 That's how many vibrations the lattice has. 610 00:38:23 --> 00:38:29 So in fact, you have to multiply this by 3N. 611 00:38:29 --> 00:38:36 So what would be seen is, you'd have 3R, the gas constant, 612 00:38:36 --> 00:38:38 per mole, in other words. 613 00:38:38 --> 00:38:44 And if you looked at Cv over 3R, then this 614 00:38:44 --> 00:38:50 value would be one. 615 00:38:50 --> 00:38:53 Very useful to see that. 616 00:38:53 --> 00:38:55 To figure that out. 617 00:38:55 --> 00:38:56 And people understood it. 618 00:38:56 --> 00:39:03 What people didn't understand is this stuff. 619 00:39:03 --> 00:39:06 Why did it do that? 620 00:39:06 --> 00:39:08 That was a great mystery. 621 00:39:08 --> 00:39:13 Why did the heat capacity go to zero at low temperature? 622 00:39:13 --> 00:39:15 And the reason they didn't understand it is because 623 00:39:15 --> 00:39:18 the model for vibration was really simple. 624 00:39:18 --> 00:39:21 The lattice is a bunch of masses and springs. 625 00:39:21 --> 00:39:25 I know the vibrational energy. 626 00:39:25 --> 00:39:26 And I can calculate it. 627 00:39:26 --> 00:39:31 That is, I know the classical vibrational energy. 628 00:39:31 --> 00:39:35 Remember, the reason it goes to zero is this. 629 00:39:35 --> 00:39:39 It's all because of the fact that the energy levels are 630 00:39:39 --> 00:39:43 discrete, quantized levels, with gaps in between them. 631 00:39:43 --> 00:39:47 If I've got classical mechanics, then that means 632 00:39:47 --> 00:39:48 it's vibrational energy. 633 00:39:48 --> 00:39:51 The energy just gets bigger if the amplitude get bigger. 634 00:39:51 --> 00:39:54 It's not discrete, it's continuous. 635 00:39:54 --> 00:39:56 There are always energies in there. 636 00:39:56 --> 00:39:59 In that case, there's never a situation like this. 637 00:39:59 --> 00:40:03 Where kT is lower than the first available excited 638 00:40:03 --> 00:40:04 level, and everything's in the ground state. 639 00:40:04 --> 00:40:06 That never happens in classical mechanics, because there 640 00:40:06 --> 00:40:09 are always levels there. 641 00:40:09 --> 00:40:13 But it does happen in quantum mechanics. 642 00:40:13 --> 00:40:17 And Einstein recognized that this was a way to explain 643 00:40:17 --> 00:40:20 this low temperature limiting heat capacity. 644 00:40:20 --> 00:40:24 So actually if you look at early development of quantum 645 00:40:24 --> 00:40:26 mechanics, really it was all predicated on 646 00:40:26 --> 00:40:28 statistical mechanics. 647 00:40:28 --> 00:40:31 And the idea that, well, that you could then do the 648 00:40:31 --> 00:40:35 statistical mechanics with quantized levels, just 649 00:40:35 --> 00:40:36 the way we've done it. 650 00:40:36 --> 00:40:38 And what you immediately discover is, gee, 651 00:40:38 --> 00:40:39 it all makes sense. 652 00:40:39 --> 00:40:43 You go to low temperature, everything's stunk down here. 653 00:40:43 --> 00:40:45 And suddenly you've got zero heat capacity, because you 654 00:40:45 --> 00:40:46 changed the temperature a little bit, and everything 655 00:40:46 --> 00:40:51 is still stuck back here. 656 00:40:51 --> 00:40:56 So that's the vibrational heat capacity of a solid. 657 00:40:56 --> 00:40:57 That's what it looks like. 658 00:40:57 --> 00:41:01 And at moderate temperature, this doesn't have to be very 659 00:41:01 --> 00:41:03 much bigger than epsilon zero. 660 00:41:03 --> 00:41:05 You're already in, essentially, the limit. 661 00:41:05 --> 00:41:06 The high temperature limit. 662 00:41:06 --> 00:41:12 And now for molecules, that limit isn't usually reached 663 00:41:12 --> 00:41:13 at room temperature. 664 00:41:13 --> 00:41:20 Here's a kind of calibration. kT at room temperature is about 665 00:41:20 --> 00:41:27 equal to 200 wave numbers. 666 00:41:27 --> 00:41:32 So molecular vibrations, you know, you've taken IR spectra 667 00:41:32 --> 00:41:36 they're typically on the order of 1,000 wave numbers or so. kT 668 00:41:36 --> 00:41:40 isn't bigger than the vibrational energy. 669 00:41:40 --> 00:41:43 But a crystal lattice, you know the vibrations are 670 00:41:43 --> 00:41:46 the acoustics vibrations. 671 00:41:46 --> 00:41:48 And those are much lower in frequency. 672 00:41:48 --> 00:41:52 If you have an atomic crystal, it just has the sound 673 00:41:52 --> 00:41:56 vibrations at all the different wavelengths that are available. 674 00:41:56 --> 00:41:58 They're never very high. 675 00:41:58 --> 00:42:01 So it's easy to get into the high temperature 676 00:42:01 --> 00:42:04 limit, in that case. 677 00:42:04 --> 00:42:07 Where you basically see a temperature independent 678 00:42:07 --> 00:42:14 heat capacity. 679 00:42:14 --> 00:42:15 OK. 680 00:42:15 --> 00:42:18 By the way, this was actually used commonly to determine the 681 00:42:18 --> 00:42:20 molecular weights of molecular crystals. 682 00:42:20 --> 00:42:25 Because you've got a factor of the number of moles in there. 683 00:42:25 --> 00:42:26 If you ask how big is the heat capacity? 684 00:42:26 --> 00:42:29 Well it does depend on how many moles of material you have. 685 00:42:29 --> 00:42:31 Because it depends on how many atoms. 686 00:42:31 --> 00:42:34 That control how many modes there are in the crystal. 687 00:42:34 --> 00:42:35 How many vibrational modes. 688 00:42:35 --> 00:42:39 Because each atom has 3N degrees of freedom. 689 00:42:39 --> 00:42:41 So if you just weigh the whole crystal, and then you measure 690 00:42:41 --> 00:42:44 the heat capacity, you know how many moles there are, and now 691 00:42:44 --> 00:42:45 you know the weight, you can figure out the 692 00:42:45 --> 00:42:49 molecular weight. 693 00:42:49 --> 00:42:53 OK. 694 00:42:53 --> 00:42:54 So that's the low temperature limit. 695 00:42:54 --> 00:42:57 And now I want to talk a little bit further about 696 00:42:57 --> 00:42:59 the high temperature limit. 697 00:42:59 --> 00:43:04 And in particular, I want to talk about both the heat 698 00:43:04 --> 00:43:07 capacity and the energy that we've seen. 699 00:43:07 --> 00:43:11 Namely, this thing. 700 00:43:11 --> 00:43:13 Of course it's really the same result for the energy 701 00:43:13 --> 00:43:14 and the heat capacity. 702 00:43:14 --> 00:43:18 They're obviously intimately connected. 703 00:43:18 --> 00:43:22 So these are the high temperature limits. 704 00:43:22 --> 00:43:32 Now it turns out that that high temperature limit doesn't 705 00:43:32 --> 00:43:35 just obtain for vibrations. 706 00:43:35 --> 00:43:39 But it's also the case for molecular rotations, 707 00:43:39 --> 00:43:41 translations. 708 00:43:41 --> 00:43:46 All these low energy degrees of freedom. 709 00:43:46 --> 00:43:50 So let's see why. 710 00:43:50 --> 00:43:51 It has a name, that result. 711 00:43:51 --> 00:43:59 It's called the equipartition of energy. 712 00:43:59 --> 00:44:06 Sometimes it's called the classical equipartition 713 00:44:06 --> 00:44:10 of energy theorem. 714 00:44:10 --> 00:44:23 And what it says is one half kT per degree of freedom equals 715 00:44:23 --> 00:44:31 energy in the high T limit. 716 00:44:31 --> 00:44:38 And in particular, for translation, so E 717 00:44:38 --> 00:44:44 translational is 3/2. 718 00:44:44 --> 00:44:49 Well, NkT for N atoms. 719 00:44:49 --> 00:44:55 Or molecules. 720 00:44:55 --> 00:45:01 E rotational is, now it depends how many rotational degrees 721 00:45:01 --> 00:45:02 of freedom there are. 722 00:45:02 --> 00:45:05 If I've got a linear molecule, there are only two. 723 00:45:05 --> 00:45:08 It can rotate this way, and it can rotate this way. 724 00:45:08 --> 00:45:10 If I've got a non linear molecule, parts all 725 00:45:10 --> 00:45:14 over the place, it has three unique axes. 726 00:45:14 --> 00:45:15 It can also spin this way. 727 00:45:15 --> 00:45:17 And that's a rotational degree of freedom. 728 00:45:17 --> 00:45:19 Of course the linear molecule wasn't like that. 729 00:45:19 --> 00:45:23 Nothing is moving when you do that. 730 00:45:23 --> 00:45:30 So it's either NkT, linear. 731 00:45:30 --> 00:45:34 Or 3/2 NkT. 732 00:45:34 --> 00:45:34 Non linear. 733 00:45:34 --> 00:45:38 Great. 734 00:45:38 --> 00:45:49 And then E vibrational is NkT per vibrational mode. 735 00:45:49 --> 00:45:52 That's because vibrational energy is potential and kinetic 736 00:45:52 --> 00:45:56 energy, and it's 1/2 kT each. 737 00:45:56 --> 00:45:59 Why does all that stuff happen? 738 00:45:59 --> 00:46:10 Turns out, you can see why pretty easily. 739 00:46:10 --> 00:46:12 All those degrees of freedom. 740 00:46:12 --> 00:46:20 Those classical degrees of freedom. 741 00:46:20 --> 00:46:31 If you say, let's write out an expression for the energy. 742 00:46:31 --> 00:46:35 Classical. 743 00:46:35 --> 00:46:39 You know it's 1/2 m v squared. 744 00:46:39 --> 00:46:42 Or it's 1/2 k x squared. 745 00:46:42 --> 00:46:51 Or for rotational energy it's 1/2 I omega squared. 746 00:46:51 --> 00:46:52 You see a functional form emerging here? 747 00:46:52 --> 00:46:56 That looks similar in all these cases? 748 00:46:56 --> 00:46:59 You know, 1/2 times some constant, times some 749 00:46:59 --> 00:47:03 variable squared. 750 00:47:03 --> 00:47:11 Well, now let's look at our expressions for the energy. 751 00:47:11 --> 00:47:16 Average energy. 752 00:47:16 --> 00:47:21 We're going to sum over all the energies of epsilon i, 753 00:47:21 --> 00:47:25 e to the minus Ei over kT. 754 00:47:25 --> 00:47:30 Over sum over i, e to the minus Ei over kT. 755 00:47:30 --> 00:47:34 That's just how we originally derived the average of energy. 756 00:47:34 --> 00:47:38 In other words, it's the probability of each state times 757 00:47:38 --> 00:47:39 the energy of that state. 758 00:47:39 --> 00:47:44 Summed up over all the states. 759 00:47:44 --> 00:47:47 Well, now we have an expression for the energy. 760 00:47:47 --> 00:47:48 It's one of these things. 761 00:47:48 --> 00:47:53 It's something times a variable squared. 762 00:47:53 --> 00:48:01 So, we'll use some general functional form, a y squared. 763 00:48:01 --> 00:48:04 And now, let's assume we're in the high temperature limit. 764 00:48:04 --> 00:48:06 And we've seen what that means. 765 00:48:06 --> 00:48:11 It means kT is big, compared to the separation 766 00:48:11 --> 00:48:13 between the energies. 767 00:48:13 --> 00:48:16 When that's the case, there are lots of these terms in the sum. 768 00:48:16 --> 00:48:18 We can convert them to integrals. 769 00:48:18 --> 00:48:21 We can forget about the fact that the energies are discrete. 770 00:48:21 --> 00:48:26 We can say look, they're so close together, compared to kT. 771 00:48:26 --> 00:48:29 That we can turn the sums into integrals. 772 00:48:29 --> 00:48:36 So then we have integrals instead of sums. 773 00:48:36 --> 00:48:37 And here's our energy. 774 00:48:37 --> 00:48:39 It's a y squared. 775 00:48:39 --> 00:48:39 Whatever that is. 776 00:48:39 --> 00:48:41 It could be this, it could be this, it could be this. 777 00:48:41 --> 00:48:47 And it's not going to matter. e to the minus a y squared over 778 00:48:47 --> 00:48:53 kT over, integral over e to the minus a y squared 779 00:48:53 --> 00:48:56 over kT. dy, dy. 780 00:48:56 --> 00:49:00 781 00:49:00 --> 00:49:03 OK. 782 00:49:03 --> 00:49:06 And here's what's going to happen. 783 00:49:06 --> 00:49:09 If you do this integral by parts. 784 00:49:09 --> 00:49:11 This one. 785 00:49:11 --> 00:49:16 What ends up happening is it gives you this integral 786 00:49:16 --> 00:49:19 times a certain number. 787 00:49:19 --> 00:49:23 This is going to come out of the integral. 788 00:49:23 --> 00:49:26 And so it will turn out. 789 00:49:26 --> 00:49:27 And it's straightforward to do it. 790 00:49:27 --> 00:49:28 It's in the notes. 791 00:49:28 --> 00:49:29 It goes through. 792 00:49:29 --> 00:49:31 But I'll just write the result here. 793 00:49:31 --> 00:49:35 The result is that you get, in this high temperature limit 794 00:49:35 --> 00:49:42 where you've gone to the integral form, you get 1/2 kT. 795 00:49:42 --> 00:49:43 And it will always be the case. 796 00:49:43 --> 00:49:47 All you need to know is the form of the energy. 797 00:49:47 --> 00:49:51 As long as that's the case -- Remember y is just a variable 798 00:49:51 --> 00:49:52 of integration here. 799 00:49:52 --> 00:49:56 That's not going to be preserved. 800 00:49:56 --> 00:50:00 This comes out because of what happens here. 801 00:50:00 --> 00:50:03 So what that's telling you is whenever you have an energy of 802 00:50:03 --> 00:50:07 this form, and you're in the high temperature limit, then 803 00:50:07 --> 00:50:14 you get this classical equipartition of energy result. 804 00:50:14 --> 00:50:16 So, for translation, of course there are three separate 805 00:50:16 --> 00:50:17 degrees of freedom. 806 00:50:17 --> 00:50:21 For velocity in the x, y, or z direction. 807 00:50:21 --> 00:50:23 For rotation, if it's a linear molecule, let's say there are 808 00:50:23 --> 00:50:24 two separate degrees of freedom. 809 00:50:24 --> 00:50:26 You have to keep track of how many degrees 810 00:50:26 --> 00:50:27 of freedom there are. 811 00:50:27 --> 00:50:29 But that's all you have to do. 812 00:50:29 --> 00:50:31 That's enormously powerful. 813 00:50:31 --> 00:50:35 It means that without doing anything, I know the average 814 00:50:35 --> 00:50:39 translational energy of the molecules in this room. 815 00:50:39 --> 00:50:41 Because of course I'm certainly in the high temperature limit. 816 00:50:41 --> 00:50:43 With respect to translational energy levels, they're 817 00:50:43 --> 00:50:45 really closely spaced. 818 00:50:45 --> 00:50:48 Same with rotations. 819 00:50:48 --> 00:50:51 Now at room temperature vibrations, forget it. 820 00:50:51 --> 00:50:53 I have essentially no vibrational energy. 821 00:50:53 --> 00:50:57 I'm at the low temperature limit for the molecular 822 00:50:57 --> 00:50:59 vibrations of nitrogen or oxygen. 823 00:50:59 --> 00:51:01 Those are high in frequency. 824 00:51:01 --> 00:51:04 So much higher than 200 wavenumbers. 825 00:51:04 --> 00:51:09 But for each molecule, I have 3/2 kT of translational energy. 826 00:51:09 --> 00:51:12 Linear molecules, I have kT of rotational energy. 827 00:51:12 --> 00:51:14 Without doing any work at all. 828 00:51:14 --> 00:51:18 And since that applies to most molecules at room temperature, 829 00:51:18 --> 00:51:22 it's an incredibly useful, very, very general result. 830 00:51:22 --> 00:51:22 OK. 831 00:51:22 --> 00:51:25 Next time we'll do a little bit of chemistry, and look 832 00:51:25 --> 00:51:27 at phase transformations. 833 00:51:27 --> 00:51:28