1 00:00:06 --> 00:00:13 All right, good morning. So today, we are going to talk 2 00:00:13 --> 00:00:20 about what is both a basic device in itself, 3 00:00:20 --> 00:00:26 the amplifier, and it also serves as a real 4 00:00:26 --> 00:00:34 key example of both nonlinear analysis and small signal 5 00:00:34 --> 00:00:40 analysis. So, today, dependent sources 6 00:00:40 --> 00:00:42 and amplifiers. 7 00:00:42 --> 00:01:01 8 00:01:01 --> 00:01:06 So, let me first spend a few seconds just pointing out to you 9 00:01:06 --> 00:01:10 some of the key points from our previous lectures. 10 00:01:10 --> 00:01:15 I also want to point out that each chapter in the course notes 11 00:01:15 --> 00:01:20 has a summary at the end of it. And if you take a quick scan of 12 00:01:20 --> 00:01:26 the summary at the end of each chapter, it highlights the major 13 00:01:26 --> 00:01:30 takeaway points from each chapter. 14 00:01:30 --> 00:01:35 It stresses what's important, and if you have to remember a 15 00:01:35 --> 00:01:39 few things, what are those things to remember? 16 00:01:39 --> 00:01:43 So, to quickly review, we talked about a few primitive 17 00:01:43 --> 00:01:47 elements: resistors, voltage sources, 18 00:01:47 --> 00:01:50 and so on. And by now, you should have the 19 00:01:50 --> 00:01:55 facility to play around with these device elements. 20 00:01:55 --> 00:02:00 And then we talked about the Node method, and this is kind of 21 00:02:00 --> 00:02:05 the workhorse of 6.002. When in doubt, 22 00:02:05 --> 00:02:10 use the Node method. OK, and this will work both for 23 00:02:10 --> 00:02:13 linear circuits and nonlinear circuits. 24 00:02:13 --> 00:02:19 OK, so if you see a problem, or if you see a situation in 25 00:02:19 --> 00:02:24 real life that requires analysis, then as a first step, 26 00:02:24 --> 00:02:30 you should try to think of whether you could apply some of 27 00:02:30 --> 00:02:36 the key intuitive shortcut methods, superposition. 28 00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 One of my favorites, the Thevenin method, 29 00:02:39 --> 00:02:42 the Norton method, or the method that involves 30 00:02:42 --> 00:02:47 composition, that is very quickly analyzing circuits that 31 00:02:47 --> 00:02:50 have resistors in series and parallel. 32 00:02:50 --> 00:02:55 OK, so if you can apply one of these quick, intuitive, 33 00:02:55 --> 00:02:57 shortcut methods, go do so. 34 00:02:57 --> 00:03:00 If you can't, then usually you can resort to 35 00:03:00 --> 00:03:05 the Node method irrespective of whether the circuit is linear or 36 00:03:05 --> 00:03:10 nonlinear. So the last week was focused on 37 00:03:10 --> 00:03:13 the nonlinear method or nonlinear circuits, 38 00:03:13 --> 00:03:18 and we spent the first lecture talking about a straightforward 39 00:03:18 --> 00:03:22 application of the Node method, which gave us a bunch of 40 00:03:22 --> 00:03:25 nonlinear equations that we had to solve. 41 00:03:25 --> 00:03:29 In the last lecture, we talked about the small 42 00:03:29 --> 00:03:33 signal trick. What we said is if you look at 43 00:03:33 --> 00:03:37 the whole space of nonlinear circuits, then within that 44 00:03:37 --> 00:03:42 space, if we focus on small variations, small perturbations 45 00:03:42 --> 00:03:46 about an operating point, then even the behavior of 46 00:03:46 --> 00:03:51 nonlinear circuits in that small regime would be linear. 47 00:03:51 --> 00:03:54 So small signal method. 48 00:03:54 --> 00:04:07 49 00:04:07 --> 00:04:11 And as an example, I showed you how I could take a 50 00:04:11 --> 00:04:15 highly nonlinear device like the garage door opener LED, 51 00:04:15 --> 00:04:19 and using that, build a pretty nice transmitter 52 00:04:19 --> 00:04:24 that would transmit music. And as long as we kept the 53 00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 signal small, and operated the device in a 54 00:04:27 --> 00:04:32 region where its transfer curve was relatively smooth, 55 00:04:32 --> 00:04:35 and I biased, or set the operating point 56 00:04:35 --> 00:04:38 appropriately, I would get a linear, 57 00:04:38 --> 00:04:42 small signal response. OK. 58 00:04:42 --> 00:04:48 So today, we're going to do a couple things. 59 00:04:48 --> 00:04:54 We're going to look at dependent sources. 60 00:04:54 --> 00:05:02 And the reading for this is section 2.6 of your course 61 00:05:02 --> 00:05:07 notes. And, the dependent source will 62 00:05:07 --> 00:05:11 be a new element in your tool chest. 63 00:05:11 --> 00:05:17 We will also do amplifiers, and amplifiers are in section 64 00:05:17 --> 00:05:21 7.1 and section 7.2 of your course notes. 65 00:05:21 --> 00:05:26 So, before I begin with dependent sources, 66 00:05:26 --> 00:05:32 I'm just a huge believer in motivating things with real 67 00:05:32 --> 00:05:36 world examples. OK, so let me start by 68 00:05:36 --> 00:05:39 motivating: why we need an amplifier? 69 00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 Why do we need to do things like this? 70 00:05:42 --> 00:05:47 Or why do we even bother? And, spend a few minutes really 71 00:05:47 --> 00:05:51 getting you to appreciate that amplification is fundamental. 72 00:05:51 --> 00:05:56 OK, it's as foundational to life as high fat potato chips 73 00:05:56 --> 00:06:01 and stuff like that. So, let's do some basic 74 00:06:01 --> 00:06:06 examples here. So first, let me talk about, 75 00:06:06 --> 00:06:10 why do we need to amplify signals. 76 00:06:10 --> 00:06:15 Why amplify? Why do we care about building 77 00:06:15 --> 00:06:19 an amplifier? So, an amplifier, 78 00:06:19 --> 00:06:25 think of a little box, and apply some sort of small 79 00:06:25 --> 00:06:31 input. And I get a larger output. 80 00:06:31 --> 00:06:35 In this example, this may be a voltage with a 81 00:06:35 --> 00:06:38 swing of 10 mV, and in this case, 82 00:06:38 --> 00:06:42 the output might be another voltage with a swing of, 83 00:06:42 --> 00:06:45 say, 100 mV. And commonly, 84 00:06:45 --> 00:06:49 the amplifier, in addition to an input and an 85 00:06:49 --> 00:06:55 output, input port and output port, may also contain the power 86 00:06:55 --> 00:07:00 port, OK, so that I can apply a power supply to the amplifier 87 00:07:00 --> 00:07:06 because commonly as an amplifier signal, I'm looking for a power 88 00:07:06 --> 00:07:10 gain as well, an increase in the power 89 00:07:10 --> 00:07:16 provided by the output. So, that's an abstract 90 00:07:16 --> 00:07:22 definition of an amplifier, and let's take a look at an 91 00:07:22 --> 00:07:28 example of why we may need this. So let's say I have a small, 92 00:07:28 --> 00:07:33 useful signal, and let's say the signal has 1 93 00:07:33 --> 00:07:38 mV peak to peak. And, I'm looking to transmit 94 00:07:38 --> 00:07:41 the signal over a wire to some other point. 95 00:07:41 --> 00:07:45 But let's say that in this environment, I get a bunch of 96 00:07:45 --> 00:07:48 noise that is in a noisy environment. 97 00:07:48 --> 00:07:52 And in this environment, let's assume that some noise 98 00:07:52 --> 00:07:56 may get superimposed. And if I have a 1 mV signal, 99 00:07:56 --> 00:08:00 and 10 mV of noise, then what I end up with at the 100 00:08:00 --> 00:08:05 output is something that looks like this. 101 00:08:05 --> 00:08:10 And it's really hard to distinguish my 1 mV signal from 102 00:08:10 --> 00:08:14 that large amount of noise. On the other hand, 103 00:08:14 --> 00:08:19 if I do the following, if I took the signal and passed 104 00:08:19 --> 00:08:25 the signal to an amplifier, and I amplified the signal to 105 00:08:25 --> 00:08:31 be a much larger version of the same signal, let's say in this 106 00:08:31 --> 00:08:37 particular situation 100 mV peak to peak signal. 107 00:08:37 --> 00:08:41 OK, so I magnified the signal by a factor of 100. 108 00:08:41 --> 00:08:46 OK, let's say it's a linear amplifier, I linearly amplified 109 00:08:46 --> 00:08:49 signal to be 100 mV, then in that case, 110 00:08:49 --> 00:08:54 if I had a noise on top of this, it's going to be less 111 00:08:54 --> 00:08:57 discernible. The signal will look like this. 112 00:08:57 --> 00:09:02 OK, my 10 mV noise would add on to it. 113 00:09:02 --> 00:09:04 But, this is still pretty decent. 114 00:09:04 --> 00:09:06 I can still recognize the input. 115 00:09:06 --> 00:09:10 And so, this is one application of amplification. 116 00:09:10 --> 00:09:14 If I need to send something from point A to point B as an 117 00:09:14 --> 00:09:17 analog signal, then an amplified signal is 118 00:09:17 --> 00:09:21 less prone to noise attacks than a small signal. 119 00:09:21 --> 00:09:24 Not surprisingly, a large number of devices that 120 00:09:24 --> 00:09:30 are used in everyday life have amplifiers built into them. 121 00:09:30 --> 00:09:33 So, get a little cell phone, and virtually every single cell 122 00:09:33 --> 00:09:37 phone contains an amplifier. By the way, this is an all 123 00:09:37 --> 00:09:39 digital cell phone. It's a Kyocera, 124 00:09:39 --> 00:09:42 I forget the number now. It's completely digital. 125 00:09:42 --> 00:09:45 OK, although they say it's completely digital, 126 00:09:45 --> 00:09:49 it turns out that a significant fraction of the circuitry is 127 00:09:49 --> 00:09:52 analog, in particular, so digital is sort of a 128 00:09:52 --> 00:09:56 marketing term to say that there's something special about 129 00:09:56 --> 00:09:57 this. But remember, 130 00:09:57 --> 00:10:01 there's a bunch of analog stuff. 131 00:10:01 --> 00:10:04 So, here's my little antenna from the cell phone. 132 00:10:04 --> 00:10:09 OK, and typically the first thing that happens to a signal 133 00:10:09 --> 00:10:13 as it comes out of the antenna in your cell phone is, 134 00:10:13 --> 00:10:18 look at cell phone circuits, or cell phone systems would be 135 00:10:18 --> 00:10:23 something that looks like this, OK, this, and may have a label 136 00:10:23 --> 00:10:26 LNA. If someone were to take a guess 137 00:10:26 --> 00:10:30 at what LNA might stand for? What's that? 138 00:10:30 --> 00:10:33 Linear amplifier. That's pretty good. 139 00:10:33 --> 00:10:36 So that's LNA. Close enough. 140 00:10:36 --> 00:10:38 A is correct. It's amplifier. 141 00:10:38 --> 00:10:41 What does L and N stand for? Low noise. 142 00:10:41 --> 00:10:45 OK, so this stands for low noise amplifier. 143 00:10:45 --> 00:10:49 So, I get a really rinky dinky small signal here, 144 00:10:49 --> 00:10:53 and then the low noise amplifier amplifies a signal. 145 00:10:53 --> 00:10:56 And in real cell phones, and for that matter, 146 00:10:56 --> 00:11:00 in your 802.11b, or 802.11a, or 802.11g wireless 147 00:11:00 --> 00:11:04 cards, same thing. Antenna, low noise amplifier, 148 00:11:04 --> 00:11:10 and then you may have a bunch of processing. 149 00:11:10 --> 00:11:12 And commonly, you have a bunch of analog 150 00:11:12 --> 00:11:15 processing. And then, you convert the 151 00:11:15 --> 00:11:19 analog to a digital signal. OK, I recall last week I asked 152 00:11:19 --> 00:11:23 somebody in class here, how would we transmit the 153 00:11:23 --> 00:11:27 signal from point A to point B without it being impacted way 154 00:11:27 --> 00:11:29 too much by noise, and he said, 155 00:11:29 --> 00:11:32 oh, go digital. Good point. 156 00:11:32 --> 00:11:36 OK, so if I go digital, I can transfer the signal 157 00:11:36 --> 00:11:39 without noise being a real factor. 158 00:11:39 --> 00:11:42 But the analog to digital converters need the signal 159 00:11:42 --> 00:11:47 strengths to be a given value before it can chop it up into 160 00:11:47 --> 00:11:50 digital levels. OK, so an amplifier is very 161 00:11:50 --> 00:11:53 fundamental. OK, and so in this case, 162 00:11:53 --> 00:11:57 what may be a signal of a few tens of microvolts to be 163 00:11:57 --> 00:12:01 amplified to some large enough value that it can be further 164 00:12:01 --> 00:12:06 processed. So, that's application of 165 00:12:06 --> 00:12:08 amplification in the analog domain. 166 00:12:08 --> 00:12:13 Let me talk about amplification in the digital domain. 167 00:12:13 --> 00:12:15 So, that's in the analog domain. 168 00:12:15 --> 00:12:20 This amplification is in the domain that I have both analog 169 00:12:20 --> 00:12:23 and digital. OK, and now let me talk about 170 00:12:23 --> 00:12:26 amplification in the digital domain, OK? 171 00:12:26 --> 00:12:30 I'm going to argue that amplification is absolutely 172 00:12:30 --> 00:12:35 foundational to the digital domain. 173 00:12:35 --> 00:12:40 OK, the digital abstraction would not occur if I did not 174 00:12:40 --> 00:12:45 have basic amplification. OK, and the next minute and 37 175 00:12:45 --> 00:12:49 seconds I will prove that to you, OK? 176 00:12:49 --> 00:12:53 So, let's do so. So, let's suppose I have a very 177 00:12:53 --> 00:12:59 simple digital system, and the system simply contains 178 00:12:59 --> 00:13:03 a pair of inverters. So, if I send a one here, 179 00:13:03 --> 00:13:07 it's a zero here and a one here, which is a very simple, 180 00:13:07 --> 00:13:10 trivial, digital system. And here's the input. 181 00:13:10 --> 00:13:13 Here's the output. And we said that for digital 182 00:13:13 --> 00:13:17 systems of this sort to work, they have to follow a static 183 00:13:17 --> 00:13:19 discipline. OK, our signals and our 184 00:13:19 --> 00:13:23 circuits must follow a discipline for them all to work 185 00:13:23 --> 00:13:26 together. And, the discipline we 186 00:13:26 --> 00:13:31 described comprised of signals adhering to certain voltage 187 00:13:31 --> 00:13:36 thresholds so that all the components in the system could 188 00:13:36 --> 00:13:41 agree on what comprised a zero, and what comprised a one, 189 00:13:41 --> 00:13:43 OK? So the way we did that was we 190 00:13:43 --> 00:13:47 said that you would have a threshold called VIH, 191 00:13:47 --> 00:13:51 V input high, and another threshold called 192 00:13:51 --> 00:13:54 VIL, V input low. OK, and we said that this 193 00:13:54 --> 00:13:59 circuit must recognize signals that are higher than VIH, 194 00:13:59 --> 00:14:03 3 V for example as a one, and simultaneously, 195 00:14:03 --> 00:14:07 any signal that has a voltage level less than VIL, 196 00:14:07 --> 00:14:13 say, two volts, should be recognized as a zero. 197 00:14:13 --> 00:14:16 That was the input constraint. On the output, 198 00:14:16 --> 00:14:20 it had a similar set of constraints, where we had 199 00:14:20 --> 00:14:26 tougher constraints on devices, where we said that the output 200 00:14:26 --> 00:14:30 had to satisfy a output low constraint, output high 201 00:14:30 --> 00:14:34 constraint. What this said is that for this 202 00:14:34 --> 00:14:38 circuit to be called a good digital circuit that satisfies 203 00:14:38 --> 00:14:41 the static discipline, signals that were ones here 204 00:14:41 --> 00:14:45 should be recognized as such. And if I am producing a one as 205 00:14:45 --> 00:14:49 an output, then the signal level should be higher than VOH. 206 00:14:49 --> 00:14:53 Similarly, if the signal's a zero, then it should be less 207 00:14:53 --> 00:14:54 than VOL. So as an example, 208 00:14:54 --> 00:14:57 this may be 2 V, this may be 3 V, 209 00:14:57 --> 00:15:01 and this may be 4 V, and this may be 1 V. 210 00:15:01 --> 00:15:05 OK, so input, I should recognize 2 V and less 211 00:15:05 --> 00:15:11 as a zero, but at the output I have to produce a very, 212 00:15:11 --> 00:15:13 very low value, 1 V. 213 00:15:13 --> 00:15:18 So, I have some noise margin. So as an example, 214 00:15:18 --> 00:15:23 say if I made a plot of the input/output, 215 00:15:23 --> 00:15:26 so I get my VIL here and VIH here. 216 00:15:26 --> 00:15:31 This is time. This would comprise a valid 217 00:15:31 --> 00:15:34 digital signal: zero, one, zero, 218 00:15:34 --> 00:15:41 one, and so on. OK, now, I had a tougher set of 219 00:15:41 --> 00:15:45 constraints at the output. I would have VOL, 220 00:15:45 --> 00:15:48 VOH. So, at the output, 221 00:15:48 --> 00:15:54 OK, I'm required to stretch the ones and zeros to be further 222 00:15:54 --> 00:15:59 apart from each other so that I get noise margin, 223 00:15:59 --> 00:16:05 and the corresponding signal for our little circuit there 224 00:16:05 --> 00:16:10 would look like so. Right, if this is a valid 225 00:16:10 --> 00:16:13 input, then this would be the corresponding, 226 00:16:13 --> 00:16:15 valid output. OK, and need I say more? 227 00:16:15 --> 00:16:18 OK, you can see that, intuitively, 228 00:16:18 --> 00:16:20 look, there's amplification happening here, 229 00:16:20 --> 00:16:24 and the reason is that VOL is chosen to be less than VIL, 230 00:16:24 --> 00:16:27 and VOH is higher than VIH. So therefore, 231 00:16:27 --> 00:16:32 the signal has to be stretched. The signal has to be amplified. 232 00:16:32 --> 00:16:37 OK, and what's the minimum amplification needed for the 233 00:16:37 --> 00:16:41 system to work? The minimum amplification is if 234 00:16:41 --> 00:16:44 I had a signal that looked like this. 235 00:16:44 --> 00:16:49 OK, that barely skimmed the VIL, VIH level. 236 00:16:49 --> 00:16:53 OK, so if signal were this high peak to peak, 237 00:16:53 --> 00:16:57 VIH minus VIL, and what's the absolute minimum 238 00:16:57 --> 00:17:02 signal at the output? It would look something like 239 00:17:02 --> 00:17:06 this. OK, barely skimming VOL and 240 00:17:06 --> 00:17:11 VOH, OK, so the corresponding output level would be VOH minus 241 00:17:11 --> 00:17:14 VOL. OK, so this is the absolute 242 00:17:14 --> 00:17:19 minimum amplification that my digital circuit has to provide. 243 00:17:19 --> 00:17:23 OK, and notice, VOH is larger than VIH. 244 00:17:23 --> 00:17:27 VOL is smaller than VIL. Therefore, this quantity needs 245 00:17:27 --> 00:17:34 to be greater than one. OK, so I've shown you both a 246 00:17:34 --> 00:17:38 simple, graphical, intuitive explanation, 247 00:17:38 --> 00:17:45 and this is a slightly more formal proof that even the 248 00:17:45 --> 00:17:52 digital circuit really requires to have amplification built into 249 00:17:52 --> 00:17:57 it, if it is to satisfy valid static disciplines. 250 00:17:57 --> 00:18:00 Yes? Yes. 251 00:18:00 --> 00:18:03 The question is, is that the same as gain? 252 00:18:03 --> 00:18:08 Good question. Yes, the term amplification has 253 00:18:08 --> 00:18:11 many, many variants. You could say gain. 254 00:18:11 --> 00:18:16 You could say amplification. You could say increase in 255 00:18:16 --> 00:18:20 signal strength, and so on and so forth. 256 00:18:20 --> 00:18:24 And in fact, when talking about low noise 257 00:18:24 --> 00:18:29 amplifiers, people sometimes talk about having the low noise, 258 00:18:29 --> 00:18:35 high gain amplifier at the input stage. 259 00:18:35 --> 00:18:39 OK, so let me pause there in terms of motivation. 260 00:18:39 --> 00:18:44 So, I believe I've motivated every which way: 261 00:18:44 --> 00:18:47 pure analog, analog/digital, 262 00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 and digital. OK, so I've covered every 263 00:18:50 --> 00:18:55 single base here. And so, we need amplification. 264 00:18:55 --> 00:19:00 OK, so let's look at how to build a fundamental, 265 00:19:00 --> 00:19:04 primitive device called the amplifier. 266 00:19:04 --> 00:19:08 Before we do that, however, let me take a quick 267 00:19:08 --> 00:19:13 detour. It will be convenient for me, 268 00:19:13 --> 00:19:19 as I show you how to build an amplifier, to introduce a new 269 00:19:19 --> 00:19:24 device, a new element, called the dependent source. 270 00:19:24 --> 00:19:30 OK, let me introduce a new device for your arsenal of 271 00:19:30 --> 00:19:38 devices, along with resistors, You learned about a MOSFET, 272 00:19:38 --> 00:19:45 a switch, voltage source, current source, 273 00:19:45 --> 00:19:54 and now a dependent source. So, a dependent source looks 274 00:19:54 --> 00:19:59 like this, OK, has an output port, 275 00:19:59 --> 00:20:07 and has a control port. So, a dependent source in its 276 00:20:07 --> 00:20:12 simplest form has two ports: an input port and an output 277 00:20:12 --> 00:20:14 port. Remember, a port is a 278 00:20:14 --> 00:20:19 convenient pairing of terminals, and I apply signals to such 279 00:20:19 --> 00:20:23 terminal pairs. But this is a abstract diagram 280 00:20:23 --> 00:20:27 for a dependent source, and to get a little bit more 281 00:20:27 --> 00:20:34 specific, let me show you an example of a dependent source. 282 00:20:34 --> 00:20:36 So, let's say, here's my input, 283 00:20:36 --> 00:20:40 and I label the terminal variables for the input. 284 00:20:40 --> 00:20:45 VC is the voltage applied to the input, and IC is the current 285 00:20:45 --> 00:20:50 into this terminal here. And, here is the symbol for the 286 00:20:50 --> 00:20:54 dependent source. Much like a current source or a 287 00:20:54 --> 00:20:59 voltage source has a circle around it, the corresponding 288 00:20:59 --> 00:21:04 symbol for a dependent source is like so. 289 00:21:04 --> 00:21:06 So this example, for instance, 290 00:21:06 --> 00:21:09 is a dependent, current source. 291 00:21:09 --> 00:21:14 I can apply the corresponding output variables, 292 00:21:14 --> 00:21:20 I0, OK, and I can say that the current, I, is some function. 293 00:21:20 --> 00:21:24 In this example, I've designed the example that 294 00:21:24 --> 00:21:30 the current through the current source, I, is some function of 295 00:21:30 --> 00:21:36 the input voltage or the control voltage, VC. 296 00:21:36 --> 00:21:40 OK, so notice that the current through a current source, 297 00:21:40 --> 00:21:43 the current through this current source, 298 00:21:43 --> 00:21:45 I, is some function of another variable. 299 00:21:45 --> 00:21:49 OK, in this example, it's the voltage across its 300 00:21:49 --> 00:21:51 control port. Not surprisingly, 301 00:21:51 --> 00:21:57 this device is called a voltage controlled current source -- 302 00:21:57 --> 00:22:10 303 00:22:10 --> 00:22:14 -- or a VCCS. So, in like manner I can also 304 00:22:14 --> 00:22:19 devise other forms of sources. You can think of this is a 305 00:22:19 --> 00:22:24 device where a voltage controls an output current. 306 00:22:24 --> 00:22:27 You can think of all other combinations, 307 00:22:27 --> 00:22:33 current controlling current, voltage controlling voltage, 308 00:22:33 --> 00:22:38 current controlling voltage, and so on. 309 00:22:38 --> 00:22:43 So, another example, I give you another dependent 310 00:22:43 --> 00:22:50 source, and in this situation, my output current is controlled 311 00:22:50 --> 00:22:52 by an input current, VC. 312 00:22:52 --> 00:22:57 IC rather. And I claim that I for this one 313 00:22:57 --> 00:23:02 is some function of a current, IC. 314 00:23:02 --> 00:23:06 OK, it's another dependent source where the output current 315 00:23:06 --> 00:23:09 for its output port is related to the current, 316 00:23:09 --> 00:23:11 IC. And, this is a current 317 00:23:11 --> 00:23:15 controlled current source. OK, it's a current controlled 318 00:23:15 --> 00:23:18 current source. And, if I had lots of time on 319 00:23:18 --> 00:23:22 my hands, and I was wanting to kill time, I'd sit around 320 00:23:22 --> 00:23:25 drawing for you, other types of dependent 321 00:23:25 --> 00:23:28 sources. I would draw for you a current 322 00:23:28 --> 00:23:33 controlled voltage sourced, and I could also draw for you a 323 00:23:33 --> 00:23:37 voltage controlled voltage source. 324 00:23:37 --> 00:23:42 OK, so that's an abstract diagram for such a source. 325 00:23:42 --> 00:23:48 And so, let's do a few examples involving elements like this. 326 00:23:48 --> 00:23:53 To begin, just so you can build up your intuition, 327 00:23:53 --> 00:23:57 let me start by doing a very simple circuit, 328 00:23:57 --> 00:24:01 involving an independent current source, 329 00:24:01 --> 00:24:09 OK, just so we can relate back to what we've been doing so far. 330 00:24:09 --> 00:24:14 So, let's say I have some resistor, and I have a standard 331 00:24:14 --> 00:24:17 current source with current I nought. 332 00:24:17 --> 00:24:20 This is an independent current source. 333 00:24:20 --> 00:24:24 Remember the circle? And, some resistor, 334 00:24:24 --> 00:24:29 R, and let's say I care about the voltage across the resistor. 335 00:24:29 --> 00:24:35 OK, so I have a current I nought flowing through it. 336 00:24:35 --> 00:24:39 So, I can very quickly write down VR as, simply, 337 00:24:39 --> 00:24:43 I0 R. OK, it's the drop across the 338 00:24:43 --> 00:24:48 resistor when a current I nought flows through it. 339 00:24:48 --> 00:24:53 OK, so this is what you've been used to doing. 340 00:24:53 --> 00:24:57 Correspondingly, I can do an example with a 341 00:24:57 --> 00:25:03 dependent current source. And, as an example, 342 00:25:03 --> 00:25:07 I'll use a voltage controlled current source. 343 00:25:07 --> 00:25:13 OK, a voltage controlled current source is a dependent 344 00:25:13 --> 00:25:20 current source whose output current depends on the voltage 345 00:25:20 --> 00:25:25 applied at the control port of the current source. 346 00:25:25 --> 00:25:30 So let me build a little circuit. 347 00:25:30 --> 00:25:34 OK, so here's my current. And let's say it's VC IC for 348 00:25:34 --> 00:25:37 the control port, and similarly, 349 00:25:37 --> 00:25:41 let's say my current I here is some function of the control 350 00:25:41 --> 00:25:44 port voltage. And let's say, 351 00:25:44 --> 00:25:47 to be specific, there is some K over VC, 352 00:25:47 --> 00:25:50 some function. OK, there are a variety of 353 00:25:50 --> 00:25:55 dependent sources that can be built, and here's a hypothetical 354 00:25:55 --> 00:26:01 device where the output current is mathematically related to the 355 00:26:01 --> 00:26:07 input in the following manner. So, let me build a circuit of 356 00:26:07 --> 00:26:11 the following form. So, let's add the resistor, 357 00:26:11 --> 00:26:14 R, and here's my circuit, OK? 358 00:26:14 --> 00:26:18 And, as before, let me look to figuring out 359 00:26:18 --> 00:26:21 what VR is. So, notice that I have to 360 00:26:21 --> 00:26:27 supply some voltage at the input so that the output can depend on 361 00:26:27 --> 00:26:34 the input because right now I don't know what the input here. 362 00:26:34 --> 00:26:38 So what I'll do is let me apply VR over here. 363 00:26:38 --> 00:26:41 OK, so let me make this connection. 364 00:26:41 --> 00:26:46 OK, let me make the connection from here to here. 365 00:26:46 --> 00:26:52 What I've done is I've applied VR at the control port of the 366 00:26:52 --> 00:26:58 dependent current source. OK, and I often draw a circuit 367 00:26:58 --> 00:27:03 like this. This looks pretty messy. 368 00:27:03 --> 00:27:10 I will often draw the circuit like so: R, VR. 369 00:27:10 --> 00:27:26 370 00:27:26 --> 00:27:30 OK, short form circuit drawing would look like this. 371 00:27:30 --> 00:27:34 This is a complete drawing that I show you the explicit 372 00:27:34 --> 00:27:38 connections of the control port, but oftentimes, 373 00:27:38 --> 00:27:43 when the control port does not have any other impact in the 374 00:27:43 --> 00:27:48 circuit, you can eliminate, don't explicitly show the 375 00:27:48 --> 00:27:51 control port. Rather, you can simply show the 376 00:27:51 --> 00:27:57 dependence of the output current on whatever circuit variable you 377 00:27:57 --> 00:28:00 have in mind. So, you can draw the diamond 378 00:28:00 --> 00:28:04 like this, and see its current is some function of VR. 379 00:28:04 --> 00:28:10 VR in this is case is K divided by VR, OK? 380 00:28:10 --> 00:28:14 OK, so let's go ahead and analyze this little circuit 381 00:28:14 --> 00:28:18 here, and look at what this might give us. 382 00:28:18 --> 00:28:21 Our goal, as before, is to find out the value, 383 00:28:21 --> 00:28:23 VR. So, in this case, 384 00:28:23 --> 00:28:28 let's apply the Node method to this node, and sum the currents 385 00:28:28 --> 00:28:34 into that node to be zero. OK, so sum the currents going 386 00:28:34 --> 00:28:39 into that node to be zero. The current going down is 387 00:28:39 --> 00:28:44 simply VR divided by R. OK, and that is equal to the 388 00:28:44 --> 00:28:47 current that is going out of the node. 389 00:28:47 --> 00:28:50 And so that is equal to F of VR. 390 00:28:50 --> 00:28:54 And I know that F of VR is given by K divided by VR. 391 00:28:54 --> 00:29:00 OK, a simple application of the Node method. 392 00:29:00 --> 00:29:04 So then, I collect VR's on the left hand side, 393 00:29:04 --> 00:29:10 and I get VR squared is K times R, OK, and VR is simply the 394 00:29:10 --> 00:29:13 square root of KR. There you go: 395 00:29:13 --> 00:29:17 I'm done. OK, I've gone ahead an applied 396 00:29:17 --> 00:29:22 the Node method to this, and when have to figure out the 397 00:29:22 --> 00:29:27 current here, I simply reflect the fact that 398 00:29:27 --> 00:29:32 it depends on VR like so, and I just go ahead and solve 399 00:29:32 --> 00:29:37 the circuit. Remember, the workhorse of the 400 00:29:37 --> 00:29:40 circuit industry, the Node method, 401 00:29:40 --> 00:29:42 when in doubt, apply it. 402 00:29:42 --> 00:29:46 It simply works. And notice, this is a nonlinear 403 00:29:46 --> 00:29:48 circuit. OK, the dependence is 404 00:29:48 --> 00:29:53 nonlinear, and I get the response like so. 405 00:29:53 --> 00:30:00 So, to plug in some numbers, supposing K was 10 to the minus 406 00:30:00 --> 00:30:05 3 amperes per volt, and R was one kilo ohm, 407 00:30:05 --> 00:30:12 then I can plug the numbers in and the kilo here cancels with 408 00:30:12 --> 00:30:18 the 10 to the minus 3, and I get VR equals 1 V. 409 00:30:18 --> 00:30:24 OK, this simply says, if I build a circuit like this, 410 00:30:24 --> 00:30:30 then this voltage here will be 1 V. 411 00:30:30 --> 00:30:34 So, again, as long as you remember that the dependent 412 00:30:34 --> 00:30:38 source is simply another little circuit element, 413 00:30:38 --> 00:30:43 OK, and you usually draw just the output port for dependent 414 00:30:43 --> 00:30:48 sources, and reflect the way that the control affects the 415 00:30:48 --> 00:30:52 current, that'll suffice, and you get, 416 00:30:52 --> 00:30:57 through the application of the Node method, the variable you're 417 00:30:57 --> 00:31:02 interested in. Let's do another example, 418 00:31:02 --> 00:31:08 OK, of another fun current source, a voltage controlled 419 00:31:08 --> 00:31:12 current source, and look at it this way. 420 00:31:12 --> 00:31:17 So, let's say I have a resistor, and I have a current 421 00:31:17 --> 00:31:22 source, a resistor, RL, and this goes to some, 422 00:31:22 --> 00:31:26 I apply a VS here. Remember this short form 423 00:31:26 --> 00:31:33 notation; that's simply applying a supply VS between that node 424 00:31:33 --> 00:31:39 and the ground. OK, and let us say the current 425 00:31:39 --> 00:31:45 IV through the device is some function of the current at its 426 00:31:45 --> 00:31:49 control port. OK, so I'm not going to show 427 00:31:49 --> 00:31:53 you that. But remember that the device 428 00:31:53 --> 00:31:58 already looks like this, that there is a control port 429 00:31:58 --> 00:32:02 here. I'm not showing that to you. 430 00:32:02 --> 00:32:05 And let us say that I apply some voltage, 431 00:32:05 --> 00:32:09 VI, to the input port. The reason we often don't show 432 00:32:09 --> 00:32:13 the input port is for many practical dependent sources, 433 00:32:13 --> 00:32:17 the input has no other effect on the circuit. 434 00:32:17 --> 00:32:19 So, for example, in this case, 435 00:32:19 --> 00:32:22 the input has infinite resistance looking in. 436 00:32:22 --> 00:32:25 So therefore, if I apply a VI here, 437 00:32:25 --> 00:32:28 it doesn't draw any current from VI. 438 00:32:28 --> 00:32:32 I simply apply the voltage, VI. 439 00:32:32 --> 00:32:38 It doesn't affect the circuit in any other way except in terms 440 00:32:38 --> 00:32:42 of how it controls the current ID. 441 00:32:42 --> 00:32:49 So let's say the current ID is some function of VI because VI 442 00:32:49 --> 00:32:55 is applied at the control port. OK, and as I pointed out 443 00:32:55 --> 00:32:59 before, I oftentimes, just for clarity, 444 00:32:59 --> 00:33:06 just to show this dependent source explicitly. 445 00:33:06 --> 00:33:10 OK, so let's work the example. So as I said, 446 00:33:10 --> 00:33:16 I'm going to choose ID to be F of VI, and let's pick some 447 00:33:16 --> 00:33:22 specific parameters here. Let's say it's K by two VI 448 00:33:22 --> 00:33:28 minus one, both squared. OK, and let's say this is true 449 00:33:28 --> 00:33:33 for VI less than equal to one volt. 450 00:33:33 --> 00:33:38 And let us also say that ID equals zero for VI less than one 451 00:33:38 --> 00:33:40 volt. OK, it's a dependent source, 452 00:33:40 --> 00:33:45 and it can have various forms of dependences on the input. 453 00:33:45 --> 00:33:49 And, I just picked an example of some hypothetical, 454 00:33:49 --> 00:33:53 or as yet, hypothetical dependent source, 455 00:33:53 --> 00:33:58 the current through which is related to the input using a 456 00:33:58 --> 00:34:02 square law relation, VI minus one all squared as 457 00:34:02 --> 00:34:08 long as VI is greater than one. And if VI is less than one, 458 00:34:08 --> 00:34:11 then the current is simply zero, it shuts off. 459 00:34:11 --> 00:34:16 So, I can go ahead and apply. So, let's say I want to find 460 00:34:16 --> 00:34:19 out V0 versus VI. So, I care about finding out 461 00:34:19 --> 00:34:22 V0. V0 is the voltage of this node 462 00:34:22 --> 00:34:26 with respect to ground. OK, so it's a slightly more 463 00:34:26 --> 00:34:32 complicated circuit than you saw up here, than you saw up there. 464 00:34:32 --> 00:34:35 So, let's go ahead and do this example. 465 00:34:35 --> 00:34:39 Start by applying the workhorse of the circuits business, 466 00:34:39 --> 00:34:43 the Node method, and let's start with doing this 467 00:34:43 --> 00:34:46 for VI. Let's first do it for VI 468 00:34:46 --> 00:34:50 greater than one, notice the behavior of this is 469 00:34:50 --> 00:34:53 different for different ranges of VI. 470 00:34:53 --> 00:34:58 So let's first do it for VI greater than or equal to one and 471 00:34:58 --> 00:35:02 apply the Node method. Node method says sum the 472 00:35:02 --> 00:35:06 currents going into this node; we know the voltage at this 473 00:35:06 --> 00:35:07 node. It's VI. 474 00:35:07 --> 00:35:09 We know the voltage at this node. 475 00:35:09 --> 00:35:11 It's VS. OK, the only unknown is V 476 00:35:11 --> 00:35:14 nought. And so, let's go ahead and 477 00:35:14 --> 00:35:16 write the node equations for that node. 478 00:35:16 --> 00:35:20 So, the current going up, let me simply equate the 479 00:35:20 --> 00:35:24 current going up to the current that has been supplied by this 480 00:35:24 --> 00:35:27 particular node here. And, that should equate that 481 00:35:27 --> 00:35:31 the two of them should sum to zero, the current going up plus 482 00:35:31 --> 00:35:36 the current going down should sum to zero. 483 00:35:36 --> 00:35:38 So, I get V0 minus VS divided by R. 484 00:35:38 --> 00:35:43 That's the current going up. Plus, the current going down 485 00:35:43 --> 00:35:46 must sum to zero, plus ID must sum to zero. 486 00:35:46 --> 00:35:51 And ID is going to be K divided by two VI minus one all squared. 487 00:35:51 --> 00:35:56 That must equal zero. Straightforward application of 488 00:35:56 --> 00:36:00 Node method, current going up plus the current going down at 489 00:36:00 --> 00:36:05 this node should equal zero because the total current 490 00:36:05 --> 00:36:09 leaving the node must be zero, OK? 491 00:36:09 --> 00:36:13 So I can go ahead and simplify this, multiply it throughout by, 492 00:36:13 --> 00:36:17 I call this RL here. So, multiply it throughout by 493 00:36:17 --> 00:36:22 RL, and move all of this to the other side, so I get VS divided 494 00:36:22 --> 00:36:24 by RL, multiply it throughout by RL. 495 00:36:24 --> 00:36:28 I get VS at this side. I take this term to the other 496 00:36:28 --> 00:36:31 side. This becomes a minus. 497 00:36:31 --> 00:36:34 RL multiplies here, so I get KRL. 498 00:36:34 --> 00:36:39 That's the expression I get. V nought is VS minus KRL 499 00:36:39 --> 00:36:43 divided by two times VI minus one all squared. 500 00:36:43 --> 00:36:48 Let me put a box around this because I will be referring to 501 00:36:48 --> 00:36:54 this more times in 6.002 for a variety of reasons than probably 502 00:36:54 --> 00:36:59 any other equation on Earth. OK, this is the first time you 503 00:36:59 --> 00:37:03 saw it. You saw it here. 504 00:37:03 --> 00:37:06 OK, mark it down. You'll smile every other time 505 00:37:06 --> 00:37:10 you look at it in quizzes, and you will find out why this 506 00:37:10 --> 00:37:14 comes up very often in 6.002. So, I'll just give you a few 507 00:37:14 --> 00:37:18 seconds to savor this big moment in your 6.002 life. 508 00:37:18 --> 00:37:21 All right, OK, so it's pretty simple actually. 509 00:37:21 --> 00:37:23 I mean, there's really not much. 510 00:37:23 --> 00:37:28 A lot of this stuff is just a plain old, simple application of 511 00:37:28 --> 00:37:31 the Node method, and things just fall out. 512 00:37:31 --> 00:37:35 It's just so simple. So, the V nought, 513 00:37:35 --> 00:37:41 I apply the Node method, I get V nought for this 514 00:37:41 --> 00:37:47 nonlinear circuit. I can also it for VI less than 515 00:37:47 --> 00:37:49 one. For VI less than one, 516 00:37:49 --> 00:37:54 when VI is less than one, what happens? 517 00:37:54 --> 00:37:58 ID is zero. OK, since ID is zero, 518 00:37:58 --> 00:38:01 think of this as an open circuit. 519 00:38:01 --> 00:38:06 OK, so there's no voltage drop across RL. 520 00:38:06 --> 00:38:13 And, this voltage V nought is equal to VS. 521 00:38:13 --> 00:38:15 So, I like to see things in pictures. 522 00:38:15 --> 00:38:18 I'm not an equations kind of person. 523 00:38:18 --> 00:38:21 I'm much more of a graphical person. 524 00:38:21 --> 00:38:25 So, let me draw a little graph to show how V nought, 525 00:38:25 --> 00:38:29 to see the form of V nought, and then let's study that 526 00:38:29 --> 00:38:34 little system a little bit more carefully. 527 00:38:34 --> 00:38:39 So, this is page seven, and we plot V nought versus VI 528 00:38:39 --> 00:38:42 for you. And let's take a look at how 529 00:38:42 --> 00:38:46 this really simple circuit looks. 530 00:38:46 --> 00:38:50 This has got nothing. It's got an RL resistor 531 00:38:50 --> 00:38:55 connected to a supply, and a dependent current source, 532 00:38:55 --> 00:39:01 and I apply some voltage VI at the input. 533 00:39:01 --> 00:39:04 It's a very, very simple circuit. 534 00:39:04 --> 00:39:08 So, let's see. So as long as VI is less than 535 00:39:08 --> 00:39:14 one, the output stays at VS. OK, that makes intuitive sense, 536 00:39:14 --> 00:39:18 right? As long as the current here is 537 00:39:18 --> 00:39:21 zero, this is like an open circuit here. 538 00:39:21 --> 00:39:26 If this is an open circuit, then effectively, 539 00:39:26 --> 00:39:31 V nought is simply the voltage VS. 540 00:39:31 --> 00:39:35 V nought simply appears here. If you want to grunge through 541 00:39:35 --> 00:39:39 KVL and KCL, go ahead. VS minus RL times the current 542 00:39:39 --> 00:39:43 is V nought, and the current is zero so it's, 543 00:39:43 --> 00:39:45 yes. So, this is simply VS. 544 00:39:45 --> 00:39:50 When VI goes above one volt, fun stuff begins to happen. 545 00:39:50 --> 00:39:54 OK, when V nought goes above one volt, then this equation 546 00:39:54 --> 00:39:58 applies because VI is greater than one. 547 00:39:58 --> 00:40:02 This equation applies. And, when VI is a one, 548 00:40:02 --> 00:40:06 one minus one is zero. This term cancels out, 549 00:40:06 --> 00:40:08 so this is VS. OK, phew! 550 00:40:08 --> 00:40:12 So, I start off here. As VI increases, 551 00:40:12 --> 00:40:15 what happens now? As VI increases, 552 00:40:15 --> 00:40:19 this term here becomes increasingly negative, 553 00:40:19 --> 00:40:23 OK, subtracting from VS. OK, so I get some behavior like 554 00:40:23 --> 00:40:26 this. V nought begins to drop. 555 00:40:26 --> 00:40:31 And it makes intuitive sense, right? 556 00:40:31 --> 00:40:35 As ID begins to increase, the voltage here will begin to 557 00:40:35 --> 00:40:40 drop because I'm drawing more and more current through RL. 558 00:40:40 --> 00:40:43 I'm dropping more and more across RL. 559 00:40:43 --> 00:40:48 So more and more drops across RL, so V nought begins to drop 560 00:40:48 --> 00:40:51 too. So, it looks something like 561 00:40:51 --> 00:40:53 this. I'll show you a little demo, 562 00:40:53 --> 00:40:58 but my claim is that you have just seen an amplifier. 563 00:40:58 --> 00:41:03 Whoa. You just saw an amplifier. 564 00:41:03 --> 00:41:07 So, I snuck an amplifier by you, OK? 565 00:41:07 --> 00:41:11 So, I just snuck an amplifier past you. 566 00:41:11 --> 00:41:18 I'll show you why in a second. So, let's take a look at this 567 00:41:18 --> 00:41:23 waveform here. Let's not worry about what 568 00:41:23 --> 00:41:29 happens way down here. We'll talk about that a little 569 00:41:29 --> 00:41:36 later. But, look at this curve here. 570 00:41:36 --> 00:41:44 I claim there is amplification in the following sense. 571 00:41:44 --> 00:41:51 Focus on some change in the input voltage, 572 00:41:51 --> 00:41:57 delta VI, OK, and for that change in input 573 00:41:57 --> 00:42:06 voltage, I get some change in the output voltage. 574 00:42:06 --> 00:42:09 OK, for some change in the input voltage, 575 00:42:09 --> 00:42:13 delta VI, I get some change in the output voltage. 576 00:42:13 --> 00:42:17 And guess what? In this, at least the way I 577 00:42:17 --> 00:42:21 have drawn it, delta V nought divided by delta 578 00:42:21 --> 00:42:26 VI, if I can find regions of the curve where this is greater than 579 00:42:26 --> 00:42:32 one, then I have amplification. OK, so what's that saying? 580 00:42:32 --> 00:42:37 What that's saying is that if I apply some voltage here, 581 00:42:37 --> 00:42:42 OK, and I change that voltage by a small amount from, 582 00:42:42 --> 00:42:46 let's say, 2 V to 2.1. OK, I am going to find the 583 00:42:46 --> 00:42:50 output voltage. Let's say I go from 2 V to 2.1 584 00:42:50 --> 00:42:53 here. OK, abstractly out there, 585 00:42:53 --> 00:42:57 I might have an output that goes from three to, 586 00:42:57 --> 00:43:03 let's say, two V perhaps. OK, so for a 0.1 change here, 587 00:43:03 --> 00:43:07 I'm going to get a bigger drop here, so from 3 V to 2 V, 588 00:43:07 --> 00:43:10 giving me an amplification in this little circuit. 589 00:43:10 --> 00:43:14 OK, so we'll see this again and again, and you'll really 590 00:43:14 --> 00:43:17 understand it. So, I have a small change in 591 00:43:17 --> 00:43:21 the input, and I have a corresponding larger change in 592 00:43:21 --> 00:43:23 the output. So, I've shown you an 593 00:43:23 --> 00:43:26 amplifier. I haven't shown you a linear 594 00:43:26 --> 00:43:29 amplifier. There's an extra charge for 595 00:43:29 --> 00:43:32 that. OK, that'll happen later. 596 00:43:32 --> 00:43:35 OK, all I've shown you so far is an amplifier, 597 00:43:35 --> 00:43:37 and this happens to be a crummy amplifier. 598 00:43:37 --> 00:43:40 It's a nonlinear amplifier because, notice, 599 00:43:40 --> 00:43:43 this is not linear. It's a nice little curve, 600 00:43:43 --> 00:43:45 and so it's not linear. But, I promised you an 601 00:43:45 --> 00:43:49 amplifier, and I'm cheap, and that's all you get for now. 602 00:43:49 --> 00:43:52 OK, we'll see linear stuff later, but for now, 603 00:43:52 --> 00:43:55 I have a little amplifier. So, let's do some real numbers, 604 00:43:55 --> 00:44:00 and plot some numbers down, and also look at a demo. 605 00:44:00 --> 00:44:04 So, let's do an example. Let's say VS is 10 V, 606 00:44:04 --> 00:44:10 that the K is two milliamps per V squared, and let's say RL is 607 00:44:10 --> 00:44:12 five kilo-ohms, OK? 608 00:44:12 --> 00:44:18 So, let me substitute these values into that equation, 609 00:44:18 --> 00:44:21 and I get V nought is, VS is ten. 610 00:44:21 --> 00:44:25 So, it's ten minus, KRL divided by two. 611 00:44:25 --> 00:44:31 So, K is two milliamps. Two milliamps times five 612 00:44:31 --> 00:44:36 kilo-ohms is ten divided by two gives me five, 613 00:44:36 --> 00:44:40 and VI minus one squared. That's what I have. 614 00:44:40 --> 00:44:46 I just plug in a bunch of numbers, and that's what I get. 615 00:44:46 --> 00:44:52 So, what I'll do is let me just do a little table for you, 616 00:44:52 --> 00:44:57 and plot using real numbers, simply plot those values for 617 00:44:57 --> 45:00 you.