|Class Participation and Discussion||15%|
Lectures: 2 sessions / week, 1.5 hours / session
Prof. Shankar Raman
Shakespeare "doth bestride the narrow world" of the English Renaissance "like a colossus," leaving his contemporaries "walk under his large legs and peep about" to find themselves in "dishonourable graves." (A bonus point if you can identify the source of these lines!) This course aims in part to correct this grave injustice by surveying the extraordinary output of playwrights whose names have largely been eclipsed by their more luminous compatriot: Marlowe, Jonson, Webster, and Ford, among others. Reading Shakespeare as just one of a group of practitioners -- many of whom were more popular than him during and even after his remarkable career -- will restore, I hope, a sense not just of the richness of English Renaissance drama, but also that of the historical and cultural moment of the English Renaissance itself. For this period bears witness both to the emergence of English theatre as a secular, commercial form (whose lineaments are visible even today), and to widespread changes that affected all aspects of social life. The birth of theatre was part and parcel of a deep-rooted cultural transformation affecting the nature of sovereignty, religion, the composition of social classes, the formation of the nation etc. This course will examine the relationship between theatre and society through the lens of the drama produced in response to these changes. However, we will not try to map the progress of drama directly onto the social world, as if the former can simply read off the latter. Rather, focusing on discrete issues and problems, we will try to understand the ways in which a particular text not only reflects but responds to and shapes aspects of the culture from which it derives, developing an aesthetic that actively engages its world. If we succeed, you will (I hope!) not only begin to enjoy plays that are really not "Shakespearian," but also to appreciate how the English Renaissance (Shakespeare included) raises and grapples with a range of questions deeply relevant to us today. The topics addressed over the course of the semester will be wide-ranging but will include: gender and class dynamics in Renaissance society; money, trade, and colonialism; the body as metaphor and theatrical "object"; allegory and aesthetic form; theatricality and meta-theatricality; the private and the public.
Students will be required to do an oral presentation and to write either two or three papers. If you choose the three paper option, the required length for three assignments will be 5-6 pages, 8-9 pages, and 10-12 pages respectively. If you choose the two paper option, you will turn in a 5-6 page essay as a first assignment, an early draft of a final paper along with an annotated bibliography, and a final 15-18 page essay.
Your overall grade will be determined as follows:
Option 1 (3 Papers)
|Class Participation and Discussion||15%|
The course will rest heavily upon your participation, since a lot of the discussion will be structured by you and will draw upon a detailed presentation of each text by one or more students. The presentation will involve reading not just the play, but also assigned primary and secondary material that should be used to illuminate the play, shape in-class discussion, and provide the starting point for your essays. Each presenter will ideally read and think about the material accompanying a particular play, and then try to develop a coherent way of integrating the additional reading with an interpretation of the text. The aim will be to convey new information to the group and to lead a thought-provoking and engaging discussion during the particular session(s) devoted to the play under consideration. All presenters will meet with me prior to the date of presentation, and will also provide by email a list of discussion questions that the other members of the group will mull over in advance of the class period.
Given the rising number of cases involving plagiarism in recent terms, I am forced to spell out what should go without saying. Plagiarism is out, and the penalty for anyone caught "lifting" material from other sources without adequate acknowledgement will be an automatic F in the class and a trip to appropriate disciplinary committee at MIT. In short, while this class will demand the use of external critical and historical material in writing your essays, it will expect you to clearly and specifically acknowledge all such use (in the body of the text, or in foot/endnotes, or in the accompanying bibliography). If you have any doubts about use of material beyond the text itself or about the definition of plagiarism, please speak to me before submitting your work.