1 00:00:07 --> 00:00:13 We are going to start today in a serious way on the 2 00:00:12 --> 00:00:18 inhomogenous equation, second-order linear 3 00:00:17 --> 00:00:23 differential, I'll simply write it out 4 00:00:22 --> 00:00:28 instead of writing out all the words which go with it. 5 00:00:28 --> 00:00:34 So, such an equation looks like, the second-order equation 6 00:00:35 --> 00:00:41 is going to look like y double prime plus p of x, 7 00:00:40 --> 00:00:46 t, x plus q of x times y. Now, up to now the right-hand 8 00:00:47 --> 00:00:53 side has been zero. So, now we are going to make it 9 00:00:53 --> 00:00:59 not be zero. So, this is going to be f of x. 10 00:00:57 --> 00:01:03 In the most frequent 11 00:01:00 --> 00:01:06 applications, x is time. 12 00:01:02 --> 00:01:08 x is usually time, often, but not always. 13 00:01:08 --> 00:01:14 So, maybe just for today, I will use X in talking about 14 00:01:13 --> 00:01:19 the general theory. And, from now on, 15 00:01:16 --> 00:01:22 I'll probably make X equal time because that's what is most of 16 00:01:22 --> 00:01:28 the time in the applications. So, this is the part we've been 17 00:01:27 --> 00:01:33 studying up until now. It has a lot of names. 18 00:01:31 --> 00:01:37 It's input, signal, commas between those, 19 00:01:35 --> 00:01:41 a driving term, or sometimes it's called the 20 00:01:39 --> 00:01:45 forcing term. You'll see all of these in the 21 00:01:44 --> 00:01:50 literature, and it pretty much depends upon what course you're 22 00:01:48 --> 00:01:54 sitting at, what the professor habitually calls it. 23 00:01:52 --> 00:01:58 I will try to use all these terms now and then, 24 00:01:55 --> 00:02:01 probably most often I will lapse into input as the most 25 00:01:59 --> 00:02:05 generic term, suggesting nothing in 26 00:02:01 --> 00:02:07 particular, and therefore, equally acceptable or 27 00:02:05 --> 00:02:11 unacceptable to everybody. The response, 28 00:02:09 --> 00:02:15 the solution, then, the solution as you know 29 00:02:15 --> 00:02:21 is then called the response. The response, 30 00:02:20 --> 00:02:26 sometimes it's called the output. 31 00:02:24 --> 00:02:30 I think I'll stick pretty much with response. 32 00:02:31 --> 00:02:37 So, I'm using pretty much the same terminology we use for 33 00:02:35 --> 00:02:41 studying first-order equations. Now, as you will see, 34 00:02:40 --> 00:02:46 the reason we had to study the homogeneous case first was 35 00:02:45 --> 00:02:51 because you cannot solve this without knowing the homogeneous 36 00:02:50 --> 00:02:56 solutions. So, that's the inhomogeneous 37 00:02:53 --> 00:02:59 case. But the homogeneous one, 38 00:02:56 --> 00:03:02 the corresponding homogeneous thing, y double prime plus p of 39 00:03:01 --> 00:03:07 x y prime plus q of x times y equals zero 40 00:03:06 --> 00:03:12 is an essential part of the solution to this 41 00:03:11 --> 00:03:17 equation. That's called, 42 00:03:15 --> 00:03:21 therefore, it has names. Now, unfortunately, 43 00:03:19 --> 00:03:25 it doesn't have a single name. I don't know what to call it, 44 00:03:24 --> 00:03:30 but I think I'll probably call it the associated homogeneous 45 00:03:30 --> 00:03:36 equation, or ODE, the associated homogeneous 46 00:03:34 --> 00:03:40 equation, the one associated to the guy on the left. 47 00:03:40 --> 00:03:46 It's also called the reduced equation by some people. 48 00:03:44 --> 00:03:50 There is some other term for it, which escapes me totally, 49 00:03:48 --> 00:03:54 but what the heck. Now, its solution has a name. 50 00:03:52 --> 00:03:58 So, its solution, of course, doesn't depend on 51 00:03:55 --> 00:04:01 anything in particular, the general solution, 52 00:03:58 --> 00:04:04 because the right-hand side is always zero. 53 00:04:03 --> 00:04:09 So, its solution, we know can be written as y 54 00:04:06 --> 00:04:12 equals in the form c1 y1 plus c2 y2, 55 00:04:10 --> 00:04:16 where y1 and y2 are any two independent solutions of that, 56 00:04:14 --> 00:04:20 and then c1's and c2's are arbitrary constants. 57 00:04:17 --> 00:04:23 Now, what you are looking at this equation, 58 00:04:20 --> 00:04:26 you're going to need this also. And therefore, 59 00:04:24 --> 00:04:30 it has a name. It has various names. 60 00:04:26 --> 00:04:32 Sometimes there is a subscript, c, there. 61 00:04:31 --> 00:04:37 Sometimes there's a subscript, h. 62 00:04:34 --> 00:04:40 Sometimes there's no subscript at all, which is the most 63 00:04:39 --> 00:04:45 confusing of all. But, anyway, 64 00:04:42 --> 00:04:48 what's the name given to it? Well, there is no name. 65 00:04:47 --> 00:04:53 Many books call it the solution to the associated homogeneous 66 00:04:53 --> 00:04:59 equation. That's maximally long. 67 00:04:56 --> 00:05:02 Your book calls it the complementary solution. 68 00:05:02 --> 00:05:08 Many people call it that, and many will look at you with 69 00:05:06 --> 00:05:12 a blank, who know differential equations very well, 70 00:05:10 --> 00:05:16 and will not have the faintest idea what you're talking about. 71 00:05:14 --> 00:05:20 If you call it (y)h, then you are thinking of it as 72 00:05:18 --> 00:05:24 the solution; the h is for homogeneous to 73 00:05:21 --> 00:05:27 indicate it's the solution. So, it's the solution to the, 74 00:05:26 --> 00:05:32 I'm not going to write that. You put it in her books if you 75 00:05:30 --> 00:05:36 like writing. Write solution to the 76 00:05:33 --> 00:05:39 associated homogeneous equation, y(h). 77 00:05:36 --> 00:05:42 But, it's all the same thing. Now, or the solution to the 78 00:05:41 --> 00:05:47 reduced equation, I see I have in my notes. 79 00:05:45 --> 00:05:51 Okay, good, the solution to the reduced equation, 80 00:05:48 --> 00:05:54 too. Okay, now, the examples, 81 00:05:50 --> 00:05:56 there are, of course, two classical examples, 82 00:05:53 --> 00:05:59 of which you know one. But, use them as the model for 83 00:05:57 --> 00:06:03 what solutions of these things should look like and how they 84 00:06:02 --> 00:06:08 should behave. So, the model you know already 85 00:06:06 --> 00:06:12 is the one, I won't make the leading coefficient one because 86 00:06:11 --> 00:06:17 it usually isn't, is the one, m x double prime, 87 00:06:15 --> 00:06:21 so t is the independent variable, 88 00:06:18 --> 00:06:24 plus b x prime plus k x equals f of t. 89 00:06:23 --> 00:06:29 That's the spring-mass system, 90 00:06:26 --> 00:06:32 the spring-mass-dashpot system. Mass, the damping constant and 91 00:06:32 --> 00:06:38 the spring constant, except up to now, 92 00:06:35 --> 00:06:41 it's always been zero here. What does this f of t 93 00:06:40 --> 00:06:46 represent? Well, if you think of the way 94 00:06:43 --> 00:06:49 in which I derived the equation, the mx, that was the Newton's 95 00:06:49 --> 00:06:55 law. That's the acceleration. 96 00:06:51 --> 00:06:57 So, it's the acceleration, the mass times the 97 00:06:55 --> 00:07:01 acceleration. By Newton's law, 98 00:06:57 --> 00:07:03 this is equal to the imposed force on the little mass truck. 99 00:07:04 --> 00:07:10 Okay, you got that truck, there. 100 00:07:06 --> 00:07:12 I'm not going to draw the truck for the nth time. 101 00:07:09 --> 00:07:15 You'll have to imagine it. So, here's our truck. 102 00:07:13 --> 00:07:19 Okay, forces are acting on it. Remember, the forces were 103 00:07:17 --> 00:07:23 minus kx. That came from the spring. 104 00:07:20 --> 00:07:26 There was a force, minus b x prime. 105 00:07:23 --> 00:07:29 That came from the dashpot, the damping force. 106 00:07:26 --> 00:07:32 So, this other guy is f of t. 107 00:07:30 --> 00:07:36 What's this? This is the external force, 108 00:07:32 --> 00:07:38 which is acting out. In other words, 109 00:07:34 --> 00:07:40 instead of the little truck going back and forth and doing 110 00:07:38 --> 00:07:44 its own thing all by itself, here's someone with an 111 00:07:41 --> 00:07:47 electromagnet, and the mass it's carrying is a 112 00:07:44 --> 00:07:50 big pile of iron ore. You're turning it on and off, 113 00:07:47 --> 00:07:53 and pulling that thing from afar where nobody can see it. 114 00:07:51 --> 00:07:57 So, this is the external force. Now, think, that is the model 115 00:07:55 --> 00:08:01 you must have in your mind of how these equations are treated. 116 00:08:00 --> 00:08:06 In other words, when f of t is zero, 117 00:08:03 --> 00:08:09 the system is passive. There is no external force on 118 00:08:07 --> 00:08:13 it when this is zero. The system is sitting, 119 00:08:10 --> 00:08:16 and just doing what it wants to do, all by itself. 120 00:08:14 --> 00:08:20 You wanted up by giving it an initial push, 121 00:08:17 --> 00:08:23 and putting its initial position somewhere. 122 00:08:20 --> 00:08:26 But after that, you lay your hands off. 123 00:08:23 --> 00:08:29 The system then just passively responds to its initial 124 00:08:27 --> 00:08:33 conditions and does what it wants. 125 00:08:31 --> 00:08:37 The other model is that you don't let it respond the way it 126 00:08:35 --> 00:08:41 wants to. You force it from the outside 127 00:08:37 --> 00:08:43 by pushing it with an external force. 128 00:08:40 --> 00:08:46 Now, those are clearly two entirely different problems: 129 00:08:44 --> 00:08:50 what it does by itself, or what it does when it's acted 130 00:08:48 --> 00:08:54 on from outside. And, when I explained to you 131 00:08:51 --> 00:08:57 how the thing is to be solved, you have to keep in mind those 132 00:08:55 --> 00:09:01 two models. So, this is the forced system. 133 00:09:00 --> 00:09:06 I'll just use the word, forced system, 134 00:09:02 --> 00:09:08 that's where f of t is not zero, versus the passive 135 00:09:07 --> 00:09:13 system where there is no external applied force. 136 00:09:11 --> 00:09:17 The passive system, the forced system, 137 00:09:14 --> 00:09:20 now, you have to both, even if you wanted to solve the 138 00:09:18 --> 00:09:24 forced system, the way the system would behave 139 00:09:22 --> 00:09:28 if nothing would be done to it from the outside is nonetheless 140 00:09:27 --> 00:09:33 going to be an important part of the solution. 141 00:09:32 --> 00:09:38 And, I won't be able to give you that solution without 142 00:09:35 --> 00:09:41 knowing this also. Now, I'd like to give you the 143 00:09:38 --> 00:09:44 other model very rapidly because it's in your book. 144 00:09:42 --> 00:09:48 It's in the problems I have to give you. 145 00:09:45 --> 00:09:51 You know, it's part of everybody's culture, 146 00:09:48 --> 00:09:54 whether they like it or not. So, that's example number one. 147 00:09:52 --> 00:09:58 Example number two, which follows the differential 148 00:09:55 --> 00:10:01 equation just as perfectly as the spring-mass-dashpot system 149 00:09:59 --> 00:10:05 is the simple electric circuit. The inductance, 150 00:10:04 --> 00:10:10 you don't know yet what an inductance is, 151 00:10:08 --> 00:10:14 officially, but you will, a resistance, 152 00:10:11 --> 00:10:17 sorry, that's okay, put the capacitance up there, 153 00:10:15 --> 00:10:21 resistance, and then maybe a thing. 154 00:10:18 --> 00:10:24 So, this is a resistance. I think you know these symbols. 155 00:10:24 --> 00:10:30 By now, you certainly know the system for capacitance. 156 00:10:28 --> 00:10:34 What I mean when I say C is the capacitance, you may not know 157 00:10:34 --> 00:10:40 yet what L is. That's called the inductance. 158 00:10:39 --> 00:10:45 So, this is something called a coil because it looks like one. 159 00:10:43 --> 00:10:49 L is what's called its inductance. 160 00:10:45 --> 00:10:51 And, the differential equation, there are two differential 161 00:10:50 --> 00:10:56 equations which can be used in this. 162 00:10:52 --> 00:10:58 They are essentially the same. One is simply the derivative of 163 00:10:56 --> 00:11:02 the other. Both differential equations 164 00:10:59 --> 00:11:05 come from Kirchhoff's voltage law, that the sum of the voltage 165 00:11:04 --> 00:11:10 drops as you move around the circuit -- 166 00:11:08 --> 00:11:14 -- has to be zero because otherwise, I don't have to, 167 00:11:11 --> 00:11:17 that's because of somebody's law, Kirchhoff, 168 00:11:14 --> 00:11:20 with two h's. The sum of the voltage drops to 169 00:11:17 --> 00:11:23 zero, and now you know the voltage drop across this, 170 00:11:21 --> 00:11:27 and you know the voltage drop across that because you learned 171 00:11:25 --> 00:11:31 in 8.02. You will, one day, 172 00:11:27 --> 00:11:33 learn the voltage drop across this. 173 00:11:29 --> 00:11:35 But, I already know it. It's Li. 174 00:11:32 --> 00:11:38 So, i is the current. I'll write this thing in its 175 00:11:37 --> 00:11:43 primitive form first. So, i is the current that's 176 00:11:42 --> 00:11:48 flowing in the circuit. q is the charge on the 177 00:11:47 --> 00:11:53 capacitance. So, the voltage drop across the 178 00:11:51 --> 00:11:57 coil is L times i. The voltage shop across the, 179 00:11:57 --> 00:12:03 Li prime, the voltage drop across the 180 00:12:02 --> 00:12:08 resistance is, well, you know that. 181 00:12:07 --> 00:12:13 And, the voltage shop across the capacitance is q 182 00:12:10 --> 00:12:16 divided by C. And so, that's equal to, 183 00:12:13 --> 00:12:19 well, it's equal to zero, except if there's a battery 184 00:12:16 --> 00:12:22 here or something generating a voltage drop, 185 00:12:19 --> 00:12:25 so, let's call that E is a generic word. 186 00:12:21 --> 00:12:27 E could be a battery. It could be a source of 187 00:12:24 --> 00:12:30 alternating current, something like that. 188 00:12:27 --> 00:12:33 But, there's a voltage drop across it, and I'm giving E the 189 00:12:31 --> 00:12:37 name of the voltage drop. So, and then there's the 190 00:12:35 --> 00:12:41 question of the signs, which I know I'll never 191 00:12:38 --> 00:12:44 understand. But, let's assume you've chosen 192 00:12:41 --> 00:12:47 the sign convention so that this comes out nicely on the 193 00:12:44 --> 00:12:50 right-hand side. So, this might be varying 194 00:12:47 --> 00:12:53 sinusoidally, in which case you'd have source 195 00:12:50 --> 00:12:56 of alternating current. Or, it might be constant, 196 00:12:53 --> 00:12:59 in which that would be a battery, a little dry cell 197 00:12:56 --> 00:13:02 giving you direct current of a constant voltage, 198 00:12:59 --> 00:13:05 stuff like that. So, you could make this minus 199 00:13:03 --> 00:13:09 if you want, but everything will have the wrong signs, 200 00:13:07 --> 00:13:13 so don't do it. Now, this doesn't look like 201 00:13:09 --> 00:13:15 what it's supposed to look like because it's got q and i. 202 00:13:13 --> 00:13:19 So, the final thing you have to know is that q prime is 203 00:13:17 --> 00:13:23 equal to i. The rate at which that charge 204 00:13:19 --> 00:13:25 leaves the condenser and hurries around the circuit to find its 205 00:13:23 --> 00:13:29 little soul mate on the other side is the current that's 206 00:13:27 --> 00:13:33 flowing in the circuit. That's why current flows, 207 00:13:30 --> 00:13:36 except nothing really happens. Electrons just push on each 208 00:13:35 --> 00:13:41 other, and they stay where they are. 209 00:13:37 --> 00:13:43 I don't understand this at all. So, if I differentiate this, 210 00:13:42 --> 00:13:48 you can do two things. Either you could integrate i, 211 00:13:46 --> 00:13:52 and expressed the thing entirely in terms of q, 212 00:13:50 --> 00:13:56 or you can differentiate it, and express everything in terms 213 00:13:54 --> 00:14:00 of i. Your book does nicely both, 214 00:13:57 --> 00:14:03 does not take sides. So, let's differentiate it, 215 00:14:02 --> 00:14:08 and then it will look like L i double prime plus R i prime plus 216 00:14:06 --> 00:14:12 i divided by C equals, 217 00:14:09 --> 00:14:15 and now, watch out, you have now not the 218 00:14:12 --> 00:14:18 electromotive force, but its derivative. 219 00:14:15 --> 00:14:21 So, if you were so unfortunate as to put a little dry cell 220 00:14:19 --> 00:14:25 there, now you've got nothing, and you've got the homogeneous 221 00:14:24 --> 00:14:30 case. That's okay. 222 00:14:25 --> 00:14:31 Where are the erasers? One eraser? 223 00:14:28 --> 00:14:34 I don't believe this. 224 00:14:31 --> 00:14:37 225 00:14:43 --> 00:14:49 So, there's the equation. There are our two equations. 226 00:14:47 --> 00:14:53 Why don't we put them up in colored chalk. 227 00:14:50 --> 00:14:56 There's the spring equation. And, here's the equation that 228 00:14:54 --> 00:15:00 governs the current, for how the current flows in 229 00:14:58 --> 00:15:04 that circuit. And now, you can see, 230 00:15:01 --> 00:15:07 again, what does it mean? If this is zero, 231 00:15:04 --> 00:15:10 for example, if I have a dry cell there, 232 00:15:07 --> 00:15:13 or if I have nothing at all in the circuit, then this 233 00:15:11 --> 00:15:17 represents the passive circuit. It's just sitting there. 234 00:15:16 --> 00:15:22 It wouldn't do anything at all, except that you've put a charge 235 00:15:20 --> 00:15:26 on the capacitor, and waited, and of course, 236 00:15:22 --> 00:15:28 when you put a charge on there, it's got a discharge, 237 00:15:26 --> 00:15:32 and discharges through the circuit, and swings back and 238 00:15:29 --> 00:15:35 forth a little bit if it's under-damped until finally 239 00:15:32 --> 00:15:38 towards the end the current dies away to zero. 240 00:15:36 --> 00:15:42 But, what usually happens is that you drive this passive 241 00:15:39 --> 00:15:45 circuit by putting an effective E in it, and then you want to 242 00:15:44 --> 00:15:50 know how the current behaves. So, those are the two problems, 243 00:15:48 --> 00:15:54 the passive circuit without an applied electromotive force, 244 00:15:52 --> 00:15:58 or plugging it into the wall, and wanting it to do things. 245 00:15:56 --> 00:16:02 That's the normal state of affairs. 246 00:16:00 --> 00:16:06 People don't want passive circuits, they want circuits 247 00:16:03 --> 00:16:09 which do things because, okay, that's why they want to 248 00:16:07 --> 00:16:13 solve inhomogeneous equations instead of homogeneous 249 00:16:11 --> 00:16:17 equations. But as I said, 250 00:16:13 --> 00:16:19 you have to do the homogeneous case first. 251 00:16:16 --> 00:16:22 Okay, you are now officially responsible for this, 252 00:16:20 --> 00:16:26 and I don't care that you haven't had it in physics yet. 253 00:16:24 --> 00:16:30 You will before the next exam. So, I don't even feel guilty. 254 00:16:30 --> 00:16:36 But, you're going to start using it on the problem set 255 00:16:34 --> 00:16:40 right away. So, it's never too soon to 256 00:16:37 --> 00:16:43 start learning it. Okay, now, the main theorem, 257 00:16:41 --> 00:16:47 I now want to go, so that was just examples to 258 00:16:44 --> 00:16:50 give you some physical feeling for the sorts of differential 259 00:16:49 --> 00:16:55 equations we'll be talking about. 260 00:16:52 --> 00:16:58 I now want to tell you briefly about the key theorem about 261 00:16:56 --> 00:17:02 solving the homogeneous equation. 262 00:16:59 --> 00:17:05 So, the main theorem about solving the homogeneous equation 263 00:17:04 --> 00:17:10 is, the inhomogeneous equation. So, I'm going to write the 264 00:17:09 --> 00:17:15 inhomogeneous equation out. I'm going to make the left-hand 265 00:17:14 --> 00:17:20 side a linear operator, and am going to write the 266 00:17:18 --> 00:17:24 equation as Ly equals f of x. 267 00:17:21 --> 00:17:27 That's the inhomogeneous equation. 268 00:17:23 --> 00:17:29 So, L is the linear operator, second order because I'm only 269 00:17:28 --> 00:17:34 talking about second-order equations. 270 00:17:32 --> 00:17:38 L is a linear operator, and then this is the 271 00:17:37 --> 00:17:43 differential equation. So, here's our differential 272 00:17:43 --> 00:17:49 equation. It's inhomogeneous because it's 273 00:17:48 --> 00:17:54 go the f of x on the right hand side. 274 00:17:53 --> 00:17:59 And, what the theorem says is that the solution has the 275 00:18:00 --> 00:18:06 following form, y sub p, I'll explain what that 276 00:18:05 --> 00:18:11 is in just a moment, plus y sub c. 277 00:18:13 --> 00:18:19 So, the hypothesis is we've got the linear equation, 278 00:18:17 --> 00:18:23 and the conclusion is that that's what its solution looks 279 00:18:21 --> 00:18:27 like. Now, you already know what y 280 00:18:24 --> 00:18:30 sub c looks like. In other words, 281 00:18:27 --> 00:18:33 if I write this out in more detail, it would be i.e., 282 00:18:31 --> 00:18:37 department of fuller explanation, -- 283 00:18:35 --> 00:18:41 -- the general solution looks like y equals yp, 284 00:18:38 --> 00:18:44 and then this thing is going to look like an arbitrary constant 285 00:18:43 --> 00:18:49 times y1 plus an arbitrary constant times y2, 286 00:18:47 --> 00:18:53 where these are solutions of the homogeneous equation. 287 00:18:51 --> 00:18:57 So, Yc looks like this part, and the yp, what's yp? 288 00:18:55 --> 00:19:01 p stands for particular, the most confusing word in this 289 00:19:00 --> 00:19:06 subject. But, you've got at least four 290 00:19:04 --> 00:19:10 weeks to learn what it means. Okay, yp is a particular 291 00:19:10 --> 00:19:16 solution to Ly equals f of x. 292 00:19:14 --> 00:19:20 Now, I'm not going to explain what particular means. 293 00:19:19 --> 00:19:25 First, I'll chat as if you knew what it meant, 294 00:19:24 --> 00:19:30 and then we'll see if you have picked it up. 295 00:19:30 --> 00:19:36 In other words, the procedure for solving this 296 00:19:33 --> 00:19:39 equation is composed of two steps. 297 00:19:36 --> 00:19:42 First, to find this part. In other words, 298 00:19:40 --> 00:19:46 to find the complementary solution, in other words, 299 00:19:44 --> 00:19:50 to do what we've been doing for the last week, 300 00:19:48 --> 00:19:54 solve not the equation you are given, but the reduced equation. 301 00:19:53 --> 00:19:59 So, the first step is to find this. 302 00:19:56 --> 00:20:02 The second step is to find yp. Now, what's yp? 303 00:20:01 --> 00:20:07 yp is a particular solution to the whole equation. 304 00:20:05 --> 00:20:11 Yeah, but which one? Well, if it's any one, 305 00:20:09 --> 00:20:15 then it's not a particular solution, yeah. 306 00:20:12 --> 00:20:18 I say, unfortunately the word particular here is not being 307 00:20:17 --> 00:20:23 used in exactly the same sense in which most people use it in 308 00:20:22 --> 00:20:28 ordinary English. It's a perfectly valid way to 309 00:20:26 --> 00:20:32 use it. It's just confusing, 310 00:20:29 --> 00:20:35 and no one has ever come up with a better word. 311 00:20:33 --> 00:20:39 So, particular means any one solution. 312 00:20:38 --> 00:20:44 Any one will do. Okay, even these have slightly 313 00:20:45 --> 00:20:51 different meanings. Any questions about this? 314 00:20:51 --> 00:20:57 I refuse to answer them. [LAUGHTER] 315 00:20:58 --> 00:21:04 Now, well, examples of course will make it all clear. 316 00:21:03 --> 00:21:09 But I'd like, first, to prove the theorem, 317 00:21:08 --> 00:21:14 to show you how simple it is. It's extremely simple if you 318 00:21:15 --> 00:21:21 just use the fact that L is a linear operator. 319 00:21:20 --> 00:21:26 We've got two things to prove. What have we got to prove? 320 00:21:26 --> 00:21:32 Well, I have to prove two statements, first of all, 321 00:21:32 --> 00:21:38 that all the yp plus c1 y1 plus c2 y2 are 322 00:21:39 --> 00:21:45 solutions. How are we going to prove that? 323 00:21:43 --> 00:21:49 Well, how do you know if something is a solution? 324 00:21:46 --> 00:21:52 Well, you plug it into the equation, and you see if it 325 00:21:49 --> 00:21:55 satisfies the equation. Good, let's do it, 326 00:21:52 --> 00:21:58 proof. L, I'm going to plug it into 327 00:21:54 --> 00:22:00 the equation. That means I calculate L of yp 328 00:21:56 --> 00:22:02 plus c1 y1 plus c2 y2. 329 00:22:00 --> 00:22:06 Now, what's the answer? Because this is a linear 330 00:22:04 --> 00:22:10 operator, and notice, the argument doesn't use the 331 00:22:08 --> 00:22:14 fact that the equation is second order. 332 00:22:12 --> 00:22:18 It immediately generalizes to a linear equation of any order, 333 00:22:17 --> 00:22:23 whatever-- 47. Okay, this is L of yp plus L of 334 00:22:21 --> 00:22:27 c1 y1 plus c2 y2. 335 00:22:25 --> 00:22:31 Well, what's that? What's L of the complementary 336 00:22:29 --> 00:22:35 solution? What does it mean to be the 337 00:22:34 --> 00:22:40 complementary solution? It means when you apply the 338 00:22:37 --> 00:22:43 operator L to it, you get zero because this 339 00:22:40 --> 00:22:46 satisfies the homogeneous equation. 340 00:22:43 --> 00:22:49 So, this is zero. What's L of yp? 341 00:22:46 --> 00:22:52 Well, it was a particular solution to the equation. 342 00:22:50 --> 00:22:56 Therefore, when I plugged it into the equation, 343 00:22:53 --> 00:22:59 I must have gotten out on the right-hand side, 344 00:22:57 --> 00:23:03 f of x. So, this is since yp is a 345 00:23:00 --> 00:23:06 solution to the whole equation. So, what's the conclusion? 346 00:23:06 --> 00:23:12 That, if I take any one of these guys, no matter what c1 347 00:23:10 --> 00:23:16 and c2 are, apply the linear operator, L to it, 348 00:23:13 --> 00:23:19 the answer comes out to be f of. 349 00:23:17 --> 00:23:23 Therefore, this proves that this shows that these are all 350 00:23:21 --> 00:23:27 solutions because that's what it means. 351 00:23:24 --> 00:23:30 Therefore, they satisfy L of y equals f of x. 352 00:23:30 --> 00:23:36 They satisfy the whole inhomogeneous differential 353 00:23:34 --> 00:23:40 equation, and that's it. Well, that's only half the 354 00:23:38 --> 00:23:44 story. The other half of the story is 355 00:23:41 --> 00:23:47 to show that there are no other solutions. 356 00:23:45 --> 00:23:51 Okay, so we got our little u of x coming up again, 357 00:23:50 --> 00:23:56 and he thinks he's a solution. Okay, so, to prove there are no 358 00:23:55 --> 00:24:01 other solutions, it almost sounds biblical, 359 00:23:59 --> 00:24:05 thou shalt have no other solutions before me, 360 00:24:03 --> 00:24:09 okay. There are no other solutions 361 00:24:07 --> 00:24:13 accept these guys for different values of c1 and c2. 362 00:24:10 --> 00:24:16 Okay, so, u of x is a solution. 363 00:24:13 --> 00:24:19 I have to show that u of x is one of these guys. 364 00:24:16 --> 00:24:22 How am I going to do that? Easy. 365 00:24:19 --> 00:24:25 If it's a solution that, L of u, 366 00:24:21 --> 00:24:27 okay, I'm going to drop the x, okay, just to make the, 367 00:24:25 --> 00:24:31 like I dropped the x over there. 368 00:24:29 --> 00:24:35 If it's a solution to the whole inhomogeneous equation, 369 00:24:33 --> 00:24:39 then this must come out to be f of x. 370 00:24:37 --> 00:24:43 Now, what's L of yp? That's f of x too, 371 00:24:41 --> 00:24:47 by secret little particular solution I've got in my pocket. 372 00:24:47 --> 00:24:53 Okay, I pull it out, ah-ha, L of yp, 373 00:24:50 --> 00:24:56 that's f of x, too. 374 00:24:51 --> 00:24:57 Now, I'm going to not add them. I'm going to subtract them. 375 00:24:56 --> 00:25:02 What is L of u minus yp? 376 00:25:00 --> 00:25:06 Well, it's zero. It's zero because this is a 377 00:25:05 --> 00:25:11 linear operator. This would be L of u minus L of 378 00:25:08 --> 00:25:14 yp. I guess the answer is zero on 379 00:25:12 --> 00:25:18 the right-hand side. And therefore, 380 00:25:14 --> 00:25:20 what is the conclusion? If that's zero, 381 00:25:17 --> 00:25:23 it must be a solution to the homogeneous equation. 382 00:25:21 --> 00:25:27 Therefore, u minus yp is equal to, 383 00:25:24 --> 00:25:30 there must be c1 and c2. I won't give them the generic 384 00:25:28 --> 00:25:34 names. I'll give them a name, 385 00:25:30 --> 00:25:36 a particular one. I'll put a tilde to indicate 386 00:25:34 --> 00:25:40 it's a particular one. c1 plus c2 y2 tilde, 387 00:25:37 --> 00:25:43 so, in other words, for some choice of these 388 00:25:41 --> 00:25:47 constants, and I'll call those particular choices c1 tilde and 389 00:25:45 --> 00:25:51 c2 tilde, it must be that these are equal. 390 00:25:48 --> 00:25:54 Well, what does that say? It says that u is equal to yp 391 00:25:52 --> 00:25:58 plus c1 tilde, blah, blah, blah, 392 00:25:54 --> 00:26:00 blah, plus c2 tilde, blah, blah, blah, 393 00:25:57 --> 00:26:03 blah, and therefore chose that u wasn't a new solution. 394 00:26:02 --> 00:26:08 It was one of these. So, u isn't new. 395 00:26:08 --> 00:26:14 So, I should write it down. Otherwise some of you will have 396 00:26:18 --> 00:26:24 missed the punch line. Okay, therefore, 397 00:26:25 --> 00:26:31 u is equal to yp plus c1 tilde y1 plus c2 tilde y2. 398 00:26:36 --> 00:26:42 And, it shows. This guy who thought he was new 399 00:26:39 --> 00:26:45 was not new at all. It was just one of the other 400 00:26:43 --> 00:26:49 solutions. Okay, well, now, 401 00:26:45 --> 00:26:51 since the coefficient's a constant, apparently we've done 402 00:26:49 --> 00:26:55 half the work. We know what the complementary 403 00:26:52 --> 00:26:58 solution is because you know how to do those in terms of 404 00:26:56 --> 00:27:02 exponentials and complex exponentials, 405 00:26:59 --> 00:27:05 signs and cosines, and so on. 406 00:27:03 --> 00:27:09 So, what's left to do? All we have to do is find to 407 00:27:07 --> 00:27:13 solve equations, which are inhomogeneous. 408 00:27:10 --> 00:27:16 All we have to do is find a particular solution, 409 00:27:14 --> 00:27:20 find one solution. It doesn't matter which one, 410 00:27:18 --> 00:27:24 any one. Just find one, 411 00:27:20 --> 00:27:26 okay? Now, we're going to spend the 412 00:27:23 --> 00:27:29 next two weeks trying to do this. 413 00:27:26 --> 00:27:32 I'll give you various methods. I'll give you a general method 414 00:27:32 --> 00:27:38 involving Fourier series because it's a good excuse for learning 415 00:27:37 --> 00:27:43 what Fourier series are. But, the answer is that in 416 00:27:41 --> 00:27:47 general, for a few standard functions, it's known how to do 417 00:27:45 --> 00:27:51 this. You will learn those methods 418 00:27:48 --> 00:27:54 for finding those using operators. 419 00:27:50 --> 00:27:56 For all the others, it's done by a series, 420 00:27:54 --> 00:28:00 or a method involving approximation. 421 00:27:58 --> 00:28:04 Or, the worse comes to worst, you throw it on a computer and 422 00:28:02 --> 00:28:08 just take a graph and the numerical output of answers as 423 00:28:07 --> 00:28:13 the particular solution. Okay, now before, 424 00:28:10 --> 00:28:16 we are going to start that work, not today. 425 00:28:14 --> 00:28:20 We'll start it next Monday, and it will last, 426 00:28:18 --> 00:28:24 as I say the next two weeks. And, we will be up to spring 427 00:28:22 --> 00:28:28 break. But, before we do that, 428 00:28:25 --> 00:28:31 I'd like to relate this to what we did for first order equations 429 00:28:30 --> 00:28:36 because there is something to be learned from that. 430 00:28:36 --> 00:28:42 Think back to the linear first-order equation, 431 00:28:38 --> 00:28:44 and I'm going to, since from now on for the rest 432 00:28:41 --> 00:28:47 of the period, I'm going to be considering the 433 00:28:44 --> 00:28:50 case for constant coefficients. In other words, 434 00:28:47 --> 00:28:53 this case of springs or circuits or simple systems which 435 00:28:51 --> 00:28:57 behave like those and have constant coefficients. 436 00:28:54 --> 00:29:00 So, for the linear, first-order equation, 437 00:28:56 --> 00:29:02 there, too, I'm going to think of constant coefficients. 438 00:29:01 --> 00:29:07 We talked quite a bit about this equation. 439 00:29:04 --> 00:29:10 What did I call the right-hand side? 440 00:29:06 --> 00:29:12 I think we usually called it q of t, 441 00:29:09 --> 00:29:15 right? This is in ancient history. 442 00:29:12 --> 00:29:18 The definition of ancient history was before the first 443 00:29:16 --> 00:29:22 exam. Okay, now how does that fit 444 00:29:18 --> 00:29:24 into this theorem that I've given you? 445 00:29:21 --> 00:29:27 Remember what the solution looked like. 446 00:29:25 --> 00:29:31 The solution looked like, remember, you took the 447 00:29:28 --> 00:29:34 integrating factor was e to the kt, 448 00:29:32 --> 00:29:38 and then after you integrated both sides, multiplied through, 449 00:29:37 --> 00:29:43 and then the final answer looked like this, 450 00:29:41 --> 00:29:47 y equaled, it was e to the negative kt times 451 00:29:45 --> 00:29:51 either an indefinite integral, or a definite integral 452 00:29:50 --> 00:29:56 depending on your preference, q of t, 453 00:29:54 --> 00:30:00 so, x is metamorphosed into t. I gather you've got that, 454 00:29:58 --> 00:30:04 e to the kt plus, what was the other term? 455 00:30:02 --> 00:30:08 A constant times e to the negative kt 456 00:30:08 --> 00:30:14 How does this fit into the paradigm I've given you over 457 00:30:12 --> 00:30:18 there for solving the second order equation? 458 00:30:15 --> 00:30:21 Which term is which? Well, this has the arbitrary 459 00:30:19 --> 00:30:25 constant in it. So, this must be the 460 00:30:22 --> 00:30:28 complementary solution. Is it? 461 00:30:24 --> 00:30:30 Is this the solution to the associated homogeneous equation? 462 00:30:30 --> 00:30:36 What's the associated homogeneous equation? 463 00:30:32 --> 00:30:38 Put zero here. Okay, if you put zero there, 464 00:30:35 --> 00:30:41 what's the solution? Now, this you ought to know. 465 00:30:38 --> 00:30:44 y prime equals negative ky. 466 00:30:40 --> 00:30:46 What's the solution? e to the negative kt. 467 00:30:43 --> 00:30:49 You are supposed to come into 468 00:30:46 --> 00:30:52 this course knowing that, except there's an arbitrary 469 00:30:49 --> 00:30:55 constant in front. So, right, this is exactly the 470 00:30:52 --> 00:30:58 solution to the associated homogeneous equation, 471 00:30:55 --> 00:31:01 where there is zero here. Then, what's this thing? 472 00:31:00 --> 00:31:06 This is a particular solution. This is my yp. 473 00:31:02 --> 00:31:08 But that's not a particular solution because this indefinite 474 00:31:06 --> 00:31:12 integral, you know, has an arbitrary constant in 475 00:31:09 --> 00:31:15 it. In fact, it's just that 476 00:31:10 --> 00:31:16 arbitrary constant. So, it's totally confusing. 477 00:31:13 --> 00:31:19 But, this symbol, you know when you actually 478 00:31:16 --> 00:31:22 solve the equation this way, all you did was you found one 479 00:31:20 --> 00:31:26 function here. You didn't throw in the 480 00:31:22 --> 00:31:28 arbitrary constant right away. All you needed to do was find 481 00:31:26 --> 00:31:32 one function. And, even if you really are 482 00:31:29 --> 00:31:35 bothered by the fact that this is so indefinite, 483 00:31:32 --> 00:31:38 and therefore, make it a particular solution 484 00:31:35 --> 00:31:41 by making this zero, make it a definite integral, 485 00:31:38 --> 00:31:44 zero, here, t there, and then change those t's to 486 00:31:42 --> 00:31:48 dummy t's, t1's or t tildes, or something like that. 487 00:31:45 --> 00:31:51 So, this fits into that thing. In other words, 488 00:31:48 --> 00:31:54 I could have done it at that time, but I didn't the point 489 00:31:52 --> 00:31:58 because this can be solved directly, whereas, 490 00:31:55 --> 00:32:01 of course, the general second order equation in homogeneous 491 00:31:58 --> 00:32:04 cannot be solved directly, and therefore you have to be 492 00:32:02 --> 00:32:08 willing to talk about what its solutions look like in advance. 493 00:32:08 --> 00:32:14 Now, remember I said, we talked, I said there was two 494 00:32:12 --> 00:32:18 different cases, although both of them had the 495 00:32:15 --> 00:32:21 identical looking solution. Their meaning in the physical 496 00:32:19 --> 00:32:25 world was so different that they really should be considered as 497 00:32:24 --> 00:32:30 solving the same equation. And, one of these was the case. 498 00:32:30 --> 00:32:36 Of the two, perhaps the more important was the case when k 499 00:32:34 --> 00:32:40 was positive, and of course the other is when 500 00:32:38 --> 00:32:44 k is negative. When k is positive, 501 00:32:41 --> 00:32:47 that had the effect of separating that solution into 502 00:32:45 --> 00:32:51 this part, which was a transient, and the other part, 503 00:32:49 --> 00:32:55 which was a steady state. The steady state solution, 504 00:32:53 --> 00:32:59 that was the yp part of it in that terminology. 505 00:32:57 --> 00:33:03 And, the transient part, it was trangent because it went 506 00:33:02 --> 00:33:08 to zero. If k is positive, 507 00:33:05 --> 00:33:11 the exponential dies regardless of what c is. 508 00:33:09 --> 00:33:15 So, the transient, that's the yc part. 509 00:33:12 --> 00:33:18 It goes to zero as Ttgoes to infinity. 510 00:33:16 --> 00:33:22 The transient depends on, uses, the initial condition, 511 00:33:21 --> 00:33:27 whatever it is, because that's what determines 512 00:33:25 --> 00:33:31 the value of c. On the other hand, 513 00:33:28 --> 00:33:34 this initial condition makes no difference as t goes towards 514 00:33:33 --> 00:33:39 infinity. All that's left is this steady 515 00:33:38 --> 00:33:44 state solution. And, all solutions tend to the 516 00:33:42 --> 00:33:48 steady state solution. So, if k is positive, 517 00:33:46 --> 00:33:52 one gets this analysis of the solutions into the sum of one 518 00:33:52 --> 00:33:58 basic solution, and the others, 519 00:33:55 --> 00:34:01 which just die away, have no influence on this, 520 00:33:59 --> 00:34:05 less and less influence as time goes to infinity. 521 00:34:05 --> 00:34:11 For k less than zero, this analysis does not work 522 00:34:09 --> 00:34:15 because this term, if k is less than zero, 523 00:34:12 --> 00:34:18 this term goes to infinity or negative infinity, 524 00:34:16 --> 00:34:22 and typically tends to dominate that. 525 00:34:19 --> 00:34:25 So, it's the start that the important one. 526 00:34:23 --> 00:34:29 It depends on the initial conditions, and the analysis is 527 00:34:28 --> 00:34:34 meaningless. So, the above is meaningless. 528 00:34:33 --> 00:34:39 And now, what I'd like to do is try to see what the analog of 529 00:34:39 --> 00:34:45 that is for second order equations, and higher order 530 00:34:45 --> 00:34:51 equations. If you understand second-order, 531 00:34:49 --> 00:34:55 that's good enough. Higher order goes exactly the 532 00:34:54 --> 00:35:00 same way. So, the question is, 533 00:34:58 --> 00:35:04 for second-order, let's make it with constant 534 00:35:02 --> 00:35:08 coefficients plus, I could call it b and k, 535 00:35:07 --> 00:35:13 oh, no, b k, or p. 536 00:35:11 --> 00:35:17 The trouble is, that wouldn't take care of the 537 00:35:14 --> 00:35:20 electrical circuits. So, I just want to use neutral 538 00:35:17 --> 00:35:23 letters, which suggest nothing. And, you can make them turn it 539 00:35:22 --> 00:35:28 into a circuit, so springs, or yet other 540 00:35:25 --> 00:35:31 examples undreamt of. But these are constants. 541 00:35:28 --> 00:35:34 And I'm going to think of it as time. 542 00:35:32 --> 00:35:38 I think I'll switch back to time, let x be the time. 543 00:35:37 --> 00:35:43 So, B y equals f of t. So, there is our equation. 544 00:35:43 --> 00:35:49 A and B are constants. And, the question is, 545 00:35:47 --> 00:35:53 the question I'm asking, can think of either of these 546 00:35:53 --> 00:35:59 two models or others, the question I'm asking is, 547 00:35:58 --> 00:36:04 under what circumstances can I make that same type of analysis 548 00:36:04 --> 00:36:10 into steady-state and transient? Well, what does the solution 549 00:36:11 --> 00:36:17 look like? The solution looks like y 550 00:36:15 --> 00:36:21 equals a particular solution plus c1 y1 plus c2 y2. 551 00:36:20 --> 00:36:26 Therefore, to make that look 552 00:36:24 --> 00:36:30 like this, the c1 and c2 contain the initial conditions. 553 00:36:31 --> 00:36:37 This part does not. Therefore, if I want to say 554 00:36:35 --> 00:36:41 that the solutions look like a steady state solution plus 555 00:36:41 --> 00:36:47 something that dies away, which becomes less and less 556 00:36:47 --> 00:36:53 important as time goes on, what I'm really asking is, 557 00:36:52 --> 00:36:58 under what circumstances is this part guaranteed to go to 558 00:36:58 --> 00:37:04 zero? So, the question is, 559 00:37:01 --> 00:37:07 when, in other words, under what conditions on the 560 00:37:06 --> 00:37:12 equation A and B, in effect, is what we are 561 00:37:10 --> 00:37:16 asking. When does c1 y1 plus c2 y2 go 562 00:37:14 --> 00:37:20 to zero as t goes to infinity, 563 00:37:19 --> 00:37:25 regardless of what c1 and c2 are for all c1 c2. 564 00:37:25 --> 00:37:31 Now, here there was no difficulty. 565 00:37:30 --> 00:37:36 We had the thing very explicitly, and you could see k 566 00:37:34 --> 00:37:40 is positive: this goes to zero. And if k is negative, 567 00:37:38 --> 00:37:44 it doesn't go to zero. It goes to infinity. 568 00:37:41 --> 00:37:47 Here, I want to make the same kind of analysis, 569 00:37:44 --> 00:37:50 except it's just going to take, it's a little more trouble. 570 00:37:49 --> 00:37:55 But the answer, when it finally comes out is 571 00:37:52 --> 00:37:58 very beautiful. So, when are all these guys 572 00:37:55 --> 00:38:01 going to go to zero? First of all, 573 00:37:58 --> 00:38:04 you might as well just have the definition. 574 00:38:01 --> 00:38:07 So, all the good things that this is going to imply, 575 00:38:05 --> 00:38:11 if this is so, in other words, 576 00:38:07 --> 00:38:13 if they all go to zero, everything in the complementary 577 00:38:12 --> 00:38:18 solution, then the ODE is called stable. 578 00:38:17 --> 00:38:23 Some people call it asymptotically stable. 579 00:38:21 --> 00:38:27 I don't know what to call it. I can make the analysis, 580 00:38:28 --> 00:38:34 and then I use the identical terminology, c1 y1 plus c2 y2. 581 00:38:36 --> 00:38:42 This is called the transient because it goes to zero. 582 00:38:40 --> 00:38:46 This is called the particular solution now that we labored so 583 00:38:45 --> 00:38:51 hard to get for the next two weeks. 584 00:38:47 --> 00:38:53 It's the important part. It's the steady-state part. 585 00:38:52 --> 00:38:58 It's what lasts out to infinity after the other stuff has 586 00:38:56 --> 00:39:02 disappeared. So, this is the steady-state 587 00:38:59 --> 00:39:05 solution, steady-state solution, okay? 588 00:39:04 --> 00:39:10 And, the differential equation is called stable. 589 00:39:07 --> 00:39:13 Now, it's of the highest interest to know when a 590 00:39:10 --> 00:39:16 differential equation is stable, linear differential equation is 591 00:39:14 --> 00:39:20 stable in this sense because you have a control. 592 00:39:17 --> 00:39:23 You know what its solutions look like. 593 00:39:20 --> 00:39:26 You have some feeling for how it's behaving in the long term. 594 00:39:24 --> 00:39:30 If this is not so, each equation is a law unto 595 00:39:27 --> 00:39:33 itself if you don't know. So, let's do the work. 596 00:39:31 --> 00:39:37 For the rest of the period, what I'd like to do is to find 597 00:39:36 --> 00:39:42 out what the conditions are, which make this true. 598 00:39:40 --> 00:39:46 Those were the equations which we will have a right to call 599 00:39:45 --> 00:39:51 stable. So, when does this happen, 600 00:39:48 --> 00:39:54 and where is it going to happen? 601 00:39:50 --> 00:39:56 I don't know. I guess, here. 602 00:39:54 --> 00:40:00 603 00:40:05 --> 00:40:11 Now, I think the first step is fairly easy, and it will give 604 00:40:10 --> 00:40:16 you a good review of what we've been doing up until now. 605 00:40:14 --> 00:40:20 So, I'm simply going to make a case-by-case analysis. 606 00:40:19 --> 00:40:25 Don't worry, it won't take very long. 607 00:40:22 --> 00:40:28 What are the cases we've been studying? 608 00:40:25 --> 00:40:31 Well, what do the characteristic roots look like? 609 00:40:29 --> 00:40:35 The roots of the characteristic equation, in other words, 610 00:40:34 --> 00:40:40 remember, there are cases. The first case is they are real 611 00:40:41 --> 00:40:47 and distinct, r1 not equal to r2, 612 00:40:45 --> 00:40:51 real and distinct. What are the other cases? 613 00:40:50 --> 00:40:56 Well, r1 equals r2. And then, there's the case 614 00:40:56 --> 00:41:02 where there are complex. So, I will write it r equals a 615 00:41:02 --> 00:41:08 plus or minus b i. What do the solutions look 616 00:41:07 --> 00:41:13 like? So, my ham-handed approach to 617 00:41:09 --> 00:41:15 this problem is going to be, in each case, 618 00:41:12 --> 00:41:18 I'll look at the solutions, and first get the condition on 619 00:41:16 --> 00:41:22 the roots. So, in other words, 620 00:41:18 --> 00:41:24 I'm not going to worry right away about the a and the b. 621 00:41:21 --> 00:41:27 I'm going, instead, to worry about expressing this 622 00:41:24 --> 00:41:30 condition of stability in terms of the characteristic roots. 623 00:41:28 --> 00:41:34 In fact, that's the only way in which many people know the 624 00:41:32 --> 00:41:38 conditions. You're going to be smarter. 625 00:41:35 --> 00:41:41 Okay, what do the solutions look like? 626 00:41:38 --> 00:41:44 Well, the general solution looks like e to the r1 t plus c2 627 00:41:42 --> 00:41:48 e to the r2 t. 628 00:41:45 --> 00:41:51 Okay, so, what's the stability condition? 629 00:41:48 --> 00:41:54 In other words, if equation happened to have 630 00:41:51 --> 00:41:57 its characteristic roots, real and distinct, 631 00:41:54 --> 00:42:00 under what circumstances would it be stable? 632 00:41:57 --> 00:42:03 Would it, in other words, all its solutions go to zero? 633 00:42:01 --> 00:42:07 So, I'm talking about the homogeneous equation, 634 00:42:04 --> 00:42:10 the reduced equation, the associated homogeneous 635 00:42:07 --> 00:42:13 equation. Why? 636 00:42:10 --> 00:42:16 Because that's all that's involved in this. 637 00:42:13 --> 00:42:19 In other words, when I write that, 638 00:42:15 --> 00:42:21 I am no longer interested in the whole equation. 639 00:42:19 --> 00:42:25 All I'm interested in is the reduced equation, 640 00:42:22 --> 00:42:28 the equation where you turn the f of t on the 641 00:42:26 --> 00:42:32 right-hand side into zero. So, what's the stability 642 00:42:31 --> 00:42:37 condition? Well, let's write it out. 643 00:42:35 --> 00:42:41 Under what circumstances will all these guys go to zero? 644 00:42:41 --> 00:42:47 If r1 and r2 should be negative, can they be zero? 645 00:42:46 --> 00:42:52 No, because then it will be a constant and it will go to zero. 646 00:42:52 --> 00:42:58 How about this one? Well, in this one, 647 00:42:56 --> 00:43:02 it's (c1 plus c2 times t) multiplied by e to the r1 t. 648 00:43:01 --> 00:43:07 Of course, both of these are 649 00:43:08 --> 00:43:14 the same. I'll just arbitrarily pick one 650 00:43:11 --> 00:43:17 of them. What happens to this as things 651 00:43:14 --> 00:43:20 go to zero? Well, this part is rising, 652 00:43:16 --> 00:43:22 at least if c2 is positive. This part is either helping or 653 00:43:21 --> 00:43:27 it's hindering. But, I hope you know what these 654 00:43:24 --> 00:43:30 functions look like, and you know which of them go 655 00:43:28 --> 00:43:34 to zero. They go to zero if r1 is 656 00:43:31 --> 00:43:37 negative. It might rise in the beginning, 657 00:43:35 --> 00:43:41 but after a while they lose the energy. 658 00:43:39 --> 00:43:45 Of course, if r1 is equal to zero, what do these guys do? 659 00:43:44 --> 00:43:50 Linear, go to infinity. Well, we are doing okay. 660 00:43:49 --> 00:43:55 How about here? Well, here, it's a little more 661 00:43:53 --> 00:43:59 complicated. The solutions look like e to 662 00:43:57 --> 00:44:03 the at times (c1 cosine bt plus c2 sine bt). 663 00:44:03 --> 00:44:09 Now, this part is a pure 664 00:44:07 --> 00:44:13 oscillation. You know that. 665 00:44:09 --> 00:44:15 It might have a big amplitude, but whatever it does, 666 00:44:13 --> 00:44:19 it does the same thing all the time. 667 00:44:16 --> 00:44:22 So, whether this goes to zero depends entirely upon what that 668 00:44:20 --> 00:44:26 exponential is doing. And, that exponential goes to 669 00:44:24 --> 00:44:30 zero if a is negative. So here, the condition is 670 00:44:28 --> 00:44:34 negative. And now, the only thing left to 671 00:44:33 --> 00:44:39 do is to say it nicely. I've got three cases, 672 00:44:38 --> 00:44:44 and I want to say them all in one breath. 673 00:44:43 --> 00:44:49 So, the stability condition is, the ODE is stable. 674 00:44:49 --> 00:44:55 So, this is, or f of t. 675 00:44:53 --> 00:44:59 It doesn't matter. But, psychologically, 676 00:44:57 --> 00:45:03 you can put this as zero there, is stable if what? 677 00:45:05 --> 00:45:11 In case one, this is true. 678 00:45:07 --> 00:45:13 In case two, that's true. 679 00:45:10 --> 00:45:16 In case three, that's true. 680 00:45:13 --> 00:45:19 But that's ugly. Make it beautiful. 681 00:45:17 --> 00:45:23 The beautiful way of saying it is if all the characteristic 682 00:45:23 --> 00:45:29 roots have negative real parts. If the characteristic roots, 683 00:45:31 --> 00:45:37 the r's or the a plus or minus b i, have negative real part. 684 00:45:38 --> 00:45:44 That's the form in which the electrical engineers will nod 685 00:45:44 --> 00:45:50 their head, tell you, yeah, that's right, 686 00:45:49 --> 00:45:55 negative real part, sorry. 687 00:45:52 --> 00:45:58 Isn't it right? Is that right here? 688 00:45:56 --> 00:46:02 Yeah. What's the real part of these 689 00:45:59 --> 00:46:05 guys? They themselves, 690 00:46:03 --> 00:46:09 because they are real. What's the real part of this? 691 00:46:09 --> 00:46:15 Yeah. The only case in which I really 692 00:46:13 --> 00:46:19 had to use real part is when I talk about the complex case 693 00:46:20 --> 00:46:26 because a is just the real part of a complex number. 694 00:46:26 --> 00:46:32 It's not the whole thing.