1 00:00:00 --> 00:00:06 2 00:00:08 --> 00:00:14 So the topic for today is we have a system like the kind we 3 00:00:14 --> 00:00:20 have been studying, but there is now a difference. 4 00:00:20 --> 00:00:26 A system of first order differential equations, 5 00:00:25 --> 00:00:31 just two of them. It is an autonomous system 6 00:00:30 --> 00:00:36 meaning, of course, that there is no t explicitly 7 00:00:36 --> 00:00:42 on the right-hand side. But what makes this different, 8 00:00:42 --> 00:00:48 now, is that it is nonlinear. 9 00:00:47 --> 00:00:53 10 00:00:56 --> 00:01:02 In other words, the functions on the right-hand 11 00:00:59 --> 00:01:05 side are no longer simple things like ax plus by, 12 00:01:03 --> 00:01:09 cx plus dy. Those are the kind we have been 13 00:01:07 --> 00:01:13 studying. But we are going to allow them 14 00:01:10 --> 00:01:16 to have quadratic terms, sines, cosines, 15 00:01:13 --> 00:01:19 different stuff there that are not linear functions anymore. 16 00:01:18 --> 00:01:24 And the problem is, if it's a linear system you 17 00:01:21 --> 00:01:27 know how to get a sketch of its trajectories without using the 18 00:01:26 --> 00:01:32 computer by using eigenlines. You were very good at that on 19 00:01:33 --> 00:01:39 the exam on Friday. Most of you could do that very 20 00:01:38 --> 00:01:44 well. But what do you do if you have 21 00:01:42 --> 00:01:48 a nonlinear system? The problem is to sketch its 22 00:01:47 --> 00:01:53 trajectories. 23 00:01:50 --> 00:01:56 24 00:02:00 --> 00:02:06 In general, there are not analytic formulas for the 25 00:02:03 --> 00:02:09 solutions to nonlinear systems like that. 26 00:02:06 --> 00:02:12 There are only computer-drawn things. 27 00:02:08 --> 00:02:14 But sometimes you have to get qualitative information, 28 00:02:12 --> 00:02:18 a quick idea of how the trajectories look. 29 00:02:15 --> 00:02:21 And, especially on Friday, I will give you examples of 30 00:02:18 --> 00:02:24 stuff that you can do that the computer cannot do very well at 31 00:02:22 --> 00:02:28 all. Okay, so the problem is to 32 00:02:24 --> 00:02:30 sketch those trajectories. Now, what I am going to do is 33 00:02:28 --> 00:02:34 -- The way I will give the lecture 34 00:02:33 --> 00:02:39 is, this is the general problem. We have to do two things sort 35 00:02:39 --> 00:02:45 of simultaneously. I will give a general 36 00:02:42 --> 00:02:48 explanation using x and y, but then, as we do each step of 37 00:02:48 --> 00:02:54 the process and talk about it in general, I would like to carry 38 00:02:54 --> 00:03:00 it out on a specific example. And so we will do it with a 39 00:03:00 --> 00:03:06 specific example. The example I am going to carry 40 00:03:04 --> 00:03:10 out is that of the nonlinear pendulum. 41 00:03:10 --> 00:03:16 I am using this because it illustrates virtually 42 00:03:13 --> 00:03:19 everything. And, in addition, 43 00:03:16 --> 00:03:22 it has the great advantage that, since we know how a 44 00:03:20 --> 00:03:26 pendulum swings, we will be able to, 45 00:03:23 --> 00:03:29 when we get the answer, verify it and, 46 00:03:26 --> 00:03:32 at various stages of the procedure, verify that the 47 00:03:30 --> 00:03:36 mathematics is, in fact, in agreement with our 48 00:03:34 --> 00:03:40 physical intuition. It is going to be a lightly 49 00:03:39 --> 00:03:45 damped pendulum because I am going to have to put in numbers 50 00:03:43 --> 00:03:49 in order to do the calculations. And that seems like a good case 51 00:03:48 --> 00:03:54 which illustrates several types of behavior. 52 00:03:51 --> 00:03:57 Let's first of all, before we talk in general, 53 00:03:55 --> 00:04:01 remind you of the pendulum. The pendulum I am talking about 54 00:04:00 --> 00:04:06 has the vertex from which it swings. 55 00:04:04 --> 00:04:10 This is a rigid rod. It is not one of these 56 00:04:08 --> 00:04:14 string-type pendulums. There is a mass here. 57 00:04:12 --> 00:04:18 The rigid rod is of length l. And so it swings in a circular 58 00:04:17 --> 00:04:23 orbit like that back and forth in a circle. 59 00:04:21 --> 00:04:27 And let's put in the vertical distance, the vertical position 60 00:04:27 --> 00:04:33 rather. And now, as variables, 61 00:04:30 --> 00:04:36 of course normally we use neutral variables like x and y. 62 00:04:35 --> 00:04:41 But here x and y are not relevant variables to describing 63 00:04:39 --> 00:04:45 the way the mass moves. The obviously relevant variable 64 00:04:44 --> 00:04:50 is theta, this angle. Now, I am taking it in the 65 00:04:47 --> 00:04:53 positive direction. Here theta is zero. 66 00:04:50 --> 00:04:56 As it swings, theta becomes positive. 67 00:04:53 --> 00:04:59 Over here, when it is horizontal, theta has the value 68 00:04:57 --> 00:05:03 pi over two and then so on it goes. 69 00:05:02 --> 00:05:08 Values here correspond to negative values of theta. 70 00:05:06 --> 00:05:12 That is how it swings. Now, just to remind you of the 71 00:05:10 --> 00:05:16 equation that this satisfies, it satisfies F equals ma, 72 00:05:15 --> 00:05:21 rather ma equals F. Now, the acceleration is along 73 00:05:19 --> 00:05:25 the circular path. And that is different from the 74 00:05:23 --> 00:05:29 angular acceleration. I have to put in the factor of 75 00:05:28 --> 00:05:34 the length. You had that a lot in 8.01 so I 76 00:05:32 --> 00:05:38 am simply going to write it down. 77 00:05:35 --> 00:05:41 It is the mass. Therefore, the linear 78 00:05:38 --> 00:05:44 acceleration along the circular path is equal to the angular 79 00:05:44 --> 00:05:50 acceleration times l. It is l times theta prime 80 00:05:48 --> 00:05:54 prime, or double dot if you prefer. 81 00:05:51 --> 00:05:57 And so this much of it is the acceleration vector. 82 00:05:55 --> 00:06:01 Now, once the force is acting on it, well, there is a force of 83 00:06:00 --> 00:06:06 gravity which is pulling it straight down. 84 00:06:06 --> 00:06:12 But, of course, that is not the relevant force. 85 00:06:09 --> 00:06:15 I am interested in the force that acts along that circular 86 00:06:14 --> 00:06:20 line. And that will not be all of the 87 00:06:17 --> 00:06:23 pink line but only its component in that direction. 88 00:06:21 --> 00:06:27 And the component, I fill out the little right 89 00:06:25 --> 00:06:31 triangle. And then the way to get the 90 00:06:28 --> 00:06:34 component in that direction, the vertical pink part has the 91 00:06:32 --> 00:06:38 magnitude mg. But, since I only want this 92 00:06:36 --> 00:06:42 part, I have to multiply by the sign of this angle. 93 00:06:39 --> 00:06:45 Now, sometimes I have given on a diagnostic test to students 94 00:06:43 --> 00:06:49 when they enter to what angle is that? 95 00:06:45 --> 00:06:51 But, of course, anybody can guess it must be 96 00:06:48 --> 00:06:54 theta. Otherwise, why would he be 97 00:06:50 --> 00:06:56 asking it? So this is still the angle 98 00:06:52 --> 00:06:58 theta. You can prove these two 99 00:06:54 --> 00:07:00 triangles are similar. One of them I haven't even 100 00:06:57 --> 00:07:03 written in, but it would be the right triangle whose leg is 101 00:07:01 --> 00:07:07 perpendicular to it. So the right angle is here. 102 00:07:06 --> 00:07:12 If that is theta then the length of this small pink line 103 00:07:11 --> 00:07:17 is mg times the sine of theta. 104 00:07:15 --> 00:07:21 That is the force due gravity. It is mg sine theta. 105 00:07:20 --> 00:07:26 Except in what direction is it? It is acting in the negative 106 00:07:25 --> 00:07:31 direction. This is theta increasing. 107 00:07:30 --> 00:07:36 This is the opposite direction, so I should put a negative sign 108 00:07:35 --> 00:07:41 in front of it. But that is not the only force. 109 00:07:39 --> 00:07:45 There is also a damping force that goes with a velocity. 110 00:07:44 --> 00:07:50 And that also occurs if the angular velocity is positive, 111 00:07:48 --> 00:07:54 the angle theta is increasing, in other words, 112 00:07:52 --> 00:07:58 the damping force resists that. It is opposite to the velocity. 113 00:07:59 --> 00:08:05 So the velocity is going to be l times theta prime. 114 00:08:02 --> 00:08:08 There is my velocity v. Linear velocity, 115 00:08:05 --> 00:08:11 not angular velocity. And so this is going to be a 116 00:08:08 --> 00:08:14 negative times some constant times that c1. 117 00:08:11 --> 00:08:17 Now, that is the equation. But let's make it look a little 118 00:08:15 --> 00:08:21 better by getting rid of some of these constants. 119 00:08:19 --> 00:08:25 If I write it out this way and put everything on the left-hand 120 00:08:23 --> 00:08:29 side, the way it is usually done in writing a second order 121 00:08:27 --> 00:08:33 differential equation. Theta I am going to divide 122 00:08:32 --> 00:08:38 through by ml and put everything on the left-hand side and in the 123 00:08:37 --> 00:08:43 right order. Next should come the theta 124 00:08:40 --> 00:08:46 prime term. And so that is going to be c1l 125 00:08:43 --> 00:08:49 divided by ml, so that is c1 over m. 126 00:08:46 --> 00:08:52 The l's cancel out. And, finally, 127 00:08:48 --> 00:08:54 the last term on the right, I will move this over to the 128 00:08:53 --> 00:08:59 left, but remember everything is being divided by ml, 129 00:08:57 --> 00:09:03 so the m's cancel out, and it is plus g over l times 130 00:09:01 --> 00:09:07 the sine of theta. That is our differential 131 00:09:05 --> 00:09:11 equation. But let's make it look still a 132 00:09:08 --> 00:09:14 little bit better by lumping these constants and giving them 133 00:09:13 --> 00:09:19 new names. It is going to be finally theta 134 00:09:16 --> 00:09:22 double prime. I will simply call this thing 135 00:09:19 --> 00:09:25 the damping constant. I will lump those two together 136 00:09:23 --> 00:09:29 into single damping constant. And then g over l, 137 00:09:27 --> 00:09:33 I will lump those together, too. 138 00:09:29 --> 00:09:35 And we usually call that k. It is k sine theta. 139 00:09:34 --> 00:09:40 Now, this is a second-order 140 00:09:37 --> 00:09:43 different equation, but it is not linear. 141 00:09:40 --> 00:09:46 If this were a month and a half ago and I said solve that, 142 00:09:45 --> 00:09:51 you would stare at me. But, anyway, 143 00:09:47 --> 00:09:53 you couldn't solve that. And nobody can, 144 00:09:50 --> 00:09:56 in some sense. It is a nonlinear equation. 145 00:09:54 --> 00:10:00 It doesn't have any exact solution. 146 00:09:56 --> 00:10:02 The only thing you could do is look for a solution in infinite 147 00:10:01 --> 00:10:07 series or something like that. Well, what do you do? 148 00:10:06 --> 00:10:12 You throw it on the computer, that is the easy answer, 149 00:10:11 --> 00:10:17 but what does the computer do? Well, the first thing the 150 00:10:15 --> 00:10:21 computer does is turns it into a system because the computer is 151 00:10:20 --> 00:10:26 going to use numerical methods to solve it. 152 00:10:25 --> 00:10:31 But only those methods, the formulas it uses, 153 00:10:28 --> 00:10:34 Euler or modified or improved Euler or the Runge-Cutta method, 154 00:10:32 --> 00:10:38 they are always expressed not for single higher-order 155 00:10:36 --> 00:10:42 equations, but instead they always assume that the equation 156 00:10:41 --> 00:10:47 has been converted to a first order system. 157 00:10:44 --> 00:10:50 Let's do that for the computer, even though it will do it 158 00:10:48 --> 00:10:54 itself if nobody tells it not to. 159 00:10:50 --> 00:10:56 Theta prime is equal to, now I have to figure out what 160 00:10:54 --> 00:11:00 new variable to introduce. Normally we use x prime and 161 00:11:00 --> 00:11:06 call that y. That really doesn't seem to be 162 00:11:03 --> 00:11:09 very suitable here. But what do the physicists call 163 00:11:07 --> 00:11:13 it? This is the angular velocity. 164 00:11:09 --> 00:11:15 And the standard designation for that is omega. 165 00:11:13 --> 00:11:19 Two Greek letters. I told you this was going to be 166 00:11:16 --> 00:11:22 hard. Omega prime equals what? 167 00:11:19 --> 00:11:25 Well, omega prime equals, now you do it in the standard 168 00:11:23 --> 00:11:29 way, you convert the system, but remember you have to put 169 00:11:27 --> 00:11:33 the theta first. So it is minus k sine theta. 170 00:11:32 --> 00:11:38 The theta first and then the 171 00:11:36 --> 00:11:42 omega term first. So minus c times omega, 172 00:11:39 --> 00:11:45 minus c theta prime, but theta prime is, 173 00:11:42 --> 00:11:48 in real life, omega. 174 00:11:44 --> 00:11:50 And now we have our acceptable system. 175 00:11:47 --> 00:11:53 The only problem is I have not put in any numbers yet. 176 00:11:51 --> 00:11:57 The numbers I am going to put in will make it lightly damped. 177 00:11:58 --> 00:12:04 I am going to give c, think of it here, 178 00:12:00 --> 00:12:06 this is the damping, and this is the stuff 179 00:12:03 --> 00:12:09 representing, well, if I want to make it 180 00:12:06 --> 00:12:12 lightly damped all I am saying is that c should be small 181 00:12:10 --> 00:12:16 compared with k, but it doesn't have to be very 182 00:12:13 --> 00:12:19 small. I am going to take c equal one 183 00:12:16 --> 00:12:22 and k equal two, and that will make it 184 00:12:20 --> 00:12:26 lightly enough damped. This is the lightly damped 185 00:12:23 --> 00:12:29 value, values which give underdamping. 186 00:12:26 --> 00:12:32 In other words, they are going to allow the 187 00:12:29 --> 00:12:35 pendulum to swing back and forth instead of strictly going ug and 188 00:12:34 --> 00:12:40 ending up there. Finally, therefore, 189 00:12:38 --> 00:12:44 the system that we are going to calculate is where theta prime 190 00:12:44 --> 00:12:50 equals omega and omega prime equals negative two sine theta 191 00:12:50 --> 00:12:56 minus omega. 192 00:12:54 --> 00:13:00 And now what do we do with that? 193 00:12:57 --> 00:13:03 There is our example. That is our system that 194 00:13:01 --> 00:13:07 represents a pendulum swinging back and forth, 195 00:13:05 --> 00:13:11 damped away. And now let's go back to the 196 00:13:08 --> 00:13:14 general theory. And, in general, 197 00:13:10 --> 00:13:16 if you have a nonlinear system, 198 00:13:15 --> 00:13:21 how do you go about analyzing it? 199 00:13:16 --> 00:13:22 200 00:13:22 --> 00:13:28 The first step is to find the simplest possible solutions, 201 00:13:27 --> 00:13:33 solutions that you hope can be found by inspection. 202 00:13:31 --> 00:13:37 Now, what would they be? They are the solutions that 203 00:13:36 --> 00:13:42 consist of a single point. How could a solution be a 204 00:13:40 --> 00:13:46 single point? Well, like the origin for a 205 00:13:44 --> 00:13:50 linear system, those points which form 206 00:13:47 --> 00:13:53 solutions all by themselves are called the critical points. 207 00:13:52 --> 00:13:58 I am looking for the critical points of the system. 208 00:13:57 --> 00:14:03 That is the first step. The definition is a critical 209 00:14:03 --> 00:14:09 point x zero, y zero. 210 00:14:06 --> 00:14:12 For that to be a critical point 211 00:14:10 --> 00:14:16 means that it makes the right-hand side zero. 212 00:14:15 --> 00:14:21 The f is zero there, and the g is zero there. 213 00:14:19 --> 00:14:25 See the significance of that? If you have such a point, 214 00:14:25 --> 00:14:31 let's say there is a critical point, what is the velocity 215 00:14:31 --> 00:14:37 field at that point? Well, it is given by the 216 00:14:36 --> 00:14:42 vectors on the right-hand side, but the components are zero. 217 00:14:40 --> 00:14:46 That means, at this point the velocity vector is zero. 218 00:14:43 --> 00:14:49 Well, that means if a solution starts there, 219 00:14:46 --> 00:14:52 you put the mouse there and tell it to move, 220 00:14:49 --> 00:14:55 where do you go? It has no reason to go anywhere 221 00:14:52 --> 00:14:58 since the velocity vector is zero there. 222 00:14:55 --> 00:15:01 So it sits there for all time. And indeed it solves the 223 00:14:58 --> 00:15:04 system, doesn't it? It makes the right-hand side 224 00:15:03 --> 00:15:09 zero and it makes the left-hand side zero because x equals x 225 00:15:08 --> 00:15:14 zero, y equals y zero for 226 00:15:12 --> 00:15:18 all time. If that is true for all time it 227 00:15:15 --> 00:15:21 sits there then the derivatives, with respect to time are zero, 228 00:15:20 --> 00:15:26 so the left-hand sides are zero, the right-hand sides are 229 00:15:25 --> 00:15:31 zero and everybody is happy. Well, these are great points. 230 00:15:32 --> 00:15:38 How do I find them? Well, by looking for points 231 00:15:37 --> 00:15:43 that make these two functions zero. 232 00:15:41 --> 00:15:47 I find them by solving simultaneously the equations f 233 00:15:46 --> 00:15:52 of (x, y) equals zero and g of (x, y) equals zero. 234 00:15:52 --> 00:15:58 235 00:15:55 --> 00:16:01 A pair of equations. But the trouble is those are 236 00:16:01 --> 00:16:07 not linear equations. Linear equations you know how 237 00:16:04 --> 00:16:10 to solve, but they are not linear equations. 238 00:16:07 --> 00:16:13 They are nonlinear equations that you don't know how to 239 00:16:11 --> 00:16:17 solve. And, to some extent, 240 00:16:13 --> 00:16:19 nobody else does either. There are very fat books in the 241 00:16:17 --> 00:16:23 library whose topic is how to solve just a pair of equations, 242 00:16:22 --> 00:16:28 f of (x, y) equals zero, g of (x, y) equals zero. 243 00:16:25 --> 00:16:31 And it is quite a hard problem. It is even a hard problem by 244 00:16:30 --> 00:16:36 computer. Because, if you know 245 00:16:33 --> 00:16:39 approximately where the solution is going to be, 246 00:16:36 --> 00:16:42 you can make up the little screen and then the computer 247 00:16:40 --> 00:16:46 will find it for you. Or, even without a screen, 248 00:16:43 --> 00:16:49 it will calculate it by Newton's method or something 249 00:16:47 --> 00:16:53 else, it will zero in. The problem is, 250 00:16:50 --> 00:16:56 if you don't know in advance roughly where the critical point 251 00:16:54 --> 00:17:00 is that you are looking for, there are a lot of numbers. 252 00:16:58 --> 00:17:04 They go to infinity that way and infinity that way. 253 00:17:03 --> 00:17:09 In general, it is almost an impossible problem. 254 00:17:06 --> 00:17:12 The only thing that makes it possible is that these problems 255 00:17:11 --> 00:17:17 always come from the real world and one has some physical 256 00:17:15 --> 00:17:21 feeling, one hopes, for where the critical point 257 00:17:19 --> 00:17:25 is. I am going to assume breezily 258 00:17:21 --> 00:17:27 and cheerily we can solve those. And I am only going to give you 259 00:17:26 --> 00:17:32 examples where it is possible to solve them. 260 00:17:31 --> 00:17:37 But even there, you have to watch out. 261 00:17:33 --> 00:17:39 There is a certain trickiness that will be talked about in the 262 00:17:37 --> 00:17:43 recitations tomorrow. Okay, so we found the critical 263 00:17:41 --> 00:17:47 points. Let's do it for our example. 264 00:17:43 --> 00:17:49 Let's find the critical point. What is the pair of equations 265 00:17:47 --> 00:17:53 we have to solve? We have to solve the equations 266 00:17:50 --> 00:17:56 omega equals zero, minus two sine theta minus 267 00:17:53 --> 00:17:59 omega equals zero. 268 00:17:56 --> 00:18:02 Now, it is not always this easy. 269 00:18:00 --> 00:18:06 But the solution is omega is zero. 270 00:18:03 --> 00:18:09 If omega is zero, then sine theta is zero, 271 00:18:07 --> 00:18:13 and sine theta is zero at the 272 00:18:12 --> 00:18:18 integral multiples of pi. The critical points are omega 273 00:18:18 --> 00:18:24 is always zero and theta is zero, or it could be plus or 274 00:18:24 --> 00:18:30 minus pi, plus or minus two pi and so on. 275 00:18:30 --> 00:18:36 In other words, there are an infinity of 276 00:18:32 --> 00:18:38 critical points. That seems a little 277 00:18:34 --> 00:18:40 discouraging. On the other hand, 278 00:18:36 --> 00:18:42 there are really only two. There are really physically 279 00:18:40 --> 00:18:46 only two because omega equals zero means the mass is not 280 00:18:44 --> 00:18:50 moving. The angular velocity is zero, 281 00:18:46 --> 00:18:52 so it is only the theta position which is changing. 282 00:18:49 --> 00:18:55 Now, what are the possible theta positions? 283 00:18:52 --> 00:18:58 Well, here is our nonlinear pendulum. 284 00:18:56 --> 00:19:02 Here is the critical point, theta equals zero, 285 00:18:59 --> 00:19:05 omega equals zero. Theta equals zero means the rod 286 00:19:03 --> 00:19:09 is vertical. Omega equals zero means that it 287 00:19:07 --> 00:19:13 is not moving, despite the fact that it is 288 00:19:10 --> 00:19:16 moving. Theoretically it is not moving. 289 00:19:14 --> 00:19:20 Now, what is the other one? Well, there is theta equals pi. 290 00:19:18 --> 00:19:24 Theta is now, starting from zero and 291 00:19:21 --> 00:19:27 increasing, I hope, through positive theta. 292 00:19:25 --> 00:19:31 And when it gets to pi, it is sticking straight up in 293 00:19:29 --> 00:19:35 the air. And so the claim is that 294 00:19:34 --> 00:19:40 another critical point is theta equals pi and omega equals zero. 295 00:19:40 --> 00:19:46 In other words, if it gets to this position, 296 00:19:44 --> 00:19:50 it starts out in this position and stays there for all time, 297 00:19:49 --> 00:19:55 as you see. [LAUGHTER] But my point is what 298 00:19:53 --> 00:19:59 about negative pi? That is the same as pi. 299 00:19:57 --> 00:20:03 Two pi is the same as zero. So physically there really are 300 00:20:03 --> 00:20:09 only two critical points, this one and that one. 301 00:20:08 --> 00:20:14 And they obviously have something very different about 302 00:20:13 --> 00:20:19 them. This critical point is stable. 303 00:20:16 --> 00:20:22 If I start near there, I approach that critical point 304 00:20:21 --> 00:20:27 in infinite time. This one, if I start near 305 00:20:25 --> 00:20:31 there, I do not stay near there. I always leave it. 306 00:20:31 --> 00:20:37 Of the two critical points, physically it is clear that the 307 00:20:38 --> 00:20:44 critical point is zero, zero and the other guys that 308 00:20:44 --> 00:20:50 look like it, two pi zero and so on is a 309 00:20:49 --> 00:20:55 stable critical point. Whereas, pi zero, 310 00:20:53 --> 00:20:59 when theta is sticking straight up in the air, 311 00:20:59 --> 00:21:05 is unstable. Now, of course, 312 00:21:03 --> 00:21:09 we will want to see that mathematically also, 313 00:21:06 --> 00:21:12 but basically there are just physically two point. 314 00:21:10 --> 00:21:16 There are just two critical points. 315 00:21:12 --> 00:21:18 Well, that raises the question what about all the others? 316 00:21:16 --> 00:21:22 As you will see, we have to have those. 317 00:21:19 --> 00:21:25 They are an essential part of the problem. 318 00:21:22 --> 00:21:28 They are not just redundant baggage that is trailing along. 319 00:21:26 --> 00:21:32 They are really important. But you will see that when we 320 00:21:33 --> 00:21:39 talk about finally how the trajectories look and how the 321 00:21:40 --> 00:21:46 solutions look. Now what do we do? 322 00:21:43 --> 00:21:49 Well, we found the critical points, and now the work begins. 323 00:21:50 --> 00:21:56 Virtually all the work is in this next step. 324 00:21:56 --> 00:22:02 What do we do? Step two. 325 00:22:00 --> 00:22:06 I can only describe it in general terms, 326 00:22:05 --> 00:22:11 but here is what you do. For each critical point x zero, 327 00:22:13 --> 00:22:19 y zero, a procedure that has to be done at each one, 328 00:22:21 --> 00:22:27 you linearize the system near that point. 329 00:22:28 --> 00:22:34 In other words, you may find a linear system, 330 00:22:32 --> 00:22:38 the good kind, the kind you know about, 331 00:22:37 --> 00:22:43 which is a good approximation to the nonlinear system at that 332 00:22:43 --> 00:22:49 critical point. Plot the trajectories of this 333 00:22:48 --> 00:22:54 linearized system. And you do that near the 334 00:22:53 --> 00:22:59 critical point. 335 00:22:56 --> 00:23:02 336 00:23:04 --> 00:23:10 How do you plot the trajectories? 337 00:23:05 --> 00:23:11 Well, that you knew how to do on Friday so I am assuming you 338 00:23:09 --> 00:23:15 still know how to do it on Monday. 339 00:23:11 --> 00:23:17 In other words, if the system is linear you 340 00:23:14 --> 00:23:20 know how to plot the trajectories of it by 341 00:23:16 --> 00:23:22 calculating eigenvalues and eigenvectors and maybe the 342 00:23:20 --> 00:23:26 direction of motion if it is a spiral. 343 00:23:22 --> 00:23:28 I will give you a couple of examples of that when we work 344 00:23:25 --> 00:23:31 out the pendulum. But, on the other hand, 345 00:23:29 --> 00:23:35 how do I line arise a system? Well, there are two methods. 346 00:23:33 --> 00:23:39 There is one method the book gives you, which by and large I 347 00:23:37 --> 00:23:43 do not want you to use, although I will give you an 348 00:23:41 --> 00:23:47 example of it now. I want you to use another 349 00:23:44 --> 00:23:50 method because it is much faster. 350 00:23:46 --> 00:23:52 Especially if you have to handle several critical points 351 00:23:50 --> 00:23:56 it is much, much faster. Let's first carry this out on 352 00:23:54 --> 00:24:00 an easy case, and then I will show you how to 353 00:23:57 --> 00:24:03 do it in general. Just this once I will use the 354 00:24:02 --> 00:24:08 book's method because I think it is the method which would 355 00:24:08 --> 00:24:14 naturally occur to you. Let's linearize this example at 356 00:24:13 --> 00:24:19 the point zero, zero. 357 00:24:15 --> 00:24:21 What should be the linearized system? 358 00:24:18 --> 00:24:24 In other words, it's only the nonlinear terms I 359 00:24:23 --> 00:24:29 have to worry about. Well, the minus omega is fine. 360 00:24:29 --> 00:24:35 It is that stupid sine theta that I don't like. 361 00:24:33 --> 00:24:39 But if theta is small, in other words, 362 00:24:37 --> 00:24:43 if I stay near zero, I could replace sine theta by 363 00:24:42 --> 00:24:48 theta. The linearized system is minus 364 00:24:46 --> 00:24:52 two. You replace sine theta by 365 00:24:49 --> 00:24:55 theta, since sine theta is approximately theta if theta is 366 00:24:55 --> 00:25:01 small, if theta is near zero. It is the first term of its 367 00:25:02 --> 00:25:08 Taylor series you can think of, or it's just the linear 368 00:25:06 --> 00:25:12 approximation starts out sine theta equals theta. 369 00:25:10 --> 00:25:16 That is it. Or, you draw a picture. 370 00:25:12 --> 00:25:18 I don't know. There are a millions of ways to 371 00:25:16 --> 00:25:22 do it. So we have it. 372 00:25:17 --> 00:25:23 Now what do I do? Okay, now we will plot that. 373 00:25:21 --> 00:25:27 The matrix, let's do our little routine, in other words. 374 00:25:25 --> 00:25:31 I am writing right to left for no reason. 375 00:25:30 --> 00:25:36 The matrix is, now I am just going to make 376 00:25:34 --> 00:25:40 marks on a board the way you did on your exam, 377 00:25:39 --> 00:25:45 zero, one. [LAUGHTER] I don't know what I 378 00:25:43 --> 00:25:49 am doing, but you know. Negative two, 379 00:25:47 --> 00:25:53 negative one, and then I write down the 380 00:25:51 --> 00:25:57 eigen-whatchamacallits. Lambda squared, 381 00:25:55 --> 00:26:01 plus lambda, minus the trace. 382 00:26:00 --> 00:26:06 The determinant is minus, minus two, so it is plus two 383 00:26:05 --> 00:26:11 equals zero. And then, since it doesn't 384 00:26:09 --> 00:26:15 occur to me how to factor this, I will use the quadratic 385 00:26:14 --> 00:26:20 formula. It is negative one plus or 386 00:26:18 --> 00:26:24 minus the square root of, b squared minus 4ac, 387 00:26:22 --> 00:26:28 minus seven. Complex. 388 00:26:24 --> 00:26:30 That means it is going to be a spiral. 389 00:26:30 --> 00:26:36 I am going to get a spiral. Will it be a source or a sink 390 00:26:34 --> 00:26:40 since they are complex roots? Complex eigenvalues give a 391 00:26:39 --> 00:26:45 spiral. A source or a sink? 392 00:26:41 --> 00:26:47 I tell that from the sine of the real part. 393 00:26:44 --> 00:26:50 The real part is negative one-half. 394 00:26:47 --> 00:26:53 Therefore, the amplitude is shrinking like e to the minus t 395 00:26:52 --> 00:26:58 over two. And, therefore, 396 00:26:55 --> 00:27:01 the spiral is coming into the origin. 397 00:27:00 --> 00:27:06 It is a spiral sink since lambda equals minus one-half 398 00:27:05 --> 00:27:11 plus some number times i. Spiral sink. 399 00:27:10 --> 00:27:16 And the other thing to determine is its direction of 400 00:27:15 --> 00:27:21 motion, which will be what? I determine its direction of 401 00:27:21 --> 00:27:27 motion by putting in a single vector from the velocity field. 402 00:27:28 --> 00:27:34 Here it is. The vector at one, 403 00:27:32 --> 00:27:38 zero will be the same as the first column of the 404 00:27:36 --> 00:27:42 matrix. So that is zero, 405 00:27:38 --> 00:27:44 negative two. 406 00:27:39 --> 00:27:45 Here is a vector from the velocity field, 407 00:27:42 --> 00:27:48 and that shows that the motion is clockwise and is spiraling 408 00:27:46 --> 00:27:52 into the origin. That is a picture, 409 00:27:49 --> 00:27:55 therefore, at the origin of how that looks. 410 00:27:52 --> 00:27:58 Now, it is of the utmost importance for your 411 00:27:55 --> 00:28:01 understanding of what comes now that you understand in what 412 00:27:59 --> 00:28:05 sense this picture corresponds to the physical behavior of the 413 00:28:03 --> 00:28:09 pendulum. Let's start it over here. 414 00:28:08 --> 00:28:14 What is it doing? That means that theta is some 415 00:28:13 --> 00:28:19 number like one, for example. 416 00:28:16 --> 00:28:22 Let's make it smaller. Let's say a little bit. 417 00:28:20 --> 00:28:26 And this is the omega access. If it starts over here that 418 00:28:26 --> 00:28:32 means the angular velocity is zero and theta is a small 419 00:28:32 --> 00:28:38 positive number. Theta is a small positive 420 00:28:37 --> 00:28:43 number. The angular velocity is zero. 421 00:28:40 --> 00:28:46 It's velocity zero, theta small and positive. 422 00:28:44 --> 00:28:50 I release it and it does that. What does this have to do with 423 00:28:50 --> 00:28:56 the spiral? Well, the spiral is exactly a 424 00:28:54 --> 00:29:00 mathematical picture of this motion. 425 00:28:57 --> 00:29:03 What happens? Theta starts to decrease. 426 00:29:02 --> 00:29:08 And the angular velocity increases but in the negative 427 00:29:06 --> 00:29:12 direction. This is negative angular 428 00:29:08 --> 00:29:14 velocity. Theta is decreasing. 429 00:29:11 --> 00:29:17 The angular velocity gets bigger and bigger. 430 00:29:14 --> 00:29:20 And it is biggest, most negative when theta is 431 00:29:18 --> 00:29:24 zero. It has reached the vertical 432 00:29:20 --> 00:29:26 position is when the angular velocity is biggest. 433 00:29:24 --> 00:29:30 It continues then. Theta gets negative, 434 00:29:27 --> 00:29:33 but the angular velocity then decreases to zero. 435 00:29:33 --> 00:29:39 436 00:29:37 --> 00:29:43 Now the angular velocity is zero and theta is at its most 437 00:29:41 --> 00:29:47 negative, and then it reverses. Angular velocity gets positive 438 00:29:46 --> 00:29:52 as theta increases again, and so on. 439 00:29:48 --> 00:29:54 These represent the successive swings back and forth. 440 00:29:52 --> 00:29:58 Notice the fact that it is damped is reflected in the fact 441 00:29:57 --> 00:30:03 that each successive swing, the biggest that theta gets is 442 00:30:01 --> 00:30:07 a little less than it was before. 443 00:30:05 --> 00:30:11 In other words, this point is not quite as far 444 00:30:08 --> 00:30:14 out as that one. And this one isn't as far out 445 00:30:11 --> 00:30:17 as that one. In other words, 446 00:30:13 --> 00:30:19 it is spiraling in. 447 00:30:15 --> 00:30:21 448 00:30:20 --> 00:30:26 Well, I hope that is clear because we now have to go to the 449 00:30:26 --> 00:30:32 next critical point. And now we have a little 450 00:30:31 --> 00:30:37 problem. If I want to do the next 451 00:30:34 --> 00:30:40 critical point, so what I want to do now is, 452 00:30:38 --> 00:30:44 in other words, I want to linearize at the 453 00:30:42 --> 00:30:48 point pi zero where theta is pi and the thing is sticking up in 454 00:30:48 --> 00:30:54 the air. The question is, 455 00:30:50 --> 00:30:56 how am I going to do that? This trick of replacing sine 456 00:30:55 --> 00:31:01 theta by theta, that doesn't work at pi. 457 00:30:59 --> 00:31:05 That works at zero. 458 00:31:03 --> 00:31:09 459 00:31:08 --> 00:31:14 Now we have to go to the next step of the method. 460 00:31:11 --> 00:31:17 The way to do this, in general, as you will read in 461 00:31:14 --> 00:31:20 the notes because, as I say, this is not in the 462 00:31:17 --> 00:31:23 book, is to calculate the Jacobian. 463 00:31:20 --> 00:31:26 I mean the Jacobian matrix. The Jacobian is the 464 00:31:23 --> 00:31:29 determinant. I mean, before you put the two 465 00:31:26 --> 00:31:32 bars down and made a determinant, you called it just 466 00:31:29 --> 00:31:35 the Jacobian matrix. And the formula for it is, 467 00:31:34 --> 00:31:40 it is calculated from f and g. The top line is the partial of 468 00:31:39 --> 00:31:45 f with respect to x and y, and the bottom line is the 469 00:31:44 --> 00:31:50 partial of g with respect to x and y. 470 00:31:47 --> 00:31:53 So that is the Jacobian matrix. 471 00:31:51 --> 00:31:57 472 00:31:57 --> 00:32:03 I hope I get a chance at the end of the period to explain to 473 00:32:02 --> 00:32:08 you why, but I am most anxious right now to at least get you 474 00:32:07 --> 00:32:13 familiar with the algorithm, how to do it. 475 00:32:11 --> 00:32:17 The notes describe the y of it, if we don't get a chance to get 476 00:32:17 --> 00:32:23 to it, but I hope we will. What do you do? 477 00:32:20 --> 00:32:26 The Jacobian matrix. You calculate it at the point x 478 00:32:25 --> 00:32:31 zero, y zero. 479 00:32:29 --> 00:32:35 I will indicate that by putting a subscript zero on it. 480 00:32:32 --> 00:32:38 This means without the subscript zero it is the 481 00:32:35 --> 00:32:41 Jacobian matrix calculated out of those four partial 482 00:32:39 --> 00:32:45 derivatives. When I put a subscript zero, 483 00:32:41 --> 00:32:47 I mean I evaluated it at the critical point by plugging in 484 00:32:45 --> 00:32:51 each entry as a function of x and y. 485 00:32:47 --> 00:32:53 You plug in for x equals x zero, y equals y zero, 486 00:32:52 --> 00:32:58 and you get a numerical matrix. 487 00:32:54 --> 00:33:00 That is the matrix which is the matrix of the linearized system. 488 00:33:00 --> 00:33:06 This is the matrix of the linearized system. 489 00:33:03 --> 00:33:09 490 00:33:08 --> 00:33:14 Trust me, it is. Now, since I don't expect you 491 00:33:11 --> 00:33:17 to trust me, let's calculate it. Here, we got the matrix another 492 00:33:16 --> 00:33:22 way, by this procedure of saying sine theta is theta-- What would 493 00:33:21 --> 00:33:27 we have gotten if we had done it instead by the linearized 494 00:33:25 --> 00:33:31 system? Let's do it that way. 495 00:33:27 --> 00:33:33 Let's do it via the Jacobian. 496 00:33:31 --> 00:33:37 497 00:33:37 --> 00:33:43 I need to know the Jacobian of the system, which I have 498 00:33:43 --> 00:33:49 conveniently covered up. There is the system. 499 00:33:47 --> 00:33:53 The Jacobian matrix is what? The top line, 500 00:33:52 --> 00:33:58 I take the partial derivative of omega first with respect to 501 00:33:59 --> 00:34:05 theta and then with respect to omega. 502 00:34:04 --> 00:34:10 I then take the second line on the right-hand side. 503 00:34:08 --> 00:34:14 I take its partial with respect to theta first. 504 00:34:12 --> 00:34:18 That is negative two cosine theta. 505 00:34:16 --> 00:34:22 And, thinking ahead, I erase the one and move it 506 00:34:20 --> 00:34:26 over a little bit. And what is the partial of that 507 00:34:24 --> 00:34:30 thing with respect to omega? It is negative one. 508 00:34:30 --> 00:34:36 Does everyone see how I calculated that Jacobian matrix? 509 00:34:35 --> 00:34:41 And now I want to evaluate it. Let's do our old case first. 510 00:34:40 --> 00:34:46 At zero, zero what would this have 511 00:34:45 --> 00:34:51 amounted to? This would have given me zero, 512 00:34:49 --> 00:34:55 one. The cosine of theta at zero is 513 00:34:52 --> 00:34:58 one, so this is negative two, negative one. 514 00:34:56 --> 00:35:02 I'm screwed. [LAUGHTER] 515 00:35:00 --> 00:35:06 That is the same as that. Now you see it, 516 00:35:04 --> 00:35:10 now you don't. We got our old answer back. 517 00:35:08 --> 00:35:14 That should give us enough confidence to use it in the new 518 00:35:14 --> 00:35:20 case, where I don't have an old answer to compare it with. 519 00:35:20 --> 00:35:26 What is it going to be at pi, zero? 520 00:35:23 --> 00:35:29 The answer is J zero is now going to be -- 521 00:35:30 --> 00:35:36 Well, everything is the same. Zero, one, negative one. 522 00:35:34 --> 00:35:40 And here cosine of pi is negative one, 523 00:35:38 --> 00:35:44 so negative two times negative one is two. 524 00:35:41 --> 00:35:47 Everything is the same, except there is a two there now 525 00:35:46 --> 00:35:52 instead of negative two. Lambda squared plus lambda, 526 00:35:51 --> 00:35:57 the determinant, is now negative two. 527 00:35:54 --> 00:36:00 And this factors into lambda plus two times 528 00:36:00 --> 00:36:06 lambda minus one. 529 00:36:04 --> 00:36:10 530 00:36:08 --> 00:36:14 So lambda equals one. The corresponding eigenvector. 531 00:36:12 --> 00:36:18 I subtract one here, so the equation is minus a1 532 00:36:17 --> 00:36:23 plus a2 is zero. 533 00:36:20 --> 00:36:26 The solution is one, one, e to the t. 534 00:36:24 --> 00:36:30 And for the other one, it's lambda is equal to 535 00:36:28 --> 00:36:34 negative two. This is the sort of stuff you 536 00:36:33 --> 00:36:39 can do, so I am doing it fast. Zero minus negative two is two. 537 00:36:38 --> 00:36:44 So the equation is 2a1 plus a2 equals zero. 538 00:36:43 --> 00:36:49 And the solution is now, I give a1 the value one, 539 00:36:48 --> 00:36:54 a2 will be negative two, and that is times e to the 540 00:36:52 --> 00:36:58 minus 2t. 541 00:36:55 --> 00:37:01 542 00:37:00 --> 00:37:06 Well, what does the thing then actually look like? 543 00:37:05 --> 00:37:11 What I am now going to do is, I drew a picture before, 544 00:37:11 --> 00:37:17 that spiral picture we had before of the way the thing 545 00:37:17 --> 00:37:23 looked at the point zero, zero. 546 00:37:22 --> 00:37:28 So at the point pi, zero how does it 547 00:37:27 --> 00:37:33 look, now? Well, it looks like the origin, 548 00:37:32 --> 00:37:38 but I am thinking of it really as the point pi, 549 00:37:37 --> 00:37:43 zero. In other words, 550 00:37:39 --> 00:37:45 I am thinking of a linear variable change sliding along 551 00:37:44 --> 00:37:50 the axis so that the point pi, zero now looks like 552 00:37:50 --> 00:37:56 the origin. If I do that then those two 553 00:37:53 --> 00:37:59 basic solutions, there is the one, 554 00:37:56 --> 00:38:02 one solution which is going out that way. 555 00:38:03 --> 00:38:09 And it is going out this way. But the other guy is coming in 556 00:38:07 --> 00:38:13 along the vector one, negative two. 557 00:38:09 --> 00:38:15 So one, negative two looks like this. 558 00:38:12 --> 00:38:18 This guy is coming in at a somewhat sharper angle, 559 00:38:15 --> 00:38:21 coming in because it is e to the negative 2t. 560 00:38:19 --> 00:38:25 And we recognize this, of course, as a saddle. 561 00:38:22 --> 00:38:28 And I would complete the trajectories by putting in some 562 00:38:26 --> 00:38:32 of the typical saddle lines like that. 563 00:38:30 --> 00:38:36 Now, I say that, too, gives a picture of what is 564 00:38:36 --> 00:38:42 happening to the pendulum near that point. 565 00:38:41 --> 00:38:47 Let's, for example, look here. 566 00:38:44 --> 00:38:50 What is happening here? This is theta, 567 00:38:49 --> 00:38:55 or really it is theta minus pi, is this axis. 568 00:38:55 --> 00:39:01 In other words, this will be zero. 569 00:39:01 --> 00:39:07 When theta is pi this will correspond to the point zero. 570 00:39:08 --> 00:39:14 Here is omega. What is theta doing? 571 00:39:12 --> 00:39:18 Starting up there this represents a value of theta a 572 00:39:18 --> 00:39:24 little bit less than pi, a little bit to the negative. 573 00:39:25 --> 00:39:31 A little bit less than pi. Here is pi, so a little bit 574 00:39:33 --> 00:39:39 less than pi is over here. A little bit less than pi. 575 00:39:40 --> 00:39:46 A little bit less. And omega is zero. 576 00:39:44 --> 00:39:50 What happened? Theta started decreasing ever 577 00:39:50 --> 00:39:56 more rapidly so that the omega was zero here, 578 00:39:56 --> 00:40:02 now omega is negative and gets much more negative. 579 00:40:04 --> 00:40:10 In other words, both theta decreases from that 580 00:40:09 --> 00:40:15 point and omega decreases also. What happened here? 581 00:40:14 --> 00:40:20 Here, theta is a little bit more than pi. 582 00:40:19 --> 00:40:25 Now it is a little bit more than pi. 583 00:40:23 --> 00:40:29 Theta now increases until it gets to 2pi and then oscillates 584 00:40:29 --> 00:40:35 around 2pi. So theta increases. 585 00:40:33 --> 00:40:39 And omega increases, too, because the angular 586 00:40:37 --> 00:40:43 velocity started at zero but, as theta gets more positive, 587 00:40:42 --> 00:40:48 omega gets positive, too, because theta is 588 00:40:46 --> 00:40:52 increasing. So omega increases and theta 589 00:40:49 --> 00:40:55 increases and it goes off like that. 590 00:40:52 --> 00:40:58 Well, the final step is to put them all together to be the big 591 00:40:58 --> 00:41:04 picture. Here we are for three, 592 00:41:03 --> 00:41:09 let's say, the big picture. Plot trajectories around each 593 00:41:12 --> 00:41:18 critical point and then add some. 594 00:41:17 --> 00:41:23 It's that last step that can cause you a little grief, 595 00:41:25 --> 00:41:31 but we will see how it works out. 596 00:41:32 --> 00:41:38 Add some more, according to your best 597 00:41:34 --> 00:41:40 judgment. Let's make a big picture now of 598 00:41:37 --> 00:41:43 our pendulum the way it apparently ought to look. 599 00:41:41 --> 00:41:47 Nice big axis since we are going to accommodate a lot of 600 00:41:45 --> 00:41:51 critical points here. Let's put in some critical 601 00:41:48 --> 00:41:54 points. Here is the origin. 602 00:41:50 --> 00:41:56 And now here is the one at pi, let's say, here is one at 2pi. 603 00:41:55 --> 00:42:01 I am going to add some of these others, 3pi, 4pi. 604 00:42:00 --> 00:42:06 I won't in their values. You can figure out what I mean. 605 00:42:05 --> 00:42:11 Zero here. And then here it will be 606 00:42:08 --> 00:42:14 negative pi, and here negative 2pi. 607 00:42:11 --> 00:42:17 I guess I can stop there. That is the theta axis, 608 00:42:15 --> 00:42:21 and here is the omega axis. And now, at each one of these, 609 00:42:21 --> 00:42:27 I stay nearby and I draw the linear trajectories, 610 00:42:25 --> 00:42:31 the trajectories of the corresponding linearized system. 611 00:42:32 --> 00:42:38 We decided here that the spiral went clockwise. 612 00:42:35 --> 00:42:41 Now, this point is physically, of course, the same as that 613 00:42:40 --> 00:42:46 one. But mathematically, 614 00:42:42 --> 00:42:48 the Jacobian matrix is the same also because if theta is 2pi the 615 00:42:47 --> 00:42:53 cosine of 2pi is also one. And this is the same matrix. 616 00:42:51 --> 00:42:57 So the analysis is identical. And, therefore, 617 00:42:54 --> 00:43:00 this point will also correspond to a counterclockwise spiral, 618 00:42:59 --> 00:43:05 as will this one. I am sorry, a clockwise spiral. 619 00:43:04 --> 00:43:10 Here, too, all of these points are the same. 620 00:43:08 --> 00:43:14 The behavior near them, clockwise spirals everywhere. 621 00:43:12 --> 00:43:18 How about the other ones? Well, the other ones correspond 622 00:43:17 --> 00:43:23 to these saddles, so let's draw them efficiently 623 00:43:21 --> 00:43:27 by doing the same thing on every one, mass production of saddles. 624 00:43:26 --> 00:43:32 There. And these guys go out. 625 00:43:30 --> 00:43:36 And the other guys come in, etc. 626 00:43:35 --> 00:43:41 And so here we have a little bit there, a little here, 627 00:43:44 --> 00:43:50 here, there, everywhere, etc. 628 00:43:50 --> 00:43:56 629 00:43:58 --> 00:44:04 Now what? Now you pray for inspiration. 630 00:44:01 --> 00:44:07 And what you have to do is add trajectories that are compatible 631 00:44:08 --> 00:44:14 with the ones you have. Let's start with this guy. 632 00:44:13 --> 00:44:19 Where is it going? Well, a trajectory either goes 633 00:44:18 --> 00:44:24 off to infinity, but generally they get trapped 634 00:44:22 --> 00:44:28 around critical points. This guy must be surely doing 635 00:44:28 --> 00:44:34 this. How about this one? 636 00:44:32 --> 00:44:38 Yeah, sure. How about this one? 637 00:44:35 --> 00:44:41 Why not? How about that one? 638 00:44:38 --> 00:44:44 Yeah. But notice you are in trouble 639 00:44:42 --> 00:44:48 when two arrows you want to put in are near each other and going 640 00:44:49 --> 00:44:55 in opposite directions. That you cannot have. 641 00:44:54 --> 00:45:00 Continuity forbids it. But notice if I, 642 00:44:59 --> 00:45:05 for example, had gotten these eigenlines 643 00:45:01 --> 00:45:07 wrong, if I made this come in and those go out because I made 644 00:45:05 --> 00:45:11 a simple error in drawing the thing, I would have said but I 645 00:45:08 --> 00:45:14 cannot draw this picture because this spiral wants to go that way 646 00:45:12 --> 00:45:18 but this, right next to it, wants to go the other way. 647 00:45:16 --> 00:45:22 That is the way you would know if you made a mistake. 648 00:45:19 --> 00:45:25 If you didn't make a mistake you won't have any trouble 649 00:45:22 --> 00:45:28 filling these things out. The directions of motions of 650 00:45:26 --> 00:45:32 the spirals, everything will be compatible. 651 00:45:30 --> 00:45:36 Okay. What is this guy doing? 652 00:45:33 --> 00:45:39 Oh, well, it must be joining up with that. 653 00:45:37 --> 00:45:43 How about this one? Well, it must be coming back 654 00:45:42 --> 00:45:48 there. How about this one? 655 00:45:45 --> 00:45:51 Well, trajectories cannot cross. 656 00:45:48 --> 00:45:54 This guy cannot cross so it must be doing this. 657 00:45:53 --> 00:45:59 All right. What is that trajectory? 658 00:45:57 --> 00:46:03 Starts zero. Omega, on the other hand, 659 00:46:03 --> 00:46:09 is big and positive. Omega big and positive. 660 00:46:10 --> 00:46:16 [LAUGHTER] I am scared. Omega starts. 661 00:46:15 --> 00:46:21 Theta is zero. Omega big and positive. 662 00:46:21 --> 00:46:27 It went around, slowed up, but continued beyond 663 00:46:28 --> 00:46:34 pi. And, in fact, 664 00:46:30 --> 00:46:36 went too far. It continued to go here and 665 00:46:33 --> 00:46:39 then finally wound around that one. 666 00:46:36 --> 00:46:42 Now do you see why we had to have all the critical points? 667 00:46:40 --> 00:46:46 You have to have all the critical points. 668 00:46:42 --> 00:46:48 And not just the two physicals ones because the other critical 669 00:46:47 --> 00:46:53 points are necessary to describe a complicated motion that goes 670 00:46:51 --> 00:46:57 round and round and round until finally it crashes. 671 00:46:56 --> 00:47:02 You are going to practice drawing these pictures and 672 00:46:59 --> 00:47:05 interpreting them in recitation tomorrow.