Hints for Writing Papers (PDF)
Hints for Presentations (PDF)
Thinking of the steroid hormone industry and earlier efforts to foster industrialization, what could Mexico have done to promote economic development during the 1950s? Did the Mexican government have any real choices, or was its fate foretold? If it did have choices, what should the government have done differently?
During the 1970s and early 1980s, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Bolivia, Peru, El Salvador, and others experienced a period of harsh military rule. During the 1980s and early 1990s, these countries made the transition to something resembling a democratic political system. Drawing on the readings, films, and lectures from lecture 6 to lecture 16, discuss the legacies of military rule. and the process of democratization in Chile and elsewhere. What were the main obstacles and challenges to democratization? How complete was the process of political transition? What "authoritarian enclaves" remained or remain?
A range of political scientists, economists, and civic activists have argued that the rule of law in Latin America is weak. Drawing on the cases of Brazil and Mexico, and focusing on the issues of property rights and criminal justice, discuss what can be done to improve the rule of law where it is seriously compromised.
You will divide up into teams, and each team will find a relatively recent article in the popular press on Latin America today. One team member will then summarize the article for the class; another will try to put it in context and explain what about it is provocative, misguided, and insightful. Other members of the team will then each pose one question for class discussion that flows logically from the article.
We have scheduled "individual class presentations" on the subject of economic development. For these presentations, you will be called upon at random to answer one of the five questions on the list below, meaning that you must be prepared to answer all of them.
The following questions are fair game:
Your presentations should be no more than 3 minutes, and we will be strict with the time to make sure that everyone gets a chance to go. (This is enough time to develop two or three good points.) You should make sure to practice and time your answers; be ready!
Based on your own reading and discussions in your break-out groups with the TA, you should be prepared to answer any of the following questions in class. You may continue to speak as long as you are "adding value", and I will follow-up your answers with more questions.
Same as first show and tell, except with regard to recent events in Chile.
Resolved: Chile's current democratic leaders should prosecute General Augusto Pinochet for his role in human rights abuses perpetrated under the military regime (1973-1990).
Team 1A (affirmative)
Team 1B (negative)
Team 2A (affirmative)
Team 2B (negative)
There will be two debates: one between Team 1A and Team 1B; the next between teams 1B and 2B. Speakers on the affirmative teams will defend prosecution; speakers on the negative teams will oppose it. Judges will then each render a 2-minute verdict.
The first speaker from each team will make a two-minute opening statement laying out her team's overall position. The second speaker from each team will then have two minutes to rebut the arguments made by the other teams. The third speaker from each team will then be allowed three minutes to cross-examine her counterpart on the opposing team, who must defend her team's position with brief and direct replies. The fourth speaker on each team will then have two minutes to summarize her team's arguments, addressing any weaknesses that have been exposed and pointing out weaknesses in the other team's positions. After we have held the first debate, we will move on to the second debate. Time permitting, we will then open up the class to general discussion.
Please note that we will time each presentation strictly, so that you should prepare and practice your comments. You will also want to talk among your team members to iron out your overall strategy. In most cases, this will require anticipating the strengths and weaknesses of each side of the debate, drawing on your knowledge of the Chilean case from readings, films, and lectures.
Because of time constraints, we will begin promptly. Lateness will be penalized in a draconian fashion. Each team will receive a grade, as will each individual speaker; your final grade for the session will be the average of the two grades.
Same as first show and tell, except with regard to recent issues in criminal justice in Mexico.
Everyone in the class will be divided into teams. You should address the following points:
You may elect as many speakers as you wish to represent your group, or just one, but you will be graded entirely as a team.
For the group presentation, everyone in the class will be divided into teams. Each team will be asked to present on the following issues:
Each person in each group must speak for roughly the same amount of time. You will, however, be graded entirely as a team.
Same as first show and tell, except that it should focus on Venezuela.