1
00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:13,139
GUEST SPEAKER: Dear
secretary of the interior,

2
00:00:13,139 --> 00:00:14,680
thank you for inviting
me to weigh in

3
00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:16,600
on this very important
counter study

4
00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:19,640
to and indefensible claim
by the heritage society.

5
00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:22,160
As you know, this
conservative organization

6
00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:24,957
is pushing for free enterprise
in limited government.

7
00:00:24,957 --> 00:00:26,540
So they're merely
trying to deregulate

8
00:00:26,540 --> 00:00:29,270
to support free enterprise
and to help their allies,

9
00:00:29,270 --> 00:00:31,630
including industry
to save some money.

10
00:00:31,630 --> 00:00:33,970
As you know, in 1970
the EPA was formed

11
00:00:33,970 --> 00:00:36,230
to control the extreme
pollution of water and air

12
00:00:36,230 --> 00:00:37,130
in this country.

13
00:00:37,130 --> 00:00:39,830
These conditions were causing
fish kills, bird [INAUDIBLE],,

14
00:00:39,830 --> 00:00:42,094
and having negative
effects on human health.

15
00:00:42,094 --> 00:00:44,510
[INAUDIBLE] control policy
suggests that clean [INAUDIBLE]

16
00:00:44,510 --> 00:00:47,330
were established, also
in 1970, to regulate

17
00:00:47,330 --> 00:00:48,700
the use of these pollutants.

18
00:00:48,700 --> 00:00:50,950
The goal was to protect the
ecosystem and human health

19
00:00:50,950 --> 00:00:52,610
for future generations.

20
00:00:52,610 --> 00:00:55,090
And so far, it's been
effective from the point

21
00:00:55,090 --> 00:00:57,330
of view of scientists and
environmental advocates.

22
00:00:57,330 --> 00:00:58,030
It's a success.

23
00:00:58,030 --> 00:00:59,730
Pollution has been
vastly reduced

24
00:00:59,730 --> 00:01:01,188
to [INAUDIBLE]
[? implementation ?]

25
00:01:01,188 --> 00:01:03,940
these policies and this is
a tremendous achievement,

26
00:01:03,940 --> 00:01:07,780
so why stop now is our argument.

27
00:01:07,780 --> 00:01:10,070
There are still extremely
endangered ecosystems

28
00:01:10,070 --> 00:01:12,250
in the country and
industries are constantly

29
00:01:12,250 --> 00:01:16,510
inventing new products that
have new negative effects

30
00:01:16,510 --> 00:01:20,000
on the environment that
we're not yet aware of.

31
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,240
So the study we conduct
to challenge the heritage

32
00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:25,490
societies claims
will have four parts.

33
00:01:25,490 --> 00:01:27,780
First, we'll focus on
science benchmarks.

34
00:01:27,780 --> 00:01:31,080
We'll also focus
on topic opinion,

35
00:01:31,080 --> 00:01:33,820
propose an administrative
review of the EPA,

36
00:01:33,820 --> 00:01:36,100
and a review by the
Justice Department.

37
00:01:36,100 --> 00:01:38,410
So for our first pillar,
the scientific measurements

38
00:01:38,410 --> 00:01:41,440
will hire an outside team
of environmental scientists

39
00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:43,590
to evaluate air
and water quality

40
00:01:43,590 --> 00:01:45,970
and how it has
improved since 1970.

41
00:01:45,970 --> 00:01:47,880
Scientists must also
prove that threats

42
00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:49,260
to the health of
our environment,

43
00:01:49,260 --> 00:01:51,630
to our clean air and
water, still exists

44
00:01:51,630 --> 00:01:54,520
and that regulation of anything
should be expanded and improved

45
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:56,800
and not reduced or terminated.

46
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:00,760
We need to frame our study and
focus on scientific results

47
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,380
to counter the
heritage societies

48
00:02:02,380 --> 00:02:05,480
focus on economic results.

49
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:07,691
We will design a study based
on science and numbers,

50
00:02:07,691 --> 00:02:09,190
because that is how
you will measure

51
00:02:09,190 --> 00:02:13,750
the efficacy of a program
like the clean air act.

52
00:02:13,750 --> 00:02:16,280
So focus on how you
improve vehicle emissions,

53
00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:19,150
how efficient bird
have bounced back.

54
00:02:19,150 --> 00:02:20,970
And this will help
legitimate our study

55
00:02:20,970 --> 00:02:23,020
in the eyes of the
scientific community

56
00:02:23,020 --> 00:02:25,580
and we'll also involve
the scientific community.

57
00:02:25,580 --> 00:02:27,780
We can also come at
this from an angle that

58
00:02:27,780 --> 00:02:30,730
will satisfy the business
community and congress.

59
00:02:30,730 --> 00:02:33,340
We can require companies to
maintain certain air quality

60
00:02:33,340 --> 00:02:36,660
standards as a means
to spur innovation.

61
00:02:36,660 --> 00:02:39,770
We've been innovative
in this regard so far.

62
00:02:39,770 --> 00:02:44,665
We've invented cleaner
fuels, renewable energy

63
00:02:44,665 --> 00:02:47,290
and we believe that the American
people can invent even better,

64
00:02:47,290 --> 00:02:49,600
cleaner technologies
and the regulation

65
00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:51,340
will help inspire that.

66
00:02:51,340 --> 00:02:55,420
Our second component will
focus on the public stance

67
00:02:55,420 --> 00:02:57,610
on the issue of
environmental protection.

68
00:02:57,610 --> 00:03:00,460
We're in an unprecedented era
in environmental awareness

69
00:03:00,460 --> 00:03:02,650
and the public is
completely behind it.

70
00:03:02,650 --> 00:03:05,770
I'd like to bring your attention
to a very revealing ruling that

71
00:03:05,770 --> 00:03:09,040
just came out in the last
few weeks in Massachusetts.

72
00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:11,700
Two men used their lobster
boat to block a coal shipment

73
00:03:11,700 --> 00:03:14,470
from passing through
the channel on its way

74
00:03:14,470 --> 00:03:16,570
to Brayton Point Power Plant.

75
00:03:16,570 --> 00:03:19,120
The men were on trial
for several counts

76
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,600
and faced several years
in jail and the judge

77
00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,190
ruled that he approved
the use of necessity

78
00:03:24,190 --> 00:03:26,140
as a defense for their actions.

79
00:03:26,140 --> 00:03:27,810
In order to use the
necessity defense,

80
00:03:27,810 --> 00:03:31,666
you have to prove that you were
in clear and imminent danger.

81
00:03:31,666 --> 00:03:33,040
And in this
instance, the defense

82
00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:35,050
argues the men in
their communities

83
00:03:35,050 --> 00:03:38,510
were in clear and imminent
danger of climate change.

84
00:03:38,510 --> 00:03:40,700
So the judge decreed they
had no legal alternative

85
00:03:40,700 --> 00:03:42,491
to protect themselves
and their communities

86
00:03:42,491 --> 00:03:45,050
other than to try to
block the coal shipment.

87
00:03:45,050 --> 00:03:47,920
So the prosecutors subsequently
dropped the charges.

88
00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,030
So obviously this is a
totally unprecedented case.

89
00:03:51,030 --> 00:03:54,970
This is an exciting time for
environmental progressives.

90
00:03:54,970 --> 00:03:56,932
Judges are going
rouge on this issue

91
00:03:56,932 --> 00:03:58,640
and they're allowing
people a lot of room

92
00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:01,338
to maneuver, to fight
environmental problems,

93
00:04:01,338 --> 00:04:03,254
so we want to design a
policy [INAUDIBLE] that

94
00:04:03,254 --> 00:04:06,380
involves the public energy
as much as possible.

95
00:04:06,380 --> 00:04:08,300
So we're going to
educate the public,

96
00:04:08,300 --> 00:04:09,883
we're going to use
some of our funding

97
00:04:09,883 --> 00:04:12,100
to organize conferences and
small community advisory

98
00:04:12,100 --> 00:04:12,607
committees.

99
00:04:12,607 --> 00:04:15,190
These committees will call small
meetings in their communities

100
00:04:15,190 --> 00:04:18,750
and discuss the EPA's
[INAUDIBLE] control policies

101
00:04:18,750 --> 00:04:20,380
and they can weigh
in on whether or not

102
00:04:20,380 --> 00:04:23,250
they think those policies
should continue at this time.

103
00:04:23,250 --> 00:04:25,000
This method will give
our study legitimacy

104
00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:26,940
in the eyes of the
public and in the eyes

105
00:04:26,940 --> 00:04:31,900
of congress, who depend
on the public for voting.

106
00:04:31,900 --> 00:04:34,830
I highly doubt a heritage
society did a public assessment

107
00:04:34,830 --> 00:04:37,024
or reached out to the
public in their review,

108
00:04:37,024 --> 00:04:38,440
so basically, we'll
get our study,

109
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,500
that added legitimacy that we
involved the public opinion.

110
00:04:41,500 --> 00:04:43,420
And then, come election
time, the public

111
00:04:43,420 --> 00:04:46,150
will play a role in the
political evaluation

112
00:04:46,150 --> 00:04:51,040
of the heritage societies
policy suggestions.

113
00:04:51,040 --> 00:04:54,300
And we'll also ask the public
to consider who the heritage

114
00:04:54,300 --> 00:04:56,620
society is serving
in trying to overturn

115
00:04:56,620 --> 00:04:59,300
these important policies.

116
00:04:59,300 --> 00:05:01,270
The courts finally
ruled that the BP oil

117
00:05:01,270 --> 00:05:05,430
spill was the result of gross
negligence and so we can ask,

118
00:05:05,430 --> 00:05:07,930
are these the types of behaviors
the heritage society thinks

119
00:05:07,930 --> 00:05:10,691
we no longer need
to regulate against.

120
00:05:10,691 --> 00:05:11,190
OK.

121
00:05:11,190 --> 00:05:14,590
Third component, we're going
to play the business community

122
00:05:14,590 --> 00:05:16,165
into the heritage
society by holding

123
00:05:16,165 --> 00:05:19,020
an administrative
review of the EPA.

124
00:05:19,020 --> 00:05:21,550
They are arguing against the
efficiency of the program.

125
00:05:21,550 --> 00:05:24,130
The EPA has had some
organizational problems in

126
00:05:24,130 --> 00:05:28,510
the last few decades, so we're
going to go ahead and help them

127
00:05:28,510 --> 00:05:31,360
out with that and also better--

128
00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:34,900
organize better [? about ?]
EPA is good for everybody.

129
00:05:34,900 --> 00:05:37,840
And that will satisfy the
business community, also,

130
00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:39,700
to have some of
that what they see

131
00:05:39,700 --> 00:05:41,590
as wasteful practices reduced.

132
00:05:41,590 --> 00:05:43,173
Our fourth review
method, like I said,

133
00:05:43,173 --> 00:05:45,094
is to involve the
Justice Department

134
00:05:45,094 --> 00:05:47,760
and I'll remind you again of the
instance of the judge releasing

135
00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:50,980
the environmental activists
who blocked the coal barge.

136
00:05:50,980 --> 00:05:52,720
So the Justice
Department, as a whole,

137
00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:55,075
we think should take a stand
on this issue of the right

138
00:05:55,075 --> 00:05:57,440
to clean air and water,
so we're requesting

139
00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:00,200
a judicial review of the
constitutionality of removing

140
00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:02,460
[INAUDIBLE] policies
designed to protect

141
00:06:02,460 --> 00:06:04,274
the people and the environment.

142
00:06:04,274 --> 00:06:06,190
So in conclusion, I agree
with you, secretary,

143
00:06:06,190 --> 00:06:08,856
that the study by the
heritage society is bogus

144
00:06:08,856 --> 00:06:11,230
and we need to organize our
own review of command control

145
00:06:11,230 --> 00:06:13,550
policies that
highlight their value.

146
00:06:13,550 --> 00:06:15,100
PROFESSOR: Thank you.