WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.364 align:middle line:84%
[SQUEAKING]
[RUSTLING] [CLICKING]

00:00:04.364 --> 00:00:09.680 align:middle line:90%


00:00:09.680 --> 00:00:14.080 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: I just wanted
to do a little review.

00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:19.020 align:middle line:84%
In the last class, I had
mentioned the Westinghouse

00:00:19.020 --> 00:00:21.900 align:middle line:84%
eVinci kind of nuclear
battery concept,

00:00:21.900 --> 00:00:26.140 align:middle line:84%
and I hadn't looked
back at this in a while.

00:00:26.140 --> 00:00:28.440 align:middle line:84%
And Emil, who's walking
through the door,

00:00:28.440 --> 00:00:33.400 align:middle line:84%
had informed me that they
had made progress on this.

00:00:33.400 --> 00:00:35.840 align:middle line:84%
So I just wanted to
show you the progress,

00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:37.340 align:middle line:90%
apparently, care of Emil.

00:00:37.340 --> 00:00:40.600 align:middle line:84%
This is the reactor has gone
from this concept, which

00:00:40.600 --> 00:00:43.120 align:middle line:90%
was very rough, to this.

00:00:43.120 --> 00:00:47.080 align:middle line:84%
So it's now, I
guess, five modules--

00:00:47.080 --> 00:00:50.800 align:middle line:84%
reactor module, power conversion
module, and then at least three

00:00:50.800 --> 00:00:55.560 align:middle line:90%
of these control modules.

00:00:55.560 --> 00:00:58.320 align:middle line:84%
You can see here that it looked
like originally the reactor was

00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:01.380 align:middle line:84%
like 12 to 15 feet high
based on this fence.

00:01:01.380 --> 00:01:03.620 align:middle line:84%
And you can see here
there's a person.

00:01:03.620 --> 00:01:06.980 align:middle line:84%
So it looks like it
got a lot bigger, which

00:01:06.980 --> 00:01:10.280 align:middle line:84%
I think it looks like details
are still being worked out.

00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:14.060 align:middle line:84%
But that's kind of illustrative
of why the costs escalate.

00:01:14.060 --> 00:01:17.420 align:middle line:84%
You have this idea, and then you
have to actually engineer it.

00:01:17.420 --> 00:01:19.380 align:middle line:90%
And reality sets in.

00:01:19.380 --> 00:01:21.820 align:middle line:90%
That explains what's going on.

00:01:21.820 --> 00:01:25.240 align:middle line:84%
I also said that
for the first time,

00:01:25.240 --> 00:01:29.100 align:middle line:84%
I had tried to get you some
numbers about how cost had come

00:01:29.100 --> 00:01:31.900 align:middle line:84%
down, not depending on
the number of reactors

00:01:31.900 --> 00:01:35.420 align:middle line:84%
that were produced, but actually
on the rate of production, which

00:01:35.420 --> 00:01:39.180 align:middle line:84%
seemed to be actually where
the real benefits of factory

00:01:39.180 --> 00:01:41.140 align:middle line:90%
fabrication lie.

00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:44.040 align:middle line:90%
And I found this.

00:01:44.040 --> 00:01:48.580 align:middle line:84%
I was looking for
a comparable study,

00:01:48.580 --> 00:01:51.860 align:middle line:84%
and I found this study
on rates of production

00:01:51.860 --> 00:01:57.280 align:middle line:84%
for fixed fuel cells,
stationary fuel cells,

00:01:57.280 --> 00:01:58.790 align:middle line:84%
which are kind of
like a battery,

00:01:58.790 --> 00:02:00.250 align:middle line:90%
but a little bit more complex.

00:02:00.250 --> 00:02:02.850 align:middle line:84%
And they found a
30% cost reduction

00:02:02.850 --> 00:02:07.010 align:middle line:84%
for every factor of 10 kind
of, at least at the beginning,

00:02:07.010 --> 00:02:09.250 align:middle line:84%
factor of 10 increase
in production rate.

00:02:09.250 --> 00:02:14.330 align:middle line:84%
Emil also told me that there's
a study looking at this

00:02:14.330 --> 00:02:17.130 align:middle line:90%
in nuclear for microreactors.

00:02:17.130 --> 00:02:20.770 align:middle line:84%
So I thought this is a
better example, maybe.

00:02:20.770 --> 00:02:23.070 align:middle line:90%
So here's the study.

00:02:23.070 --> 00:02:26.450 align:middle line:84%
And here's their kind
of final bottom line--

00:02:26.450 --> 00:02:31.340 align:middle line:84%
20% when the cost increases
by a factor of 100,

00:02:31.340 --> 00:02:33.610 align:middle line:90%
or two tenfoldings.

00:02:33.610 --> 00:02:36.790 align:middle line:84%
So that's instead of
a 30% per tenfolding.

00:02:36.790 --> 00:02:42.170 align:middle line:84%
If you back out, it's
about 9% per tenfolding.

00:02:42.170 --> 00:02:47.050 align:middle line:84%
So I guess my calculation
was overoptimistic.

00:02:47.050 --> 00:02:51.410 align:middle line:84%
But you can see there there
are people looking at this.

00:02:51.410 --> 00:02:55.010 align:middle line:84%
It doesn't move in
a good direction.

00:02:55.010 --> 00:03:00.230 align:middle line:84%
I guess if I revise my slide,
then it would look like this.

00:03:00.230 --> 00:03:03.150 align:middle line:84%
I was suggesting that maybe
at 50 units per year, which

00:03:03.150 --> 00:03:05.770 align:middle line:84%
is like all the nonwind
and solar online,

00:03:05.770 --> 00:03:09.150 align:middle line:84%
we could bring
the cost down 45%.

00:03:09.150 --> 00:03:14.630 align:middle line:84%
But the revised numbers
are not as good.

00:03:14.630 --> 00:03:18.850 align:middle line:90%
So sorry for being optimistic.

00:03:18.850 --> 00:03:21.910 align:middle line:90%
I have a habit of that.

00:03:21.910 --> 00:03:22.410 align:middle line:90%
OK.

00:03:22.410 --> 00:03:27.550 align:middle line:84%
So today, we're going to
talk about the electric grid.

00:03:27.550 --> 00:03:32.230 align:middle line:84%
So in the beginning, there
really wasn't a grid.

00:03:32.230 --> 00:03:35.710 align:middle line:84%
And let's do some
history because it's fun.

00:03:35.710 --> 00:03:39.510 align:middle line:84%
So the first
electric distribution

00:03:39.510 --> 00:03:42.430 align:middle line:84%
of any kind with a
central generator

00:03:42.430 --> 00:03:46.750 align:middle line:84%
was in Wall Street
in New York in 1882.

00:03:46.750 --> 00:03:49.270 align:middle line:84%
And the price of
electricity, if we inflate it

00:03:49.270 --> 00:03:53.430 align:middle line:84%
to today's dollars, was about
100 times more expensive

00:03:53.430 --> 00:03:54.850 align:middle line:90%
than it is today.

00:03:54.850 --> 00:03:58.210 align:middle line:90%
It was a real luxury item.

00:03:58.210 --> 00:04:02.770 align:middle line:84%
And today, we have this enormous
grid that actually is not just

00:04:02.770 --> 00:04:03.630 align:middle line:90%
an American grid.

00:04:03.630 --> 00:04:08.530 align:middle line:84%
It goes up into Canada,
and it's shared.

00:04:08.530 --> 00:04:12.290 align:middle line:84%
It's split into three
synchronous zones.

00:04:12.290 --> 00:04:19.290 align:middle line:84%
And Texas has its own
grid, as does Alaska.

00:04:19.290 --> 00:04:21.370 align:middle line:84%
Texas likes this because
it insulates them

00:04:21.370 --> 00:04:23.530 align:middle line:84%
from federal oversight,
because anytime

00:04:23.530 --> 00:04:25.968 align:middle line:84%
you sell electricity
across borders,

00:04:25.968 --> 00:04:27.510 align:middle line:84%
the federal government
gets involved.

00:04:27.510 --> 00:04:31.330 align:middle line:90%
But Texas avoids that.

00:04:31.330 --> 00:04:33.850 align:middle line:84%
And so this creates
a political structure

00:04:33.850 --> 00:04:35.750 align:middle line:84%
that we're going to
talk more about in class

00:04:35.750 --> 00:04:38.610 align:middle line:84%
that has really shaped
the history of how

00:04:38.610 --> 00:04:40.830 align:middle line:90%
this grid operates.

00:04:40.830 --> 00:04:44.210 align:middle line:84%
And there are various councils
and political entities that

00:04:44.210 --> 00:04:47.330 align:middle line:90%
are important in this story.

00:04:47.330 --> 00:04:50.530 align:middle line:84%
The grid, in case you
are not electrically

00:04:50.530 --> 00:04:53.090 align:middle line:84%
engineering inclined,
is something

00:04:53.090 --> 00:04:58.040 align:middle line:84%
that was really made possible
by the emergence of AC

00:04:58.040 --> 00:04:59.140 align:middle line:90%
transformers.

00:04:59.140 --> 00:05:03.720 align:middle line:84%
And before that,
electricity distribution

00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:05.680 align:middle line:90%
was done with direct current.

00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:09.760 align:middle line:84%
But the problem with direct
current is as follows.

00:05:09.760 --> 00:05:12.280 align:middle line:84%
Let's say that I
have a house that

00:05:12.280 --> 00:05:18.160 align:middle line:84%
wants to consume a kilowatt
of power at 100 volts.

00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:23.700 align:middle line:84%
And so that's something like 10
to 20 incandescent light bulbs--

00:05:23.700 --> 00:05:26.280 align:middle line:90%
not a huge amount of power.

00:05:26.280 --> 00:05:31.400 align:middle line:84%
So by Ohm's law, we can
calculate the current required.

00:05:31.400 --> 00:05:35.340 align:middle line:90%
And we would get 10 amps.

00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:38.220 align:middle line:84%
1,000 watts divided by
100 volts is 10 amps.

00:05:38.220 --> 00:05:39.680 align:middle line:90%
OK, very simple.

00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:43.580 align:middle line:84%
Now let's imagine that house is
a mile away from the generator,

00:05:43.580 --> 00:05:45.320 align:middle line:90%
which is not that far.

00:05:45.320 --> 00:05:47.680 align:middle line:90%
Walk across campus.

00:05:47.680 --> 00:05:51.320 align:middle line:84%
And so there's going to be
some ohmic losses on this line.

00:05:51.320 --> 00:05:54.400 align:middle line:84%
And if you look up the
resistance of copper wire--

00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:57.780 align:middle line:84%
this is a 10 AWG is
American Wire Gauge.

00:05:57.780 --> 00:05:59.720 align:middle line:84%
I don't know if you
know your wire gauges,

00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:02.500 align:middle line:84%
but this is much fatter, a
little bit fatter than what you

00:06:02.500 --> 00:06:05.700 align:middle line:84%
have in your house, which is
typically around 14 for 15-amp

00:06:05.700 --> 00:06:10.820 align:middle line:84%
service or 12 for
20-amp service.

00:06:10.820 --> 00:06:17.000 align:middle line:84%
And so this is not
a shoddy, thin wire.

00:06:17.000 --> 00:06:24.380 align:middle line:84%
And it has a loss of 1
ohm per thousand feet.

00:06:24.380 --> 00:06:27.980 align:middle line:84%
For 5,000 feet, which is
one mile, we would have--

00:06:27.980 --> 00:06:31.060 align:middle line:84%
well, I guess I
did my math wrong.

00:06:31.060 --> 00:06:33.920 align:middle line:84%
I said, oh, round trip,
yes, 10 ohms round trip.

00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:36.260 align:middle line:84%
Because you've got to send
the current there and back.

00:06:36.260 --> 00:06:38.300 align:middle line:90%
Yes, so 10 ohms round trip.

00:06:38.300 --> 00:06:42.100 align:middle line:84%
And so we need to figure out
how much energy is lost here.

00:06:42.100 --> 00:06:42.600 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:48.020 align:middle line:84%
So again, we use Ohm's law,
and we say with 10 amps running

00:06:48.020 --> 00:06:52.880 align:middle line:84%
through 10-ohm resistor
is a 100-volt graph.

00:06:52.880 --> 00:06:56.900 align:middle line:84%
So in order to provide the
100 volts at the house,

00:06:56.900 --> 00:07:00.760 align:middle line:84%
the generator needs to
put 200 volts on the line.

00:07:00.760 --> 00:07:03.840 align:middle line:84%
And that means 50%
of the energy is

00:07:03.840 --> 00:07:06.080 align:middle line:90%
being lost in this power line.

00:07:06.080 --> 00:07:10.800 align:middle line:84%
And that's why the
small DC Edison-style

00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:16.280 align:middle line:84%
grids were very tiny with
just very local customers.

00:07:16.280 --> 00:07:20.740 align:middle line:84%
But once you can
fix this problem,

00:07:20.740 --> 00:07:23.020 align:middle line:84%
well, there is the
original Edison plant.

00:07:23.020 --> 00:07:25.400 align:middle line:84%
There's the service
area in orange.

00:07:25.400 --> 00:07:28.400 align:middle line:84%
You can fix this problem if
you can change the voltage.

00:07:28.400 --> 00:07:34.240 align:middle line:84%
So transformers preserve
power by changing current

00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.780 align:middle line:90%
for voltage, potential energy.

00:07:36.780 --> 00:07:38.660 align:middle line:90%
And so let's just do that.

00:07:38.660 --> 00:07:42.280 align:middle line:84%
Let's say we'll have power
transformers at each end.

00:07:42.280 --> 00:07:45.640 align:middle line:84%
And instead of sending 100
volts down that mile of wire,

00:07:45.640 --> 00:07:48.200 align:middle line:84%
we're going to
send 100 kilovolts.

00:07:48.200 --> 00:07:51.430 align:middle line:84%
Now I send 10
milliamps of current

00:07:51.430 --> 00:07:53.230 align:middle line:84%
through the line
at 100 kilovolts,

00:07:53.230 --> 00:07:55.070 align:middle line:90%
the same amount of power.

00:07:55.070 --> 00:07:58.210 align:middle line:84%
And if I do the same
loss calculation,

00:07:58.210 --> 00:08:00.090 align:middle line:84%
here's my 10 milliamps
times 10 ohms.

00:08:00.090 --> 00:08:02.550 align:middle line:84%
I'm going to lose
100 millivolts.

00:08:02.550 --> 00:08:08.730 align:middle line:84%
So the amount of power I lose
is 0.1% as opposed to 50%.

00:08:08.730 --> 00:08:13.110 align:middle line:84%
That was the magic-- the
invention of the transformer.

00:08:13.110 --> 00:08:18.390 align:middle line:84%
And so that enabled suddenly
long-distance transmission

00:08:18.390 --> 00:08:21.670 align:middle line:84%
and as a result, large-scale
power stations that

00:08:21.670 --> 00:08:24.670 align:middle line:90%
could then power large regions.

00:08:24.670 --> 00:08:28.510 align:middle line:84%
So this is the first of those
stations in Schoellkopf Mills

00:08:28.510 --> 00:08:30.310 align:middle line:90%
outside of Niagara Falls.

00:08:30.310 --> 00:08:31.770 align:middle line:90%
And this is a hydro station.

00:08:31.770 --> 00:08:36.630 align:middle line:84%
And just lots of early
makeshift generators running

00:08:36.630 --> 00:08:39.030 align:middle line:90%
turbines powered by this thing.

00:08:39.030 --> 00:08:42.350 align:middle line:84%
So this thing sent power
to Buffalo, New York.

00:08:42.350 --> 00:08:43.690 align:middle line:90%
It was 20 miles away.

00:08:43.690 --> 00:08:46.430 align:middle line:84%
And it was all possible
because of these transformers.

00:08:46.430 --> 00:08:49.690 align:middle line:84%
So early electric
grid started out

00:08:49.690 --> 00:08:52.630 align:middle line:84%
by sending power
at 66 kilovolts,

00:08:52.630 --> 00:08:55.390 align:middle line:84%
and then it went from
there 150 kilovolts,

00:08:55.390 --> 00:08:58.330 align:middle line:90%
245 kilovolts, 375 kilovolts.

00:08:58.330 --> 00:09:00.930 align:middle line:84%
Now we talk about
long-distance transmission,

00:09:00.930 --> 00:09:05.910 align:middle line:84%
high-voltage transmission
at 765 kilovolts, I think.

00:09:05.910 --> 00:09:08.210 align:middle line:84%
And people are even
talking about going

00:09:08.210 --> 00:09:11.130 align:middle line:90%
to higher numbers than that.

00:09:11.130 --> 00:09:17.690 align:middle line:84%
So the high voltage
and distances

00:09:17.690 --> 00:09:19.270 align:middle line:90%
then became the standard.

00:09:19.270 --> 00:09:23.330 align:middle line:84%
And the reason was because
of economies of scale.

00:09:23.330 --> 00:09:27.170 align:middle line:84%
So just like building
a larger nuclear power

00:09:27.170 --> 00:09:31.130 align:middle line:84%
plant is more economic than
building a microreactor,

00:09:31.130 --> 00:09:34.250 align:middle line:84%
that is also true for a natural
gas plant and a coal plant.

00:09:34.250 --> 00:09:38.010 align:middle line:84%
And so it was more economic
to build these large plants

00:09:38.010 --> 00:09:41.930 align:middle line:84%
and run transmission to
customers over long distances

00:09:41.930 --> 00:09:46.250 align:middle line:84%
than to have a bunch of
smaller regional plants.

00:09:46.250 --> 00:09:49.240 align:middle line:84%
And so this led to of
hub-and-spoke architecture

00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:52.280 align:middle line:84%
that we see and that has
dominated the world today.

00:09:52.280 --> 00:09:55.600 align:middle line:84%
And also, as a result of
this, the companies that

00:09:55.600 --> 00:09:57.480 align:middle line:84%
were interested in
building these plants

00:09:57.480 --> 00:10:01.920 align:middle line:84%
became large, vertically
integrated monopolies that

00:10:01.920 --> 00:10:05.060 align:middle line:84%
built plants, built transmission
lines, built distribution,

00:10:05.060 --> 00:10:08.880 align:middle line:84%
built transformers, and
they owned everything.

00:10:08.880 --> 00:10:12.520 align:middle line:84%
And so you had these regions
that run company-operated.

00:10:12.520 --> 00:10:16.560 align:middle line:84%
Something-something Edison
Company operated in this region,

00:10:16.560 --> 00:10:18.820 align:middle line:84%
and Edison Company
operated in that region.

00:10:18.820 --> 00:10:22.400 align:middle line:84%
And they had total control
of what was going on.

00:10:22.400 --> 00:10:26.760 align:middle line:84%
Another couple of
consequences to this history--

00:10:26.760 --> 00:10:30.120 align:middle line:84%
so one is that this
architecture is

00:10:30.120 --> 00:10:33.760 align:middle line:84%
more vulnerable to
single points of failure.

00:10:33.760 --> 00:10:38.040 align:middle line:84%
If this plant goes
down, you've got issues.

00:10:38.040 --> 00:10:40.020 align:middle line:84%
These transmission
lines are fragile.

00:10:40.020 --> 00:10:44.160 align:middle line:84%
They can be taken out by
natural events-- lightning,

00:10:44.160 --> 00:10:48.500 align:middle line:84%
someone drives their
car into the power pole.

00:10:48.500 --> 00:10:51.020 align:middle line:90%
It's not great.

00:10:51.020 --> 00:10:53.900 align:middle line:84%
Another thing is because of
vertically integrated monopoly,

00:10:53.900 --> 00:10:57.660 align:middle line:84%
you had potential
opportunities for price fixing,

00:10:57.660 --> 00:11:01.160 align:middle line:84%
and there was no
competitor nearby to go to.

00:11:01.160 --> 00:11:04.180 align:middle line:84%
And so you had
problems with pricing.

00:11:04.180 --> 00:11:08.620 align:middle line:84%
And finally, this
architecture in today's world

00:11:08.620 --> 00:11:12.360 align:middle line:84%
becomes unfriendly towards
things like wind and solar,

00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:14.980 align:middle line:84%
which are distributed generation
because these power lines are

00:11:14.980 --> 00:11:16.720 align:middle line:90%
all going back to one point.

00:11:16.720 --> 00:11:18.760 align:middle line:84%
And unless this is where
your solar farm is,

00:11:18.760 --> 00:11:19.920 align:middle line:90%
it's not helping you.

00:11:19.920 --> 00:11:23.380 align:middle line:84%
If you're trying to move power
from different distributed

00:11:23.380 --> 00:11:26.340 align:middle line:84%
solar, distributed
wind generation,

00:11:26.340 --> 00:11:29.260 align:middle line:84%
this architecture
works against you.

00:11:29.260 --> 00:11:33.340 align:middle line:84%
And so that is a situation that
we're still dealing with today.

00:11:33.340 --> 00:11:35.900 align:middle line:84%
So let me just talk a little
bit about this price fixing

00:11:35.900 --> 00:11:37.180 align:middle line:90%
situation.

00:11:37.180 --> 00:11:41.260 align:middle line:90%
So this was pretty real.

00:11:41.260 --> 00:11:44.880 align:middle line:84%
The price of
electricity in 1900,

00:11:44.880 --> 00:11:50.360 align:middle line:84%
inflated to today's dollars,
was $6 per kilowatt,

00:11:50.360 --> 00:11:56.920 align:middle line:84%
which is at least a factor of
10 higher than retail price

00:11:56.920 --> 00:12:05.120 align:middle line:84%
and a factor of 100 higher than
wholesale price for electricity.

00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:09.760 align:middle line:84%
And this was basically
holding back expansion.

00:12:09.760 --> 00:12:12.560 align:middle line:84%
During the Great Depression,
the US government

00:12:12.560 --> 00:12:16.000 align:middle line:84%
intervened and
created a regulator

00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:18.960 align:middle line:84%
to prevent this monopoly
pricing of electricity,

00:12:18.960 --> 00:12:26.680 align:middle line:84%
and prices dropped from $6
per kilowatt to $0.88 in 1932.

00:12:26.680 --> 00:12:30.080 align:middle line:84%
And of course, that meant
more access to electricity

00:12:30.080 --> 00:12:32.600 align:middle line:84%
for more people, which
helped pull the country out

00:12:32.600 --> 00:12:34.120 align:middle line:90%
of the Great Depression.

00:12:34.120 --> 00:12:35.540 align:middle line:90%
And it was a great thing.

00:12:35.540 --> 00:12:40.200 align:middle line:84%
And of course, we built Hoover
Dam and electrified society.

00:12:40.200 --> 00:12:42.710 align:middle line:84%
So the kind of bottom
line is regulation

00:12:42.710 --> 00:12:46.750 align:middle line:84%
is important to prevent
monopoly pricing and issues,

00:12:46.750 --> 00:12:51.250 align:middle line:84%
and also that cheap power
is also very important.

00:12:51.250 --> 00:12:55.790 align:middle line:84%
And it's what keeps the
middle class growing

00:12:55.790 --> 00:12:58.110 align:middle line:90%
and the economy ticking along.

00:12:58.110 --> 00:13:03.270 align:middle line:84%
So between 1920
and 1960, the grid

00:13:03.270 --> 00:13:07.190 align:middle line:84%
just blew up, expanded
by enormous amounts.

00:13:07.190 --> 00:13:09.830 align:middle line:84%
And here's essentially
the architecture

00:13:09.830 --> 00:13:12.630 align:middle line:84%
of the transmission system
in the United States today.

00:13:12.630 --> 00:13:17.750 align:middle line:84%
The major generation
is shown as these dots.

00:13:17.750 --> 00:13:19.630 align:middle line:90%
Coal is gray.

00:13:19.630 --> 00:13:23.530 align:middle line:84%
Nuclear is yellow,
and hydro is blue.

00:13:23.530 --> 00:13:28.630 align:middle line:84%
I don't show the natural gas
because this is too much of it.

00:13:28.630 --> 00:13:31.670 align:middle line:84%
And this has basically
kind of worked.

00:13:31.670 --> 00:13:37.190 align:middle line:84%
Regions that were owned
by different companies

00:13:37.190 --> 00:13:39.650 align:middle line:84%
expanded, connected
to other regions,

00:13:39.650 --> 00:13:41.370 align:middle line:84%
and then they could
share power and deal

00:13:41.370 --> 00:13:44.030 align:middle line:84%
with power plants going out
or refueling in service.

00:13:44.030 --> 00:13:47.650 align:middle line:84%
And that was all well
and good until 1965.

00:13:47.650 --> 00:13:52.730 align:middle line:84%
So what happened in 1965 is
there was an enormous blackout.

00:13:52.730 --> 00:13:56.690 align:middle line:84%
And the result is they
realized that having everyone

00:13:56.690 --> 00:13:59.070 align:middle line:84%
operating their
grid laissez-faire

00:13:59.070 --> 00:14:06.770 align:middle line:84%
and pushing power onto the grid
was not a stable situation.

00:14:06.770 --> 00:14:10.410 align:middle line:84%
It's kind of a miracle
that this thing works.

00:14:10.410 --> 00:14:15.930 align:middle line:84%
And it was basically you
create instabilities.

00:14:15.930 --> 00:14:18.450 align:middle line:84%
If you push power
onto the grid, you

00:14:18.450 --> 00:14:21.810 align:middle line:84%
energize the lines,
which then store energy

00:14:21.810 --> 00:14:23.190 align:middle line:90%
as a magnetic field.

00:14:23.190 --> 00:14:24.470 align:middle line:90%
So you have reactive power.

00:14:24.470 --> 00:14:28.410 align:middle line:84%
So you have this
sloshing of energy around

00:14:28.410 --> 00:14:30.830 align:middle line:84%
between mines and
transformers and generators.

00:14:30.830 --> 00:14:32.630 align:middle line:84%
And you can cause
generators to oscillate.

00:14:32.630 --> 00:14:35.570 align:middle line:84%
And you can do all kinds
of problematic things

00:14:35.570 --> 00:14:38.530 align:middle line:84%
if you're not careful
with how you control

00:14:38.530 --> 00:14:40.310 align:middle line:90%
power flows on the grid.

00:14:40.310 --> 00:14:47.670 align:middle line:84%
And so in '65, a non-profit
was created called--

00:14:47.670 --> 00:14:50.590 align:middle line:84%
oh, so I should have said that
the nonprofit, the organization

00:14:50.590 --> 00:14:53.070 align:middle line:84%
created to do this
regulation, is

00:14:53.070 --> 00:14:59.530 align:middle line:84%
FERC, which is the Federal
Energy Regulation, something,

00:14:59.530 --> 00:15:00.030 align:middle line:90%
something.

00:15:00.030 --> 00:15:01.490 align:middle line:90%
I don't know.

00:15:01.490 --> 00:15:02.830 align:middle line:90%
We have to look it up.

00:15:02.830 --> 00:15:04.910 align:middle line:90%
I really should know that.

00:15:04.910 --> 00:15:06.830 align:middle line:84%
And it's a government
entity, and it basically

00:15:06.830 --> 00:15:16.510 align:middle line:84%
just sets rules for how you
compete and price electricity.

00:15:16.510 --> 00:15:20.790 align:middle line:84%
In 1965, following the blackout,
a nonprofit organization

00:15:20.790 --> 00:15:25.670 align:middle line:84%
called NERC, which is the
National Energy Reliability

00:15:25.670 --> 00:15:30.150 align:middle line:84%
Corporation, was
created to set rules

00:15:30.150 --> 00:15:33.390 align:middle line:84%
for not economic
competitiveness,

00:15:33.390 --> 00:15:36.470 align:middle line:84%
but how you actually
dump the power

00:15:36.470 --> 00:15:39.280 align:middle line:84%
on the grid, how you maintain
the grid in a reliable state,

00:15:39.280 --> 00:15:43.240 align:middle line:84%
how you can communicate power
between entities, and so on.

00:15:43.240 --> 00:15:46.820 align:middle line:90%


00:15:46.820 --> 00:15:48.120 align:middle line:90%
FERC is a federal entity.

00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:49.940 align:middle line:90%
NERC is a non-profit.

00:15:49.940 --> 00:15:51.040 align:middle line:90%
Those are the differences.

00:15:51.040 --> 00:15:53.380 align:middle line:90%
N-E-R-C is NERC.

00:15:53.380 --> 00:15:58.040 align:middle line:84%
So NERC's rules are
essentially voluntary.

00:15:58.040 --> 00:16:01.400 align:middle line:84%
But because everyone wants
their grids to operate

00:16:01.400 --> 00:16:04.460 align:middle line:84%
and so they can make money,
people follow the rules.

00:16:04.460 --> 00:16:11.300 align:middle line:84%
And so following this time
in the '60s, what emerged was

00:16:11.300 --> 00:16:16.260 align:middle line:84%
a structure that was
kind of a private cloud.

00:16:16.260 --> 00:16:19.220 align:middle line:84%
You had a handful
of major generators

00:16:19.220 --> 00:16:22.940 align:middle line:84%
that operated their
local regional monopoly,

00:16:22.940 --> 00:16:25.060 align:middle line:84%
and each company
would individually

00:16:25.060 --> 00:16:27.640 align:middle line:84%
make decisions about
what generation

00:16:27.640 --> 00:16:29.800 align:middle line:84%
it was going to build,
what transmission

00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:31.900 align:middle line:84%
it was going to
build, where it was

00:16:31.900 --> 00:16:33.540 align:middle line:90%
going to put the power lines.

00:16:33.540 --> 00:16:38.040 align:middle line:84%
And then you had
essentially state regulators

00:16:38.040 --> 00:16:40.990 align:middle line:84%
and FERC working
together to say, look,

00:16:40.990 --> 00:16:44.120 align:middle line:84%
you can't rip off the consumer,
so we're going to regulate

00:16:44.120 --> 00:16:45.800 align:middle line:90%
the prices you charge.

00:16:45.800 --> 00:16:48.420 align:middle line:90%
And everyone worked things out.

00:16:48.420 --> 00:16:52.640 align:middle line:90%


00:16:52.640 --> 00:16:58.080 align:middle line:84%
It may seem counterintuitive,
but these regulations,

00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:02.200 align:middle line:84%
both the FERC and
the NERC regulations,

00:17:02.200 --> 00:17:04.920 align:middle line:84%
basically cemented
this system in place.

00:17:04.920 --> 00:17:08.319 align:middle line:84%
It prevented, to a large
extent, the emergence

00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:10.400 align:middle line:90%
of independent generators.

00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:15.960 align:middle line:84%
And you may say, well, why would
regulation essentially create

00:17:15.960 --> 00:17:19.823 align:middle line:84%
a monopoly when it's trying to
prevent a monopoly, if you will?

00:17:19.823 --> 00:17:21.740 align:middle line:84%
Well, it's trying to
prevent monopoly pricing,

00:17:21.740 --> 00:17:24.839 align:middle line:84%
but it's not trying to
prevent monopoly per se.

00:17:24.839 --> 00:17:28.440 align:middle line:84%
And indeed, the electric
grid is an example

00:17:28.440 --> 00:17:30.580 align:middle line:84%
of what we might call
a natural monopoly.

00:17:30.580 --> 00:17:32.080 align:middle line:84%
It doesn't really
make sense to have

00:17:32.080 --> 00:17:35.060 align:middle line:84%
different outlets for
different companies' power

00:17:35.060 --> 00:17:35.800 align:middle line:90%
coming out of it.

00:17:35.800 --> 00:17:39.140 align:middle line:84%
Is it an inefficient
use of resources?

00:17:39.140 --> 00:17:42.540 align:middle line:84%
So the phenomenon
was first articulated

00:17:42.540 --> 00:17:44.800 align:middle line:84%
by the famous economist
George Stigler,

00:17:44.800 --> 00:17:48.040 align:middle line:84%
and the regulation of
competition by other means.

00:17:48.040 --> 00:17:49.580 align:middle line:90%
It's a famous quote.

00:17:49.580 --> 00:17:52.940 align:middle line:84%
And so let me explain what
he's talking about here.

00:17:52.940 --> 00:17:58.260 align:middle line:84%
Essentially, if regulations
are onerous, no one likes them.

00:17:58.260 --> 00:18:01.660 align:middle line:84%
But the more onerous
they are, the harder

00:18:01.660 --> 00:18:05.700 align:middle line:84%
it is for small startups
to deal with them.

00:18:05.700 --> 00:18:08.580 align:middle line:90%
So imagine you're the FDA.

00:18:08.580 --> 00:18:11.708 align:middle line:84%
You're creating regulations
for the safe use of a drug.

00:18:11.708 --> 00:18:14.000 align:middle line:84%
You say, look, you have to
run this big clinical trial.

00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:15.400 align:middle line:90%
You need 10,000 people.

00:18:15.400 --> 00:18:18.140 align:middle line:84%
You need all this, all
these independent auditors

00:18:18.140 --> 00:18:18.880 align:middle line:90%
and everything.

00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:22.740 align:middle line:84%
And it's going to cost
you a billion dollars

00:18:22.740 --> 00:18:24.580 align:middle line:90%
to put your drug on the market.

00:18:24.580 --> 00:18:30.172 align:middle line:84%
So Pfizer and Merck assemble
all this regulatory apparatus.

00:18:30.172 --> 00:18:32.380 align:middle line:84%
And they hate it because
they don't like to pay that.

00:18:32.380 --> 00:18:35.410 align:middle line:84%
But at some small startup down
the street on Albany Street

00:18:35.410 --> 00:18:37.150 align:middle line:84%
that is trying to
invent a new drug,

00:18:37.150 --> 00:18:41.950 align:middle line:84%
those guys have no hope at all
going through that process.

00:18:41.950 --> 00:18:43.890 align:middle line:84%
So their best hope is
basically to sell out

00:18:43.890 --> 00:18:45.210 align:middle line:90%
to the big companies.

00:18:45.210 --> 00:18:46.930 align:middle line:84%
And so essentially,
this is what was

00:18:46.930 --> 00:18:51.130 align:middle line:84%
happening that the
regulatory apparatus cemented

00:18:51.130 --> 00:18:52.890 align:middle line:90%
this private cloud.

00:18:52.890 --> 00:18:56.290 align:middle line:84%
And the private cloud
worked on a one-on-one basis

00:18:56.290 --> 00:18:57.550 align:middle line:90%
with the state regulators.

00:18:57.550 --> 00:19:00.020 align:middle line:84%
And they said, look, this is
the amount we want to charge.

00:19:00.020 --> 00:19:01.770 align:middle line:84%
And the regulators
basically say, well, it

00:19:01.770 --> 00:19:02.750 align:middle line:90%
seems reasonable to us.

00:19:02.750 --> 00:19:05.210 align:middle line:84%
And that's how electricity
prices were set.

00:19:05.210 --> 00:19:07.330 align:middle line:90%
And that was it.

00:19:07.330 --> 00:19:12.010 align:middle line:84%
The consequence of that
is, well, it worked.

00:19:12.010 --> 00:19:15.330 align:middle line:84%
There wasn't a lot of pressure
for more efficient generation

00:19:15.330 --> 00:19:20.290 align:middle line:84%
or cleaner generation, like less
polluting, greener, less CO2.

00:19:20.290 --> 00:19:22.170 align:middle line:84%
Because there weren't
market forces in

00:19:22.170 --> 00:19:25.810 align:middle line:84%
play to essentially
deliver those incentives

00:19:25.810 --> 00:19:27.190 align:middle line:90%
to the corporations.

00:19:27.190 --> 00:19:32.150 align:middle line:84%
Then came a bunch of academics
who thought they knew better.

00:19:32.150 --> 00:19:35.470 align:middle line:84%
And they started
writing studies arguing

00:19:35.470 --> 00:19:39.790 align:middle line:84%
that what if the electric power
system were a free market,

00:19:39.790 --> 00:19:42.270 align:middle line:84%
and instead of having
these vertically

00:19:42.270 --> 00:19:45.830 align:middle line:84%
integrated monopolies,
everyone would compete and sell

00:19:45.830 --> 00:19:47.370 align:middle line:90%
their electricity onto the grid?

00:19:47.370 --> 00:19:49.970 align:middle line:84%
And the grid would operate
in a non-discriminatory way,

00:19:49.970 --> 00:19:52.250 align:middle line:84%
and they would buy power
from the cheapest producers.

00:19:52.250 --> 00:19:54.105 align:middle line:84%
And inefficient,
expensive producers

00:19:54.105 --> 00:19:56.230 align:middle line:84%
would go out of business,
and prices of electricity

00:19:56.230 --> 00:19:57.050 align:middle line:90%
would come down.

00:19:57.050 --> 00:19:59.030 align:middle line:84%
And all of this
would be fantastic.

00:19:59.030 --> 00:20:02.710 align:middle line:84%
And so this idea
was largely accepted

00:20:02.710 --> 00:20:05.550 align:middle line:90%
as a valid theoretical basis.

00:20:05.550 --> 00:20:09.950 align:middle line:90%
And FERC issued order 888.

00:20:09.950 --> 00:20:12.830 align:middle line:84%
And that required these
private monopolies

00:20:12.830 --> 00:20:16.830 align:middle line:84%
to establish independent
system operators that would

00:20:16.830 --> 00:20:19.070 align:middle line:90%
operate their electric grids.

00:20:19.070 --> 00:20:21.510 align:middle line:84%
So they still own
the power plants,

00:20:21.510 --> 00:20:23.910 align:middle line:84%
and they still own
the grid hardware.

00:20:23.910 --> 00:20:29.130 align:middle line:84%
But they could not decide who
put the electricity on the grid.

00:20:29.130 --> 00:20:31.850 align:middle line:84%
They had to make
the grid available

00:20:31.850 --> 00:20:34.010 align:middle line:90%
to any independent company.

00:20:34.010 --> 00:20:37.110 align:middle line:84%
And so what emerged was a lot
of what we call merchant plants,

00:20:37.110 --> 00:20:39.570 align:middle line:84%
including merchant
nuclear plants that

00:20:39.570 --> 00:20:44.770 align:middle line:90%
decide to try to sell power.

00:20:44.770 --> 00:20:52.510 align:middle line:84%
So this is what the ISOs,
Independent System Operators.

00:20:52.510 --> 00:20:55.770 align:middle line:84%
There's also something called
RTOs, which are essentially

00:20:55.770 --> 00:20:57.570 align:middle line:90%
the same thing.

00:20:57.570 --> 00:21:02.650 align:middle line:84%
And so these are where the
ISOs and RTOs are located.

00:21:02.650 --> 00:21:06.050 align:middle line:84%
These ISOs and RTOs do
the following things.

00:21:06.050 --> 00:21:09.970 align:middle line:84%
They operate a market
where you can bid and sell

00:21:09.970 --> 00:21:11.070 align:middle line:90%
your electricity.

00:21:11.070 --> 00:21:15.010 align:middle line:84%
We talked about bidding
earlier in the class.

00:21:15.010 --> 00:21:17.430 align:middle line:84%
They dispatch the
generators into the market.

00:21:17.430 --> 00:21:19.130 align:middle line:84%
They say, OK, you,
you, you, we want

00:21:19.130 --> 00:21:20.887 align:middle line:84%
you to come online
for the next hour,

00:21:20.887 --> 00:21:22.470 align:middle line:84%
and we're going to
pay you your money.

00:21:22.470 --> 00:21:24.228 align:middle line:84%
So they decide who
gets dispatched.

00:21:24.228 --> 00:21:25.770 align:middle line:84%
We talked a little
bit about dispatch

00:21:25.770 --> 00:21:28.230 align:middle line:84%
and why nuclear plants
always bid close to 0,

00:21:28.230 --> 00:21:31.320 align:middle line:84%
because they always
want to be dispatched.

00:21:31.320 --> 00:21:34.640 align:middle line:84%
And then they take whatever
revenues they can get.

00:21:34.640 --> 00:21:37.440 align:middle line:84%
They oversee operations
on the transmission lines.

00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:40.760 align:middle line:84%
They enforce the reliability
standards from NERC.

00:21:40.760 --> 00:21:45.420 align:middle line:84%
So NERC says, look, you need to
have this much spinning reserve.

00:21:45.420 --> 00:21:48.140 align:middle line:84%
You need to have this
much voltage control.

00:21:48.140 --> 00:21:49.980 align:middle line:84%
If your frequency
goes out by this much,

00:21:49.980 --> 00:21:52.840 align:middle line:84%
you need to sever the link
between here and here.

00:21:52.840 --> 00:21:56.480 align:middle line:84%
And so all these rules,
they enforce them.

00:21:56.480 --> 00:22:01.400 align:middle line:84%
And in principle, they can
require the transmission line

00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:03.915 align:middle line:84%
owners, which are
still to a large extent

00:22:03.915 --> 00:22:05.540 align:middle line:84%
those vertically
integrated monopolies,

00:22:05.540 --> 00:22:09.000 align:middle line:84%
but could, in principle, be
private transmission line

00:22:09.000 --> 00:22:10.000 align:middle line:90%
companies.

00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:12.820 align:middle line:84%
They can in principle require
them to make upgrades,

00:22:12.820 --> 00:22:17.360 align:middle line:84%
though as far as I know,
not a lot of that goes on.

00:22:17.360 --> 00:22:21.400 align:middle line:84%
There are, however, some
places in the United States

00:22:21.400 --> 00:22:23.940 align:middle line:84%
where this system
does not exist,

00:22:23.940 --> 00:22:26.040 align:middle line:90%
and that's these gray areas.

00:22:26.040 --> 00:22:29.920 align:middle line:84%
And so in these regions, you
still have, to a large extent,

00:22:29.920 --> 00:22:32.980 align:middle line:84%
these vertically
integrated monopolies,

00:22:32.980 --> 00:22:36.620 align:middle line:84%
and they still talk to
regional state regulators

00:22:36.620 --> 00:22:38.500 align:middle line:84%
and decide what the
price of power will be

00:22:38.500 --> 00:22:40.580 align:middle line:90%
and do whatever they want to do.

00:22:40.580 --> 00:22:43.140 align:middle line:90%
It's not a competitive market.

00:22:43.140 --> 00:22:46.650 align:middle line:90%
And this is actually why.

00:22:46.650 --> 00:22:48.340 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: You can
finish your point.

00:22:48.340 --> 00:22:49.200 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Oh, no.

00:22:49.200 --> 00:22:50.140 align:middle line:90%
Go ahead.

00:22:50.140 --> 00:22:53.340 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: I'm just wondering, in
California specifically, what is

00:22:53.340 --> 00:22:55.000 align:middle line:90%
happening with those little--

00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:56.300 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Patches?

00:22:56.300 --> 00:22:59.980 align:middle line:84%
I actually don't know
why Kaiser doesn't.

00:22:59.980 --> 00:23:02.260 align:middle line:84%
Yeah, I'm not exactly
sure what explains

00:23:02.260 --> 00:23:04.660 align:middle line:90%
those patches on this map.

00:23:04.660 --> 00:23:06.940 align:middle line:90%
So yeah.

00:23:06.940 --> 00:23:09.620 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: On the orange,
what does PJM mean?

00:23:09.620 --> 00:23:12.040 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Oh, I forget.

00:23:12.040 --> 00:23:12.540 align:middle line:90%
I forget.

00:23:12.540 --> 00:23:17.700 align:middle line:90%
It's the name of the region.

00:23:17.700 --> 00:23:18.560 align:middle line:90%
Let's look it up.

00:23:18.560 --> 00:23:23.660 align:middle line:90%


00:23:23.660 --> 00:23:26.000 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Something
junction manager, maybe?

00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:30.480 align:middle line:90%


00:23:30.480 --> 00:23:34.000 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Pennsylvania,
New Jersey, Maryland--

00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:34.720 align:middle line:90%
there you go.

00:23:34.720 --> 00:23:37.540 align:middle line:84%
Pennsylvania, New Jersey,
Maryland interconnecting.

00:23:37.540 --> 00:23:42.280 align:middle line:90%


00:23:42.280 --> 00:23:47.960 align:middle line:84%
So these regions, which are
still regulated because these

00:23:47.960 --> 00:23:49.180 align:middle line:90%
are deregulated.

00:23:49.180 --> 00:23:51.240 align:middle line:84%
And you hear about
people talking about when

00:23:51.240 --> 00:23:52.880 align:middle line:90%
we deregulated power.

00:23:52.880 --> 00:23:55.680 align:middle line:84%
That means creation of
all these ISOs and so on.

00:23:55.680 --> 00:23:58.180 align:middle line:84%
These areas are still
regulated markets,

00:23:58.180 --> 00:24:00.840 align:middle line:84%
which means there's a government
regulator that sets the price.

00:24:00.840 --> 00:24:03.200 align:middle line:84%
And in those
markets are actually

00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:07.040 align:middle line:84%
where you see nuclear power
being built because they can

00:24:07.040 --> 00:24:10.720 align:middle line:90%
say, oh, we want nuclear power.

00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:14.800 align:middle line:84%
And yeah, OK, it costs
more, but we don't care.

00:24:14.800 --> 00:24:16.760 align:middle line:84%
And then they just
go to the regulator

00:24:16.760 --> 00:24:19.560 align:middle line:84%
and say, well, we need
to charge this much.

00:24:19.560 --> 00:24:21.880 align:middle line:90%
And they will say, OK.

00:24:21.880 --> 00:24:22.760 align:middle line:90%
Yep.

00:24:22.760 --> 00:24:24.135 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: What's
the relationship

00:24:24.135 --> 00:24:27.010 align:middle line:84%
between the ISOs
or non-ISO regions,

00:24:27.010 --> 00:24:29.590 align:middle line:84%
and in the broader
interconnection

00:24:29.590 --> 00:24:30.682 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: The broader--

00:24:30.682 --> 00:24:32.390 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: It was one
of the first slides.

00:24:32.390 --> 00:24:35.510 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Oh, the
synchronous regions.

00:24:35.510 --> 00:24:36.010 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:24:36.010 --> 00:24:38.135 align:middle line:84%
So the synchronous regions
are literally just that.

00:24:38.135 --> 00:24:41.870 align:middle line:84%
That's like the AC waveform
is going up and down together.

00:24:41.870 --> 00:24:48.270 align:middle line:84%
And so you can have
independent system operators

00:24:48.270 --> 00:24:53.290 align:middle line:84%
transmit to other operators
as long as they are synced up.

00:24:53.290 --> 00:24:58.230 align:middle line:84%
And so they'll adjust the
generation on their grid.

00:24:58.230 --> 00:25:00.255 align:middle line:84%
They can control
demand not easily,

00:25:00.255 --> 00:25:01.630 align:middle line:84%
but they'll adjust
the generation

00:25:01.630 --> 00:25:05.070 align:middle line:84%
on the grid to lag the
phase or advance the phase.

00:25:05.070 --> 00:25:09.950 align:middle line:84%
And then they can sync
up with other ISOs

00:25:09.950 --> 00:25:14.190 align:middle line:90%
or with other non-ISO markets.

00:25:14.190 --> 00:25:16.150 align:middle line:84%
And so you can still
sell electricity

00:25:16.150 --> 00:25:18.830 align:middle line:84%
across these boundaries
even though they are

00:25:18.830 --> 00:25:20.610 align:middle line:90%
operated by different entities.

00:25:20.610 --> 00:25:24.230 align:middle line:84%
And this is like hinting at
how complex this thing is.

00:25:24.230 --> 00:25:27.370 align:middle line:84%
There are like 2,000 legal
entities involved in this

00:25:27.370 --> 00:25:28.410 align:middle line:90%
system.

00:25:28.410 --> 00:25:31.890 align:middle line:84%
And on top of all
these regional issues,

00:25:31.890 --> 00:25:34.130 align:middle line:84%
you have tiny little
power companies

00:25:34.130 --> 00:25:36.810 align:middle line:84%
in here, which are doing end
user distribution, which are all

00:25:36.810 --> 00:25:38.730 align:middle line:84%
independent of what
we call transmission

00:25:38.730 --> 00:25:42.170 align:middle line:84%
distribution, a whole bunch of
other little tiny companies who

00:25:42.170 --> 00:25:44.770 align:middle line:84%
are involved with this
stuff, on the power poles.

00:25:44.770 --> 00:25:49.530 align:middle line:84%
So just enormous quantities of
interdependency and changing

00:25:49.530 --> 00:25:52.150 align:middle line:84%
things is very hard
because of that.

00:25:52.150 --> 00:25:56.370 align:middle line:90%
It's a very [INAUDIBLE].

00:25:56.370 --> 00:26:01.467 align:middle line:84%
So what happened when the
power system was deregulated?

00:26:01.467 --> 00:26:03.050 align:middle line:84%
It was supposed to
save consumers lots

00:26:03.050 --> 00:26:05.830 align:middle line:84%
of money and in all
kinds of great things,

00:26:05.830 --> 00:26:07.850 align:middle line:90%
and actually, it didn't happen.

00:26:07.850 --> 00:26:10.270 align:middle line:84%
The price of electricity
was basically unchanged.

00:26:10.270 --> 00:26:12.370 align:middle line:84%
And it's kind of like
a big economics mystery

00:26:12.370 --> 00:26:14.210 align:middle line:84%
that, as far as I know,
is still not really

00:26:14.210 --> 00:26:16.890 align:middle line:90%
been answered as to why.

00:26:16.890 --> 00:26:20.810 align:middle line:84%
Why is it that essentially
a monopoly and a monopsony

00:26:20.810 --> 00:26:23.488 align:middle line:84%
independently negotiating
electricity prices

00:26:23.488 --> 00:26:25.030 align:middle line:84%
come up for something
that is roughly

00:26:25.030 --> 00:26:29.350 align:middle line:84%
the same as a complex market in
which everyone is just bidding

00:26:29.350 --> 00:26:33.030 align:middle line:90%
in the lowest generator rates?

00:26:33.030 --> 00:26:35.950 align:middle line:84%
You can hypothesize
various theories

00:26:35.950 --> 00:26:38.090 align:middle line:84%
as to why this
might be the case,

00:26:38.090 --> 00:26:41.870 align:middle line:84%
but that's what the
data seems to show

00:26:41.870 --> 00:26:43.710 align:middle line:84%
is that over the long
run, deregulation

00:26:43.710 --> 00:26:46.310 align:middle line:90%
didn't reduce prices.

00:26:46.310 --> 00:26:50.950 align:middle line:84%
It did, however, allow for
more competitive generators

00:26:50.950 --> 00:26:52.830 align:middle line:90%
to enter the market.

00:26:52.830 --> 00:26:58.510 align:middle line:84%
So in these regions,
in deregulated regions,

00:26:58.510 --> 00:27:02.510 align:middle line:84%
you will see a lot more wind
and solar in these markets

00:27:02.510 --> 00:27:06.310 align:middle line:84%
because they have very low
marginal costs, essentially

00:27:06.310 --> 00:27:07.010 align:middle line:90%
zero.

00:27:07.010 --> 00:27:09.570 align:middle line:90%
They get sunlight for free.

00:27:09.570 --> 00:27:14.470 align:middle line:84%
And then they can bid into
the market and get dispatched.

00:27:14.470 --> 00:27:17.550 align:middle line:84%
And so this is where you
see these things popping up.

00:27:17.550 --> 00:27:21.720 align:middle line:84%
Whereas in these regions,
there is no solar being built,

00:27:21.720 --> 00:27:25.140 align:middle line:84%
but it has to be built
by corporate decision.

00:27:25.140 --> 00:27:27.560 align:middle line:84%
The monopoly that all
these enterprises will say,

00:27:27.560 --> 00:27:29.320 align:middle line:84%
well, we'll build wind
because it's cheap,

00:27:29.320 --> 00:27:34.783 align:middle line:84%
but maybe we'll build it when a
coal plant finally shuts down.

00:27:34.783 --> 00:27:36.700 align:middle line:84%
Whereas in these regions,
they're building it,

00:27:36.700 --> 00:27:38.780 align:middle line:84%
and the coal plant
gets shut down

00:27:38.780 --> 00:27:40.580 align:middle line:84%
because they can
no longer compete.

00:27:40.580 --> 00:27:45.860 align:middle line:84%
So you see the movement to
more efficient and greener

00:27:45.860 --> 00:27:52.480 align:middle line:84%
technologies happen more rapidly
in these deregulated markets.

00:27:52.480 --> 00:27:56.820 align:middle line:90%


00:27:56.820 --> 00:28:00.020 align:middle line:84%
So the bidding system that
is operated by the ISO

00:28:00.020 --> 00:28:04.200 align:middle line:84%
is supposed to be
non-discriminatory.

00:28:04.200 --> 00:28:08.180 align:middle line:84%
It says we look at the price of
electricity that you offer us.

00:28:08.180 --> 00:28:11.400 align:middle line:84%
And it doesn't matter if you're
making that with wind, solar,

00:28:11.400 --> 00:28:12.360 align:middle line:90%
nuclear, hamsters.

00:28:12.360 --> 00:28:14.380 align:middle line:90%
We don't care.

00:28:14.380 --> 00:28:17.720 align:middle line:90%
And that sounds great.

00:28:17.720 --> 00:28:21.680 align:middle line:84%
But in fact, it
is discriminatory.

00:28:21.680 --> 00:28:24.000 align:middle line:84%
And the reason
it's discriminatory

00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:32.000 align:middle line:84%
is because there's a interaction
between the NERC rules about how

00:28:32.000 --> 00:28:35.960 align:middle line:84%
the grid must be
operated to stay reliable

00:28:35.960 --> 00:28:39.400 align:middle line:84%
and the shape of the grid
and the other generators

00:28:39.400 --> 00:28:41.280 align:middle line:90%
that are on the grid.

00:28:41.280 --> 00:28:46.840 align:middle line:84%
So if the capacity of the
grid as close to its max,

00:28:46.840 --> 00:28:51.160 align:middle line:84%
and most of the generators
are natural gas plants

00:28:51.160 --> 00:28:55.720 align:middle line:84%
and is a hub-spoke kind
of grid architecture,

00:28:55.720 --> 00:29:00.480 align:middle line:84%
it's really hard for
a wind or solar farm

00:29:00.480 --> 00:29:05.000 align:middle line:84%
to go online and maintain
the reliability standard

00:29:05.000 --> 00:29:08.000 align:middle line:90%
that the grid operator demands.

00:29:08.000 --> 00:29:12.320 align:middle line:84%
Because maybe their
power is fluctuating,

00:29:12.320 --> 00:29:14.853 align:middle line:84%
and they can't necessarily
promise that it will

00:29:14.853 --> 00:29:16.020 align:middle line:90%
be operate in a certain way.

00:29:16.020 --> 00:29:19.950 align:middle line:84%
If the grid doesn't have margin,
then they don't get dispatched.

00:29:19.950 --> 00:29:23.250 align:middle line:84%
And so this actually,
this reality,

00:29:23.250 --> 00:29:26.210 align:middle line:84%
this history of the
hub-and-spoke architecture

00:29:26.210 --> 00:29:29.070 align:middle line:84%
and these NERC
regulations are what

00:29:29.070 --> 00:29:32.050 align:middle line:84%
slows down the deployment
of wind and solar today.

00:29:32.050 --> 00:29:35.870 align:middle line:84%
If it were not for that, we
would have enormous quantities

00:29:35.870 --> 00:29:37.470 align:middle line:90%
of wind and solar.

00:29:37.470 --> 00:29:42.390 align:middle line:84%
So everything will boil down
to how hard is this to change.

00:29:42.390 --> 00:29:46.210 align:middle line:84%
And that is going to control
the speed of deregulation.

00:29:46.210 --> 00:29:51.470 align:middle line:90%


00:29:51.470 --> 00:29:56.030 align:middle line:84%
I think I basically
mentioned all these things.

00:29:56.030 --> 00:29:58.010 align:middle line:84%
Yeah, so if you have
variable generation,

00:29:58.010 --> 00:30:00.030 align:middle line:84%
you need to move
electricity around more.

00:30:00.030 --> 00:30:01.870 align:middle line:84%
That requires more
line capacity.

00:30:01.870 --> 00:30:09.070 align:middle line:90%


00:30:09.070 --> 00:30:11.390 align:middle line:84%
And we are already,
I hope, convinced

00:30:11.390 --> 00:30:13.267 align:middle line:84%
that wind and solar
has a major role

00:30:13.267 --> 00:30:15.850 align:middle line:84%
to play according to the various
economic models we looked at.

00:30:15.850 --> 00:30:16.683 align:middle line:90%
We looked at Shaner.

00:30:16.683 --> 00:30:19.690 align:middle line:84%
We looked at the future
of MIT nuclear power

00:30:19.690 --> 00:30:22.810 align:middle line:84%
study, which showed a large
component of wind and solar.

00:30:22.810 --> 00:30:27.130 align:middle line:84%
I think there was a question
a couple of sessions

00:30:27.130 --> 00:30:30.730 align:middle line:84%
ago about the cost of storage
and whether the cost of storage

00:30:30.730 --> 00:30:32.930 align:middle line:90%
would be a limiting factor.

00:30:32.930 --> 00:30:35.990 align:middle line:84%
In the Shaner
model, they assume.

00:30:35.990 --> 00:30:38.930 align:middle line:84%
And remember, the Shaner
model is not an optimal model.

00:30:38.930 --> 00:30:42.970 align:middle line:84%
The Shaner model is just there
to illustrate whether or not

00:30:42.970 --> 00:30:48.010 align:middle line:84%
a full renewables
grid is possible.

00:30:48.010 --> 00:30:50.890 align:middle line:84%
The MIT Future of
Nuclear Power model

00:30:50.890 --> 00:30:53.250 align:middle line:84%
is more like a
cost-optimal model.

00:30:53.250 --> 00:30:54.970 align:middle line:84%
Shaner model is
only looking at can

00:30:54.970 --> 00:30:58.690 align:middle line:84%
you actually do it with wind
and solar given the weather?

00:30:58.690 --> 00:31:02.370 align:middle line:84%
And the Shaner model, we
looked at various solutions,

00:31:02.370 --> 00:31:05.610 align:middle line:84%
and we found a solution
at 12 hours of storage,

00:31:05.610 --> 00:31:08.210 align:middle line:84%
produced a cost of
something like $150

00:31:08.210 --> 00:31:11.730 align:middle line:84%
per megawatt-hour, which was
a reasonable cost, something

00:31:11.730 --> 00:31:12.230 align:middle line:90%
like that.

00:31:12.230 --> 00:31:13.410 align:middle line:90%
Remember that?

00:31:13.410 --> 00:31:17.190 align:middle line:84%
And someone raised a
question about whether the 12

00:31:17.190 --> 00:31:21.110 align:middle line:84%
hours of storage was
at all attainable.

00:31:21.110 --> 00:31:22.902 align:middle line:84%
Could we build all
of that storage?

00:31:22.902 --> 00:31:24.610 align:middle line:84%
Now there's lots of
storage technologies,

00:31:24.610 --> 00:31:26.068 align:middle line:84%
but then the standard
Shaner model,

00:31:26.068 --> 00:31:27.870 align:middle line:84%
they kind of just
assumed lithium ion.

00:31:27.870 --> 00:31:31.008 align:middle line:84%
So I went into the calculation
because you probably

00:31:31.008 --> 00:31:31.550 align:middle line:90%
want to know.

00:31:31.550 --> 00:31:38.710 align:middle line:84%
12 hours of storage will cost
at current lithium-ion cost

00:31:38.710 --> 00:31:41.550 align:middle line:90%
$1 trillion.

00:31:41.550 --> 00:31:43.950 align:middle line:84%
Sounds like a lot but don't
forget the whole electricity

00:31:43.950 --> 00:31:45.790 align:middle line:90%
system is very expensive.

00:31:45.790 --> 00:31:47.790 align:middle line:84%
And that is also the
amount of money we're going

00:31:47.790 --> 00:31:49.832 align:middle line:84%
to-- it's actually about
half the amount of money

00:31:49.832 --> 00:31:54.670 align:middle line:84%
we're planning to spend on
maintaining and upgrading

00:31:54.670 --> 00:32:00.670 align:middle line:84%
our 1,550 nuclear weapons
over the next 10 years.

00:32:00.670 --> 00:32:05.190 align:middle line:84%
So it's within the scope
of budgetary probability.

00:32:05.190 --> 00:32:07.590 align:middle line:84%
And as far as
production rates go,

00:32:07.590 --> 00:32:10.070 align:middle line:84%
I looked at the
current factories that

00:32:10.070 --> 00:32:12.922 align:middle line:84%
are coming online,
and we would be

00:32:12.922 --> 00:32:14.380 align:middle line:84%
able to produce
all of that storage

00:32:14.380 --> 00:32:17.620 align:middle line:84%
within five years at
current production rates.

00:32:17.620 --> 00:32:21.500 align:middle line:90%
So it's within feasible.

00:32:21.500 --> 00:32:23.720 align:middle line:90%
This is not beyond the pale.

00:32:23.720 --> 00:32:26.500 align:middle line:84%
That's something that will
take 900 years or something.

00:32:26.500 --> 00:32:32.700 align:middle line:84%
OK, so we get to
these questions.

00:32:32.700 --> 00:32:35.900 align:middle line:84%
Who will pay for
this grid expansion?

00:32:35.900 --> 00:32:38.060 align:middle line:84%
Who should pay for
this grid expansion,

00:32:38.060 --> 00:32:40.580 align:middle line:90%
and how much will this cost?

00:32:40.580 --> 00:32:42.940 align:middle line:84%
And the current situation
in the United States

00:32:42.940 --> 00:32:47.980 align:middle line:84%
is that if you want to
have a wind and solar farm,

00:32:47.980 --> 00:32:50.780 align:middle line:90%
you get saddled with that cost.

00:32:50.780 --> 00:32:54.820 align:middle line:84%
And a lot of people are
interested in building

00:32:54.820 --> 00:32:58.580 align:middle line:84%
these Renaissance farms
just can't afford or are not

00:32:58.580 --> 00:33:03.460 align:middle line:90%
interested in paying that cost.

00:33:03.460 --> 00:33:08.820 align:middle line:84%
Now the existing
utilities who operate

00:33:08.820 --> 00:33:13.200 align:middle line:84%
large natural gas,
coal, and hydro plants,

00:33:13.200 --> 00:33:17.400 align:middle line:84%
do they want to see
the grid expanded?

00:33:17.400 --> 00:33:18.460 align:middle line:90%
Not really.

00:33:18.460 --> 00:33:21.620 align:middle line:84%
If they see this grid
expansion, their businesses,

00:33:21.620 --> 00:33:25.160 align:middle line:84%
their generators are going
to go out of business,

00:33:25.160 --> 00:33:28.280 align:middle line:84%
at least in the
competitive markets,

00:33:28.280 --> 00:33:31.760 align:middle line:84%
because their electricity
is more expensive.

00:33:31.760 --> 00:33:35.280 align:middle line:84%
And if wind and solar shows up
and starts to undercut them,

00:33:35.280 --> 00:33:37.840 align:middle line:84%
they're going to have to
shut down their plants.

00:33:37.840 --> 00:33:41.920 align:middle line:84%
That means the vertically
integrated monopoly

00:33:41.920 --> 00:33:46.720 align:middle line:84%
that own coal plants, that own
historical transmission lines,

00:33:46.720 --> 00:33:48.800 align:middle line:84%
are going to do
everything in their power

00:33:48.800 --> 00:33:51.160 align:middle line:90%
to prevent this from happening.

00:33:51.160 --> 00:33:53.000 align:middle line:84%
And that is what
is happening now.

00:33:53.000 --> 00:33:57.000 align:middle line:84%
They are keeping the grid
right at the edge of the NERC

00:33:57.000 --> 00:33:59.880 align:middle line:84%
stability requirement,
so that if you

00:33:59.880 --> 00:34:03.320 align:middle line:84%
are a wind and
solar generator, you

00:34:03.320 --> 00:34:06.720 align:middle line:84%
can't connect without paying
enormous amount of money

00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:10.460 align:middle line:84%
to fix the grid,
which looks like it

00:34:10.460 --> 00:34:11.980 align:middle line:90%
is for historical reasons.

00:34:11.980 --> 00:34:13.060 align:middle line:90%
Yeah?

00:34:13.060 --> 00:34:15.540 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: What kinds of
margins do coal and natural gas

00:34:15.540 --> 00:34:18.460 align:middle line:84%
companies make for
per kilowatt hour?

00:34:18.460 --> 00:34:22.360 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Oh, I don't know.

00:34:22.360 --> 00:34:22.860 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:34:22.860 --> 00:34:26.420 align:middle line:90%


00:34:26.420 --> 00:34:28.620 align:middle line:84%
I mean, it probably
depends a lot

00:34:28.620 --> 00:34:33.100 align:middle line:84%
on how old the plant is
and questions like this.

00:34:33.100 --> 00:34:36.460 align:middle line:84%
Yeah, so coal today, no
one is building new coal

00:34:36.460 --> 00:34:41.060 align:middle line:84%
because it's already not cost
competitive with natural gas

00:34:41.060 --> 00:34:43.580 align:middle line:90%
and what renewables there are.

00:34:43.580 --> 00:34:45.780 align:middle line:90%
So they don't make any margins.

00:34:45.780 --> 00:34:49.980 align:middle line:84%
But as far as historical
plants, the plants that are sunk

00:34:49.980 --> 00:34:52.460 align:middle line:84%
cost, and they're only
looking at the marginal cost

00:34:52.460 --> 00:34:54.260 align:middle line:90%
of electricity.

00:34:54.260 --> 00:34:56.273 align:middle line:90%
I would have to work it out.

00:34:56.273 --> 00:34:57.940 align:middle line:84%
But you should be
able to if you go back

00:34:57.940 --> 00:35:00.145 align:middle line:84%
and look at these charts,
these data tables,

00:35:00.145 --> 00:35:02.020 align:middle line:84%
you should be able to
figure it out yourself,

00:35:02.020 --> 00:35:03.160 align:middle line:90%
or at least approximate it.

00:35:03.160 --> 00:35:03.840 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:35:03.840 --> 00:35:04.960 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Just going
back to clarify,

00:35:04.960 --> 00:35:06.840 align:middle line:84%
you mentioned the
hub-and-spoke architecture

00:35:06.840 --> 00:35:07.548 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Yeah.

00:35:07.548 --> 00:35:10.230 align:middle line:90%
That's a rough-- yeah.

00:35:10.230 --> 00:35:13.590 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Would the
alternative be just a web?

00:35:13.590 --> 00:35:16.530 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Well, it
is a web, but it's

00:35:16.530 --> 00:35:19.770 align:middle line:84%
just that you get these
centralized generators.

00:35:19.770 --> 00:35:22.510 align:middle line:84%
And most of the capacity comes
out, and then the capacity,

00:35:22.510 --> 00:35:25.050 align:middle line:84%
the lines get smaller and
smaller as you get further away

00:35:25.050 --> 00:35:26.530 align:middle line:90%
from the generators.

00:35:26.530 --> 00:35:28.850 align:middle line:84%
And the other
architecture would be

00:35:28.850 --> 00:35:32.610 align:middle line:84%
a web where all the lines
are kind of the same size.

00:35:32.610 --> 00:35:35.990 align:middle line:84%
And that would kind
be the differentiator.

00:35:35.990 --> 00:35:36.490 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:35:36.490 --> 00:35:37.650 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:35:37.650 --> 00:35:39.410 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: So the
electricity market

00:35:39.410 --> 00:35:43.130 align:middle line:84%
is kind of notorious for the
amount of foul play, et cetera.

00:35:43.130 --> 00:35:45.450 align:middle line:84%
So I definitely believe
that the incumbents

00:35:45.450 --> 00:35:51.690 align:middle line:84%
are kind of keeping the grid not
very friendly to new players.

00:35:51.690 --> 00:35:55.250 align:middle line:84%
Isn't there also something
to be said for just NIMBYism

00:35:55.250 --> 00:35:56.282 align:middle line:90%
against new [INAUDIBLE]?

00:35:56.282 --> 00:35:56.990 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Yeah.

00:35:56.990 --> 00:35:58.350 align:middle line:90%
No, no, we'll get there.

00:35:58.350 --> 00:35:58.850 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:35:58.850 --> 00:35:59.890 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

00:35:59.890 --> 00:36:03.890 align:middle line:84%
There's all kinds of problems
that prevent expansion.

00:36:03.890 --> 00:36:09.990 align:middle line:84%
But there are some
remarkable stories.

00:36:09.990 --> 00:36:11.970 align:middle line:90%
Oh, I forget the name of it.

00:36:11.970 --> 00:36:14.190 align:middle line:84%
So a big part of it in
the NIMBYism situation

00:36:14.190 --> 00:36:15.810 align:middle line:90%
is we don't want power lines.

00:36:15.810 --> 00:36:17.710 align:middle line:84%
We don't want to look
at them, or we're not

00:36:17.710 --> 00:36:21.550 align:middle line:84%
going to give you right
away to put a power

00:36:21.550 --> 00:36:24.870 align:middle line:84%
line across my property,
things like that.

00:36:24.870 --> 00:36:33.550 align:middle line:84%
There was a plan to put a buried
power line along a railroad

00:36:33.550 --> 00:36:38.230 align:middle line:84%
track, and they had
secured the right of way.

00:36:38.230 --> 00:36:39.250 align:middle line:90%
And it can be buried.

00:36:39.250 --> 00:36:41.430 align:middle line:84%
So no one was really
opposed to it.

00:36:41.430 --> 00:36:45.930 align:middle line:84%
And they needed to
connect that line.

00:36:45.930 --> 00:36:48.430 align:middle line:90%
I think it was actually PJM.

00:36:48.430 --> 00:36:53.590 align:middle line:84%
They want to deliver a wind from
the Midwest into PJM's grid,

00:36:53.590 --> 00:36:57.390 align:middle line:84%
and PJM basically told
them, go fly a kite.

00:36:57.390 --> 00:37:00.690 align:middle line:84%
And the reason was
because they said,

00:37:00.690 --> 00:37:06.530 align:middle line:84%
and the claim was that it
would destabilize our grid.

00:37:06.530 --> 00:37:10.610 align:middle line:84%
And the wind and solar people
said we're sending you.

00:37:10.610 --> 00:37:13.730 align:middle line:84%
We're building a DC
line, which means

00:37:13.730 --> 00:37:18.370 align:middle line:84%
that we have a lot of power
electronics to convert it to AC,

00:37:18.370 --> 00:37:21.710 align:middle line:84%
and we can give you as much or
as little power as you require.

00:37:21.710 --> 00:37:24.410 align:middle line:84%
It's not like you're on
a synchronous system,

00:37:24.410 --> 00:37:27.970 align:middle line:84%
and we're forcing the power
down the throat of the grid.

00:37:27.970 --> 00:37:30.890 align:middle line:84%
And PJM said, no, no,
it doesn't matter.

00:37:30.890 --> 00:37:33.390 align:middle line:90%
And then went to court.

00:37:33.390 --> 00:37:39.930 align:middle line:84%
And so yeah, there's all kinds
of dirty stories like this.

00:37:39.930 --> 00:37:46.570 align:middle line:90%
So here's a challenge.

00:37:46.570 --> 00:37:52.130 align:middle line:84%
Is it fair to ask the
wind and solar companies

00:37:52.130 --> 00:37:55.370 align:middle line:84%
to pay for this
generation expansion?

00:37:55.370 --> 00:38:01.770 align:middle line:84%
So on the one hand, the fact
that wind and solar is variable

00:38:01.770 --> 00:38:05.640 align:middle line:84%
is an externality associated
with that generation.

00:38:05.640 --> 00:38:10.100 align:middle line:84%
It's a flaw in the
quality of the power,

00:38:10.100 --> 00:38:12.240 align:middle line:84%
and they have to
pay for that flaw.

00:38:12.240 --> 00:38:17.720 align:middle line:84%
And that flaw requires
more grid capacity.

00:38:17.720 --> 00:38:20.240 align:middle line:84%
Fixing that problem should
be rolled into the price

00:38:20.240 --> 00:38:21.520 align:middle line:90%
of wind and solar.

00:38:21.520 --> 00:38:25.400 align:middle line:84%
So that is the argument
for them paying.

00:38:25.400 --> 00:38:28.080 align:middle line:84%
On the other hand,
everyone else just

00:38:28.080 --> 00:38:30.920 align:middle line:84%
gets access to
the grid for free,

00:38:30.920 --> 00:38:35.000 align:middle line:84%
and new natural gas
players are just using it.

00:38:35.000 --> 00:38:37.280 align:middle line:84%
And they didn't have
to pay for anything.

00:38:37.280 --> 00:38:39.480 align:middle line:84%
It's not that
they're paying less.

00:38:39.480 --> 00:38:46.680 align:middle line:84%
They just get it for
free under the order 888.

00:38:46.680 --> 00:38:49.960 align:middle line:84%
And so it's kind
of like saying, I

00:38:49.960 --> 00:38:52.640 align:middle line:84%
want to drive down to
Florida for winter vacation.

00:38:52.640 --> 00:38:54.900 align:middle line:84%
And someone saying, OK,
you can drive down there,

00:38:54.900 --> 00:38:58.880 align:middle line:84%
but the roads are congested,
so you need to build a road.

00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:00.860 align:middle line:84%
And it's like, OK,
but it's just me.

00:39:00.860 --> 00:39:03.407 align:middle line:90%
Well, too bad.

00:39:03.407 --> 00:39:04.240 align:middle line:90%
You want to go down.

00:39:04.240 --> 00:39:05.620 align:middle line:90%
You pay for the road.

00:39:05.620 --> 00:39:10.900 align:middle line:84%
And that's kind of
the problem with this.

00:39:10.900 --> 00:39:21.060 align:middle line:84%
So one of the
challenges is trying

00:39:21.060 --> 00:39:22.677 align:middle line:90%
to balance these two things.

00:39:22.677 --> 00:39:24.260 align:middle line:84%
And then there are
other externalities

00:39:24.260 --> 00:39:25.400 align:middle line:90%
that we should think about.

00:39:25.400 --> 00:39:30.340 align:middle line:84%
So if you have a grid that is
operating really close to margin

00:39:30.340 --> 00:39:36.060 align:middle line:84%
and you have an event, like
a hurricane or something.

00:39:36.060 --> 00:39:40.160 align:middle line:84%
Now that grid, it has a more
likely chance of going down.

00:39:40.160 --> 00:39:43.120 align:middle line:84%
It's harder to recover,
et cetera, et cetera.

00:39:43.120 --> 00:39:46.860 align:middle line:84%
So there are reliability and
national security considerations

00:39:46.860 --> 00:39:51.060 align:middle line:84%
associated with operating the
grid in of traditional fashion.

00:39:51.060 --> 00:39:53.660 align:middle line:84%
So especially as you see
the rise of wildfires

00:39:53.660 --> 00:39:56.860 align:middle line:84%
and other things in
high temperatures

00:39:56.860 --> 00:39:59.980 align:middle line:84%
from climate change that require
the grid operators to de-rate

00:39:59.980 --> 00:40:03.000 align:middle line:84%
the lines, we're seeing more
and more instability and more

00:40:03.000 --> 00:40:04.600 align:middle line:90%
brownouts and blackouts.

00:40:04.600 --> 00:40:09.600 align:middle line:84%
And so society is paying
too for this reticence

00:40:09.600 --> 00:40:13.640 align:middle line:84%
to expand the grid to allow for
distributed generation and more

00:40:13.640 --> 00:40:14.540 align:middle line:90%
capacity.

00:40:14.540 --> 00:40:17.880 align:middle line:90%


00:40:17.880 --> 00:40:19.860 align:middle line:84%
We basically have
a moral dilemma.

00:40:19.860 --> 00:40:22.040 align:middle line:90%
There's no clear answer.

00:40:22.040 --> 00:40:24.480 align:middle line:84%
So let's just look at what
other countries have done.

00:40:24.480 --> 00:40:29.020 align:middle line:84%
So the UK, EU, most EU
countries, Australia, Canada,

00:40:29.020 --> 00:40:31.880 align:middle line:90%
and Korea basically say this.

00:40:31.880 --> 00:40:36.160 align:middle line:84%
You need to pay for
whatever local lines have

00:40:36.160 --> 00:40:40.800 align:middle line:84%
to be built to connect your
new plant, your wind farm,

00:40:40.800 --> 00:40:43.400 align:middle line:90%
to the major transmission lines.

00:40:43.400 --> 00:40:46.520 align:middle line:84%
And you're going to have
to build a substation

00:40:46.520 --> 00:40:50.240 align:middle line:84%
to raise the voltage
and put that power.

00:40:50.240 --> 00:40:54.080 align:middle line:84%
But as for the major
transmission system,

00:40:54.080 --> 00:40:59.160 align:middle line:84%
those costs will be paid
by a regulated tariff that

00:40:59.160 --> 00:41:02.550 align:middle line:84%
is socialized across
all the generators.

00:41:02.550 --> 00:41:05.510 align:middle line:90%
And this is socialism.

00:41:05.510 --> 00:41:10.670 align:middle line:84%
In Japan, they used to
have a different system.

00:41:10.670 --> 00:41:15.270 align:middle line:84%
Sorry, they used to have a
system in which it was all

00:41:15.270 --> 00:41:20.390 align:middle line:84%
socialized by generators, but
they now have a little extra,

00:41:20.390 --> 00:41:23.230 align:middle line:90%
they call a reeling tariff.

00:41:23.230 --> 00:41:27.870 align:middle line:84%
That is an extra charge that
they assign to the new generator

00:41:27.870 --> 00:41:31.710 align:middle line:90%
to balance the two things.

00:41:31.710 --> 00:41:35.470 align:middle line:84%
So you can see how the
US is kind of an outlier

00:41:35.470 --> 00:41:37.790 align:middle line:90%
here with this approach.

00:41:37.790 --> 00:41:43.350 align:middle line:84%
And that may also explain
why deployment of renewables

00:41:43.350 --> 00:41:47.050 align:middle line:84%
is probably progressing
maybe more slowly here,

00:41:47.050 --> 00:41:50.968 align:middle line:84%
despite the fact that we
have a really optimal country

00:41:50.968 --> 00:41:53.510 align:middle line:84%
for renewable generation, with
lots of wind and lots of solar

00:41:53.510 --> 00:41:56.390 align:middle line:90%
and lots of space.

00:41:56.390 --> 00:41:59.830 align:middle line:84%
There is a new FERC
order issued last year,

00:41:59.830 --> 00:42:03.770 align:middle line:84%
called 1920, that is
attempting to basically make us

00:42:03.770 --> 00:42:05.530 align:middle line:90%
like the rest of the world.

00:42:05.530 --> 00:42:07.690 align:middle line:84%
They say in the
FERC order, requires

00:42:07.690 --> 00:42:10.290 align:middle line:84%
long-term regional
transmission planning

00:42:10.290 --> 00:42:14.350 align:middle line:84%
and cost allocation to be
done through cost allocation,

00:42:14.350 --> 00:42:17.130 align:middle line:84%
that is, for those
planning lines.

00:42:17.130 --> 00:42:20.170 align:middle line:84%
It doesn't say exactly how that
cost allocation will work out

00:42:20.170 --> 00:42:23.070 align:middle line:84%
if it's a tariff that is
applied to everyone or so on.

00:42:23.070 --> 00:42:25.450 align:middle line:84%
But basically, they're
saying you can't just put it

00:42:25.450 --> 00:42:27.190 align:middle line:90%
all on the new generator.

00:42:27.190 --> 00:42:30.650 align:middle line:90%


00:42:30.650 --> 00:42:34.570 align:middle line:84%
New people will still have to
pay for the interconnect, which

00:42:34.570 --> 00:42:37.090 align:middle line:90%
is like every other country.

00:42:37.090 --> 00:42:43.290 align:middle line:84%
So predictably, this
new order is now

00:42:43.290 --> 00:42:49.370 align:middle line:84%
suspended and being challenged
in court by a bunch of lawsuits.

00:42:49.370 --> 00:42:52.610 align:middle line:84%
The principal one is a
coalition of 19 states being

00:42:52.610 --> 00:42:54.610 align:middle line:90%
led by the state of Texas.

00:42:54.610 --> 00:42:57.910 align:middle line:84%
100% of these states
who oppose this order

00:42:57.910 --> 00:43:01.230 align:middle line:84%
are Republican
legislature states.

00:43:01.230 --> 00:43:05.910 align:middle line:84%
You can probably guess
that there's probably

00:43:05.910 --> 00:43:09.630 align:middle line:84%
some money behind this,
getting these guys to put up

00:43:09.630 --> 00:43:15.150 align:middle line:84%
this lawsuit by established
corporations who own old coal

00:43:15.150 --> 00:43:17.590 align:middle line:90%
and natural gas plants.

00:43:17.590 --> 00:43:19.110 align:middle line:84%
When you read the
legal filing, it's

00:43:19.110 --> 00:43:22.070 align:middle line:84%
pretty clear that they want
to just block wind and solar.

00:43:22.070 --> 00:43:26.050 align:middle line:84%
They're like, we have the right
to choose our generator mix.

00:43:26.050 --> 00:43:30.390 align:middle line:84%
And upstart generators should
be kept off our system.

00:43:30.390 --> 00:43:35.910 align:middle line:90%
And so it's unfortunate.

00:43:35.910 --> 00:43:38.460 align:middle line:90%
Earlier, I showed you this plot.

00:43:38.460 --> 00:43:40.710 align:middle line:84%
And one of the things that
emerged in the conversation

00:43:40.710 --> 00:43:43.790 align:middle line:84%
is that, well, OK,
so this plot is

00:43:43.790 --> 00:43:48.790 align:middle line:84%
the amount of nameplate
capacity in the queue waiting

00:43:48.790 --> 00:43:50.830 align:middle line:90%
to connect to the grid.

00:43:50.830 --> 00:43:54.790 align:middle line:84%
And this is wind
and solar capacity.

00:43:54.790 --> 00:43:59.020 align:middle line:84%
And this line is
current generation.

00:43:59.020 --> 00:44:02.900 align:middle line:84%
And it just shows how many
wind and solar projects

00:44:02.900 --> 00:44:06.300 align:middle line:90%
are just waiting to connect.

00:44:06.300 --> 00:44:11.700 align:middle line:84%
Now, it was pointed out that
many of these disappear.

00:44:11.700 --> 00:44:18.220 align:middle line:84%
And I got the
statistics for you.

00:44:18.220 --> 00:44:21.580 align:middle line:84%
Depending on if you count by
the number of requests or count

00:44:21.580 --> 00:44:29.620 align:middle line:84%
by the fraction of total power,
something like 75%, roughly 3/4,

00:44:29.620 --> 00:44:33.940 align:middle line:84%
of these projects are
basically withdrawn.

00:44:33.940 --> 00:44:36.432 align:middle line:84%
Now there's a question as
to whether these-- yeah.

00:44:36.432 --> 00:44:38.640 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: So when you say
they're waiting to connect,

00:44:38.640 --> 00:44:40.848 align:middle line:84%
you mean they're literally
just sitting there and not

00:44:40.848 --> 00:44:41.640 align:middle line:90%
doing anything?

00:44:41.640 --> 00:44:42.860 align:middle line:90%
SCOTT KEMP: Yes.

00:44:42.860 --> 00:44:44.500 align:middle line:84%
Usually, I don't
think they really

00:44:44.500 --> 00:44:47.700 align:middle line:84%
build the capacity until they
get authorization for it.

00:44:47.700 --> 00:44:49.960 align:middle line:84%
But yeah, they're basically
we have a project.

00:44:49.960 --> 00:44:52.620 align:middle line:84%
We have an idea, or we're
going to build this farm.

00:44:52.620 --> 00:44:54.400 align:middle line:90%
We have a legal entity.

00:44:54.400 --> 00:44:55.680 align:middle line:90%
We're ready to go.

00:44:55.680 --> 00:44:57.520 align:middle line:90%
And then they're waiting.

00:44:57.520 --> 00:45:03.900 align:middle line:84%
And the grid operator says,
we have to make expansion,

00:45:03.900 --> 00:45:05.040 align:middle line:90%
or you have to pay.

00:45:05.040 --> 00:45:07.760 align:middle line:84%
And you have to
wait in this queue.

00:45:07.760 --> 00:45:12.280 align:middle line:84%
And the average time from
the queue is 13 years.

00:45:12.280 --> 00:45:16.080 align:middle line:84%
So if you are an
investor and you're

00:45:16.080 --> 00:45:18.600 align:middle line:84%
planning to do something
with your money,

00:45:18.600 --> 00:45:21.920 align:middle line:84%
you want to build a wind
farm, and you make money.

00:45:21.920 --> 00:45:23.480 align:middle line:84%
And they said,
well yeah, but you

00:45:23.480 --> 00:45:28.053 align:middle line:84%
won't get your first dollar of
return for the next 15 years

00:45:28.053 --> 00:45:29.220 align:middle line:90%
while you wait in the queue.

00:45:29.220 --> 00:45:31.000 align:middle line:84%
And then we have
to build the farm.

00:45:31.000 --> 00:45:33.480 align:middle line:90%
This is the problem.

00:45:33.480 --> 00:45:36.680 align:middle line:84%
So it's not really a surprise
that 3/4 of these things are

00:45:36.680 --> 00:45:40.280 align:middle line:90%
withdrawn and never succeed.

00:45:40.280 --> 00:45:44.840 align:middle line:84%
There was some suggestion that
some of these might not be real.

00:45:44.840 --> 00:45:47.880 align:middle line:84%
We have no way of
actually knowing that,

00:45:47.880 --> 00:45:51.480 align:middle line:84%
whether these projects
are real or not.

00:45:51.480 --> 00:45:55.880 align:middle line:90%
But yeah, this is the situation.

00:45:55.880 --> 00:46:02.340 align:middle line:90%


00:46:02.340 --> 00:46:07.980 align:middle line:84%
I mean, this basically shows how
much it is slowing things down.

00:46:07.980 --> 00:46:12.740 align:middle line:84%
In case you're wondering how
expensive this is, typically

00:46:12.740 --> 00:46:16.140 align:middle line:84%
the point of
interconnection charge

00:46:16.140 --> 00:46:19.340 align:middle line:84%
is something less than
$50 per kilowatt in terms

00:46:19.340 --> 00:46:22.780 align:middle line:90%
of capital expenditure.

00:46:22.780 --> 00:46:25.320 align:middle line:84%
And I'll have a plot at
the end where we can.

00:46:25.320 --> 00:46:26.780 align:middle line:90%
So just remember that.

00:46:26.780 --> 00:46:31.820 align:middle line:84%
Whereas a network upgrade would
be something like $200 or $300

00:46:31.820 --> 00:46:34.740 align:middle line:90%
per kilowatt of capacity.

00:46:34.740 --> 00:46:40.780 align:middle line:84%
So it depends on the
project, but it's somewhat

00:46:40.780 --> 00:46:43.700 align:middle line:84%
of an addition to the
cost of these things.

00:46:43.700 --> 00:46:45.920 align:middle line:84%
I think the killer is
not really the cost.

00:46:45.920 --> 00:46:49.620 align:middle line:84%
The killer really is the
queue, the wait time.

00:46:49.620 --> 00:46:55.490 align:middle line:90%


00:46:55.490 --> 00:46:58.570 align:middle line:84%
If you're a new project and you
want to connect to the grid,

00:46:58.570 --> 00:47:01.170 align:middle line:90%
how much does it cost?

00:47:01.170 --> 00:47:04.690 align:middle line:84%
So it turns out that the
permitting and right of way

00:47:04.690 --> 00:47:08.370 align:middle line:84%
costs, as I mentioned a
moment ago, which turns out

00:47:08.370 --> 00:47:15.250 align:middle line:84%
to be something like 25%
to 30% of the total cost

00:47:15.250 --> 00:47:16.490 align:middle line:90%
of the project--

00:47:16.490 --> 00:47:21.130 align:middle line:84%
an amazing amount
of money being spent

00:47:21.130 --> 00:47:24.550 align:middle line:84%
negotiating legal agreements
with various entities.

00:47:24.550 --> 00:47:28.270 align:middle line:90%


00:47:28.270 --> 00:47:31.210 align:middle line:84%
Sorry, this is for transmission,
not for wind and solar.

00:47:31.210 --> 00:47:35.050 align:middle line:84%
The towers are something
like half the cost

00:47:35.050 --> 00:47:37.410 align:middle line:84%
to put up these large
transmission towers.

00:47:37.410 --> 00:47:39.990 align:middle line:84%
The conductors and
wire are about 10%.

00:47:39.990 --> 00:47:45.210 align:middle line:84%
Substation is about 15%,
20%, and it's a contingency.

00:47:45.210 --> 00:47:53.390 align:middle line:84%
What is interesting is that the
towers determine the voltage.

00:47:53.390 --> 00:47:57.390 align:middle line:84%
The voltage determines how far
apart the lines have to be,

00:47:57.390 --> 00:48:00.110 align:middle line:84%
how far apart they have
to be off the ground.

00:48:00.110 --> 00:48:04.150 align:middle line:84%
And that is the
most expensive part.

00:48:04.150 --> 00:48:07.550 align:middle line:84%
The number of conductors
that you run on the tower

00:48:07.550 --> 00:48:11.030 align:middle line:84%
determines the ampacity
of the circuit,

00:48:11.030 --> 00:48:12.910 align:middle line:90%
how much current you can send.

00:48:12.910 --> 00:48:16.270 align:middle line:84%
So you can triple
the amount of power

00:48:16.270 --> 00:48:18.430 align:middle line:84%
by tripling the amount
of wires as long as you

00:48:18.430 --> 00:48:20.610 align:middle line:84%
have room on your towers
to put more wires.

00:48:20.610 --> 00:48:23.950 align:middle line:84%
So sometimes you'll see all
these wires hanging in a row.

00:48:23.950 --> 00:48:25.870 align:middle line:90%
And that's why.

00:48:25.870 --> 00:48:29.890 align:middle line:84%
And that doesn't cost very
much to increase the ampacity,

00:48:29.890 --> 00:48:34.510 align:middle line:84%
but it does cost if you
want to change the voltage.

00:48:34.510 --> 00:48:37.310 align:middle line:84%
So you have this
weird phenomenon

00:48:37.310 --> 00:48:41.830 align:middle line:84%
where the voltage is actually
the determining factor

00:48:41.830 --> 00:48:46.750 align:middle line:84%
in the cost of transmission, not
the power that you're sending,

00:48:46.750 --> 00:48:51.000 align:middle line:84%
where power is, obviously
the thing that you're using.

00:48:51.000 --> 00:48:54.020 align:middle line:90%


00:48:54.020 --> 00:49:05.060 align:middle line:84%
So it's notable that since
2010, we have installed--

00:49:05.060 --> 00:49:06.900 align:middle line:90%
I think it's 70.

00:49:06.900 --> 00:49:09.660 align:middle line:84%
Yeah, I think I have
this on another slide--

00:49:09.660 --> 00:49:14.260 align:middle line:90%
70 miles of 765-kilovolt lines.

00:49:14.260 --> 00:49:17.780 align:middle line:90%


00:49:17.780 --> 00:49:21.700 align:middle line:84%
And the average time for
one of these projects

00:49:21.700 --> 00:49:24.420 align:middle line:90%
is something like 13 years.

00:49:24.420 --> 00:49:28.260 align:middle line:84%
We've installed in the same time
100,000 miles of natural gas

00:49:28.260 --> 00:49:29.900 align:middle line:90%
pipelines.

00:49:29.900 --> 00:49:39.660 align:middle line:84%
And one reason might be
that for power lines,

00:49:39.660 --> 00:49:41.780 align:middle line:84%
the company that is
trying to build the line

00:49:41.780 --> 00:49:47.520 align:middle line:84%
has to go out and negotiate
with each federal entity, state

00:49:47.520 --> 00:49:52.000 align:middle line:84%
entity, local government,
landowner, et cetera

00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:54.820 align:middle line:84%
and secure all these
rights themselves.

00:49:54.820 --> 00:49:58.640 align:middle line:84%
And it takes a long
time to do that.

00:49:58.640 --> 00:50:01.440 align:middle line:84%
For going across
federal lands, and there

00:50:01.440 --> 00:50:03.560 align:middle line:84%
are lots of federal
lands, they still

00:50:03.560 --> 00:50:06.880 align:middle line:84%
have to deal with
the EPA and FERC

00:50:06.880 --> 00:50:10.620 align:middle line:84%
and the Department of Energy and
the Bureau of Land Management,

00:50:10.620 --> 00:50:13.160 align:middle line:84%
or a bunch of
different entities have

00:50:13.160 --> 00:50:15.815 align:middle line:90%
to have a licensing process.

00:50:15.815 --> 00:50:17.440 align:middle line:84%
And they have to go
through all of this

00:50:17.440 --> 00:50:20.080 align:middle line:84%
with all these different
federal entities.

00:50:20.080 --> 00:50:22.040 align:middle line:84%
For natural gas
pipelines, there's

00:50:22.040 --> 00:50:24.920 align:middle line:84%
a law on the books
that says, when

00:50:24.920 --> 00:50:26.700 align:middle line:84%
dealing with the
federal government,

00:50:26.700 --> 00:50:28.680 align:middle line:84%
there's a single
point of contact that

00:50:28.680 --> 00:50:30.180 align:middle line:90%
authorizes the transmission.

00:50:30.180 --> 00:50:32.513 align:middle line:84%
And you don't have to go to
all these different agencies

00:50:32.513 --> 00:50:34.020 align:middle line:90%
and do all of this permitting.

00:50:34.020 --> 00:50:37.400 align:middle line:90%


00:50:37.400 --> 00:50:40.080 align:middle line:84%
As a result, the average
time to get a natural gas

00:50:40.080 --> 00:50:45.620 align:middle line:84%
pipeline permitted in the US
is two years, instead of 13.

00:50:45.620 --> 00:50:50.580 align:middle line:84%
And you can understand why
100,000 miles of gas pipelines

00:50:50.580 --> 00:50:51.480 align:middle line:90%
have been installed.

00:50:51.480 --> 00:50:53.940 align:middle line:84%
It's just much,
much easier to do.

00:50:53.940 --> 00:50:57.140 align:middle line:84%
So of course,
there is a proposal

00:50:57.140 --> 00:51:02.380 align:middle line:84%
for a law to revise permitting
on federal lands of transmission

00:51:02.380 --> 00:51:06.340 align:middle line:84%
lines and make it identical to
that of a natural gas system.

00:51:06.340 --> 00:51:09.980 align:middle line:84%
But predictably, the
Republican Congress

00:51:09.980 --> 00:51:11.280 align:middle line:90%
is not interested in that law.

00:51:11.280 --> 00:51:13.180 align:middle line:84%
And it has just sat
there, and no one

00:51:13.180 --> 00:51:15.100 align:middle line:90%
has ever put it up for a vote.

00:51:15.100 --> 00:51:18.620 align:middle line:84%
So you can see
how these politics

00:51:18.620 --> 00:51:22.200 align:middle line:84%
are kind of holding
back decarbonization.

00:51:22.200 --> 00:51:24.980 align:middle line:90%


00:51:24.980 --> 00:51:29.660 align:middle line:84%
So is this expansion
that is required

00:51:29.660 --> 00:51:32.700 align:middle line:84%
to enable all of these
wind and solar projects

00:51:32.700 --> 00:51:34.700 align:middle line:90%
that are waiting in the queue?

00:51:34.700 --> 00:51:38.580 align:middle line:84%
Is this thing going
to be expensive?

00:51:38.580 --> 00:51:44.530 align:middle line:84%
So I did some statistics on
the 13 most recently completed

00:51:44.530 --> 00:51:49.890 align:middle line:84%
construction costs, and I
developed this little regression

00:51:49.890 --> 00:51:52.650 align:middle line:84%
formula-- some fixed costs
associated with running

00:51:52.650 --> 00:51:56.350 align:middle line:84%
your operations and
then $100,000 per mile,

00:51:56.350 --> 00:51:59.930 align:middle line:84%
plus $8,000 per
kilovolt per mile.

00:51:59.930 --> 00:52:03.830 align:middle line:84%
Remember, the voltage determines
how big the towers are.

00:52:03.830 --> 00:52:09.110 align:middle line:84%
And so that there's a strong
dependence on the voltage.

00:52:09.110 --> 00:52:11.670 align:middle line:90%


00:52:11.670 --> 00:52:16.120 align:middle line:90%
Say this is maybe typical today.

00:52:16.120 --> 00:52:17.870 align:middle line:84%
If we really have a
lot of wind and solar,

00:52:17.870 --> 00:52:19.790 align:middle line:84%
we need to go to higher
voltages than this.

00:52:19.790 --> 00:52:22.630 align:middle line:84%
But for typical contemporary
line, 500-kilovolt line,

00:52:22.630 --> 00:52:26.450 align:middle line:84%
that's something like
$4 million per mile.

00:52:26.450 --> 00:52:30.650 align:middle line:84%
I asked last night, ChatGPT,
to go through and look

00:52:30.650 --> 00:52:32.810 align:middle line:84%
at all the data and
do its own regression,

00:52:32.810 --> 00:52:36.130 align:middle line:84%
and here's the
formula it gave me.

00:52:36.130 --> 00:52:39.610 align:middle line:84%
So it came up with a
$5 million per mile.

00:52:39.610 --> 00:52:44.110 align:middle line:84%
And since I did my
regression some years ago,

00:52:44.110 --> 00:52:45.710 align:middle line:90%
it came out pretty good.

00:52:45.710 --> 00:52:49.670 align:middle line:84%
It has this really nice
dependence on the voltage,

00:52:49.670 --> 00:52:51.830 align:middle line:90%
and it normalizes.

00:52:51.830 --> 00:52:54.050 align:middle line:84%
And it has the
number of conductors.

00:52:54.050 --> 00:52:58.576 align:middle line:84%
It's a fancy result. So
something like $4 million,

00:52:58.576 --> 00:53:04.470 align:middle line:84%
$5 million per mile is
a good rule of thumb.

00:53:04.470 --> 00:53:06.710 align:middle line:84%
Of course, there
are lots and lots

00:53:06.710 --> 00:53:08.830 align:middle line:90%
and lots and lots of entities--

00:53:08.830 --> 00:53:15.030 align:middle line:84%
academics, NREL,
Berkeley, Berkeley Lab,

00:53:15.030 --> 00:53:17.645 align:middle line:84%
all sorts of entities who
are interested in increasing

00:53:17.645 --> 00:53:18.770 align:middle line:90%
the amount of transmission.

00:53:18.770 --> 00:53:22.030 align:middle line:84%
And they've done all kinds of
studies on what it would cost.

00:53:22.030 --> 00:53:24.430 align:middle line:90%
And here are their results.

00:53:24.430 --> 00:53:30.970 align:middle line:84%
And these lines are
slopes of constant costs.

00:53:30.970 --> 00:53:34.170 align:middle line:84%
So this is a million dollars
a mile, $2 million a mile,

00:53:34.170 --> 00:53:37.230 align:middle line:84%
$3 million a mile,
$4 million a mile.

00:53:37.230 --> 00:53:40.850 align:middle line:84%
And I said it costs
$4 million a mile.

00:53:40.850 --> 00:53:45.170 align:middle line:84%
And ChatGPT says it
costs $5 million a mile.

00:53:45.170 --> 00:53:49.810 align:middle line:84%
And the studies all predict
that it's going to cost less.

00:53:49.810 --> 00:53:54.200 align:middle line:84%
So I think this is basically
the same thing-- microreactor

00:53:54.200 --> 00:53:56.450 align:middle line:84%
vendors telling you that
things are going to be cheap,

00:53:56.450 --> 00:53:59.330 align:middle line:90%
and then they're never cheap.

00:53:59.330 --> 00:54:01.570 align:middle line:84%
And so I tend to
think that whenever

00:54:01.570 --> 00:54:06.270 align:middle line:84%
you see these
transmission studies,

00:54:06.270 --> 00:54:09.170 align:middle line:84%
and if you look at the
real historical data,

00:54:09.170 --> 00:54:10.650 align:middle line:84%
it's more expensive
than they say

00:54:10.650 --> 00:54:17.370 align:middle line:84%
it's going to be, not double or
triple, but 20% more, some 50%

00:54:17.370 --> 00:54:20.570 align:middle line:84%
more or something like that,
depending on where they line up.

00:54:20.570 --> 00:54:24.290 align:middle line:84%
So I think I will
use this scaling

00:54:24.290 --> 00:54:27.590 align:middle line:84%
factor when I talk about
the cost of these systems.

00:54:27.590 --> 00:54:31.210 align:middle line:90%


00:54:31.210 --> 00:54:34.050 align:middle line:90%
Let's just look at some costs.

00:54:34.050 --> 00:54:37.010 align:middle line:84%
Here's a line that goes from
the Great Plains to California,

00:54:37.010 --> 00:54:38.470 align:middle line:90%
1,500 miles.

00:54:38.470 --> 00:54:42.440 align:middle line:84%
This thing would
cost like $9 billion.

00:54:42.440 --> 00:54:45.760 align:middle line:84%
Here's something that brings
hydropower from Quebec

00:54:45.760 --> 00:54:49.800 align:middle line:84%
down to New York City,
something like $6.2 billion.

00:54:49.800 --> 00:54:54.360 align:middle line:84%
It's basically the price
of a nuclear power plant.

00:54:54.360 --> 00:54:58.680 align:middle line:84%
And they can carry, depending
on remember how many lines

00:54:58.680 --> 00:55:02.000 align:middle line:84%
you string on the tower and
the ampacity of the system,

00:55:02.000 --> 00:55:07.680 align:middle line:84%
something on the order of
maybe 4 to 6 gigawatts of power

00:55:07.680 --> 00:55:12.280 align:middle line:84%
continuous, which
doesn't seem like a lot.

00:55:12.280 --> 00:55:18.920 align:middle line:84%
But you have to remember that
they're also really dealing also

00:55:18.920 --> 00:55:20.930 align:middle line:90%
with excess generation.

00:55:20.930 --> 00:55:22.680 align:middle line:84%
So there will be a lot
of local generation

00:55:22.680 --> 00:55:25.320 align:middle line:84%
that is locally consumed
and just how much

00:55:25.320 --> 00:55:28.680 align:middle line:84%
excess generation do
we have to move around

00:55:28.680 --> 00:55:30.260 align:middle line:90%
to stabilize the grid?

00:55:30.260 --> 00:55:31.620 align:middle line:90%
That's their principal interest.

00:55:31.620 --> 00:55:34.720 align:middle line:84%
So they're only taking
the cream off the top.

00:55:34.720 --> 00:55:37.400 align:middle line:84%
So six gigawatts of
transmission capacity

00:55:37.400 --> 00:55:41.940 align:middle line:84%
might support a much
larger installed base

00:55:41.940 --> 00:55:43.360 align:middle line:90%
of variable generation.

00:55:43.360 --> 00:55:46.300 align:middle line:90%


00:55:46.300 --> 00:55:52.420 align:middle line:90%
So there is also a new study.

00:55:52.420 --> 00:55:55.240 align:middle line:84%
This is the 2024 National
Transmission Planning Study.

00:55:55.240 --> 00:55:58.380 align:middle line:84%
It's a multi-year study
that was run out of NREL.

00:55:58.380 --> 00:56:03.240 align:middle line:84%
And I'll just tell you what they
found and how they market it.

00:56:03.240 --> 00:56:05.620 align:middle line:84%
And I think they're
very optimistic.

00:56:05.620 --> 00:56:06.920 align:middle line:90%
But here's what they say.

00:56:06.920 --> 00:56:12.420 align:middle line:84%
They say that for every dollar
spent on building transmission,

00:56:12.420 --> 00:56:16.980 align:middle line:84%
we will save somewhere
between $1.60 and $1.80.

00:56:16.980 --> 00:56:21.660 align:middle line:84%
And in other words,
it pays for itself.

00:56:21.660 --> 00:56:24.460 align:middle line:84%
And so that comes
out to something

00:56:24.460 --> 00:56:29.380 align:middle line:84%
like $270 to $490
billion between now

00:56:29.380 --> 00:56:33.500 align:middle line:84%
and 2050, half a trillion
dollars of saved money

00:56:33.500 --> 00:56:39.240 align:middle line:90%
between now and 2050.

00:56:39.240 --> 00:56:41.800 align:middle line:84%
So they looked at hundreds
different scenarios

00:56:41.800 --> 00:56:45.800 align:middle line:84%
and they go through 2050
as their time horizon.

00:56:45.800 --> 00:56:50.040 align:middle line:84%
They also say that
it will offset

00:56:50.040 --> 00:56:54.280 align:middle line:84%
somewhere between 10 and 11
billion metric tons of CO2

00:56:54.280 --> 00:56:55.400 align:middle line:90%
emissions.

00:56:55.400 --> 00:57:03.200 align:middle line:84%
So that's about 3,000
gigawatt-years of natural gas.

00:57:03.200 --> 00:57:06.440 align:middle line:84%
So over that time period,
one way you could look at it

00:57:06.440 --> 00:57:09.960 align:middle line:84%
is we would have to
build 115 nuclear plants

00:57:09.960 --> 00:57:16.480 align:middle line:84%
and run them between today
and 2050 to save as much CO2.

00:57:16.480 --> 00:57:20.200 align:middle line:84%
So the question is, where does
all this cost savings come from?

00:57:20.200 --> 00:57:23.160 align:middle line:84%
Where does all this CO2
abatement come from?

00:57:23.160 --> 00:57:27.000 align:middle line:84%
And it's kind of not
exactly intuitive.

00:57:27.000 --> 00:57:30.600 align:middle line:84%
What they say is that
for the next 10 years,

00:57:30.600 --> 00:57:35.590 align:middle line:84%
between 2025 and 2035,
most of the cost savings

00:57:35.590 --> 00:57:41.390 align:middle line:84%
actually comes from
avoiding fossil fuel

00:57:41.390 --> 00:57:44.630 align:middle line:84%
use-- natural gas that
will not get burned

00:57:44.630 --> 00:57:46.790 align:middle line:84%
and carbon and
coal that will not

00:57:46.790 --> 00:57:53.310 align:middle line:84%
get burned because the existing
wind and solar installations

00:57:53.310 --> 00:57:56.990 align:middle line:84%
can now use more of
their nameplate capacity

00:57:56.990 --> 00:57:59.070 align:middle line:90%
and put more power on the grid.

00:57:59.070 --> 00:58:01.450 align:middle line:90%
That's basically the offset.

00:58:01.450 --> 00:58:03.910 align:middle line:84%
And as a result, they
say that the capacity

00:58:03.910 --> 00:58:09.910 align:middle line:84%
factor for wind and their model
goes up to 40% is pretty high.

00:58:09.910 --> 00:58:13.210 align:middle line:84%
And for solar, it
goes up to 28%.

00:58:13.210 --> 00:58:14.790 align:middle line:84%
You might remember
we typically think

00:58:14.790 --> 00:58:19.270 align:middle line:84%
of solar as having a capacity
factor of around 20%,

00:58:19.270 --> 00:58:21.590 align:middle line:90%
maybe 15% in the north.

00:58:21.590 --> 00:58:25.630 align:middle line:84%
And they're saying they
can actually operate at 28%

00:58:25.630 --> 00:58:30.310 align:middle line:84%
because they can shift
all that power around.

00:58:30.310 --> 00:58:32.190 align:middle line:90%
So that may all be so.

00:58:32.190 --> 00:58:35.690 align:middle line:84%
I don't doubt that
physically that's possible.

00:58:35.690 --> 00:58:40.650 align:middle line:84%
But in the process, they're
also making certain assumptions

00:58:40.650 --> 00:58:45.770 align:middle line:84%
about capacity expansion, about
people building wind and solar,

00:58:45.770 --> 00:58:48.610 align:middle line:84%
and also assumptions
about people

00:58:48.610 --> 00:58:50.490 align:middle line:90%
building all this transmission.

00:58:50.490 --> 00:58:52.770 align:middle line:84%
And I think we have to
evaluate whether any of this

00:58:52.770 --> 00:58:53.970 align:middle line:90%
is realistic.

00:58:53.970 --> 00:58:57.970 align:middle line:84%
So for example, they
assume that 770 gigawatts

00:58:57.970 --> 00:59:03.170 align:middle line:84%
of nameplate capacity of wind
and 1000 gigawatts of nameplate

00:59:03.170 --> 00:59:07.250 align:middle line:84%
capacity of solar are going to
be added, which is something

00:59:07.250 --> 00:59:12.530 align:middle line:84%
like the equivalent of 300
gigawatts of nuclear generation

00:59:12.530 --> 00:59:14.810 align:middle line:90%
between now and 2050.

00:59:14.810 --> 00:59:16.450 align:middle line:90%
That's a lot.

00:59:16.450 --> 00:59:19.370 align:middle line:84%
And I think there's some
extreme optimism here.

00:59:19.370 --> 00:59:24.930 align:middle line:84%
Despite the extreme
optimism with these numbers,

00:59:24.930 --> 00:59:28.170 align:middle line:84%
the study is good for
potentially one thing.

00:59:28.170 --> 00:59:30.810 align:middle line:84%
And that is if a very
sophisticated study

00:59:30.810 --> 00:59:37.670 align:middle line:84%
that looks at, sorry, the
mapping of the transmission

00:59:37.670 --> 00:59:40.910 align:middle line:84%
requirements onto a
future world with a lot

00:59:40.910 --> 00:59:42.790 align:middle line:90%
of renewables generation.

00:59:42.790 --> 00:59:46.270 align:middle line:84%
Whether that happens
by 2050 or not,

00:59:46.270 --> 00:59:50.110 align:middle line:84%
that is still an
interesting relationship.

00:59:50.110 --> 00:59:52.910 align:middle line:84%
And that gives us
a price that we

00:59:52.910 --> 00:59:56.310 align:middle line:84%
can use to estimate the
additional cost that we should

00:59:56.310 --> 00:59:59.870 align:middle line:84%
burden on solar and
wind, because we

00:59:59.870 --> 01:00:01.630 align:middle line:84%
choose a technology
that requires

01:00:01.630 --> 01:00:03.310 align:middle line:90%
a bunch of new generation.

01:00:03.310 --> 01:00:06.450 align:middle line:84%
So they don't give us
that price explicitly,

01:00:06.450 --> 01:00:08.790 align:middle line:84%
but you can back it out
of their calculations.

01:00:08.790 --> 01:00:13.750 align:middle line:84%
And it comes out to somewhere
between $80 and $200

01:00:13.750 --> 01:00:17.670 align:middle line:90%
per kilowatt of capacity.

01:00:17.670 --> 01:00:22.970 align:middle line:84%
So this goes on the front
of the overnight cost.

01:00:22.970 --> 01:00:25.830 align:middle line:84%
You're going to
build your wind farm.

01:00:25.830 --> 01:00:29.550 align:middle line:84%
It's going to cost you
$2,100 per kilowatt,

01:00:29.550 --> 01:00:34.620 align:middle line:84%
and you're going to have
to add $200 of grid penalty

01:00:34.620 --> 01:00:36.860 align:middle line:90%
because of its variability.

01:00:36.860 --> 01:00:40.940 align:middle line:84%
And that's kind of their
takeaway conclusion.

01:00:40.940 --> 01:00:44.380 align:middle line:84%
So that's something
like 4 to 14%,

01:00:44.380 --> 01:00:46.700 align:middle line:84%
depending on whether
you're applying it to wind

01:00:46.700 --> 01:00:49.720 align:middle line:84%
or applying it solar and
which one you choose.

01:00:49.720 --> 01:00:54.140 align:middle line:84%
And remember I said
that I think they're

01:00:54.140 --> 01:00:55.980 align:middle line:90%
optimistic on the pricing.

01:00:55.980 --> 01:00:57.960 align:middle line:84%
Most of these pricing
models are optimistic.

01:00:57.960 --> 01:01:02.460 align:middle line:84%
So multiply that by a factor
of 2, something like that.

01:01:02.460 --> 01:01:04.980 align:middle line:90%


01:01:04.980 --> 01:01:10.640 align:middle line:84%
But at the end of the day,
it's still not that much money.

01:01:10.640 --> 01:01:16.660 align:middle line:84%
Even if it's 30%, the price
difference between $2100

01:01:16.660 --> 01:01:24.360 align:middle line:84%
and $7,000 is not killed by
this 30% transmission tariff.

01:01:24.360 --> 01:01:29.200 align:middle line:90%


01:01:29.200 --> 01:01:31.120 align:middle line:84%
And when I did the
Shaner calculation,

01:01:31.120 --> 01:01:33.880 align:middle line:84%
and I came up with
$130 per megawatt,

01:01:33.880 --> 01:01:37.000 align:middle line:84%
do you remember what I
used for this number?

01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:39.200 align:middle line:90%
I used 25%.

01:01:39.200 --> 01:01:41.200 align:middle line:90%
This is why I used 25%.

01:01:41.200 --> 01:01:44.702 align:middle line:84%
So I think it doesn't
really change anything

01:01:44.702 --> 01:01:46.160 align:middle line:84%
with respect to
the competitiveness

01:01:46.160 --> 01:01:48.200 align:middle line:90%
of the technologies.

01:01:48.200 --> 01:01:51.600 align:middle line:84%
But it does show
how much has to be

01:01:51.600 --> 01:01:55.420 align:middle line:84%
done if you want this world
of wind and solar to emerge.

01:01:55.420 --> 01:01:56.300 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:01:56.300 --> 01:02:01.360 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: So do these studies
look at electrification as well?

01:02:01.360 --> 01:02:03.380 align:middle line:84%
Because I know back
home in Belgium,

01:02:03.380 --> 01:02:07.280 align:middle line:84%
a lot of the grid expansion
now is just from EVs.

01:02:07.280 --> 01:02:10.240 align:middle line:84%
It's not really related to
a big renewable expansion.

01:02:10.240 --> 01:02:13.640 align:middle line:84%
So today, this study,
are they looking

01:02:13.640 --> 01:02:17.380 align:middle line:84%
at you meet current demand
with wind and solar--

01:02:17.380 --> 01:02:18.840 align:middle line:90%
I mean, current demand plus--

01:02:18.840 --> 01:02:20.940 align:middle line:84%
I don't know 2% per
year or something?

01:02:20.940 --> 01:02:23.240 align:middle line:84%
Or are they also
looking at the same time

01:02:23.240 --> 01:02:27.820 align:middle line:84%
we assume this many EVs are
coming online, et cetera?

01:02:27.820 --> 01:02:30.520 align:middle line:84%
I could see it working for
or against wind and solar,

01:02:30.520 --> 01:02:31.400 align:middle line:90%
to be honest.

01:02:31.400 --> 01:02:34.900 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Yeah,
so three comments.

01:02:34.900 --> 01:02:37.720 align:middle line:84%
A, the detailed
answer, I don't know.

01:02:37.720 --> 01:02:41.220 align:middle line:90%
We have to go dig in a study.

01:02:41.220 --> 01:02:45.140 align:middle line:84%
My general sense is NREL does
have a model for increasing

01:02:45.140 --> 01:02:49.420 align:middle line:84%
demand that includes
transportation sector as part

01:02:49.420 --> 01:02:55.720 align:middle line:84%
of it, so that for transmission
purposes, total capacity,

01:02:55.720 --> 01:02:58.980 align:middle line:84%
there is some EV-related
kind of effect.

01:02:58.980 --> 01:03:03.780 align:middle line:84%
And the third comment is that
I believe most of the expansion

01:03:03.780 --> 01:03:07.420 align:middle line:84%
for dealing with that
will probably actually

01:03:07.420 --> 01:03:12.900 align:middle line:84%
be distribution rather than
transmission at this level.

01:03:12.900 --> 01:03:14.900 align:middle line:84%
It's the more regional
stuff that really is

01:03:14.900 --> 01:03:18.700 align:middle line:90%
where that's a sticking point.

01:03:18.700 --> 01:03:22.420 align:middle line:90%
So that's a different entity.

01:03:22.420 --> 01:03:26.665 align:middle line:84%
But all this could be
looked at in more detail.

01:03:26.665 --> 01:03:29.290 align:middle line:84%
And then there's a whole issue
with it you kind of pointed out.

01:03:29.290 --> 01:03:31.370 align:middle line:90%
EVs can go both ways.

01:03:31.370 --> 01:03:34.130 align:middle line:84%
They can suck up
excess solar capacity

01:03:34.130 --> 01:03:36.650 align:middle line:84%
in the middle of the
day and therefore

01:03:36.650 --> 01:03:38.830 align:middle line:84%
reduce the amount of
transmission that you need.

01:03:38.830 --> 01:03:42.050 align:middle line:90%
And so it's complex.

01:03:42.050 --> 01:03:46.890 align:middle line:84%
People have talked about
coming up with dynamic models

01:03:46.890 --> 01:03:51.910 align:middle line:84%
so that people can use
their EV as like on storage.

01:03:51.910 --> 01:03:53.430 align:middle line:84%
And there's none
of that exists yet.

01:03:53.430 --> 01:03:55.690 align:middle line:90%
But people are looking at it--

01:03:55.690 --> 01:03:58.670 align:middle line:84%
on-grid storage to
deal with the problem.

01:03:58.670 --> 01:04:02.210 align:middle line:90%


01:04:02.210 --> 01:04:08.450 align:middle line:84%
So here's my kind
of final slide.

01:04:08.450 --> 01:04:11.330 align:middle line:84%
Is this major
expansion of the grid

01:04:11.330 --> 01:04:17.890 align:middle line:84%
that is required for this world
of wind and solar realistic?

01:04:17.890 --> 01:04:20.690 align:middle line:84%
So I think the biggest
criticism is that it's

01:04:20.690 --> 01:04:23.590 align:middle line:90%
institutionally optimistic.

01:04:23.590 --> 01:04:27.990 align:middle line:84%
If over the last decade,
we've installed just 70 miles

01:04:27.990 --> 01:04:31.270 align:middle line:90%
of 765-kilovolt lines.

01:04:31.270 --> 01:04:34.510 align:middle line:84%
And this study, we're going to
need to says we need to install

01:04:34.510 --> 01:04:41.670 align:middle line:84%
170,000 miles of
765-kilovolt lines.

01:04:41.670 --> 01:04:44.030 align:middle line:84%
There's an institutional
growth there that

01:04:44.030 --> 01:04:47.630 align:middle line:90%
just is not realistic, I think.

01:04:47.630 --> 01:04:51.430 align:middle line:84%
We're supposed to do this in
the next between now and 2050.

01:04:51.430 --> 01:04:55.030 align:middle line:84%
I think it's a very
high level of optimism.

01:04:55.030 --> 01:04:56.552 align:middle line:90%
It comes from various things.

01:04:56.552 --> 01:04:58.510 align:middle line:84%
For one, there's a long
lead time on equipment,

01:04:58.510 --> 01:05:02.310 align:middle line:84%
such as power transformers, is
unlikely to be the manufacturing

01:05:02.310 --> 01:05:03.990 align:middle line:84%
capacity for all
the transformers

01:05:03.990 --> 01:05:06.130 align:middle line:84%
that would be required
here in the United States.

01:05:06.130 --> 01:05:08.670 align:middle line:84%
Some of them can come from
China, but even that probably

01:05:08.670 --> 01:05:09.170 align:middle line:90%
not enough.

01:05:09.170 --> 01:05:10.850 align:middle line:90%
Where's this capacity come from?

01:05:10.850 --> 01:05:14.250 align:middle line:84%
Same for transmission towers,
insulators, wire, switches,

01:05:14.250 --> 01:05:16.670 align:middle line:90%
all that stuff.

01:05:16.670 --> 01:05:23.490 align:middle line:84%
It also presumes that all these
ISOs will have planning capacity

01:05:23.490 --> 01:05:26.130 align:middle line:90%
to operate this grid.

01:05:26.130 --> 01:05:28.890 align:middle line:84%
This is a level
of operations and

01:05:28.890 --> 01:05:31.890 align:middle line:84%
of inter-regional transmission
that has never before

01:05:31.890 --> 01:05:36.410 align:middle line:84%
been demonstrated, especially
the high-voltage DC lines.

01:05:36.410 --> 01:05:39.170 align:middle line:84%
We just don't have
any experience

01:05:39.170 --> 01:05:43.570 align:middle line:84%
operating all of this kind
of power transmission.

01:05:43.570 --> 01:05:50.730 align:middle line:84%
So I think these things are
going to be major barriers.

01:05:50.730 --> 01:05:53.350 align:middle line:84%
On top of that, none of
this is going to get built.

01:05:53.350 --> 01:05:55.650 align:middle line:84%
If all the costs of
building it is just

01:05:55.650 --> 01:05:58.345 align:middle line:84%
going to sit on the
next solar generator who

01:05:58.345 --> 01:05:59.970 align:middle line:84%
wants to add their
plant, and then they

01:05:59.970 --> 01:06:02.250 align:middle line:84%
have to pay for
another line and so on.

01:06:02.250 --> 01:06:06.890 align:middle line:84%
There really has to be something
like FERC order 1920 that

01:06:06.890 --> 01:06:10.690 align:middle line:84%
socializes the cost of
being major lines over all

01:06:10.690 --> 01:06:12.490 align:middle line:90%
of the generators.

01:06:12.490 --> 01:06:16.450 align:middle line:84%
But of course, that thing
could be held up in court

01:06:16.450 --> 01:06:18.790 align:middle line:90%
for years, maybe a decade.

01:06:18.790 --> 01:06:23.500 align:middle line:84%
So I think for all
of these reasons,

01:06:23.500 --> 01:06:25.800 align:middle line:90%
it's not likely to happen.

01:06:25.800 --> 01:06:28.240 align:middle line:84%
Then there's also the
rights of way issue.

01:06:28.240 --> 01:06:31.120 align:middle line:84%
30% of the cost of
this transmission line

01:06:31.120 --> 01:06:33.560 align:middle line:90%
was rights of way.

01:06:33.560 --> 01:06:36.120 align:middle line:84%
It takes 13 years for the
average transmission project

01:06:36.120 --> 01:06:37.780 align:middle line:84%
to be permitted
versus two years.

01:06:37.780 --> 01:06:40.680 align:middle line:84%
It just shows how hard
this is going to be

01:06:40.680 --> 01:06:42.720 align:middle line:90%
unless those policies change.

01:06:42.720 --> 01:06:45.240 align:middle line:84%
And yet, despite the
bills being written,

01:06:45.240 --> 01:06:48.360 align:middle line:84%
there's no indication that these
bills are going to be passed.

01:06:48.360 --> 01:06:55.040 align:middle line:84%
So there's a lot of legal,
regulatory, and political issues

01:06:55.040 --> 01:07:01.920 align:middle line:84%
that are in the way of
this transmission fantasy

01:07:01.920 --> 01:07:05.800 align:middle line:90%
from coming into place.

01:07:05.800 --> 01:07:09.120 align:middle line:84%
The most recent blow,
the Trump administration

01:07:09.120 --> 01:07:11.640 align:middle line:84%
used to have a loan guarantee
program for companies that

01:07:11.640 --> 01:07:15.520 align:middle line:84%
wanted to build large-distance,
high-voltage transmission,

01:07:15.520 --> 01:07:18.760 align:middle line:84%
just like we have a loan
guarantee program for nuclear.

01:07:18.760 --> 01:07:22.900 align:middle line:84%
And the Trump
administration last July

01:07:22.900 --> 01:07:26.440 align:middle line:84%
just decided to cancel
all those guarantees

01:07:26.440 --> 01:07:29.860 align:middle line:84%
so that they can basically
stop transmission

01:07:29.860 --> 01:07:31.840 align:middle line:90%
from being generated.

01:07:31.840 --> 01:07:34.220 align:middle line:84%
They're doing their
best to prevent

01:07:34.220 --> 01:07:39.140 align:middle line:84%
wind and solar from being
built. On the finance side--

01:07:39.140 --> 01:07:40.450 align:middle line:90%
yep.

01:07:40.450 --> 01:07:43.420 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Why isn't this is
a problem also for nuclear

01:07:43.420 --> 01:07:44.800 align:middle line:90%
and just for wind and solar?

01:07:44.800 --> 01:07:46.263 align:middle line:90%
You would expect [? nuclear. ?]

01:07:46.263 --> 01:07:48.180 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: So it will
be eventually a problem

01:07:48.180 --> 01:07:49.620 align:middle line:90%
for everyone.

01:07:49.620 --> 01:07:52.420 align:middle line:90%


01:07:52.420 --> 01:07:57.060 align:middle line:84%
As long as your
nuclear plant isn't

01:07:57.060 --> 01:08:00.020 align:middle line:84%
needing to deal with
the variability,

01:08:00.020 --> 01:08:04.020 align:middle line:84%
then you can very reliably
say, OK, I need this size line

01:08:04.020 --> 01:08:04.800 align:middle line:90%
into this region.

01:08:04.800 --> 01:08:06.650 align:middle line:84%
I don't have to send
it long distances.

01:08:06.650 --> 01:08:08.400 align:middle line:84%
I'm going to take this
coal plant offline.

01:08:08.400 --> 01:08:10.380 align:middle line:84%
I'm going to put this
nuclear plant online,

01:08:10.380 --> 01:08:14.100 align:middle line:84%
and the total transmission
costs are going to be small.

01:08:14.100 --> 01:08:17.920 align:middle line:84%
It's when you've got a lot
of wind in the Great Plains,

01:08:17.920 --> 01:08:20.850 align:middle line:84%
and you need to move
it to Los Angeles.

01:08:20.850 --> 01:08:22.109 align:middle line:90%
That's the problem.

01:08:22.109 --> 01:08:24.689 align:middle line:84%
Otherwise, you just build your
nuclear plant in Los Angeles.

01:08:24.689 --> 01:08:30.250 align:middle line:84%
And so that's kind
of difference.

01:08:30.250 --> 01:08:32.609 align:middle line:84%
So it turns out
there's a lot of money

01:08:32.609 --> 01:08:36.210 align:middle line:84%
available for new nuclear
startups, as we've seen.

01:08:36.210 --> 01:08:40.170 align:middle line:84%
Some money may be
smarter than other money.

01:08:40.170 --> 01:08:42.649 align:middle line:84%
But there's also,
predictably, a lot of money

01:08:42.649 --> 01:08:44.970 align:middle line:90%
available for transmission.

01:08:44.970 --> 01:08:48.890 align:middle line:84%
And there are basically
private capital people

01:08:48.890 --> 01:08:50.847 align:middle line:90%
waiting to help build mines.

01:08:50.847 --> 01:08:52.930 align:middle line:84%
So despite the Trump
administration's best efforts

01:08:52.930 --> 01:08:56.890 align:middle line:84%
to cancel federal loan programs,
the money to build these things

01:08:56.890 --> 01:08:59.330 align:middle line:90%
is there.

01:08:59.330 --> 01:09:02.370 align:middle line:90%
That may not be enough.

01:09:02.370 --> 01:09:05.210 align:middle line:84%
We need these
timelines to come down

01:09:05.210 --> 01:09:07.232 align:middle line:84%
if we want to build
this capacity.

01:09:07.232 --> 01:09:09.649 align:middle line:84%
And that means dealing with
the regulatory frameworks that

01:09:09.649 --> 01:09:11.330 align:middle line:90%
are holding everything back.

01:09:11.330 --> 01:09:16.770 align:middle line:84%
So the short answer is we
can decarbonize the grid.

01:09:16.770 --> 01:09:19.950 align:middle line:84%
We have all the
technology we need.

01:09:19.950 --> 01:09:25.790 align:middle line:84%
According to these studies, we
will save money if we do it--

01:09:25.790 --> 01:09:31.029 align:middle line:84%
$1.70-ish for every dollar spent
on this technology by not having

01:09:31.029 --> 01:09:33.189 align:middle line:90%
to buy fossil fuels.

01:09:33.189 --> 01:09:35.710 align:middle line:84%
We'll save enormous
amounts of carbon.

01:09:35.710 --> 01:09:41.310 align:middle line:84%
But there is a
political battle that

01:09:41.310 --> 01:09:45.830 align:middle line:84%
is backed by a lot of dark
money by the fossil fuel

01:09:45.830 --> 01:09:50.550 align:middle line:84%
industry working to stop
this from happening.

01:09:50.550 --> 01:09:54.590 align:middle line:84%
And in the meantime,
nuclear is benefiting

01:09:54.590 --> 01:09:58.590 align:middle line:84%
because it's the alternative
that doesn't require

01:09:58.590 --> 01:10:00.750 align:middle line:90%
all of this legal architecture.

01:10:00.750 --> 01:10:04.030 align:middle line:84%
And so there's a
storyline that says,

01:10:04.030 --> 01:10:05.850 align:middle line:84%
all this wind and solar
is great, but look,

01:10:05.850 --> 01:10:08.350 align:middle line:90%
it's not getting done.

01:10:08.350 --> 01:10:11.350 align:middle line:84%
And then the question is
whether nuclear can actually

01:10:11.350 --> 01:10:15.410 align:middle line:84%
be cheap enough and whether it
can actually happen fast enough.

01:10:15.410 --> 01:10:18.490 align:middle line:84%
We talked about 20-25-year
timescales to bring a new

01:10:18.490 --> 01:10:22.690 align:middle line:84%
reactor online and whether
at the end of the day,

01:10:22.690 --> 01:10:28.010 align:middle line:84%
that's really the path we
should be taking or not.

01:10:28.010 --> 01:10:32.810 align:middle line:84%
So a lot depends on what happens
in the next election, 2026,

01:10:32.810 --> 01:10:35.850 align:middle line:84%
and for the midterms, whether
we can get some bills passed

01:10:35.850 --> 01:10:38.450 align:middle line:84%
that help reform some of
these things and in 2028,

01:10:38.450 --> 01:10:41.370 align:middle line:84%
with the new
administration to reinstate

01:10:41.370 --> 01:10:45.410 align:middle line:84%
executive-level programs to
help streamline and incentivize

01:10:45.410 --> 01:10:47.490 align:middle line:90%
transmission production.

01:10:47.490 --> 01:10:50.490 align:middle line:84%
I am not terribly
optimistic that policymakers

01:10:50.490 --> 01:10:54.930 align:middle line:84%
will move the needle
on this very quickly.

01:10:54.930 --> 01:10:57.610 align:middle line:84%
I think it's probably going
to be the case that we're

01:10:57.610 --> 01:11:01.110 align:middle line:84%
going to see a lot of business
as usual and more of the same

01:11:01.110 --> 01:11:04.530 align:middle line:84%
and continuing to see more
fossil fuel generators be built

01:11:04.530 --> 01:11:06.970 align:middle line:90%
and so on.

01:11:06.970 --> 01:11:09.610 align:middle line:84%
And then this transmission
and renovation

01:11:09.610 --> 01:11:13.690 align:middle line:84%
will happen very slowly
over the next 30 to 40 years

01:11:13.690 --> 01:11:18.600 align:middle line:84%
in bits and bobs as becomes
practical for entities to do it.

01:11:18.600 --> 01:11:24.360 align:middle line:84%
So climate change is not
a technological problem,

01:11:24.360 --> 01:11:27.800 align:middle line:84%
or dealing with
the electric grid

01:11:27.800 --> 01:11:29.340 align:middle line:90%
is not a technological problem.

01:11:29.340 --> 01:11:32.480 align:middle line:84%
It's a legal and
political problem.

01:11:32.480 --> 01:11:34.960 align:middle line:90%
And that's where we stand.

01:11:34.960 --> 01:11:35.840 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:11:35.840 --> 01:11:38.080 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Do you think the
potential international

01:11:38.080 --> 01:11:40.880 align:middle line:84%
competition, like
seeing China build out

01:11:40.880 --> 01:11:44.840 align:middle line:84%
like extremely fast solar,
could then potentially

01:11:44.840 --> 01:11:47.080 align:middle line:84%
become a motivator
in terms of the US,

01:11:47.080 --> 01:11:49.840 align:middle line:84%
just like the Republican Party
becomes jealous in a sense

01:11:49.840 --> 01:11:52.260 align:middle line:84%
more so than it being a
decarbonizing technology,

01:11:52.260 --> 01:11:55.400 align:middle line:84%
and more so just being China's
doing it better than us?

01:11:55.400 --> 01:11:58.400 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: I think all these
arguments will be brought

01:11:58.400 --> 01:12:00.400 align:middle line:90%
to bear on the politics.

01:12:00.400 --> 01:12:02.280 align:middle line:84%
But at the end of
the day, I think

01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:05.560 align:middle line:84%
that the argument
that will win is who

01:12:05.560 --> 01:12:07.420 align:middle line:90%
is paying for your campaign?

01:12:07.420 --> 01:12:10.840 align:middle line:90%


01:12:10.840 --> 01:12:11.740 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:12:11.740 --> 01:12:15.460 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] talk about
financing and interest costs

01:12:15.460 --> 01:12:18.180 align:middle line:84%
as a portion of
cost for nuclear.

01:12:18.180 --> 01:12:21.020 align:middle line:84%
If wind and solar
farms do have to end up

01:12:21.020 --> 01:12:22.500 align:middle line:84%
paying for their
own transmission,

01:12:22.500 --> 01:12:26.620 align:middle line:84%
we know what that cost of
transmission will [INAUDIBLE]

01:12:26.620 --> 01:12:30.700 align:middle line:84%
against the actual
[INAUDIBLE] cost?

01:12:30.700 --> 01:12:33.363 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Well, that's the
I think if I'm understanding

01:12:33.363 --> 01:12:34.780 align:middle line:84%
your question,
you're asking, what

01:12:34.780 --> 01:12:38.380 align:middle line:84%
is the fractional
increase in capex?

01:12:38.380 --> 01:12:38.880 align:middle line:90%
Yes,

01:12:38.880 --> 01:12:39.940 align:middle line:90%
AUDIENCE: Yes.

01:12:39.940 --> 01:12:41.860 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Which
is this number.

01:12:41.860 --> 01:12:44.020 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Given
the amount of time

01:12:44.020 --> 01:12:46.220 align:middle line:84%
it takes to actually
build the transmission.

01:12:46.220 --> 01:12:49.340 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Oh, like
the IDC, the Interest

01:12:49.340 --> 01:12:50.240 align:middle line:90%
During Construction?

01:12:50.240 --> 01:12:52.285 align:middle line:90%
AUDIENCE: Yes.

01:12:52.285 --> 01:12:54.960 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: So the actual
construction times,

01:12:54.960 --> 01:12:59.240 align:middle line:84%
once you get through the
rating period, I'm not sure.

01:12:59.240 --> 01:13:01.100 align:middle line:90%
They're probably not very long.

01:13:01.100 --> 01:13:01.700 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:13:01.700 --> 01:13:02.780 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:13:02.780 --> 01:13:04.380 align:middle line:90%
You look it up.

01:13:04.380 --> 01:13:06.660 align:middle line:84%
But I would guess a couple
of years or something.

01:13:06.660 --> 01:13:09.200 align:middle line:90%
So any other questions?

01:13:09.200 --> 01:13:10.000 align:middle line:90%
Yep.

01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:13.080 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Do we expect the
unregulated and regulated map

01:13:13.080 --> 01:13:14.380 align:middle line:90%
to pretty much stay the same?

01:13:14.380 --> 01:13:16.160 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: Yeah, I
don't think there's

01:13:16.160 --> 01:13:17.677 align:middle line:90%
any momentum to change that.

01:13:17.677 --> 01:13:19.760 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: So then I guess
in a lot of those states

01:13:19.760 --> 01:13:21.768 align:middle line:84%
that won't be changing
to unregulated markets

01:13:21.768 --> 01:13:23.560 align:middle line:84%
and that might potentially
be a place where

01:13:23.560 --> 01:13:25.000 align:middle line:90%
nuclear could thrive.

01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:27.087 align:middle line:84%
I mean, assuming that
you're able to build a not

01:13:27.087 --> 01:13:27.920 align:middle line:90%
Nobel Prize, though.

01:13:27.920 --> 01:13:30.823 align:middle line:90%


01:13:30.823 --> 01:13:33.240 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: There have been
people in the nuclear business

01:13:33.240 --> 01:13:35.520 align:middle line:84%
that have obviously
self-interest at least said,

01:13:35.520 --> 01:13:37.520 align:middle line:84%
oh, we should get
rid of deregulation

01:13:37.520 --> 01:13:39.920 align:middle line:84%
and go back to
regulated markets.

01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:44.800 align:middle line:84%
And I don't know if
there's anything there.

01:13:44.800 --> 01:13:49.340 align:middle line:84%
It's a mumble I
hear, but I don't

01:13:49.340 --> 01:13:51.840 align:middle line:84%
think there's a lot of people
waiting to jump on board like,

01:13:51.840 --> 01:13:55.200 align:middle line:90%
oh, let's get rid of regulation.

01:13:55.200 --> 01:14:01.080 align:middle line:84%
The regulation is still
right for corruption,

01:14:01.080 --> 01:14:02.820 align:middle line:84%
and it doesn't serve
the public interest.

01:14:02.820 --> 01:14:09.280 align:middle line:84%
This is why the Vogtle plant was
billing its customers for years

01:14:09.280 --> 01:14:11.670 align:middle line:84%
and years and years for
the cost of the plant,

01:14:11.670 --> 01:14:17.350 align:middle line:84%
well before it ever was
built. And these poor people

01:14:17.350 --> 01:14:19.870 align:middle line:84%
are basically footing the
bill and avoiding the interest

01:14:19.870 --> 01:14:22.750 align:middle line:84%
that really the corporation
should be paying.

01:14:22.750 --> 01:14:24.990 align:middle line:90%
So it's not a great--

01:14:24.990 --> 01:14:26.632 align:middle line:84%
AUDIENCE: Necessarily
a great system.

01:14:26.632 --> 01:14:28.590 align:middle line:84%
SCOTT KEMP: But markets
are totally acceptable.

01:14:28.590 --> 01:14:29.830 align:middle line:84%
That's a whole
Enron scandal too.

01:14:29.830 --> 01:14:31.788 align:middle line:84%
Markets, you can do all
kinds of bad things to.

01:14:31.788 --> 01:14:33.210 align:middle line:90%
So I don't know, maybe.

01:14:33.210 --> 01:14:33.710 align:middle line:90%
Yeah.

01:14:33.710 --> 01:14:37.790 align:middle line:90%


01:14:37.790 --> 01:14:39.510 align:middle line:90%
Anything else?

01:14:39.510 --> 01:14:41.190 align:middle line:90%
All right.

01:14:41.190 --> 01:14:43.720 align:middle line:90%
See you next Wednesday.

01:14:43.720 --> 01:15:10.000 align:middle line:90%