1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,520 The following content is provided under a Creative 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:03,970 Commons license. 3 00:00:03,970 --> 00:00:06,360 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare 4 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:10,660 continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:10,660 --> 00:00:13,350 To make a donation or view additional materials 6 00:00:13,350 --> 00:00:17,190 from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare 7 00:00:17,190 --> 00:00:18,332 at ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:26,320 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: All right. 9 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,570 So we are here. 10 00:00:28,570 --> 00:00:30,580 I'm highlighting two, because I really 11 00:00:30,580 --> 00:00:33,040 want to keep talking about solar thermal fuels, 12 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:38,170 mostly because it really captures a key problem 13 00:00:38,170 --> 00:00:41,480 that only quantum mechanics can solve. 14 00:00:41,480 --> 00:00:41,980 OK? 15 00:00:41,980 --> 00:00:43,930 So I really want to hit that home hard. 16 00:00:43,930 --> 00:00:48,560 Also, because it's the topic of your next homework, 17 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:50,830 and also because I'm biased. 18 00:00:50,830 --> 00:00:52,553 I'm more excited about this than this. 19 00:00:52,553 --> 00:00:54,970 But I want to tell you a little bit about hydrogen storage 20 00:00:54,970 --> 00:00:58,450 too, and why I think that's a perfect problem 21 00:00:58,450 --> 00:01:01,000 for atomic-scale computational modeling. 22 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:01,960 OK? 23 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:07,030 So we're going to do a lot more of solar thermal fuels, 24 00:01:07,030 --> 00:01:09,370 picking up where we did before, and then a little bit 25 00:01:09,370 --> 00:01:10,540 of hydrogen storage. 26 00:01:10,540 --> 00:01:13,930 Now, before we do that, I want to keep blending 27 00:01:13,930 --> 00:01:18,280 in some reinforcement of key basic concepts 28 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:21,760 that we have touched on, and we need to make sure 29 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:22,890 we feel good about them. 30 00:01:22,890 --> 00:01:25,240 So we're going to feel good today 31 00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:28,240 about energy levels, first bullet of the outline, 32 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,243 feeling good. 33 00:01:30,243 --> 00:01:31,660 It's a good way to start, I think. 34 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:36,900 I didn't need to put that there, because you 35 00:01:36,900 --> 00:01:38,430 would have felt good anyway. 36 00:01:38,430 --> 00:01:39,180 Right? 37 00:01:39,180 --> 00:01:40,740 But there it is in writing. 38 00:01:40,740 --> 00:01:43,248 We're going to feel good about energy levels, 39 00:01:43,248 --> 00:01:45,540 and then we're going to keep talking about solar fuels. 40 00:01:45,540 --> 00:01:49,440 And we'll do a few calculations, more calculations 41 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:51,150 on the nanoHUB together. 42 00:01:51,150 --> 00:01:51,780 Right? 43 00:01:51,780 --> 00:01:54,510 Again, no better way to pass time. 44 00:01:54,510 --> 00:01:55,140 OK? 45 00:01:55,140 --> 00:01:57,720 And then we'll talk about hydrogen storage. 46 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:00,960 That's our plan. 47 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:05,880 Now, like I said, I want to keep reinforcing-- 48 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,180 I did this, and it put me off balance. 49 00:02:09,180 --> 00:02:10,470 It's excitement. 50 00:02:10,470 --> 00:02:14,430 That's a little bit more than my usual even. 51 00:02:14,430 --> 00:02:16,080 It's also, I think, just old age. 52 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:18,420 I think sometimes, you get a little off balance. 53 00:02:18,420 --> 00:02:25,410 Anyway, now, point is that I think probably I 54 00:02:25,410 --> 00:02:27,510 like watch the NBA so much, because I still 55 00:02:27,510 --> 00:02:31,620 don't want to give up the idea that I could someday 56 00:02:31,620 --> 00:02:33,990 be in the NBA myself. 57 00:02:33,990 --> 00:02:35,490 So I'm not letting go of that dream, 58 00:02:35,490 --> 00:02:41,070 but anyway, I want to go back to one of my original excitements 59 00:02:41,070 --> 00:02:45,430 here about materials design which 60 00:02:45,430 --> 00:02:47,020 is one of the things I really want 61 00:02:47,020 --> 00:02:49,300 to make sure we capture in this class, 62 00:02:49,300 --> 00:02:51,530 designing materials and computers. 63 00:02:51,530 --> 00:02:52,030 Right? 64 00:02:52,030 --> 00:02:53,930 So I want to take carbon, and I just 65 00:02:53,930 --> 00:02:55,180 have two or three slides here. 66 00:02:55,180 --> 00:02:56,920 So I want to touch on what I think 67 00:02:56,920 --> 00:03:01,750 is a really exciting example of materials design, 68 00:03:01,750 --> 00:03:02,810 and you all know this. 69 00:03:02,810 --> 00:03:03,310 Right? 70 00:03:03,310 --> 00:03:05,518 You know carbon can do this and this, and many of you 71 00:03:05,518 --> 00:03:07,610 know that carbon can do-- 72 00:03:07,610 --> 00:03:08,860 well, where are my fullerenes? 73 00:03:08,860 --> 00:03:10,700 Well, there's some nanotubes. 74 00:03:10,700 --> 00:03:13,720 There's fullerenes inside of nanotubes, p-pods. 75 00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:14,650 Right? 76 00:03:14,650 --> 00:03:17,320 Now, there's all kinds of forms of carbon 77 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,720 that there didn't used to be, or there used to be, 78 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:22,590 but we didn't see them, and we couldn't control them. 79 00:03:22,590 --> 00:03:24,010 OK? 80 00:03:24,010 --> 00:03:26,330 And I want to give you a really, I think, 81 00:03:26,330 --> 00:03:31,510 interesting analysis of one thing you can do with carbon. 82 00:03:31,510 --> 00:03:32,260 OK? 83 00:03:32,260 --> 00:03:36,100 And then another thing you can do with it, when you design it, 84 00:03:36,100 --> 00:03:38,480 when you can do materials design. 85 00:03:38,480 --> 00:03:42,280 So this is what we do with carbon now that we find in oil. 86 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:43,090 Right? 87 00:03:43,090 --> 00:03:47,440 We burn it, and there's 1.73 megawatt hours of energy 88 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:49,150 when you burn a barrel of oil. 89 00:03:49,150 --> 00:03:50,138 Right? 90 00:03:50,138 --> 00:03:51,430 I didn't show you this example. 91 00:03:51,430 --> 00:03:52,150 Did I? 92 00:03:52,150 --> 00:03:52,780 OK. 93 00:03:52,780 --> 00:03:54,920 Because I think it's a really neat one. 94 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:56,920 So that's how much energy is in a barrel of oil, 95 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:58,300 and it's a lot of energy. 96 00:03:58,300 --> 00:03:59,840 That's a really nice-- 97 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:01,490 oil is amazing. 98 00:04:01,490 --> 00:04:06,040 It's like this incredible energy-dense, safe, 99 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:13,040 transportable, storage system. 100 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:13,910 Right? 101 00:04:13,910 --> 00:04:14,910 It's solar powered. 102 00:04:14,910 --> 00:04:15,410 Right? 103 00:04:15,410 --> 00:04:18,079 You all know that it's made by the sun, 104 00:04:18,079 --> 00:04:20,420 but it's not renewable, which is a problem, 105 00:04:20,420 --> 00:04:24,300 but it's a really beautiful fuel. 106 00:04:24,300 --> 00:04:27,437 Now, oil has a lot of carbon in it 107 00:04:27,437 --> 00:04:29,770 which is what's burning there and giving you that energy 108 00:04:29,770 --> 00:04:31,265 release. 109 00:04:31,265 --> 00:04:33,640 But there are other things you can do with that material, 110 00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,310 and one thing you can do is you can make these other forms 111 00:04:36,310 --> 00:04:37,660 of carbon from the oil. 112 00:04:37,660 --> 00:04:40,420 In fact, that's how we make a lot of our plastics. 113 00:04:40,420 --> 00:04:41,110 OK? 114 00:04:41,110 --> 00:04:43,750 We make a lot of plastics using oil. 115 00:04:43,750 --> 00:04:50,290 If I take 1%, just 1% of the carbon in these 159 liters 116 00:04:50,290 --> 00:04:55,390 of oil, just 1% of it, and I make that into plastic, 117 00:04:55,390 --> 00:04:59,170 then because I know how to design carbon to be something 118 00:04:59,170 --> 00:05:04,000 else, like fullerenes, I can make polymers and fullerenes 119 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,300 out of that same element carbon and put them together-- 120 00:05:07,300 --> 00:05:09,430 gesundheit, whoever that was-- 121 00:05:09,430 --> 00:05:12,610 and make solar cells, new kinds of solar cells, 122 00:05:12,610 --> 00:05:16,600 in fact, solar cells made out of mostly carbon. 123 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,350 If I take 1% of that carbon that was in here, 124 00:05:20,350 --> 00:05:23,620 and I turn it into this, which we now know how to do, 125 00:05:23,620 --> 00:05:28,540 then I can make really bad solar cells. 126 00:05:28,540 --> 00:05:34,200 5% efficient, not so good, die in one year, 127 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:35,220 not so good. right? 128 00:05:35,220 --> 00:05:36,390 The efficiency goes down. 129 00:05:36,390 --> 00:05:38,580 Most solar cells, you get a 20-year warranty. 130 00:05:38,580 --> 00:05:42,180 This one, one-year warranty, then efficiency is gone. 131 00:05:42,180 --> 00:05:44,940 Even in that case, this solar cell 132 00:05:44,940 --> 00:05:48,150 over that one year of really crappy efficiency 133 00:05:48,150 --> 00:05:53,070 will give me 10,000 times as much energy than 134 00:05:53,070 --> 00:05:56,060 by burning the carbon, 10,000. 135 00:05:56,060 --> 00:05:58,340 Now, these are hand-waving arguments that are 136 00:05:58,340 --> 00:05:59,870 back-of-the-envelope calculations, 137 00:05:59,870 --> 00:06:03,050 but when you've got five orders of magnitude to play with, 138 00:06:03,050 --> 00:06:04,370 things are good. 139 00:06:04,370 --> 00:06:04,970 Right? 140 00:06:04,970 --> 00:06:08,550 And this is an example in the energy space. 141 00:06:08,550 --> 00:06:12,350 This is why I get so excited about designing materials, 142 00:06:12,350 --> 00:06:17,360 and this in particular, this is only 100 nanometers thick. 143 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:18,070 Right? 144 00:06:18,070 --> 00:06:19,653 The solar cell's thicker, because it's 145 00:06:19,653 --> 00:06:22,330 packaged but the active layer, the part of the material that's 146 00:06:22,330 --> 00:06:25,150 making the sun turn into electrons and holes, 147 00:06:25,150 --> 00:06:27,590 something we're going to talk about in our next example, 148 00:06:27,590 --> 00:06:30,820 in a few weeks. 149 00:06:30,820 --> 00:06:32,890 That part is 100 nanometers thick. 150 00:06:32,890 --> 00:06:35,050 That's atomic scale. 151 00:06:35,050 --> 00:06:36,430 That's the atomic scale. 152 00:06:36,430 --> 00:06:38,560 You can't pack that many polymers and fullerenes 153 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:40,300 into 100 nanometers. 154 00:06:40,300 --> 00:06:44,230 Things at the atomic scale and the quantum mechanical aspects 155 00:06:44,230 --> 00:06:47,410 of that material are critical, and designing 156 00:06:47,410 --> 00:06:49,420 that material is something you can 157 00:06:49,420 --> 00:06:51,430 do using atomistic modeling. 158 00:06:51,430 --> 00:06:52,690 So this is what I mean. 159 00:06:52,690 --> 00:06:58,820 You want to give elements completely new possibilities, 160 00:06:58,820 --> 00:07:01,510 and you can see the power of doing that. 161 00:07:01,510 --> 00:07:06,580 It changes the way we know how to use those elements, 162 00:07:06,580 --> 00:07:09,490 and I think that's just a very powerful concept. 163 00:07:09,490 --> 00:07:11,770 OK. 164 00:07:11,770 --> 00:07:13,220 Any questions about that example. 165 00:07:13,220 --> 00:07:17,320 So that's my little my material design example of the day, 166 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:18,340 if you will. 167 00:07:18,340 --> 00:07:22,190 We should make like a calendar, each day a new-- 168 00:07:22,190 --> 00:07:23,680 OK. 169 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:27,940 Now, I want to pause and feel our oneness with energy levels 170 00:07:27,940 --> 00:07:29,300 and basis sets. 171 00:07:29,300 --> 00:07:33,970 So this is, again, going back to some important key elements 172 00:07:33,970 --> 00:07:35,455 of the computations, and then we're 173 00:07:35,455 --> 00:07:37,705 going to come back to the calculations and the example 174 00:07:37,705 --> 00:07:39,130 of the solar thermal fuels. 175 00:07:39,130 --> 00:07:40,570 OK? 176 00:07:40,570 --> 00:07:45,580 Now these are things that we have talked about, 177 00:07:45,580 --> 00:07:47,220 but they're so important that I want 178 00:07:47,220 --> 00:07:49,720 to talk about them again and make sure there's no questions. 179 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:52,690 Make sure that we are all on the same page 180 00:07:52,690 --> 00:07:54,190 and know what these things mean. 181 00:07:54,190 --> 00:07:54,760 OK? 182 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:58,630 So I want to give you, this is my attempt 183 00:07:58,630 --> 00:08:04,430 at summarizing our beautiful path to the energy level. 184 00:08:04,430 --> 00:08:04,930 OK? 185 00:08:04,930 --> 00:08:06,620 So let's make sure we're with it. 186 00:08:06,620 --> 00:08:07,270 All right? 187 00:08:07,270 --> 00:08:11,590 So it all started back in the day in lecture one 188 00:08:11,590 --> 00:08:13,420 with the Schrodinger equation. 189 00:08:13,420 --> 00:08:15,070 Does everybody recognized that? 190 00:08:15,070 --> 00:08:17,710 Now, that is the equation we're solving. 191 00:08:17,710 --> 00:08:20,320 When you click Simulate to calculate 192 00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:24,010 the energy versus separation in say, I don't know, 193 00:08:24,010 --> 00:08:28,000 n-2, then the equation that's being solved in a computer 194 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:30,370 is this one, the Schrodinger equation. 195 00:08:30,370 --> 00:08:32,840 Now, what are you getting out of that equation? 196 00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:35,734 Well, what you're getting are what? 197 00:08:35,734 --> 00:08:38,247 These, what are these? 198 00:08:38,247 --> 00:08:39,289 AUDIENCE: Wave functions. 199 00:08:39,289 --> 00:08:40,289 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: OK. 200 00:08:40,289 --> 00:08:43,490 Thank you, and why do I want those? 201 00:08:43,490 --> 00:08:46,440 What do they tell me? 202 00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:47,940 AUDIENCE: Probability. 203 00:08:47,940 --> 00:08:48,330 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: OK. 204 00:08:48,330 --> 00:08:48,630 Yeah. 205 00:08:48,630 --> 00:08:50,922 The tell me the probability, and they tell me more than 206 00:08:50,922 --> 00:08:53,230 that which is what we need to make sure we understand. 207 00:08:53,230 --> 00:08:57,045 So you see, solving that equation gives me 208 00:08:57,045 --> 00:09:03,390 wave function, and the wave functions, well, they're waves. 209 00:09:03,390 --> 00:09:03,890 Right? 210 00:09:03,890 --> 00:09:07,340 They have some shape to them. 211 00:09:07,340 --> 00:09:09,190 They may change in time. 212 00:09:09,190 --> 00:09:12,100 Do we care about that? 213 00:09:12,100 --> 00:09:15,390 Not in this class, not in this class, in this class, 214 00:09:15,390 --> 00:09:16,900 its all time independent. 215 00:09:16,900 --> 00:09:20,560 So we're doing like a snapshot, but they may change in time. 216 00:09:20,560 --> 00:09:24,090 But they certainly vary in space, and that is psi. 217 00:09:24,090 --> 00:09:25,020 Right? 218 00:09:25,020 --> 00:09:30,250 Now, what we talked about is how these wave functions 219 00:09:30,250 --> 00:09:35,390 themselves, we don't know how to draw physical meaning from. 220 00:09:35,390 --> 00:09:37,250 That doesn't mean that they're meaningless, 221 00:09:37,250 --> 00:09:39,380 and this is a really important point 222 00:09:39,380 --> 00:09:42,590 that we have to feel good about. 223 00:09:42,590 --> 00:09:43,090 OK? 224 00:09:43,090 --> 00:09:45,070 So I'm going to come back to that, 225 00:09:45,070 --> 00:09:47,770 but we know that when you square them, we know what they mean, 226 00:09:47,770 --> 00:09:48,550 and that's this. 227 00:09:48,550 --> 00:09:49,440 Right? 228 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:51,844 So what are These do you guys remember what these are? 229 00:09:51,844 --> 00:09:53,740 AUDIENCE: Orbitals. 230 00:09:53,740 --> 00:09:56,330 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Orbitals, such a bad name, 231 00:09:56,330 --> 00:09:59,120 but anyway, because why is it a bad name? 232 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:00,870 AUDIENCE: Because they don't really orbit. 233 00:10:00,870 --> 00:10:03,630 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah, totally, but anyway, 234 00:10:03,630 --> 00:10:04,950 these are orbitals. 235 00:10:04,950 --> 00:10:07,350 So these are those wave functions squared for what? 236 00:10:10,730 --> 00:10:14,836 Who knows what-- but what system is this? 237 00:10:14,836 --> 00:10:18,700 These are the atomic orbitals of a hydrogen 238 00:10:18,700 --> 00:10:21,240 atom, one electron, one proton. 239 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:23,670 OK? 240 00:10:23,670 --> 00:10:25,441 You can solve that analytically. 241 00:10:28,810 --> 00:10:34,560 Now, so we said, OK, well, this gives us 242 00:10:34,560 --> 00:10:38,380 like an electron sitting in one of these little wiggles. 243 00:10:38,380 --> 00:10:38,880 OK? 244 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:41,670 We said that they go up in energy. 245 00:10:41,670 --> 00:10:43,440 They have different energies. 246 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:45,390 That's really important. 247 00:10:45,390 --> 00:10:48,910 Each wave function you solve for has a different energy. 248 00:10:48,910 --> 00:10:49,410 Right? 249 00:10:49,410 --> 00:10:52,290 So you get these functions, and they have different energies, 250 00:10:52,290 --> 00:10:54,960 and there it is for hydrogen. There's 251 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:58,290 the energy for hydrogen. It just depends on 1 over the principle 252 00:10:58,290 --> 00:10:59,700 quantum number squared. 253 00:10:59,700 --> 00:11:00,720 Right? 254 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,670 Remember, we talked about how it's quantized? 255 00:11:05,490 --> 00:11:07,470 But these little wiggles, when you square them, 256 00:11:07,470 --> 00:11:11,850 they give you the picture of where that electron is going 257 00:11:11,850 --> 00:11:14,610 to be, where it's likely to be. 258 00:11:14,610 --> 00:11:16,845 And we looked at how the shapes got more complicated, 259 00:11:16,845 --> 00:11:18,345 and what are these type of orbitals? 260 00:11:18,345 --> 00:11:19,382 AUDIENCE: P 261 00:11:19,382 --> 00:11:20,340 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: p? 262 00:11:20,340 --> 00:11:24,810 And then it goes to other things, d and then f. 263 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:31,210 And then we said, OK, that's nice. 264 00:11:31,210 --> 00:11:33,890 That's great, but also there's this thing called spin. 265 00:11:33,890 --> 00:11:34,870 OK? 266 00:11:34,870 --> 00:11:37,360 And somebody remind me what spin is. 267 00:11:40,186 --> 00:11:42,070 AUDIENCE: Property of the material. 268 00:11:42,070 --> 00:11:46,060 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Property of what thing in particular? 269 00:11:46,060 --> 00:11:46,673 Yeah? 270 00:11:46,673 --> 00:11:48,590 AUDIENCE: It's some intrinsic angular momentum 271 00:11:48,590 --> 00:11:49,840 that a particle has. 272 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:50,290 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: OK. 273 00:11:50,290 --> 00:11:51,470 AUDIENCE: Regardless of its motion. 274 00:11:51,470 --> 00:11:53,178 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: And if that particle 275 00:11:53,178 --> 00:11:56,110 happens to be an electron, what are your options? 276 00:11:56,110 --> 00:11:59,778 AUDIENCE: In the first one? 277 00:11:59,778 --> 00:12:00,820 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yes. 278 00:12:00,820 --> 00:12:01,900 AUDIENCE: Plus or minus. 279 00:12:01,900 --> 00:12:03,358 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Plus or minus. 280 00:12:03,358 --> 00:12:04,990 It can only be-- 281 00:12:04,990 --> 00:12:09,910 or as we like to say up or down or as we 282 00:12:09,910 --> 00:12:13,670 like to draw this or that. 283 00:12:13,670 --> 00:12:17,270 Lots of ways of doing this, but I think you get the point. 284 00:12:17,270 --> 00:12:19,540 And then we talked about poly which 285 00:12:19,540 --> 00:12:26,130 gave us rules for how electrons can be together 286 00:12:26,130 --> 00:12:29,180 in one of these orbitals. 287 00:12:29,180 --> 00:12:30,210 OK? 288 00:12:30,210 --> 00:12:32,730 So you have wave functions that wiggle. 289 00:12:35,283 --> 00:12:37,200 We don't know how to interpret what they mean, 290 00:12:37,200 --> 00:12:40,320 but we know that their square gives you the probability 291 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,560 distribution of that electron. 292 00:12:43,560 --> 00:12:45,990 And we know that these electrons also 293 00:12:45,990 --> 00:12:49,710 have another important quantity associated with them, a spin, 294 00:12:49,710 --> 00:12:53,710 and the spin can only be one of two values, up or down. 295 00:12:53,710 --> 00:12:55,660 OK? 296 00:12:55,660 --> 00:12:59,960 That is the information we need to go to energy levels. 297 00:12:59,960 --> 00:13:00,460 OK? 298 00:13:04,500 --> 00:13:07,560 To this point, this is a review, but it's about to be-- 299 00:13:07,560 --> 00:13:09,083 well, maybe something some of you 300 00:13:09,083 --> 00:13:11,000 know, but it's about to be a little different. 301 00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:11,550 OK? 302 00:13:11,550 --> 00:13:14,140 So I want to make sure we all understand this. 303 00:13:14,140 --> 00:13:17,650 Once I know that you can have two kinds of spin, 304 00:13:17,650 --> 00:13:20,920 and once I know that you get energies out of this equation, 305 00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:23,860 then the answer to the energy levels, 306 00:13:23,860 --> 00:13:27,370 to what energy levels are, is there 307 00:13:27,370 --> 00:13:29,382 are these things that you fill. 308 00:13:29,382 --> 00:13:31,630 There are these things that you fill with electrons. 309 00:13:31,630 --> 00:13:33,450 How do you fill them? 310 00:13:33,450 --> 00:13:37,500 I keep blocking the screen, but it's fun to go in there. 311 00:13:37,500 --> 00:13:39,660 It makes me feel important maybe. 312 00:13:39,660 --> 00:13:40,500 I don't know. 313 00:13:40,500 --> 00:13:42,240 Never mind. 314 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:45,070 How do you fill them? 315 00:13:45,070 --> 00:13:47,640 I'll use this. 316 00:13:47,640 --> 00:13:49,770 Oh, yeah. 317 00:13:49,770 --> 00:13:51,210 What do you do here? 318 00:13:51,210 --> 00:13:53,160 What's going on? 319 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:56,250 I want to fill these orbitals. 320 00:13:56,250 --> 00:13:57,000 Do I fill this one 321 00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:58,542 AUDIENCE: You start at the lowest end 322 00:13:58,542 --> 00:13:59,840 and work to the highest. 323 00:13:59,840 --> 00:14:03,380 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah, and when do I stop? 324 00:14:03,380 --> 00:14:05,540 AUDIENCE: When you run out of electrons. 325 00:14:05,540 --> 00:14:08,450 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: When you run out of electrons. 326 00:14:08,450 --> 00:14:10,420 How many electrons did I have? 327 00:14:10,420 --> 00:14:12,920 AUDIENCE: 29. 328 00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:16,970 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: It depends on the atom or molecule which 329 00:14:16,970 --> 00:14:18,690 is where we are now or solid. 330 00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:28,410 Now, that is really in a way-- the reason 331 00:14:28,410 --> 00:14:32,430 I'm focusing on it is this is the key quantum mechanical 332 00:14:32,430 --> 00:14:37,750 nature thingy, property of materials, 333 00:14:37,750 --> 00:14:40,000 I want you to come away with being able to understand 334 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:41,720 and calculate in this class. 335 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:42,220 OK? 336 00:14:42,220 --> 00:14:44,290 It's these energy levels. 337 00:14:44,290 --> 00:14:46,750 This is the most important thing I want you to come away 338 00:14:46,750 --> 00:14:47,290 with from this class. 339 00:14:47,290 --> 00:14:47,890 Why? 340 00:14:47,890 --> 00:14:49,600 Well, we can calculate other things, 341 00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:51,520 and I've talked about that. 342 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:53,733 We can calculate energies. 343 00:14:53,733 --> 00:14:55,150 We can calculate binding energies. 344 00:14:55,150 --> 00:14:57,970 We can calculate all kinds of things, 345 00:14:57,970 --> 00:15:02,020 but these energy levels are purely quantum mechanical. 346 00:15:02,020 --> 00:15:02,710 Right? 347 00:15:02,710 --> 00:15:06,160 There where those electrons want to be in energy, 348 00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:08,990 and they matter so much to the properties of materials. 349 00:15:08,990 --> 00:15:13,630 So I want to focus on these and connect them 350 00:15:13,630 --> 00:15:15,610 to real exciting problems. 351 00:15:15,610 --> 00:15:16,330 OK? 352 00:15:16,330 --> 00:15:17,830 And make sure that you understand 353 00:15:17,830 --> 00:15:22,030 where they come from and also how to calculate them 354 00:15:22,030 --> 00:15:23,830 and what they can mean. 355 00:15:23,830 --> 00:15:25,160 So that's where we are. 356 00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:27,360 So that's why I keep drawing things like this. 357 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:29,350 You see me just drawing this. 358 00:15:29,350 --> 00:15:30,035 Right? 359 00:15:30,035 --> 00:15:30,910 Now, what did I draw? 360 00:15:30,910 --> 00:15:31,570 I don't know. 361 00:15:31,570 --> 00:15:33,700 I drew a bunch of levels. 362 00:15:33,700 --> 00:15:35,380 Right? 363 00:15:35,380 --> 00:15:43,230 If I'm a little more careful, and I do this, 364 00:15:43,230 --> 00:15:44,550 now what am I drawing? 365 00:15:47,500 --> 00:15:48,130 What is that? 366 00:15:53,018 --> 00:15:54,060 AUDIENCE: Energy diagram. 367 00:15:54,060 --> 00:15:56,190 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Energy diagram. 368 00:15:56,190 --> 00:15:56,970 OK, good. 369 00:16:00,730 --> 00:16:03,310 What is it though? 370 00:16:03,310 --> 00:16:06,125 Do we know? 371 00:16:06,125 --> 00:16:08,000 AUDIENCE: Like there's no electrons in there. 372 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:09,540 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: OK, and it's 373 00:16:09,540 --> 00:16:12,895 the solution to which problem? 374 00:16:12,895 --> 00:16:14,520 Actually, this is infinite square well. 375 00:16:14,520 --> 00:16:16,970 So that's not the hydrogen atom, but those 376 00:16:16,970 --> 00:16:19,580 are the energy levels you get for the solution 377 00:16:19,580 --> 00:16:21,670 of the hydrogen atom. 378 00:16:21,670 --> 00:16:22,270 OK? 379 00:16:22,270 --> 00:16:25,120 Now, if I ask you what this is though without putting 380 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:31,210 any electrons down, we don't know, but what if I do this? 381 00:16:31,210 --> 00:16:34,070 Now, what is it? 382 00:16:34,070 --> 00:16:37,046 Hydrogen, what about now? 383 00:16:37,046 --> 00:16:38,820 AUDIENCE: Lithium. 384 00:16:38,820 --> 00:16:42,930 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Lithium, what is this? 385 00:16:42,930 --> 00:16:43,980 Oh, I love this one. 386 00:16:43,980 --> 00:16:45,090 AUDIENCE: Carbon. 387 00:16:45,090 --> 00:16:48,000 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Carbon, carbon, 388 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:52,030 it's a beautiful material. 389 00:16:52,030 --> 00:16:53,280 I love carbon. 390 00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:55,647 OK? 391 00:16:55,647 --> 00:16:57,480 I almost feel like you need a little moment. 392 00:16:57,480 --> 00:16:59,446 When you draw the energy levels of carbon, 393 00:16:59,446 --> 00:17:03,160 you need a little moment of respect. 394 00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:06,089 Now, but you see, this is what we did. 395 00:17:06,089 --> 00:17:08,880 We solved for these wiggles. 396 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:13,170 We got energies, and we put them in order 397 00:17:13,170 --> 00:17:14,589 from lowest to highest. 398 00:17:14,589 --> 00:17:16,547 And then we said how many electrons do we have? 399 00:17:16,547 --> 00:17:18,030 Six, OK, fill them, and then there 400 00:17:18,030 --> 00:17:20,322 are rules that we talked about about how you fill them. 401 00:17:20,322 --> 00:17:21,990 Now, why am I going through this? 402 00:17:21,990 --> 00:17:28,500 Well, because that is only good for what kind of material? 403 00:17:28,500 --> 00:17:32,040 That is only a correct picture for what kind of material? 404 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:44,700 Atoms, that's an atomic picture. 405 00:17:44,700 --> 00:17:47,730 We solve for the atom, and this is true-- and remember, 406 00:17:47,730 --> 00:17:49,880 I said that we can solve for the hydrogen atom 407 00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:53,340 and see the whole periodic table. 408 00:17:53,340 --> 00:17:54,030 Right? 409 00:17:54,030 --> 00:17:58,723 Powerful stuff, but this is only an atom. 410 00:17:58,723 --> 00:18:01,140 These are how you would fill the energy levels of an atom, 411 00:18:01,140 --> 00:18:02,390 and we've talked about this. 412 00:18:02,390 --> 00:18:06,270 But see now, we're going onto other things, where 413 00:18:06,270 --> 00:18:09,010 you bring atoms together, and you form molecules. 414 00:18:09,010 --> 00:18:10,320 This is not a chemistry class. 415 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:14,160 So I'm not going to spend a lot of time telling you 416 00:18:14,160 --> 00:18:19,470 about sigma orbitals, pi orbitals, bonding orbitals, 417 00:18:19,470 --> 00:18:20,580 antibonding orbitals. 418 00:18:20,580 --> 00:18:24,160 That's not what we're about, but I 419 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:28,660 do need you to understand that, when you bring atoms together, 420 00:18:28,660 --> 00:18:32,550 the orbitals from those atoms come together 421 00:18:32,550 --> 00:18:34,590 and form new orbitals. 422 00:18:34,590 --> 00:18:36,810 They form molecular orbitals. 423 00:18:36,810 --> 00:18:37,920 OK? 424 00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:42,350 Now, in this case, you're seeing the H2 molecule, 425 00:18:42,350 --> 00:18:43,680 and this is from this website. 426 00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:45,347 There's lots of great websites that talk 427 00:18:45,347 --> 00:18:47,130 about molecular orbital theory. 428 00:18:47,130 --> 00:18:49,580 OK? 429 00:18:49,580 --> 00:18:52,760 And in this case, you brought two s electrons 430 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:56,390 together, see, from a hydrogen atom over here and a hydrogen 431 00:18:56,390 --> 00:18:59,300 atom over there, and they drew those energy levels. 432 00:18:59,300 --> 00:19:00,850 And then they brought them together, 433 00:19:00,850 --> 00:19:03,410 and it turns out, when you bring to 1s levels 434 00:19:03,410 --> 00:19:08,690 together to form a molecule, you get two new levels. 435 00:19:08,690 --> 00:19:09,190 Right? 436 00:19:09,190 --> 00:19:13,990 And the chemists love names, and so they gave this one a sigma 437 00:19:13,990 --> 00:19:16,420 1s, and that's a sigma star 1s. 438 00:19:16,420 --> 00:19:18,040 Those are just two new levels that 439 00:19:18,040 --> 00:19:21,370 are formed, when you bring these atomic levels together. 440 00:19:21,370 --> 00:19:30,800 Now, all the same rules-- and one of them, ah, two points-- 441 00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:34,400 one of them is a bonding orbital. 442 00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:38,120 See, this actually looks like I brought two circles together, 443 00:19:38,120 --> 00:19:39,380 and they overlapped. 444 00:19:39,380 --> 00:19:40,940 That's a bonding orbital. 445 00:19:40,940 --> 00:19:43,370 OK? 446 00:19:43,370 --> 00:19:48,880 Another one of them, though, is an antibonding orbital. 447 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:50,220 All right? 448 00:19:50,220 --> 00:19:53,050 And an antibonding orbital is higher in energy. 449 00:19:53,050 --> 00:19:54,480 So it's going to come up higher. 450 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:57,510 Its energy is going to be higher than the bonding orbital, 451 00:19:57,510 --> 00:20:00,000 when you bring two orbitals together. 452 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:02,205 And often, an antibonding orbital 453 00:20:02,205 --> 00:20:04,260 will actually have a node, which means 454 00:20:04,260 --> 00:20:07,020 there's zero chance of any electron being 455 00:20:07,020 --> 00:20:09,390 in between, exactly in between. 456 00:20:09,390 --> 00:20:13,050 That doesn't sound very binding-y. 457 00:20:13,050 --> 00:20:14,210 Right? 458 00:20:14,210 --> 00:20:16,290 Doesn't have a lot of appeal for bonding, 459 00:20:16,290 --> 00:20:23,400 if there's like a plane of no existing. 460 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:25,590 Now, why would that be possible? 461 00:20:25,590 --> 00:20:27,870 Doesn't it seem from this picture-- 462 00:20:27,870 --> 00:20:32,320 I took to 1s orbitals, and I brought them together. 463 00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:32,820 Right? 464 00:20:32,820 --> 00:20:34,440 How can I get a node between them? 465 00:20:37,709 --> 00:20:40,168 AUDIENCE: Is it [INAUDIBLE] 466 00:20:40,168 --> 00:20:41,460 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Not quite. 467 00:20:41,460 --> 00:20:42,684 What is it? 468 00:20:42,684 --> 00:20:43,967 AUDIENCE: Coulomb repulsion. 469 00:20:43,967 --> 00:20:45,050 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 470 00:20:45,050 --> 00:20:47,500 It is actually. 471 00:20:47,500 --> 00:20:49,250 It does have to do with Coulomb repulsion, 472 00:20:49,250 --> 00:20:53,400 but there's something more basic here at play. 473 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:55,920 How is it that I can bring two spheres, 474 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:57,900 probability spheres like this together 475 00:20:57,900 --> 00:21:03,170 and have two orbitals that form, one of which 476 00:21:03,170 --> 00:21:04,920 has a node in between, and one of which is 477 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:08,190 like really nicely happy bound. 478 00:21:08,190 --> 00:21:11,010 AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] 479 00:21:11,010 --> 00:21:13,350 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Not quite, any other? 480 00:21:13,350 --> 00:21:14,268 Yeah? 481 00:21:14,268 --> 00:21:16,560 AUDIENCE: It looks like the infinite square well there. 482 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:18,852 You've got the ground state that doesn't have any nodes 483 00:21:18,852 --> 00:21:21,690 and then the first excited state does, the same deal. 484 00:21:21,690 --> 00:21:22,898 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Exactly. 485 00:21:22,898 --> 00:21:25,330 Well, so that's exactly right. 486 00:21:25,330 --> 00:21:28,680 We're not bringing together probability distributions. 487 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:29,310 OK? 488 00:21:29,310 --> 00:21:31,143 That is not the right way to think about it. 489 00:21:31,143 --> 00:21:33,010 I won't stand in front anymore. 490 00:21:33,010 --> 00:21:36,180 We're not bringing together probability distributions. 491 00:21:36,180 --> 00:21:39,510 We're bringing together wave functions, 492 00:21:39,510 --> 00:21:41,910 and then when those come together, 493 00:21:41,910 --> 00:21:46,200 they form a probability distribution or two, 494 00:21:46,200 --> 00:21:48,480 in the case I just showed you. 495 00:21:48,480 --> 00:21:51,180 And we all know that, when waves come together, 496 00:21:51,180 --> 00:21:54,210 they can do what and what? 497 00:21:54,210 --> 00:21:56,190 AUDIENCE: Construct and deconstruct. 498 00:21:56,190 --> 00:21:57,810 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Exactly. 499 00:21:57,810 --> 00:22:03,515 They can construct, and they can deconstruct one another. 500 00:22:03,515 --> 00:22:04,890 Sounds like they're going to have 501 00:22:04,890 --> 00:22:09,030 like a philosophical discussion. 502 00:22:09,030 --> 00:22:10,650 So that's what's happening. 503 00:22:10,650 --> 00:22:14,160 We're bringing the wave function together, 504 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:16,500 when we bring atoms together and molecules together. 505 00:22:16,500 --> 00:22:18,750 We're bringing their size together. 506 00:22:18,750 --> 00:22:22,170 Oh, size, you can't get away from size being so important, 507 00:22:22,170 --> 00:22:24,630 and we're solving for the collective psi. 508 00:22:24,630 --> 00:22:28,740 And when you bring waves together, they have phase, 509 00:22:28,740 --> 00:22:31,240 and they can form constructive and destructive interference, 510 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:33,660 as we talked about in lectures one and two, 511 00:22:33,660 --> 00:22:35,320 and that's what's happening here. 512 00:22:35,320 --> 00:22:38,950 And then you square those, and you get new orbitals 513 00:22:38,950 --> 00:22:40,380 which have those properties. 514 00:22:40,380 --> 00:22:40,880 OK? 515 00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:44,820 So this is the simplest example which is H2 molecule, 516 00:22:44,820 --> 00:22:47,400 and then we fill those orbitals. 517 00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:50,730 And when we fill these orbitals, when we draw them 518 00:22:50,730 --> 00:22:54,390 for a molecule, very often, I'll lose this notation, 519 00:22:54,390 --> 00:22:55,380 because there isn't-- 520 00:22:55,380 --> 00:22:58,770 and I'm not going to go through this notation, 521 00:22:58,770 --> 00:23:02,640 mostly because I can't remember past sigma and pi. 522 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:04,170 But there's a whole lot of notation 523 00:23:04,170 --> 00:23:05,700 out there for molecular orbitals, 524 00:23:05,700 --> 00:23:07,980 and it depends on the symmetry and the group 525 00:23:07,980 --> 00:23:11,395 symmetry of the molecule you're working with, 526 00:23:11,395 --> 00:23:13,020 and there are rules and all that stuff. 527 00:23:13,020 --> 00:23:14,728 But all we're going to need in this class 528 00:23:14,728 --> 00:23:17,880 is to know that, when you have a molecule, 529 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:22,810 and you calculate this wave function 530 00:23:22,810 --> 00:23:24,630 which gives you the wiggles. 531 00:23:24,630 --> 00:23:27,030 And then you square it, you get the distributions, 532 00:23:27,030 --> 00:23:28,758 and that helps set the energy levels. 533 00:23:28,758 --> 00:23:31,050 It tells you where those energy levels are going to be, 534 00:23:31,050 --> 00:23:32,508 that will just draw them like this. 535 00:23:32,508 --> 00:23:35,250 Right? 536 00:23:35,250 --> 00:23:37,740 Now, this is how I'll draw molecules, 537 00:23:37,740 --> 00:23:40,150 the energy levels of molecules, and again this is it. 538 00:23:40,150 --> 00:23:42,600 This is one of the most important properties 539 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:45,850 I want to focus on, because this is everything. 540 00:23:45,850 --> 00:23:49,860 This is where those electrons are in energy space, 541 00:23:49,860 --> 00:23:51,420 and I can plot them. 542 00:23:51,420 --> 00:23:54,510 I can look at their energy, and there's all kinds 543 00:23:54,510 --> 00:23:56,400 of important information here. 544 00:23:56,400 --> 00:23:57,810 OK? 545 00:23:57,810 --> 00:24:00,900 And so what this means is usually I'll 546 00:24:00,900 --> 00:24:01,860 leave a space here. 547 00:24:01,860 --> 00:24:04,104 Does anybody know what this is called? 548 00:24:04,104 --> 00:24:06,270 AUDIENCE: Gap. 549 00:24:06,270 --> 00:24:07,980 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Right. 550 00:24:07,980 --> 00:24:12,610 This is the gap, because that's how many 551 00:24:12,610 --> 00:24:15,310 electrons I had in my molecule. 552 00:24:15,310 --> 00:24:17,420 Not my atom, but in my molecule. 553 00:24:17,420 --> 00:24:18,430 So I do the same thing. 554 00:24:18,430 --> 00:24:23,050 I calculate energy levels, I fill them up, and I stop. 555 00:24:23,050 --> 00:24:27,070 I apply some rules, like you wouldn't 556 00:24:27,070 --> 00:24:34,120 have one level with two electrons up, Pauli exclusion. 557 00:24:34,120 --> 00:24:34,620 Right? 558 00:24:38,090 --> 00:24:40,160 And then I stop, and then there's 559 00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:41,720 another level beyond that. 560 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:43,233 Oh, that's important. 561 00:24:43,233 --> 00:24:44,900 So we're going to talk about that today. 562 00:24:44,900 --> 00:24:47,990 There's another level beyond that that's not filled, 563 00:24:47,990 --> 00:24:50,600 but the distance in energy between these 564 00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,060 is called the gap, and it's really important. 565 00:24:53,060 --> 00:24:55,760 And the energy gap is what determines all kinds 566 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:58,440 of properties about a material. 567 00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:00,840 It determines how it absorbs light. 568 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:02,760 It determines how it conducts charge. 569 00:25:06,330 --> 00:25:11,160 It can determine things about its magnetic properties, 570 00:25:11,160 --> 00:25:13,290 certainly transport properties. 571 00:25:13,290 --> 00:25:15,378 And what's going to happen, and that's 572 00:25:15,378 --> 00:25:16,920 why I really want to make sure we all 573 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:18,570 understand this for a molecule. 574 00:25:18,570 --> 00:25:20,730 What's going to happen is, when we go to solids-- 575 00:25:20,730 --> 00:25:22,438 on Thursday, we're going to start talking 576 00:25:22,438 --> 00:25:23,910 about moving to solids-- 577 00:25:23,910 --> 00:25:25,140 this is going to happen. 578 00:25:25,140 --> 00:25:27,360 These are no longer simple lines. 579 00:25:27,360 --> 00:25:34,783 These go like this, and that's really cool. 580 00:25:34,783 --> 00:25:36,450 That happens because you're putting them 581 00:25:36,450 --> 00:25:38,010 in a periodic arrangement. 582 00:25:38,010 --> 00:25:40,430 That's called a band structure. 583 00:25:40,430 --> 00:25:41,970 It doesn't happen for molecules. 584 00:25:41,970 --> 00:25:44,320 They're just little flat lines, like they are in atoms. 585 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:45,900 OK? 586 00:25:45,900 --> 00:25:48,390 So are we all good with this? 587 00:25:48,390 --> 00:25:49,770 Are there questions? 588 00:25:49,770 --> 00:25:54,990 Energy levels, energy levels, need 589 00:25:54,990 --> 00:25:57,670 to know about energy levels. 590 00:25:57,670 --> 00:25:58,760 No questions? 591 00:25:58,760 --> 00:26:00,520 Yeah? 592 00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:03,250 AUDIENCE: So when you put up every central gas 593 00:26:03,250 --> 00:26:06,640 and you calculated all the total energy, 594 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:08,117 if you like have big molecules-- 595 00:26:08,117 --> 00:26:09,200 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 596 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:12,878 AUDIENCE: --you got huge gap and it's harder to identify that. 597 00:26:12,878 --> 00:26:14,170 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Which one? 598 00:26:14,170 --> 00:26:16,660 What's harder to identify? 599 00:26:16,660 --> 00:26:17,425 AUDIENCE: Ammonia. 600 00:26:17,425 --> 00:26:21,330 Because if you have one more unit, for example-- 601 00:26:21,330 --> 00:26:22,580 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: One more. 602 00:26:22,580 --> 00:26:25,160 AUDIENCE: --some group. 603 00:26:25,160 --> 00:26:26,180 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: OK. 604 00:26:26,180 --> 00:26:28,550 So you put an electron here? 605 00:26:28,550 --> 00:26:29,810 Or what do you mean? 606 00:26:29,810 --> 00:26:31,977 AUDIENCE: So when you calculated the wave function-- 607 00:26:31,977 --> 00:26:33,060 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 608 00:26:33,060 --> 00:26:35,580 AUDIENCE: --how did you know the electron wave function 609 00:26:35,580 --> 00:26:37,700 for this type of ammonia? 610 00:26:37,700 --> 00:26:39,170 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Well, that's-- 611 00:26:39,170 --> 00:26:39,670 Yeah. 612 00:26:39,670 --> 00:26:49,460 So that's where really lecture three covers that. 613 00:26:49,460 --> 00:26:53,030 Where basically, you need to use an approximation 614 00:26:53,030 --> 00:26:55,585 to the Schrodinger equation, and that approximation 615 00:26:55,585 --> 00:26:56,960 that we're using in this class is 616 00:26:56,960 --> 00:26:58,640 called density function theory. 617 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:03,290 But then you simply what goes into that equation 618 00:27:03,290 --> 00:27:05,870 is the approximations you choose, 619 00:27:05,870 --> 00:27:10,340 and the positions of the atoms and the number of electrons. 620 00:27:10,340 --> 00:27:12,940 And once you have that, you basically 621 00:27:12,940 --> 00:27:13,940 are solving for the psi. 622 00:27:13,940 --> 00:27:16,980 You're solving for these. 623 00:27:16,980 --> 00:27:17,480 Right? 624 00:27:17,480 --> 00:27:20,440 And you get them and their energies out, 625 00:27:20,440 --> 00:27:23,710 and it's in the outputs of the nanoHUB runs. 626 00:27:23,710 --> 00:27:24,790 OK? 627 00:27:24,790 --> 00:27:28,870 Now, one last thing before we go back to solar fuels 628 00:27:28,870 --> 00:27:31,660 that I want to make sure we feel our oneness with 629 00:27:31,660 --> 00:27:33,220 are these basis functions. 630 00:27:33,220 --> 00:27:39,130 So this is a slide from another lecture, an older lecture, 631 00:27:39,130 --> 00:27:41,800 but I just want to be sure we understand 632 00:27:41,800 --> 00:27:42,770 what we're doing here. 633 00:27:42,770 --> 00:27:43,690 OK? 634 00:27:43,690 --> 00:27:53,480 So we said we needed to make size for our materials. 635 00:27:53,480 --> 00:27:55,850 We need the code to give us psi. 636 00:27:55,850 --> 00:27:59,000 Now, for a hydrogen atom, these are analytic functions. 637 00:27:59,000 --> 00:27:59,540 Right? 638 00:27:59,540 --> 00:28:04,130 They're like sines, cosines, but for more complex material, 639 00:28:04,130 --> 00:28:08,180 a complex atom, they can look like this. 640 00:28:08,180 --> 00:28:10,220 They can be really complicated. 641 00:28:10,220 --> 00:28:13,080 OK? 642 00:28:13,080 --> 00:28:15,900 So but a computer can't just draw lines. 643 00:28:15,900 --> 00:28:16,890 Right? 644 00:28:16,890 --> 00:28:18,000 A computer can't do that. 645 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:21,390 It needs to have some mathematical representation 646 00:28:21,390 --> 00:28:25,890 for that function, and that's what a basis set is. 647 00:28:25,890 --> 00:28:27,990 But as I stressed last week, this 648 00:28:27,990 --> 00:28:36,000 is a new sort of not a problem, but it's 649 00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:39,930 a parameter that is not present in classical simulations. 650 00:28:39,930 --> 00:28:42,390 But it's one you have to be very carefully aware of, 651 00:28:42,390 --> 00:28:45,460 and you have to know when you've converted it. 652 00:28:45,460 --> 00:28:46,440 OK? 653 00:28:46,440 --> 00:28:49,800 And the question came up last week 654 00:28:49,800 --> 00:28:52,865 of when is a basis set converged? 655 00:28:52,865 --> 00:28:53,365 OK? 656 00:28:57,058 --> 00:28:57,850 And what do I mean? 657 00:28:57,850 --> 00:29:01,360 Well, I can make a basis out of anything-- 658 00:29:01,360 --> 00:29:06,130 Gaussians, exponents, plane waves. 659 00:29:06,130 --> 00:29:09,950 I can make a basis out of wavelets 660 00:29:09,950 --> 00:29:13,040 which are really interesting hat-like functions. 661 00:29:13,040 --> 00:29:16,910 But I can take any function, and if I add enough of them 662 00:29:16,910 --> 00:29:22,550 in the right places, and they have the right width and size, 663 00:29:22,550 --> 00:29:25,190 I can recreate a curve. 664 00:29:25,190 --> 00:29:27,780 That's what we're doing, but I want 665 00:29:27,780 --> 00:29:29,760 to have as few as possible. 666 00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:30,270 OK? 667 00:29:30,270 --> 00:29:34,290 So this is a basis set study that somebody did 668 00:29:34,290 --> 00:29:38,610 and randomly put on the web, which I randomly 669 00:29:38,610 --> 00:29:42,920 found and didn't credit, which I should have. 670 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:48,060 Anyway, this is the number of basis functions 671 00:29:48,060 --> 00:29:51,360 going this way, number of basis functions, 672 00:29:51,360 --> 00:29:53,380 and that's the energy. 673 00:29:53,380 --> 00:29:56,430 And you can see that the energy is going to change, 674 00:29:56,430 --> 00:29:58,920 as you increase the number of basis functions, 675 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:02,020 and there's this thing called the basis set limit. 676 00:30:02,020 --> 00:30:04,530 Sometimes it's called the complete basis set limit, 677 00:30:04,530 --> 00:30:08,650 and that complete basis set limit is basically just saying, 678 00:30:08,650 --> 00:30:10,470 hey, I've represented my wave function 679 00:30:10,470 --> 00:30:13,170 now numerically correctly. 680 00:30:13,170 --> 00:30:17,070 So infinite number of basis functions should give you that. 681 00:30:17,070 --> 00:30:18,705 We don't have enough computer time 682 00:30:18,705 --> 00:30:20,580 to have that many basis functions, because it 683 00:30:20,580 --> 00:30:22,230 gets really long and slow. 684 00:30:22,230 --> 00:30:24,260 So we don't do that. 685 00:30:24,260 --> 00:30:29,070 Usually, we do calculations out here, and maybe we extrapolate. 686 00:30:29,070 --> 00:30:30,020 OK? 687 00:30:30,020 --> 00:30:33,300 Or we just do a few cases, and we say, 688 00:30:33,300 --> 00:30:35,930 well, my results are converged. 689 00:30:35,930 --> 00:30:38,470 But when is a basis set converged? 690 00:30:38,470 --> 00:30:42,600 It's a really important point of quantum mechanical-- 691 00:30:42,600 --> 00:30:44,640 hey, that would be like a good quiz question. 692 00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:45,650 Right? 693 00:30:45,650 --> 00:30:47,580 Like it's a really important part of quantum 694 00:30:47,580 --> 00:30:50,430 mechanical simulations are always a quiz question. 695 00:30:50,430 --> 00:30:51,450 It's not a bad one. 696 00:30:54,120 --> 00:30:59,330 Is it converged here, or is it converged here? 697 00:30:59,330 --> 00:31:01,695 You know what answer I'm looking for. 698 00:31:01,695 --> 00:31:03,070 AUDIENCE: Depends on the problem. 699 00:31:03,070 --> 00:31:05,410 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: It depends. 700 00:31:05,410 --> 00:31:07,930 I love that answer for this class. 701 00:31:07,930 --> 00:31:12,780 It depends, because here, I'm plotting 702 00:31:12,780 --> 00:31:16,890 the total energy of the whole system, 703 00:31:16,890 --> 00:31:18,820 but is that what I want? 704 00:31:18,820 --> 00:31:21,060 Is that what I'm calculating? 705 00:31:21,060 --> 00:31:25,080 I don't know, maybe, but what if I'm actually calculating this? 706 00:31:25,080 --> 00:31:27,840 What if I'm calculating the gap between the highest occupied 707 00:31:27,840 --> 00:31:29,550 and lowest occupied level? 708 00:31:29,550 --> 00:31:33,060 Well then, I should plot that versus the basis set, 709 00:31:33,060 --> 00:31:41,400 and that, this line, the total energy may converge like this. 710 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:45,540 Whereas, if I do the gap, it kind of goes-- maybe it's here, 711 00:31:45,540 --> 00:31:47,250 and then I get another value here, 712 00:31:47,250 --> 00:31:50,670 and then everything is fully converged all the way in. 713 00:31:50,670 --> 00:31:53,185 So the gap value converged there. 714 00:31:53,185 --> 00:31:53,810 You don't know. 715 00:31:53,810 --> 00:31:57,380 Different properties will converge differently, 716 00:31:57,380 --> 00:31:58,880 and you start to get a feel for it, 717 00:31:58,880 --> 00:32:00,840 as you do more calculations. 718 00:32:00,840 --> 00:32:03,500 I'm not expecting you to get to that point in this class, 719 00:32:03,500 --> 00:32:04,950 but I want you to understand this. 720 00:32:04,950 --> 00:32:06,300 It's really important. 721 00:32:06,300 --> 00:32:07,510 OK? 722 00:32:07,510 --> 00:32:10,210 So basis sets must be converged. 723 00:32:10,210 --> 00:32:11,470 That's one point. 724 00:32:11,470 --> 00:32:13,630 This can lead to big tables. 725 00:32:13,630 --> 00:32:15,850 Chemists love big tables. 726 00:32:15,850 --> 00:32:19,190 So it's actually a perfect fit. 727 00:32:19,190 --> 00:32:20,860 So you see papers like this. 728 00:32:20,860 --> 00:32:28,550 Oh, you can go to bse.pnl.gov, and let's see, maybe I can just 729 00:32:28,550 --> 00:32:29,970 go there really quickly. 730 00:32:29,970 --> 00:32:32,230 And you can see, oh, look at that. 731 00:32:32,230 --> 00:32:33,800 There's the nanoHUB. 732 00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:34,550 We're coming. 733 00:32:34,550 --> 00:32:38,000 We're coming, and look at this. 734 00:32:38,000 --> 00:32:39,230 Oh, this is beautiful. 735 00:32:39,230 --> 00:32:44,080 See, many basis sets have been made over the years. 736 00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:44,580 Right? 737 00:32:48,340 --> 00:32:49,600 And so here, they are. 738 00:32:49,600 --> 00:32:52,300 Look at all these basis sets for different-- and you see, 739 00:32:52,300 --> 00:32:53,530 I can scroll down here. 740 00:32:53,530 --> 00:32:54,580 Look at these basis sets. 741 00:32:54,580 --> 00:32:58,360 You have a few of these to choose from in the nanoHUB, 742 00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:00,730 but look at how many there are. 743 00:33:00,730 --> 00:33:02,320 These are all published basis sets, 744 00:33:02,320 --> 00:33:04,030 and you can go to a place like this. 745 00:33:04,030 --> 00:33:09,880 And you can click on one, like 3-21G*, and you can click on-- 746 00:33:09,880 --> 00:33:11,290 well, I don't think that-- 747 00:33:11,290 --> 00:33:14,310 and you can say what code am I going to use? 748 00:33:14,310 --> 00:33:15,130 Right? 749 00:33:15,130 --> 00:33:19,100 And then, you can say get the basis sets, and there they are. 750 00:33:19,100 --> 00:33:22,150 And there are the papers, where basically, they're 751 00:33:22,150 --> 00:33:26,530 trying to say what is the fewest number of Gaussians 752 00:33:26,530 --> 00:33:31,230 that we can use to represent these atoms? 753 00:33:31,230 --> 00:33:35,720 So basis sets are fit to atomic orbital wave functions. 754 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:37,910 OK? 755 00:33:37,910 --> 00:33:39,620 And this is just a certain form, where 756 00:33:39,620 --> 00:33:42,470 you have the exponent of the Gaussian 757 00:33:42,470 --> 00:33:45,110 and a coefficient of the Gaussian. 758 00:33:45,110 --> 00:33:47,570 And I'm not going to go into details, 759 00:33:47,570 --> 00:33:48,810 because we don't need them. 760 00:33:48,810 --> 00:33:49,310 OK? 761 00:33:52,370 --> 00:33:55,420 There's a lot of work on basis sets. 762 00:33:55,420 --> 00:33:59,330 There's also a lot of papers that 763 00:33:59,330 --> 00:34:03,800 were published in the 1970s and also '80s using basis sets, 764 00:34:03,800 --> 00:34:08,120 like this, that show really good answers using 765 00:34:08,120 --> 00:34:10,969 like Hartree-Fock theory or density functional theory 766 00:34:10,969 --> 00:34:14,780 even but for the completely wrong reason. 767 00:34:14,780 --> 00:34:17,960 Because they used a level of theory that wasn't accurate 768 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:20,480 and a basis set that wasn't converged, 769 00:34:20,480 --> 00:34:23,030 because the computers couldn't go to larger basis sets, 770 00:34:23,030 --> 00:34:25,280 and so the errors canceled. 771 00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:28,909 So there are many papers with really nice agreement 772 00:34:28,909 --> 00:34:34,139 with experiment from theory that are complete nonsense, 773 00:34:34,139 --> 00:34:39,080 because they're using very inaccurate theory and really 774 00:34:39,080 --> 00:34:40,280 bad basis sets. 775 00:34:40,280 --> 00:34:45,050 And so the errors cancel, and you get beautiful results. 776 00:34:45,050 --> 00:34:50,659 It's something that we need to be aware of 777 00:34:50,659 --> 00:34:53,600 and understand in this class, but we're not 778 00:34:53,600 --> 00:34:57,287 going to go into great detail in all these different basis sets. 779 00:34:57,287 --> 00:34:59,120 But you can go there, and there's just a lot 780 00:34:59,120 --> 00:34:59,995 of information there. 781 00:34:59,995 --> 00:35:03,170 And you can play around, and you can make big tables like this. 782 00:35:03,170 --> 00:35:04,940 I don't recommend that you do this. 783 00:35:04,940 --> 00:35:07,490 But this was a study, this is like the kind of thing-- 784 00:35:07,490 --> 00:35:13,620 I think that some people really like big tables. 785 00:35:13,620 --> 00:35:16,460 This one goes on and on and on, by the way. 786 00:35:16,460 --> 00:35:17,360 It never stops. 787 00:35:17,360 --> 00:35:20,790 It almost never stops. 788 00:35:20,790 --> 00:35:24,682 And you see, different levels theory here. 789 00:35:24,682 --> 00:35:26,140 These ones we haven't talked about. 790 00:35:26,140 --> 00:35:30,640 That's LDA, Hartree-Fock and then different basis sets. 791 00:35:30,640 --> 00:35:31,270 You see? 792 00:35:31,270 --> 00:35:33,700 And some property, the binding energy 793 00:35:33,700 --> 00:35:36,070 and some other properties that they care about. 794 00:35:36,070 --> 00:35:37,990 OK? 795 00:35:37,990 --> 00:35:39,570 Yeah. 796 00:35:39,570 --> 00:35:41,370 Not expecting you to do that, but I 797 00:35:41,370 --> 00:35:43,990 want you to be aware of how big of a concern 798 00:35:43,990 --> 00:35:47,130 this is in quantum mechanical calculations. 799 00:35:47,130 --> 00:35:50,850 Any questions about basis sets? 800 00:35:50,850 --> 00:35:52,410 Basis sets. 801 00:35:52,410 --> 00:36:00,270 The last theory point, last question 802 00:36:00,270 --> 00:36:05,330 I want to ask, so we asked, with basis sets, 803 00:36:05,330 --> 00:36:06,830 how do we know when we're converged? 804 00:36:06,830 --> 00:36:09,650 Well, it depends. 805 00:36:09,650 --> 00:36:12,320 When you add more basis functions or do a larger basis 806 00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:15,750 and things don't change, your converged. 807 00:36:15,750 --> 00:36:17,250 But there's another bigger question, 808 00:36:17,250 --> 00:36:20,640 which is how do we know when the calculation is right, 809 00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:22,470 that we talked about here. 810 00:36:22,470 --> 00:36:24,840 Now, this is very important, and it 811 00:36:24,840 --> 00:36:27,520 goes to the point I just made. 812 00:36:27,520 --> 00:36:29,650 Just because you agree with experiment, 813 00:36:29,650 --> 00:36:31,990 if you're not doing your calculations carefully, 814 00:36:31,990 --> 00:36:34,190 it can be still dangerous. 815 00:36:34,190 --> 00:36:34,810 OK? 816 00:36:34,810 --> 00:36:37,090 But let's suppose that you have done your calculations 817 00:36:37,090 --> 00:36:40,540 carefully, and you have converged your basis set. 818 00:36:40,540 --> 00:36:45,220 And you have checked everything else about your code, 819 00:36:45,220 --> 00:36:47,020 and you're asking the question of which 820 00:36:47,020 --> 00:36:48,850 of these structures of carbon-- 821 00:36:48,850 --> 00:36:51,330 remember, I really like carbon. 822 00:36:51,330 --> 00:36:54,280 Which of these three structures-- a ring, 823 00:36:54,280 --> 00:36:56,800 a kind of bowl, or a cage-- 824 00:36:56,800 --> 00:37:01,520 gives you-- is most stable for 20 atoms? 825 00:37:01,520 --> 00:37:03,560 That's a pretty simple question. 826 00:37:03,560 --> 00:37:04,850 Right? 827 00:37:04,850 --> 00:37:08,900 This is the question I asked as a second-year grad student, 828 00:37:08,900 --> 00:37:11,570 a few years ago now. 829 00:37:11,570 --> 00:37:12,210 Who laughed? 830 00:37:12,210 --> 00:37:12,710 Sam? 831 00:37:16,220 --> 00:37:18,290 And it was really cool, because see, 832 00:37:18,290 --> 00:37:19,880 you could try one level of theory 833 00:37:19,880 --> 00:37:22,280 and work really hard to converge it completely. 834 00:37:22,280 --> 00:37:24,680 And you'd get, for example with LDA-- 835 00:37:24,680 --> 00:37:26,540 something you can do on the nanoHUB-- 836 00:37:26,540 --> 00:37:30,870 you would get that the cage, this guy, is the lowest energy. 837 00:37:30,870 --> 00:37:33,320 This means the most stable. 838 00:37:33,320 --> 00:37:36,440 And then you would do another level of theory, Hartree-Fock 839 00:37:36,440 --> 00:37:38,780 or this other thing that you also have, 840 00:37:38,780 --> 00:37:40,580 this is called the GGA. 841 00:37:40,580 --> 00:37:43,100 It's another flavor of density function theory, 842 00:37:43,100 --> 00:37:44,990 and you would get exactly the opposite. 843 00:37:44,990 --> 00:37:47,510 You would get that the ring is the most stable, 844 00:37:47,510 --> 00:37:49,040 and the cage is the least stable. 845 00:37:49,040 --> 00:37:54,710 So what's going on? 846 00:37:54,710 --> 00:37:56,420 What's going on? 847 00:37:56,420 --> 00:37:59,840 Two different DFT functionals gave me 848 00:37:59,840 --> 00:38:03,324 completely different answers, and I've converged everything. 849 00:38:06,868 --> 00:38:08,160 AUDIENCE: Two more functionals. 850 00:38:08,160 --> 00:38:10,980 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Two more functionals. 851 00:38:10,980 --> 00:38:13,560 Now, that's actually a really good idea, 852 00:38:13,560 --> 00:38:16,020 and it's actually what people do. 853 00:38:16,020 --> 00:38:17,880 OK? 854 00:38:17,880 --> 00:38:21,010 In fact, you see, if you go to-- 855 00:38:21,010 --> 00:38:23,890 I think I left this web page open. 856 00:38:23,890 --> 00:38:26,290 Here's one of the codes that does 857 00:38:26,290 --> 00:38:28,690 density functional theory and other quantum chemistry 858 00:38:28,690 --> 00:38:29,300 calculations. 859 00:38:29,300 --> 00:38:30,175 It's called Gaussian. 860 00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:36,802 And if you look in their 2009 version, 861 00:38:36,802 --> 00:38:38,260 this is a code you have to pay for. 862 00:38:38,260 --> 00:38:41,560 There's lots of codes that are free, by the way. 863 00:38:41,560 --> 00:38:45,430 NWChem, if anybody wants to play with a code, download it, 864 00:38:45,430 --> 00:38:47,140 that does quantum chemistry, that's 865 00:38:47,140 --> 00:38:52,150 a pretty darn good one that's free which you can download, 866 00:38:52,150 --> 00:38:53,080 and there are others. 867 00:38:53,080 --> 00:38:56,320 I'm happy to provide a list. 868 00:38:56,320 --> 00:39:00,790 But look at the number of functionals 869 00:39:00,790 --> 00:39:02,240 you have to choose from. 870 00:39:02,240 --> 00:39:02,830 OK? 871 00:39:02,830 --> 00:39:04,663 Here's a little bit about density functional 872 00:39:04,663 --> 00:39:08,230 theory and the methods, and then here are the functionals. 873 00:39:08,230 --> 00:39:09,880 exchange functionals. 874 00:39:09,880 --> 00:39:15,970 You see S, XA, B, PW, G96, PBE. 875 00:39:15,970 --> 00:39:18,220 That's one of the ones on the nanoHUB. 876 00:39:18,220 --> 00:39:19,060 Right? 877 00:39:19,060 --> 00:39:24,632 And correlation functionals, VWN, LYP, B95, and so 878 00:39:24,632 --> 00:39:26,590 what you wind up getting-- and then it goes on, 879 00:39:26,590 --> 00:39:30,580 standalone functionals, hybrid functionals. 880 00:39:30,580 --> 00:39:31,120 OK? 881 00:39:31,120 --> 00:39:31,840 Here's some more. 882 00:39:34,610 --> 00:39:38,890 User defined functionals, you can actually make up your own. 883 00:39:38,890 --> 00:39:39,550 Right? 884 00:39:39,550 --> 00:39:43,360 So here's a short list of some of the keywords 885 00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:46,960 you can enter and get different functionals out. 886 00:39:46,960 --> 00:39:49,620 So now, what do I do? 887 00:39:49,620 --> 00:39:50,930 AUDIENCE: All of them. 888 00:39:50,930 --> 00:39:52,610 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: All of them. 889 00:39:52,610 --> 00:40:00,070 Well, sadly, I think some researchers do that. 890 00:40:03,120 --> 00:40:06,160 So here's the broader point. 891 00:40:06,160 --> 00:40:07,290 OK? 892 00:40:07,290 --> 00:40:10,980 Density functional theory is an approximation in the way 893 00:40:10,980 --> 00:40:13,910 that we use it in our codes. 894 00:40:13,910 --> 00:40:17,760 The actual theory itself could be exact, 895 00:40:17,760 --> 00:40:20,910 but the way that it has to be implemented 896 00:40:20,910 --> 00:40:23,730 requires this approximate functional, 897 00:40:23,730 --> 00:40:26,160 as you learned in lecture three. 898 00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:27,960 OK? 899 00:40:27,960 --> 00:40:30,600 What functional do I use? 900 00:40:30,600 --> 00:40:34,170 Well, some of these have been well tested 901 00:40:34,170 --> 00:40:36,060 for broad classes of materials and are 902 00:40:36,060 --> 00:40:39,210 known to do well for certain properties, certain materials, 903 00:40:39,210 --> 00:40:41,910 and known to do not as well for others, 904 00:40:41,910 --> 00:40:45,120 but it's mostly empirical in terms of our understanding. 905 00:40:45,120 --> 00:40:47,640 It's because it's been tried for many systems. 906 00:40:47,640 --> 00:40:48,270 OK? 907 00:40:48,270 --> 00:40:52,320 And so in a way, we're a little bit 908 00:40:52,320 --> 00:40:55,420 back to the classical world. 909 00:40:55,420 --> 00:40:58,810 In the sense that density functional theory 910 00:40:58,810 --> 00:41:01,700 is a beautiful theory, but to make it practical, 911 00:41:01,700 --> 00:41:04,060 you have to make approximations that make it 912 00:41:04,060 --> 00:41:07,570 so that you have almost an empirical nature to it, 913 00:41:07,570 --> 00:41:10,600 or a semi-empirical nature which is what you 914 00:41:10,600 --> 00:41:12,220 have in classical force fields. 915 00:41:12,220 --> 00:41:13,020 Right? 916 00:41:13,020 --> 00:41:15,460 In classical force fields, the potential 917 00:41:15,460 --> 00:41:22,000 is as good as the complexity of the potential 918 00:41:22,000 --> 00:41:24,650 and what you fit it to. 919 00:41:24,650 --> 00:41:26,780 Right? 920 00:41:26,780 --> 00:41:30,350 Density function theory is, I think, much more powerful, 921 00:41:30,350 --> 00:41:32,340 in the sense that you can really solve 922 00:41:32,340 --> 00:41:34,190 for the electronic structure, but we 923 00:41:34,190 --> 00:41:38,170 have the same kind of problem in density functional theory. 924 00:41:38,170 --> 00:41:40,860 So the functionals that I've given you on the nanoHUB 925 00:41:40,860 --> 00:41:44,730 are some of the most popular ones, 926 00:41:44,730 --> 00:41:47,610 but you always need to be aware-- 927 00:41:47,610 --> 00:41:52,910 [NON-ENGLISH]---- of the fact that we're making an approximation. 928 00:41:52,910 --> 00:41:57,280 And yes, one way to check is to try two functionals, 929 00:41:57,280 --> 00:42:01,480 and if they don't disagree too much, you may be OK. 930 00:42:01,480 --> 00:42:05,580 That's not the most gratifying way to do it. 931 00:42:05,580 --> 00:42:07,967 Another way would be to compare with experiment, 932 00:42:07,967 --> 00:42:09,800 and that's actually the most gratifying way. 933 00:42:09,800 --> 00:42:11,480 Once you converge everything else, 934 00:42:11,480 --> 00:42:14,870 if you're functional agrees with experiment 935 00:42:14,870 --> 00:42:16,580 for the kind of problem you're trying 936 00:42:16,580 --> 00:42:20,120 to solve, then that's a pretty good indication that it's 937 00:42:20,120 --> 00:42:23,750 an accurate solution to the Schrodinger equation, 938 00:42:23,750 --> 00:42:26,270 but you are making a approximations. 939 00:42:26,270 --> 00:42:28,150 OK? 940 00:42:28,150 --> 00:42:32,890 And that is something that we won't-- 941 00:42:32,890 --> 00:42:35,500 as you can see, I don't give you much options 942 00:42:35,500 --> 00:42:38,530 on the nanoHUB, because I don't really want to go there, 943 00:42:38,530 --> 00:42:40,280 but I do want you to be aware of this. 944 00:42:40,280 --> 00:42:42,430 We are not solving quantum mechanics exactly. 945 00:42:42,430 --> 00:42:46,390 We cannot, and with density functional theory, 946 00:42:46,390 --> 00:42:48,930 there are some systems. 947 00:42:48,930 --> 00:42:53,320 So in my graduate days, I worked on a method 948 00:42:53,320 --> 00:42:55,690 that goes beyond density functional theory inaccuracy. 949 00:42:55,690 --> 00:42:59,810 So it's a very accurate method, very slow but very accurate. 950 00:42:59,810 --> 00:43:01,720 And so I was purposefully looking 951 00:43:01,720 --> 00:43:07,720 for systems where DFT fails, and I was very happy with this one, 952 00:43:07,720 --> 00:43:09,520 where you basically don't know the answer. 953 00:43:09,520 --> 00:43:10,978 You can try functionals, and you'll 954 00:43:10,978 --> 00:43:14,060 get all kinds of different results. 955 00:43:14,060 --> 00:43:16,060 So the only thing you can do in that case 956 00:43:16,060 --> 00:43:18,350 is go to a higher accuracy method. 957 00:43:18,350 --> 00:43:18,850 OK? 958 00:43:21,370 --> 00:43:23,980 What I found out is that this method here 959 00:43:23,980 --> 00:43:27,340 is the most accurate one, that actually none of the functions 960 00:43:27,340 --> 00:43:29,810 were right, and the bowl was the most stable. 961 00:43:29,810 --> 00:43:32,830 So it's pretty cool. 962 00:43:32,830 --> 00:43:34,330 It was exciting. 963 00:43:34,330 --> 00:43:37,070 What can I say? 964 00:43:37,070 --> 00:43:39,320 I was a physicist at the time, so you know. 965 00:43:42,370 --> 00:43:44,040 I won't say anything more. 966 00:43:44,040 --> 00:43:44,540 OK. 967 00:43:44,540 --> 00:43:48,520 Now, let's go back to our first application example. 968 00:43:53,180 --> 00:43:56,120 Does everybody remember this from last week? 969 00:43:56,120 --> 00:43:56,810 OK. 970 00:43:56,810 --> 00:44:01,190 So let me make sure we know why. 971 00:44:01,190 --> 00:44:03,505 OK. 972 00:44:03,505 --> 00:44:04,880 I want to make sure we understand 973 00:44:04,880 --> 00:44:09,920 why this is such an important problem for quantum mechanics. 974 00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:10,550 OK? 975 00:44:10,550 --> 00:44:16,740 So sun shines on a molecule, the molecule changes shape, 976 00:44:16,740 --> 00:44:21,190 and that changed shape is a higher energy. 977 00:44:21,190 --> 00:44:25,080 So if you draw the reaction, if you 978 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:31,960 draw the reaction coordinate for this system, 979 00:44:31,960 --> 00:44:33,370 It looks like this. 980 00:44:33,370 --> 00:44:33,870 OK? 981 00:44:33,870 --> 00:44:37,060 So that would be the trans state and the cis state, 982 00:44:37,060 --> 00:44:40,350 and this is the higher energy that that forms, 983 00:44:40,350 --> 00:44:43,020 and it stores that much energy in the molecule. 984 00:44:43,020 --> 00:44:45,960 OK? 985 00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:48,300 Now, what we found is that there's 986 00:44:48,300 --> 00:44:50,100 all these molecules that do this, 987 00:44:50,100 --> 00:44:51,760 but they're not very good solar fuels. 988 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:52,260 OK? 989 00:44:52,260 --> 00:44:54,930 So there's lots of them that do this trans 990 00:44:54,930 --> 00:44:57,990 to cis photoisomerization. 991 00:44:57,990 --> 00:45:01,680 So the sun makes it go, or light makes it go, from one state 992 00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:02,550 to another. 993 00:45:02,550 --> 00:45:05,020 None of them are good solar fuels on their own, 994 00:45:05,020 --> 00:45:11,713 but we found this way of making them in general into good ones. 995 00:45:11,713 --> 00:45:13,380 And this is a slide I skipped last week, 996 00:45:13,380 --> 00:45:17,670 so I want to just very quickly explain this again. 997 00:45:17,670 --> 00:45:21,600 Because it's really important to understand why 998 00:45:21,600 --> 00:45:23,080 we're so excited about this. 999 00:45:23,080 --> 00:45:25,740 If you put these molecules that switch back and forth 1000 00:45:25,740 --> 00:45:30,150 onto a template, and the template can be anything, 1001 00:45:30,150 --> 00:45:31,470 but here it's a nanotube. 1002 00:45:31,470 --> 00:45:34,080 But if you put them onto it, and you covalently bind them-- 1003 00:45:34,080 --> 00:45:36,210 that means you attach them really strongly, 1004 00:45:36,210 --> 00:45:37,770 so they're not going to come off. 1005 00:45:37,770 --> 00:45:40,950 Then, what you've done is you've packed them in a way 1006 00:45:40,950 --> 00:45:43,200 that they're not able to get out of. 1007 00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:46,800 So you've packed them together, and they're not 1008 00:45:46,800 --> 00:45:49,830 allowed to get out, because they're covalently bound. 1009 00:45:49,830 --> 00:45:53,970 Some self-assembly work is weakly bound. 1010 00:45:53,970 --> 00:45:55,200 Some is not. 1011 00:45:55,200 --> 00:45:56,920 Here, it's really strongly bound. 1012 00:45:56,920 --> 00:45:59,310 So they're really forced into this packing. 1013 00:45:59,310 --> 00:46:00,610 Now, what does that mean? 1014 00:46:00,610 --> 00:46:02,140 Well, look up here for a minute. 1015 00:46:02,140 --> 00:46:05,580 It's a little busy, but look at that cyan 1016 00:46:05,580 --> 00:46:08,540 curve, the light blue. 1017 00:46:08,540 --> 00:46:11,750 This is the spacing that they're packing on on this template. 1018 00:46:11,750 --> 00:46:14,610 This is it, 4.2 angstroms. 1019 00:46:14,610 --> 00:46:15,620 OK? 1020 00:46:15,620 --> 00:46:20,120 And that's also exactly the minimum of that molecule, 1021 00:46:20,120 --> 00:46:22,790 when it's in the T state, here. 1022 00:46:22,790 --> 00:46:26,950 When it's in the T state, it's happy at that spacing. 1023 00:46:26,950 --> 00:46:29,020 It's happiest. 1024 00:46:29,020 --> 00:46:29,560 Right? 1025 00:46:29,560 --> 00:46:31,330 But when it's in the cis state, you 1026 00:46:31,330 --> 00:46:34,510 see the cis state has a different spacing 1027 00:46:34,510 --> 00:46:35,470 that it wants to be at. 1028 00:46:35,470 --> 00:46:36,700 That's the red curve. 1029 00:46:36,700 --> 00:46:37,350 Right? 1030 00:46:37,350 --> 00:46:38,725 These are the kinds of curves you 1031 00:46:38,725 --> 00:46:43,060 should be getting in your homework for problem two. 1032 00:46:43,060 --> 00:46:44,810 That's the curve for the cis state, 1033 00:46:44,810 --> 00:46:47,650 and you can see that it's a happy place is much further 1034 00:46:47,650 --> 00:46:49,990 out, but it can't be much further out. 1035 00:46:49,990 --> 00:46:52,850 It does not have that flexibility anymore. 1036 00:46:52,850 --> 00:46:55,240 So you've constrained it to always 1037 00:46:55,240 --> 00:47:00,570 be in the trans, happy place, in terms of its spacing. 1038 00:47:00,570 --> 00:47:03,690 Now, what that means is that, you can see right away, what 1039 00:47:03,690 --> 00:47:06,920 that means is that, when it's in the cis state, 1040 00:47:06,920 --> 00:47:09,120 the energy of the cis state is going to be higher. 1041 00:47:09,120 --> 00:47:12,740 So already, what you've done is you've made this state go up, 1042 00:47:12,740 --> 00:47:15,750 because you've sterically inhibited it just 1043 00:47:15,750 --> 00:47:20,070 by forcing it to be this close and never further apart. 1044 00:47:20,070 --> 00:47:25,720 In the gas phase or in solution, when it goes back and forth 1045 00:47:25,720 --> 00:47:26,740 between trans and cis. 1046 00:47:26,740 --> 00:47:28,660 It's always going to find its happy place. 1047 00:47:28,660 --> 00:47:32,230 They're not going to worry about this, but here they can't. 1048 00:47:32,230 --> 00:47:36,640 But as I mentioned last week, much more importantly even, 1049 00:47:36,640 --> 00:47:41,200 when you're in this highly confined geometry, this highly 1050 00:47:41,200 --> 00:47:44,350 constrained rigid packing, what you can do now 1051 00:47:44,350 --> 00:47:47,480 is you can play chemistry between them. 1052 00:47:47,480 --> 00:47:50,530 So I can actually create functional groups 1053 00:47:50,530 --> 00:47:54,190 on these molecules that bond them to each other 1054 00:47:54,190 --> 00:47:57,190 and to themselves in different ways, 1055 00:47:57,190 --> 00:48:00,160 depending on whether they're in the cis or the trans state. 1056 00:48:00,160 --> 00:48:00,910 OK? 1057 00:48:00,910 --> 00:48:03,430 And what that does is that allows me 1058 00:48:03,430 --> 00:48:09,170 to lower this and lower this. 1059 00:48:09,170 --> 00:48:10,290 That's the key. 1060 00:48:10,290 --> 00:48:11,210 OK? 1061 00:48:11,210 --> 00:48:13,880 So now, because the key is, remember, 1062 00:48:13,880 --> 00:48:26,300 goal is to increase this and this barrier. 1063 00:48:26,300 --> 00:48:32,067 Going back, we want to be able to tune it separately. 1064 00:48:36,180 --> 00:48:40,250 And you can see that, if you just look at this reaction 1065 00:48:40,250 --> 00:48:42,390 coordinate, if I increase delta H, 1066 00:48:42,390 --> 00:48:44,900 it looks like I'm going to probably decrease 1067 00:48:44,900 --> 00:48:47,450 the activation barrier which is not a good thing. 1068 00:48:47,450 --> 00:48:50,600 Because that's related to the stability of the fuel, when 1069 00:48:50,600 --> 00:48:52,830 it's charged, the lifetime. 1070 00:48:52,830 --> 00:48:54,620 These molecules on their own last 1071 00:48:54,620 --> 00:48:56,930 in the charged state for a few minutes. 1072 00:48:56,930 --> 00:48:57,992 That's not very useful. 1073 00:48:57,992 --> 00:49:00,200 So what we'd like to do is to be able to change both, 1074 00:49:00,200 --> 00:49:02,360 and this trick allows us to do that. 1075 00:49:02,360 --> 00:49:04,970 We push this up from steric inhibition, 1076 00:49:04,970 --> 00:49:07,260 but we pull it back down from reactions. 1077 00:49:07,260 --> 00:49:11,470 We pull this, from interactions, we pull this down even more, 1078 00:49:11,470 --> 00:49:13,570 because we can customize the interactions that 1079 00:49:13,570 --> 00:49:16,640 happen between these molecules and within the molecule. 1080 00:49:16,640 --> 00:49:17,770 So that's the key. 1081 00:49:17,770 --> 00:49:21,150 That's the magic sauce. 1082 00:49:21,150 --> 00:49:21,650 Right? 1083 00:49:24,700 --> 00:49:27,800 Now, all that is fine, except that, as I-- 1084 00:49:27,800 --> 00:49:28,300 OK. 1085 00:49:28,300 --> 00:49:30,070 So we have this new class of materials 1086 00:49:30,070 --> 00:49:31,150 we're very excited about. 1087 00:49:31,150 --> 00:49:32,650 We're making them in the lab. 1088 00:49:32,650 --> 00:49:34,690 We're designing them on a computer. 1089 00:49:34,690 --> 00:49:37,870 They're going to save the world, or maybe they'll 1090 00:49:37,870 --> 00:49:42,670 just de-ice windows, but anyway, that's very exciting. 1091 00:49:42,670 --> 00:49:52,250 Now, all of that can be done using classical force fields. 1092 00:49:52,250 --> 00:49:54,620 You can calculate delta H. You could 1093 00:49:54,620 --> 00:49:59,983 try to get a good model of potentials for these molecules. 1094 00:49:59,983 --> 00:50:01,650 You could maybe try different potentials 1095 00:50:01,650 --> 00:50:04,170 and see when it agrees with experiment and all that 1096 00:50:04,170 --> 00:50:08,100 and try to explore this phase space using classical force 1097 00:50:08,100 --> 00:50:09,060 fields. 1098 00:50:09,060 --> 00:50:10,050 That is accessible. 1099 00:50:10,050 --> 00:50:15,030 You may not-- gesundheit-- you may not be accurate. 1100 00:50:15,030 --> 00:50:16,860 You may have some worries about validating 1101 00:50:16,860 --> 00:50:18,000 the potentials and all that, but you 1102 00:50:18,000 --> 00:50:19,860 can do this with classical force fields. 1103 00:50:19,860 --> 00:50:22,920 You can get energies as a function of these twists 1104 00:50:22,920 --> 00:50:26,070 in the bonds and try to engineer it this way, 1105 00:50:26,070 --> 00:50:29,370 but you cannot talk about the optical properties. 1106 00:50:29,370 --> 00:50:32,530 You cannot do that using classical potentials. 1107 00:50:32,530 --> 00:50:36,300 You need the electrons, and this goes back to our energy levels. 1108 00:50:36,300 --> 00:50:36,940 OK? 1109 00:50:36,940 --> 00:50:43,640 So now, it will come in to play here. 1110 00:50:43,640 --> 00:50:47,290 We're going to go back to energy levels. 1111 00:50:47,290 --> 00:50:49,570 You see, I can make a really dense energy 1112 00:50:49,570 --> 00:50:53,790 fuel, a really highly energy dense fuel, 1113 00:50:53,790 --> 00:50:56,640 but if it doesn't absorb the sunlight efficiently, 1114 00:50:56,640 --> 00:50:59,010 then I can never charge it. 1115 00:50:59,010 --> 00:51:00,420 Right? 1116 00:51:00,420 --> 00:51:02,220 So that's a critical part of this. 1117 00:51:02,220 --> 00:51:06,330 If it doesn't absorb sunlight well, it's useless to me. 1118 00:51:06,330 --> 00:51:07,380 OK? 1119 00:51:07,380 --> 00:51:11,460 Now, so this is the thing that we've been talking about, 1120 00:51:11,460 --> 00:51:16,140 but that part can be looked at with potentials, if you wanted. 1121 00:51:16,140 --> 00:51:18,750 This part here, where you absorb the light, cannot. 1122 00:51:18,750 --> 00:51:21,090 So here's the light that comes down to Earth. 1123 00:51:21,090 --> 00:51:21,600 Right? 1124 00:51:21,600 --> 00:51:22,475 We talked about this. 1125 00:51:22,475 --> 00:51:25,290 That's the solar flux. 1126 00:51:25,290 --> 00:51:30,685 And the key point here is that-- 1127 00:51:30,685 --> 00:51:32,620 I keep that? 1128 00:51:32,620 --> 00:51:34,285 We don't need that anymore. 1129 00:51:34,285 --> 00:51:39,520 The key point here is that those molecules have energy levels, 1130 00:51:39,520 --> 00:51:43,510 like this and like this, and they have a gap. 1131 00:51:46,930 --> 00:51:47,530 Right? 1132 00:51:47,530 --> 00:51:55,390 These are what we call occupied, and these are unoccupied. 1133 00:51:55,390 --> 00:51:58,180 Unoccupied levels, occupied levels, 1134 00:51:58,180 --> 00:52:01,090 I just don't want to draw the arrows, 1135 00:52:01,090 --> 00:52:03,070 and that's the energy gap. 1136 00:52:03,070 --> 00:52:06,310 Now, why does the energy gap matter with respect 1137 00:52:06,310 --> 00:52:07,090 to this picture? 1138 00:52:12,590 --> 00:52:14,510 Yeah? 1139 00:52:14,510 --> 00:52:15,540 At the same time-- 1140 00:52:15,540 --> 00:52:17,930 one, two, no. 1141 00:52:17,930 --> 00:52:19,070 Go ahead. 1142 00:52:19,070 --> 00:52:20,570 AUDIENCE: Because all the absorption 1143 00:52:20,570 --> 00:52:23,435 are at certain frequencies-- or certain light 1144 00:52:23,435 --> 00:52:26,765 coming in at frequencies with great enough energy that 1145 00:52:26,765 --> 00:52:28,408 surpass the energy gap. 1146 00:52:28,408 --> 00:52:29,450 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Why? 1147 00:52:29,450 --> 00:52:30,242 That's really good. 1148 00:52:30,242 --> 00:52:31,547 That's exactly right. 1149 00:52:31,547 --> 00:52:32,630 AUDIENCE: So it's too low. 1150 00:52:32,630 --> 00:52:34,463 It's not enough energy to shut it off 1151 00:52:34,463 --> 00:52:35,630 from occupied to unoccupied. 1152 00:52:35,630 --> 00:52:36,520 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 1153 00:52:36,520 --> 00:52:37,460 AUDIENCE: I mean, too low of energy. 1154 00:52:37,460 --> 00:52:39,502 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Too low of an energy, right? 1155 00:52:39,502 --> 00:52:41,120 So this is energy going-- 1156 00:52:41,120 --> 00:52:43,350 this is wavelength going that way. 1157 00:52:43,350 --> 00:52:45,060 So energy goes this way. 1158 00:52:45,060 --> 00:52:46,600 OK? 1159 00:52:46,600 --> 00:52:49,020 Right? 1160 00:52:49,020 --> 00:52:58,980 So there is going to be some minimum energy below which 1161 00:52:58,980 --> 00:53:00,540 you can no longer absorb light. 1162 00:53:00,540 --> 00:53:03,000 The molecule is transparent. 1163 00:53:03,000 --> 00:53:05,310 That is the energy gap. 1164 00:53:05,310 --> 00:53:07,770 That's this energy gap here. 1165 00:53:07,770 --> 00:53:10,200 Any energy that that molecule receives 1166 00:53:10,200 --> 00:53:12,550 that's from those photons-- 1167 00:53:12,550 --> 00:53:14,130 and this is the energy. 1168 00:53:14,130 --> 00:53:17,010 Wavelength, as we know same, as the energy. 1169 00:53:17,010 --> 00:53:21,180 Any photons it receives from the sun that's less 1170 00:53:21,180 --> 00:53:23,220 than this just go right past. 1171 00:53:23,220 --> 00:53:24,300 They cannot get absorbed. 1172 00:53:26,890 --> 00:53:29,200 If I don't absorb a photon, I don't do this. 1173 00:53:29,200 --> 00:53:30,710 I don't switch. 1174 00:53:30,710 --> 00:53:31,210 OK? 1175 00:53:31,210 --> 00:53:33,820 So this is important. 1176 00:53:33,820 --> 00:53:37,060 Now, the question is what do I want? 1177 00:53:37,060 --> 00:53:41,740 Well, do I want the material to have a very high gap or a very 1178 00:53:41,740 --> 00:53:43,350 low gap? 1179 00:53:43,350 --> 00:53:46,160 Out here would be a very low energy gap, 1180 00:53:46,160 --> 00:53:48,500 and over here, it would be a very high energy gap. 1181 00:53:48,500 --> 00:53:51,480 What do you guys think I want here? 1182 00:53:51,480 --> 00:53:54,930 How would I get-- and I'm going to collect energy only 1183 00:53:54,930 --> 00:53:56,040 above the gap. 1184 00:53:56,040 --> 00:53:58,470 So if my energy gap is here, it's 1185 00:53:58,470 --> 00:54:01,110 only going to be this part of the sun I can collect. 1186 00:54:01,110 --> 00:54:04,960 So where do you think I want my gap to be? 1187 00:54:04,960 --> 00:54:07,060 Over here? 1188 00:54:07,060 --> 00:54:09,650 That's definitely what you would think. 1189 00:54:09,650 --> 00:54:12,880 Why not just make this material have almost no gap? 1190 00:54:12,880 --> 00:54:13,420 Right? 1191 00:54:13,420 --> 00:54:21,230 If it had almost no gap, then if this were the gap, then 1192 00:54:21,230 --> 00:54:27,790 any little bit of sunlight would excite electrons up, 1193 00:54:27,790 --> 00:54:30,010 and you'd absorbed the photon. 1194 00:54:30,010 --> 00:54:33,073 Why is that not a good solar fuel? 1195 00:54:33,073 --> 00:54:34,198 AUDIENCE: They fall easily. 1196 00:54:34,198 --> 00:54:35,698 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Say that again. 1197 00:54:35,698 --> 00:54:37,240 AUDIENCE: They fall back down easily. 1198 00:54:37,240 --> 00:54:39,865 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Well, they certainly could fall back down, 1199 00:54:39,865 --> 00:54:42,110 and actually usually, they'd be absorbed say up here, 1200 00:54:42,110 --> 00:54:44,780 and they'd usually trickle down to here anyway 1201 00:54:44,780 --> 00:54:46,370 to the LUMO state. 1202 00:54:46,370 --> 00:54:49,190 That's called thermalization. 1203 00:54:49,190 --> 00:54:51,860 They could also fall back down to the homo state 1204 00:54:51,860 --> 00:54:52,940 and re-emit a photon. 1205 00:54:52,940 --> 00:54:56,120 That's absolutely right, but there's another reason. 1206 00:54:58,958 --> 00:55:00,380 AUDIENCE: Lower energy density. 1207 00:55:00,380 --> 00:55:00,620 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 1208 00:55:00,620 --> 00:55:01,120 Why? 1209 00:55:04,890 --> 00:55:07,770 AUDIENCE: There's a band gap in the partial delta H. 1210 00:55:07,770 --> 00:55:09,040 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 1211 00:55:09,040 --> 00:55:09,540 That's it. 1212 00:55:09,540 --> 00:55:14,600 So what are we doing in storage materials? 1213 00:55:14,600 --> 00:55:17,640 What are we doing with electrons in batteries, 1214 00:55:17,640 --> 00:55:20,460 in solar thermal fuels? 1215 00:55:20,460 --> 00:55:22,405 What are we doing with those electrons? 1216 00:55:22,405 --> 00:55:24,452 AUDIENCE: Storing them. 1217 00:55:24,452 --> 00:55:26,160 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: We are storing them. 1218 00:55:26,160 --> 00:55:32,245 Yes, but what are we doing to make them-- 1219 00:55:32,245 --> 00:55:33,870 what are we doing when we convert them? 1220 00:55:33,870 --> 00:55:35,682 Maybe I should say it that way. 1221 00:55:35,682 --> 00:55:37,140 Same thing happens in a solar cell. 1222 00:55:37,140 --> 00:55:38,640 I'm doing something to these electrons. 1223 00:55:38,640 --> 00:55:39,990 AUDIENCE: Putting them on a shelf. 1224 00:55:39,990 --> 00:55:41,073 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 1225 00:55:41,073 --> 00:55:42,720 You know I love that analogy. 1226 00:55:42,720 --> 00:55:44,010 Yeah? 1227 00:55:44,010 --> 00:55:45,660 It's like pumping hydro. 1228 00:55:45,660 --> 00:55:48,030 Hydro pumping is one of the best technologies 1229 00:55:48,030 --> 00:55:50,460 we know of to store energy. 1230 00:55:50,460 --> 00:55:53,910 It's even creating a little stir here in the third row, 1231 00:55:53,910 --> 00:55:56,593 because he has read the reports, and he 1232 00:55:56,593 --> 00:55:58,260 knows that there are certain areas where 1233 00:55:58,260 --> 00:56:00,300 that's the only game in town, pumped 1234 00:56:00,300 --> 00:56:03,840 hydro, a beautiful technology. 1235 00:56:03,840 --> 00:56:04,830 It works. 1236 00:56:04,830 --> 00:56:06,540 You pump water up a hill. 1237 00:56:06,540 --> 00:56:08,400 When you got too much energy, and you let 1238 00:56:08,400 --> 00:56:10,050 it roll back down when you need it. 1239 00:56:10,050 --> 00:56:10,680 Right? 1240 00:56:10,680 --> 00:56:12,870 Now, that's all we're doing with electrons. 1241 00:56:12,870 --> 00:56:13,410 That's it. 1242 00:56:13,410 --> 00:56:14,910 It's the same exact thing. 1243 00:56:14,910 --> 00:56:17,360 We're pumping electrons up a hill. 1244 00:56:17,360 --> 00:56:19,340 We're using light to do it here. 1245 00:56:19,340 --> 00:56:21,530 For a battery, when you plug your electric car 1246 00:56:21,530 --> 00:56:26,180 in, you're using current and electrons, potential, 1247 00:56:26,180 --> 00:56:30,515 voltage to do it, but you're driving electrons up the hill. 1248 00:56:30,515 --> 00:56:32,390 And then you're trying to keep them up there, 1249 00:56:32,390 --> 00:56:34,748 and then let them come back when you need them, 1250 00:56:34,748 --> 00:56:36,290 when you need them to release energy. 1251 00:56:36,290 --> 00:56:38,260 OK? 1252 00:56:38,260 --> 00:56:40,600 Now, if my gap is really low, you 1253 00:56:40,600 --> 00:56:44,410 see, the hill, it's never going to get to the top. 1254 00:56:44,410 --> 00:56:47,060 Here's my hill. 1255 00:56:47,060 --> 00:56:49,220 OK? 1256 00:56:49,220 --> 00:56:52,340 If my gap is only this much in energy, 1257 00:56:52,340 --> 00:56:54,410 then I'm just going to roll around here, 1258 00:56:54,410 --> 00:56:57,750 and I'm never going to get any amount of storage. 1259 00:56:57,750 --> 00:56:58,250 Right? 1260 00:56:58,250 --> 00:57:02,870 So you want this to be as large as possible, 1261 00:57:02,870 --> 00:57:06,370 because that's how much energy you store. 1262 00:57:06,370 --> 00:57:09,580 But the gap can't be any smaller than this, 1263 00:57:09,580 --> 00:57:12,310 or you're not going to give those electrons enough energy 1264 00:57:12,310 --> 00:57:15,250 to get up the hill to go there, so the material can go there. 1265 00:57:15,250 --> 00:57:16,350 Yeah? 1266 00:57:16,350 --> 00:57:18,790 AUDIENCE: So let's see you have some material 1267 00:57:18,790 --> 00:57:22,870 with some small gap, and you just 1268 00:57:22,870 --> 00:57:27,490 have it exposed to sunlight and then compare it 1269 00:57:27,490 --> 00:57:29,950 with some material with a large gap. 1270 00:57:29,950 --> 00:57:33,400 Wouldn't they both on average collect the same number 1271 00:57:33,400 --> 00:57:35,300 of high-energy photons anyway? 1272 00:57:35,300 --> 00:57:36,485 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yes. 1273 00:57:36,485 --> 00:57:38,110 AUDIENCE: So with the low-gap material, 1274 00:57:38,110 --> 00:57:41,260 you'd get some with height that collect higher-- 1275 00:57:41,260 --> 00:57:42,760 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Great question. 1276 00:57:42,760 --> 00:57:45,490 AUDIENCE: High energy photons, and then they 1277 00:57:45,490 --> 00:57:47,920 have some excited state. 1278 00:57:47,920 --> 00:57:49,593 And then the ones with the high gap 1279 00:57:49,593 --> 00:57:51,010 will also have that excited state, 1280 00:57:51,010 --> 00:57:52,330 but the ones with the low gap will also 1281 00:57:52,330 --> 00:57:53,530 have these lower, excited states. 1282 00:57:53,530 --> 00:57:54,280 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yes. 1283 00:57:54,280 --> 00:57:54,580 Yes. 1284 00:57:54,580 --> 00:57:55,240 AUDIENCE: On top of that? 1285 00:57:55,240 --> 00:57:56,220 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: It's a great question, 1286 00:57:56,220 --> 00:57:59,020 and what you're talking about is such a cool idea 1287 00:57:59,020 --> 00:58:01,690 in solar PV called hot carrier. 1288 00:58:01,690 --> 00:58:04,120 What you'd like to do is get those excited, really high 1289 00:58:04,120 --> 00:58:07,860 energy electrons out in solar cells, 1290 00:58:07,860 --> 00:58:10,740 before they come back down. 1291 00:58:10,740 --> 00:58:15,360 In this case, they come back down. 1292 00:58:15,360 --> 00:58:18,420 See in this case, they thermalize, 1293 00:58:18,420 --> 00:58:21,000 and the reaction happens in the lowest excited state. 1294 00:58:24,230 --> 00:58:25,700 But it also happens in solar cells, 1295 00:58:25,700 --> 00:58:27,825 because there are no hot carrier solar cells today. 1296 00:58:27,825 --> 00:58:28,850 It's a great theory. 1297 00:58:28,850 --> 00:58:30,390 It's a great idea. 1298 00:58:30,390 --> 00:58:33,408 So this is the idea, and there's a lot of active research 1299 00:58:33,408 --> 00:58:33,950 in this area. 1300 00:58:36,800 --> 00:58:39,420 And it's basically the idea of multijunction cells 1301 00:58:39,420 --> 00:58:42,170 which are cells that work, and in fact, the highest efficiency 1302 00:58:42,170 --> 00:58:44,570 solar cells to date are multijunction, 1303 00:58:44,570 --> 00:58:46,200 triple-junction solar cells. 1304 00:58:46,200 --> 00:58:49,550 Where basically, you have different band gaps together, 1305 00:58:49,550 --> 00:58:51,950 and those different band gaps do exactly what you say. 1306 00:58:51,950 --> 00:58:52,460 OK? 1307 00:58:52,460 --> 00:58:55,670 They let you take some electrons out here, 1308 00:58:55,670 --> 00:58:58,460 and then you have another material with a higher gap, 1309 00:58:58,460 --> 00:59:00,110 and you can take them out here. 1310 00:59:00,110 --> 00:59:01,880 And then you have another material 1311 00:59:01,880 --> 00:59:04,910 with an even higher gap, and you can take those electrons out 1312 00:59:04,910 --> 00:59:05,870 there. 1313 00:59:05,870 --> 00:59:06,560 OK? 1314 00:59:06,560 --> 00:59:08,990 And see because otherwise, what happens? 1315 00:59:08,990 --> 00:59:12,110 Otherwise, all the electrons will-- in each case-- 1316 00:59:12,110 --> 00:59:14,630 all the electrons cascade down to here. 1317 00:59:14,630 --> 00:59:17,630 They all wind up in that conduction band or that LUMO 1318 00:59:17,630 --> 00:59:19,130 state, if it's a molecule. 1319 00:59:19,130 --> 00:59:23,240 No matter what, that's just the dramatic and traumatic loss 1320 00:59:23,240 --> 00:59:26,280 of solar materials. 1321 00:59:26,280 --> 00:59:27,120 Right? 1322 00:59:27,120 --> 00:59:31,320 Solar conversion, solar capture, those electrons thermalize, 1323 00:59:31,320 --> 00:59:33,720 because that process of thermalization 1324 00:59:33,720 --> 00:59:37,650 is so fast, that it's very hard to beat. 1325 00:59:37,650 --> 00:59:40,110 The way you beat it in multijunction solar cells-- 1326 00:59:40,110 --> 00:59:44,250 42% maybe is the record, something like that. 1327 00:59:44,250 --> 00:59:48,150 The way you beat it is you literally just 1328 00:59:48,150 --> 00:59:50,040 stick a level in there. 1329 00:59:50,040 --> 00:59:52,200 So it's sort of a cheat, but that's 1330 00:59:52,200 --> 00:59:55,200 the only way to do it that we know technologically today. 1331 00:59:55,200 --> 00:59:57,870 If there were other ways of extracting electrons out 1332 00:59:57,870 --> 01:00:00,540 at their higher energies, you could do wonders 1333 01:00:00,540 --> 01:00:02,910 in solar capture and storage. 1334 01:00:02,910 --> 01:00:07,800 In the molecule, the electron thermalizes down, 1335 01:00:07,800 --> 01:00:10,690 and the reaction goes in that lowest excited state. 1336 01:00:10,690 --> 01:00:14,460 So that gap has to be bigger than delta H. OK? 1337 01:00:14,460 --> 01:00:17,347 Does everybody see that? 1338 01:00:17,347 --> 01:00:18,430 It's a very good question. 1339 01:00:21,830 --> 01:00:23,770 So it's this beautiful, constrained 1340 01:00:23,770 --> 01:00:25,000 optimization problem. 1341 01:00:25,000 --> 01:00:27,940 I love those, because constrained optimization 1342 01:00:27,940 --> 01:00:30,040 problems, I want this to be really big, 1343 01:00:30,040 --> 01:00:33,280 but I want this to stay not less than an electron volt. 1344 01:00:33,280 --> 01:00:35,170 But then if this is really big, I 1345 01:00:35,170 --> 01:00:37,070 can't absorb any of the light. 1346 01:00:37,070 --> 01:00:37,570 Right? 1347 01:00:37,570 --> 01:00:42,260 If I made delta H huge, then I'd have 1348 01:00:42,260 --> 01:00:44,660 to have a gap that was like here, 1349 01:00:44,660 --> 01:00:47,430 and I'd get almost no solar efficiency. 1350 01:00:47,430 --> 01:00:49,850 These are beautiful problems for materials design 1351 01:00:49,850 --> 01:00:53,480 and for computation, because they're constrained, 1352 01:00:53,480 --> 01:00:54,980 but they're not that constrained. 1353 01:00:54,980 --> 01:00:58,070 And using computers, you can get your way out 1354 01:00:58,070 --> 01:00:59,870 of that, those constraints, sometimes. 1355 01:00:59,870 --> 01:01:01,220 OK? 1356 01:01:01,220 --> 01:01:03,170 And that's what's, I think, really exciting. 1357 01:01:03,170 --> 01:01:05,930 That's what your homework is going to be about, and so 1358 01:01:05,930 --> 01:01:07,190 let's calculate one of these. 1359 01:01:07,190 --> 01:01:07,690 OK? 1360 01:01:07,690 --> 01:01:15,180 Because that is the key to the optical efficiency. 1361 01:01:15,180 --> 01:01:16,140 Yeah? 1362 01:01:16,140 --> 01:01:20,506 AUDIENCE: So is the gas thinner than the just delta H or delta 1363 01:01:20,506 --> 01:01:23,362 H plus the base? 1364 01:01:23,362 --> 01:01:25,733 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: That's a very good question, and-- 1365 01:01:25,733 --> 01:01:26,900 AUDIENCE: He told me to ask. 1366 01:01:26,900 --> 01:01:27,290 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Yeah. 1367 01:01:27,290 --> 01:01:27,790 Yeah. 1368 01:01:27,790 --> 01:01:29,810 It's a very good question. 1369 01:01:29,810 --> 01:01:33,230 So in general, most of these kinds 1370 01:01:33,230 --> 01:01:34,760 of photoactive molecules-- 1371 01:01:34,760 --> 01:01:39,410 I've already talked to a chemist, so I'm well armed. 1372 01:01:39,410 --> 01:01:43,260 Most of these photoactive molecules 1373 01:01:43,260 --> 01:01:45,180 need the gap plus the activation barrier, 1374 01:01:45,180 --> 01:01:50,040 because in the excited state, you'll get a similar barrier. 1375 01:01:50,040 --> 01:01:52,110 It's not clear that's always true though, 1376 01:01:52,110 --> 01:01:56,240 and so that puts more constraints on this. 1377 01:01:56,240 --> 01:01:58,700 So it's even less of the spectrum you can absorb, 1378 01:01:58,700 --> 01:01:59,210 basically. 1379 01:01:59,210 --> 01:01:59,960 Right? 1380 01:01:59,960 --> 01:02:01,910 If you want to store 1 1/2 electron volts, 1381 01:02:01,910 --> 01:02:04,280 and you need an electron volt of an activation barrier, 1382 01:02:04,280 --> 01:02:07,220 that's a 2 1/2 v-gap minimum. 1383 01:02:07,220 --> 01:02:10,550 Which means you're closing in on the UV, which 1384 01:02:10,550 --> 01:02:14,540 means your optical efficiency is probably at most 5%, 8%, 10%, 1385 01:02:14,540 --> 01:02:15,650 at most. 1386 01:02:15,650 --> 01:02:16,220 Right? 1387 01:02:16,220 --> 01:02:19,170 That doesn't mean it's a deal breaker at all. 1388 01:02:19,170 --> 01:02:21,622 But there are also cases where you 1389 01:02:21,622 --> 01:02:23,455 do change the barrier in the exciting state, 1390 01:02:23,455 --> 01:02:26,580 and so we're looking into that. 1391 01:02:26,580 --> 01:02:30,380 Now, I want another concept here to come across which 1392 01:02:30,380 --> 01:02:31,580 is really important. 1393 01:02:31,580 --> 01:02:32,300 OK? 1394 01:02:32,300 --> 01:02:38,000 And that is nothing more than these levels smoothed out, 1395 01:02:38,000 --> 01:02:40,320 and it's called the density of states. 1396 01:02:40,320 --> 01:02:42,100 OK? 1397 01:02:42,100 --> 01:02:49,140 So if you do a calculation of one of these molecules-- 1398 01:02:49,140 --> 01:02:51,690 let me go back to here. 1399 01:02:51,690 --> 01:02:54,600 Oh, yeah. 1400 01:02:54,600 --> 01:02:55,990 You know we love this. 1401 01:02:55,990 --> 01:02:59,670 Have you all rated this say a 10 out of 10? 1402 01:02:59,670 --> 01:03:02,450 Come on. 1403 01:03:02,450 --> 01:03:06,320 You know it's a 10 experience. 1404 01:03:06,320 --> 01:03:08,350 AUDIENCE: Someone gave it a 9.5? 1405 01:03:08,350 --> 01:03:09,350 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: No. 1406 01:03:09,350 --> 01:03:10,300 That's an average. 1407 01:03:10,300 --> 01:03:11,830 OK. 1408 01:03:11,830 --> 01:03:13,623 I want to start using-- 1409 01:03:13,623 --> 01:03:16,040 we're going to use a different tool for our next homework. 1410 01:03:16,040 --> 01:03:18,310 We're going to use DFT for solids, surfaces, 1411 01:03:18,310 --> 01:03:19,210 and molecules. 1412 01:03:19,210 --> 01:03:20,110 It's called SIESTA. 1413 01:03:20,110 --> 01:03:24,520 It's another free software that you can download. 1414 01:03:24,520 --> 01:03:26,740 And it's solving the same equations, 1415 01:03:26,740 --> 01:03:29,950 but it uses different approximations, different basis 1416 01:03:29,950 --> 01:03:31,050 sets, and so forth. 1417 01:03:31,050 --> 01:03:31,780 OK? 1418 01:03:31,780 --> 01:03:33,888 But here, and you see that basis sets 1419 01:03:33,888 --> 01:03:35,680 are called different things, but I've still 1420 01:03:35,680 --> 01:03:39,670 tried to help by saying really bad, mediocre, and OK, in terms 1421 01:03:39,670 --> 01:03:40,840 of the quality. 1422 01:03:40,840 --> 01:03:42,520 OK? 1423 01:03:42,520 --> 01:03:46,030 Again, that's not the focus in this class. 1424 01:03:46,030 --> 01:03:48,710 Let's look at it, and we're going to do a molecule here-- 1425 01:03:48,710 --> 01:03:50,410 Uh-oh, there we go-- 1426 01:03:50,410 --> 01:03:52,030 a molecule. 1427 01:03:52,030 --> 01:03:56,080 And I'm going to upload one, and you're going to get these. 1428 01:03:56,080 --> 01:03:58,037 We'll give these with the homeworks. 1429 01:03:58,037 --> 01:03:59,120 We'll put them on Steller. 1430 01:03:59,120 --> 01:04:01,600 So here's a trans state. 1431 01:04:01,600 --> 01:04:03,810 Let's do the phenyl. 1432 01:04:03,810 --> 01:04:04,890 Here's a trans state. 1433 01:04:04,890 --> 01:04:08,010 We're going to upload it and simulate. 1434 01:04:08,010 --> 01:04:08,620 OK? 1435 01:04:08,620 --> 01:04:11,310 And this is doing just what the other code does. 1436 01:04:11,310 --> 01:04:14,490 It's doing this self-consistent cycle, where it's 1437 01:04:14,490 --> 01:04:16,300 solving for the wave function. 1438 01:04:16,300 --> 01:04:17,922 OK? 1439 01:04:17,922 --> 01:04:19,380 And it's getting the wave functions 1440 01:04:19,380 --> 01:04:24,280 of all these levels for the molecule I just entered. 1441 01:04:24,280 --> 01:04:26,490 So it's going to give me all these levels. 1442 01:04:26,490 --> 01:04:28,170 That's what I want. 1443 01:04:28,170 --> 01:04:31,950 Now, the way this plots it though is in something 1444 01:04:31,950 --> 01:04:33,570 called the density of states, and all 1445 01:04:33,570 --> 01:04:36,870 that is, as we'll see in a minute, is you take these, 1446 01:04:36,870 --> 01:04:39,240 and you turn it on the side. 1447 01:04:39,240 --> 01:04:39,960 OK? 1448 01:04:39,960 --> 01:04:42,750 So let's take a look. 1449 01:04:42,750 --> 01:04:44,040 Is it done? 1450 01:04:44,040 --> 01:04:45,990 Yes. 1451 01:04:45,990 --> 01:04:46,670 There it is. 1452 01:04:46,670 --> 01:04:48,510 Oh, this is a beautiful solar fuel. 1453 01:04:48,510 --> 01:04:52,140 It's actually got two photo-switchable molecules 1454 01:04:52,140 --> 01:04:53,820 hanging off the same azobenzene ring. 1455 01:04:57,560 --> 01:05:00,690 But anyway, and this-- 1456 01:05:00,690 --> 01:05:02,760 where is the-- there we go. 1457 01:05:02,760 --> 01:05:03,330 OK. 1458 01:05:03,330 --> 01:05:07,380 So the key outputs, so it tells you some things, 1459 01:05:07,380 --> 01:05:09,690 and then you can go to Density of States, 1460 01:05:09,690 --> 01:05:16,070 and this is a very important property. 1461 01:05:16,070 --> 01:05:16,850 OK? 1462 01:05:16,850 --> 01:05:21,930 This is the way that we like to look at energy levels, 1463 01:05:21,930 --> 01:05:23,962 especially in solids. 1464 01:05:23,962 --> 01:05:25,670 So we're going to be looking at DOS plots 1465 01:05:25,670 --> 01:05:27,030 when we get to solids. 1466 01:05:27,030 --> 01:05:27,770 OK? 1467 01:05:27,770 --> 01:05:30,050 But in molecules, you can look at the DOS plot 1468 01:05:30,050 --> 01:05:32,660 as well, and basically, what it is 1469 01:05:32,660 --> 01:05:35,000 it's just these levels turned on their side. 1470 01:05:35,000 --> 01:05:38,780 So if there's a bunch of levels near each other, 1471 01:05:38,780 --> 01:05:43,490 you'll get a higher peak in the DOS. 1472 01:05:43,490 --> 01:05:46,910 You want to think about it as averaging over 1473 01:05:46,910 --> 01:05:51,910 the likelihood of finding states at these energies. 1474 01:05:51,910 --> 01:05:53,860 Has anybody seen a DOS plot? 1475 01:05:53,860 --> 01:05:56,890 How many of you have seen a DOS plot, a density of states? 1476 01:05:56,890 --> 01:05:58,130 One or two? 1477 01:05:58,130 --> 01:05:58,780 That's OK. 1478 01:05:58,780 --> 01:06:01,730 They're energy levels turned on their side. 1479 01:06:01,730 --> 01:06:02,380 Right? 1480 01:06:02,380 --> 01:06:06,388 Now, when we do solids, it gets really fun. 1481 01:06:06,388 --> 01:06:07,930 It gets really fun when we do solids, 1482 01:06:07,930 --> 01:06:09,555 because when we do solids, like I said, 1483 01:06:09,555 --> 01:06:13,415 these things go like this in a space yet to be determined. 1484 01:06:13,415 --> 01:06:15,040 And then you turn those on their sides, 1485 01:06:15,040 --> 01:06:17,740 and you still get the same kind of DOS plot. 1486 01:06:17,740 --> 01:06:21,455 But for molecules, this is what it would look like. 1487 01:06:21,455 --> 01:06:23,080 So there's a little smoothing going on, 1488 01:06:23,080 --> 01:06:25,480 but you're also representing how many states 1489 01:06:25,480 --> 01:06:26,720 you have near these energies. 1490 01:06:26,720 --> 01:06:28,720 So that's why it's called the density of states. 1491 01:06:28,720 --> 01:06:31,420 Right? 1492 01:06:31,420 --> 01:06:33,280 Gesundheit. 1493 01:06:33,280 --> 01:06:35,980 Does everybody see that this is that energy gap? 1494 01:06:35,980 --> 01:06:37,090 This is it. 1495 01:06:37,090 --> 01:06:38,860 That's the energy gap, but there's 1496 01:06:38,860 --> 01:06:40,280 more in the density of states. 1497 01:06:40,280 --> 01:06:40,780 OK? 1498 01:06:40,780 --> 01:06:42,850 So the energy gap, now I can-- 1499 01:06:42,850 --> 01:06:45,820 watch this-- I can go back, and I can magically 1500 01:06:45,820 --> 01:06:53,650 put on some functional groups and go to the amino benzene 1501 01:06:53,650 --> 01:07:00,300 case, and I can do that simulation. 1502 01:07:03,600 --> 01:07:06,060 How many people really want to hear about hydrogen storage 1503 01:07:06,060 --> 01:07:07,740 or don't care? 1504 01:07:07,740 --> 01:07:08,880 Be honest. 1505 01:07:08,880 --> 01:07:11,920 Really want to hear about hydrogen storage? 1506 01:07:11,920 --> 01:07:12,730 In the back. 1507 01:07:16,210 --> 01:07:19,420 Because I really want to make this point, because also, 1508 01:07:19,420 --> 01:07:21,400 this will be the basis of your homework. 1509 01:07:21,400 --> 01:07:25,340 But I can also take the first 10 minutes of Thursday 1510 01:07:25,340 --> 01:07:27,257 and talk about hydrogen storage. 1511 01:07:27,257 --> 01:07:29,840 Hydrogen storage, nobody cares about hydrogen storage anymore, 1512 01:07:29,840 --> 01:07:30,950 do they? 1513 01:07:30,950 --> 01:07:35,660 In the back, we have one hydrogen storage. 1514 01:07:35,660 --> 01:07:40,170 The hydrogen economy, it was a big myth. 1515 01:07:40,170 --> 01:07:44,730 Well, it's not a myth, but it's a long way off. 1516 01:07:44,730 --> 01:07:46,965 That we'd all be-- 1517 01:07:46,965 --> 01:07:48,840 I'm not sure I would use that-- that we'd all 1518 01:07:48,840 --> 01:07:51,570 be driving hydrogen-powered cars in this decade 1519 01:07:51,570 --> 01:07:55,120 was a little bit of an exaggeration, to say the least. 1520 01:07:55,120 --> 01:07:55,920 So here's this guy. 1521 01:07:55,920 --> 01:08:00,630 Now, what I did is I decorated it. 1522 01:08:00,630 --> 01:08:03,730 I did some, like I thought-- oh, by the way, 1523 01:08:03,730 --> 01:08:06,780 your computation is only as good as what's up here. 1524 01:08:06,780 --> 01:08:07,440 Right? 1525 01:08:07,440 --> 01:08:09,810 So you need to think about what you want to simulate, 1526 01:08:09,810 --> 01:08:13,390 and here, we thought, well, we had this one. 1527 01:08:13,390 --> 01:08:13,890 OK? 1528 01:08:13,890 --> 01:08:17,310 We had this one, and it's not quite the same angle, 1529 01:08:17,310 --> 01:08:18,250 but it's close. 1530 01:08:18,250 --> 01:08:18,750 OK? 1531 01:08:18,750 --> 01:08:20,100 So these guys are going to switch, 1532 01:08:20,100 --> 01:08:22,183 when the sun shines on them, and store some energy 1533 01:08:22,183 --> 01:08:22,950 and switch back. 1534 01:08:22,950 --> 01:08:25,529 But I decided that I wanted to try to do something 1535 01:08:25,529 --> 01:08:30,260 about the strain in this state. 1536 01:08:30,260 --> 01:08:35,399 Again, you're trying to lower, remember-- 1537 01:08:35,399 --> 01:08:37,680 you're trying to lower these states, 1538 01:08:37,680 --> 01:08:40,210 or change them, figure out how to tune them. 1539 01:08:40,210 --> 01:08:40,710 Right? 1540 01:08:40,710 --> 01:08:44,000 So what I did is we put a group in there. 1541 01:08:44,000 --> 01:08:45,750 You can see, you put a group in here which 1542 01:08:45,750 --> 01:08:49,140 is going to cause some bonding, when it's in the trans state. 1543 01:08:49,140 --> 01:08:50,640 And you put another group here which 1544 01:08:50,640 --> 01:08:53,310 causes some bonding between those OH 1545 01:08:53,310 --> 01:08:56,490 groups and the nitrogen, and that adds to the energy. 1546 01:08:56,490 --> 01:08:57,420 It lowers the energy. 1547 01:08:57,420 --> 01:08:58,200 Right? 1548 01:08:58,200 --> 01:09:01,300 Now, as I said, we do that with quantum mechanics, 1549 01:09:01,300 --> 01:09:03,300 because it's actually not that big of a problem, 1550 01:09:03,300 --> 01:09:05,550 but that doesn't tell me whether-- 1551 01:09:05,550 --> 01:09:07,800 I may have made this a great solar thermal fuel that 1552 01:09:07,800 --> 01:09:09,300 can never absorb light. 1553 01:09:09,300 --> 01:09:12,960 And so you got to go, and you've got to look at these things, 1554 01:09:12,960 --> 01:09:14,330 like the density of states. 1555 01:09:14,330 --> 01:09:14,910 OK? 1556 01:09:14,910 --> 01:09:21,770 And so here they are together, and you can see that in-- 1557 01:09:21,770 --> 01:09:22,420 so that's one. 1558 01:09:22,420 --> 01:09:22,920 OK. 1559 01:09:22,920 --> 01:09:26,510 So one is now bold, and you can see that my modifications have 1560 01:09:26,510 --> 01:09:28,850 done some interesting things. 1561 01:09:28,850 --> 01:09:30,770 My chemical modifications have really 1562 01:09:30,770 --> 01:09:34,899 changed where those energy levels are. 1563 01:09:34,899 --> 01:09:38,135 Now, remember, they're getting filled from here. 1564 01:09:38,135 --> 01:09:39,010 Remember the filling. 1565 01:09:39,010 --> 01:09:39,510 Right? 1566 01:09:39,510 --> 01:09:43,390 You draw from the bottom, the most energy favorable ones, 1567 01:09:43,390 --> 01:09:45,279 all the way up, and then you fill them up, 1568 01:09:45,279 --> 01:09:47,180 and you stop filling here. 1569 01:09:47,180 --> 01:09:47,680 Right? 1570 01:09:47,680 --> 01:09:49,970 You stop filling here, and that's your gap, 1571 01:09:49,970 --> 01:09:54,000 and you can see that the gap has changed considerably. 1572 01:09:54,000 --> 01:09:55,500 So the gap has changed considerably, 1573 01:09:55,500 --> 01:09:57,830 and that changes what kind of sunlight 1574 01:09:57,830 --> 01:10:00,980 that molecule can absorb. 1575 01:10:00,980 --> 01:10:04,820 Now, what's nice about having the density of states 1576 01:10:04,820 --> 01:10:07,010 is that, you see, I'm getting-- in all 1577 01:10:07,010 --> 01:10:12,340 of the energy levels-- is I'm getting more than just the gap. 1578 01:10:12,340 --> 01:10:12,840 Right? 1579 01:10:12,840 --> 01:10:14,340 I'm getting other things. 1580 01:10:14,340 --> 01:10:16,870 I'm getting shapes and peaks, and here's a double peak. 1581 01:10:16,870 --> 01:10:18,030 There's a single peak. 1582 01:10:18,030 --> 01:10:20,850 Here's a little narrow peak, but there's a really broad thing 1583 01:10:20,850 --> 01:10:23,670 with like three peaks and a shoulder. 1584 01:10:23,670 --> 01:10:25,460 Right? 1585 01:10:25,460 --> 01:10:27,440 That matters too. 1586 01:10:27,440 --> 01:10:29,320 That matters a whole lot. 1587 01:10:29,320 --> 01:10:30,380 OK? 1588 01:10:30,380 --> 01:10:36,900 And the reason is that to a very, very crude approximation, 1589 01:10:36,900 --> 01:10:40,920 you can consider these peaks in where the states are in energy 1590 01:10:40,920 --> 01:10:43,350 as the places where this molecule will 1591 01:10:43,350 --> 01:10:46,580 be able to absorb light. 1592 01:10:46,580 --> 01:10:48,090 OK? 1593 01:10:48,090 --> 01:10:53,060 And so you can match this up with the solar spectrum. 1594 01:10:53,060 --> 01:10:53,560 Right? 1595 01:10:53,560 --> 01:10:56,110 Because what you want is for the molecules 1596 01:10:56,110 --> 01:10:59,230 to be able to absorb light, where there's a lot of light. 1597 01:10:59,230 --> 01:11:01,875 And you don't really care about them absorbing light. 1598 01:11:01,875 --> 01:11:04,000 You don't necessarily need them to have huge peaks, 1599 01:11:04,000 --> 01:11:05,330 where there's no sunlight. 1600 01:11:05,330 --> 01:11:05,830 Right? 1601 01:11:05,830 --> 01:11:08,740 So now, you have an interesting comparison 1602 01:11:08,740 --> 01:11:12,100 of where these molecules tend to absorb light 1603 01:11:12,100 --> 01:11:13,910 and where the light is. 1604 01:11:13,910 --> 01:11:14,650 OK? 1605 01:11:14,650 --> 01:11:18,650 So let's go back to this and make 1606 01:11:18,650 --> 01:11:23,020 sure we know where I'm going. 1607 01:11:23,020 --> 01:11:23,590 OK? 1608 01:11:23,590 --> 01:11:29,620 So see, we talked about-- 1609 01:11:29,620 --> 01:11:31,600 just another five minutes or so I think 1610 01:11:31,600 --> 01:11:36,180 to finish this discussion. 1611 01:11:36,180 --> 01:11:38,730 We talked about how, well, you don't want-- 1612 01:11:41,340 --> 01:11:44,940 there are constraints on just thinking about how big of a gap 1613 01:11:44,940 --> 01:11:45,480 you want. 1614 01:11:45,480 --> 01:11:47,700 Because it's a constrained optimization 1615 01:11:47,700 --> 01:11:50,010 problem with this thing and this thing and this stuff. 1616 01:11:50,010 --> 01:11:50,820 Right? 1617 01:11:50,820 --> 01:11:52,140 We just talked about that. 1618 01:11:52,140 --> 01:11:56,330 Now, I'm going to tell you there's another problem, 1619 01:11:56,330 --> 01:12:02,110 and that is that this state is also photoactive. 1620 01:12:02,110 --> 01:12:08,750 So this state can absorb light which makes it go back. 1621 01:12:08,750 --> 01:12:09,920 Well, that's a bummer. 1622 01:12:09,920 --> 01:12:10,940 Right? 1623 01:12:10,940 --> 01:12:13,040 That is a bummer. 1624 01:12:13,040 --> 01:12:15,470 Now, what that means is that, when 1625 01:12:15,470 --> 01:12:18,140 I shine light on this material, I 1626 01:12:18,140 --> 01:12:21,240 will never get it all to convert. 1627 01:12:21,240 --> 01:12:23,430 I will never charge all of the material 1628 01:12:23,430 --> 01:12:26,350 and make it all go from here to here, 1629 01:12:26,350 --> 01:12:30,130 because there's constantly a competition at play. 1630 01:12:30,130 --> 01:12:32,410 Some of it will be going this way, and some of it 1631 01:12:32,410 --> 01:12:33,730 will be going that way. 1632 01:12:33,730 --> 01:12:37,450 And what holds the key to determining how much of which 1633 01:12:37,450 --> 01:12:41,570 one is made? 1634 01:12:41,570 --> 01:12:44,428 What holds the key? 1635 01:12:44,428 --> 01:12:47,423 AUDIENCE: The ratio of delta H plus EA. 1636 01:12:47,423 --> 01:12:49,590 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Well, actually, but the delta H 1637 01:12:49,590 --> 01:12:52,320 and EA are out of the picture for now, 1638 01:12:52,320 --> 01:12:56,430 because I'm only talking about the absorption efficiency. 1639 01:12:59,130 --> 01:13:02,010 What type of photons it could absorb and what else? 1640 01:13:04,520 --> 01:13:07,430 What type of photons it can absorb and? 1641 01:13:07,430 --> 01:13:08,843 Yeah? 1642 01:13:08,843 --> 01:13:10,760 AUDIENCE: How many of those types of photons-- 1643 01:13:10,760 --> 01:13:11,300 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Exactly. 1644 01:13:11,300 --> 01:13:12,383 AUDIENCE: Your solar cell. 1645 01:13:12,383 --> 01:13:15,670 JEFFREY C. GROSSMAN: Exactly, and this. 1646 01:13:15,670 --> 01:13:16,750 Right? 1647 01:13:16,750 --> 01:13:20,650 So you're given this much photons on planet Earth. 1648 01:13:20,650 --> 01:13:23,780 You're give given the yellow, if you go up a little bit. 1649 01:13:23,780 --> 01:13:24,320 Right? 1650 01:13:24,320 --> 01:13:26,610 We're not going to charge our fuels in space. 1651 01:13:26,610 --> 01:13:29,330 So this is what you got, the red, and that's 1652 01:13:29,330 --> 01:13:33,260 where the photons are in energy, in wavelength energy, 1653 01:13:33,260 --> 01:13:34,530 same thing. 1654 01:13:34,530 --> 01:13:41,450 Now, I'm giving you the fact that some molecules-- 1655 01:13:41,450 --> 01:13:42,410 let's go back here. 1656 01:13:46,070 --> 01:13:48,380 I can't just delete one, can I? 1657 01:13:48,380 --> 01:13:53,870 I'm going to do one more simulation while I talk. 1658 01:13:53,870 --> 01:13:58,400 I wish it wouldn't show my picture everywhere. 1659 01:13:58,400 --> 01:14:00,410 I'm going to do the cis state. 1660 01:14:00,410 --> 01:14:00,910 OK? 1661 01:14:05,300 --> 01:14:13,500 You see, some molecules in their cis state, 1662 01:14:13,500 --> 01:14:16,650 they're still photoactive, which means they go back here, 1663 01:14:16,650 --> 01:14:18,430 when you shine light on them. 1664 01:14:18,430 --> 01:14:23,490 What that means is that there's going to be a stationary state. 1665 01:14:23,490 --> 01:14:26,070 When I hold the fuel out in the sun, 1666 01:14:26,070 --> 01:14:30,420 the light is converting this into this, as well as this 1667 01:14:30,420 --> 01:14:33,660 into this with some efficiency in both directions. 1668 01:14:33,660 --> 01:14:35,400 And there will be a stationary state 1669 01:14:35,400 --> 01:14:38,370 that gives me a percentage, or a yield, 1670 01:14:38,370 --> 01:14:39,960 or as it's called in the literature 1671 01:14:39,960 --> 01:14:44,410 a quantum yield, of charged material. 1672 01:14:44,410 --> 01:14:45,130 How much is it? 1673 01:14:45,130 --> 01:14:48,280 Well, in isolated azobenzene, when you don't do anything 1674 01:14:48,280 --> 01:14:49,900 to it, it's 25%. 1675 01:14:49,900 --> 01:14:54,020 I can only charge 25% of this stuff 1676 01:14:54,020 --> 01:14:59,210 in the photo-stationary state, when I hold it out in the sun. 1677 01:14:59,210 --> 01:15:02,360 And you can see why this is such an important part 1678 01:15:02,360 --> 01:15:04,790 of the problem, I will remind you, 1679 01:15:04,790 --> 01:15:07,850 a purely quantum mechanical part of the problem. 1680 01:15:07,850 --> 01:15:11,630 Because if I increase this, I work so hard to increase this 1681 01:15:11,630 --> 01:15:14,727 by a factor of three or four, and then I 1682 01:15:14,727 --> 01:15:16,310 can only charge a fourth of it, that's 1683 01:15:16,310 --> 01:15:17,760 a whole factor of four hit. 1684 01:15:17,760 --> 01:15:19,760 If you can only charge a fourth of it at a time, 1685 01:15:19,760 --> 01:15:21,930 it's four times less useful. 1686 01:15:21,930 --> 01:15:25,170 So it's effectively changing this by four times back. 1687 01:15:25,170 --> 01:15:25,670 Right? 1688 01:15:25,670 --> 01:15:27,630 So this is critical. 1689 01:15:27,630 --> 01:15:29,390 How much of this can you charge? 1690 01:15:29,390 --> 01:15:30,020 Right? 1691 01:15:30,020 --> 01:15:31,770 And that comes from the quantum mechanics. 1692 01:15:31,770 --> 01:15:36,560 Now, the way that you get it is by looking at-- 1693 01:15:36,560 --> 01:15:37,937 and I'll go through the equations 1694 01:15:37,937 --> 01:15:39,020 on the next line a minute. 1695 01:15:41,600 --> 01:15:44,660 So here it is now in the charged state. 1696 01:15:44,660 --> 01:15:45,290 OK? 1697 01:15:45,290 --> 01:15:46,220 So it's flipped. 1698 01:15:46,220 --> 01:15:47,180 It's done its flip. 1699 01:15:47,180 --> 01:15:50,000 You can see, it's rotated those nitrogen bonds. 1700 01:15:50,000 --> 01:15:54,230 It's a beautiful thing, kind of an emotional moment in a way. 1701 01:15:54,230 --> 01:15:58,010 And you go back to here, and you look at your DOS, 1702 01:15:58,010 --> 01:15:59,520 and now this is kind of hard to see. 1703 01:15:59,520 --> 01:16:00,020 Isn't it? 1704 01:16:02,600 --> 01:16:06,170 One of these is the cis state that I just mentioned, 1705 01:16:06,170 --> 01:16:07,662 and it's different. 1706 01:16:07,662 --> 01:16:09,245 I can't see, because there's two trans 1707 01:16:09,245 --> 01:16:12,680 states here and one cis state. 1708 01:16:12,680 --> 01:16:15,710 I don't think there's any way to just do simulations 1709 01:16:15,710 --> 01:16:19,020 two and three, but I think you know what I'm talking about. 1710 01:16:19,020 --> 01:16:22,280 There's a density of states for the trans. 1711 01:16:22,280 --> 01:16:27,337 These levels here turn on their side, 1712 01:16:27,337 --> 01:16:29,420 and there's a density of states for the cis state. 1713 01:16:29,420 --> 01:16:32,060 And matching that with the solar flux 1714 01:16:32,060 --> 01:16:34,610 is what will give you the photo-stationary state. 1715 01:16:34,610 --> 01:16:37,620 It will give you the quantum yield of the material. 1716 01:16:37,620 --> 01:16:38,120 OK? 1717 01:16:38,120 --> 01:16:40,700 That will be your second homework. 1718 01:16:40,700 --> 01:16:50,670 So this, let's see, this is two ways that you could do it. 1719 01:16:50,670 --> 01:16:52,600 OK? 1720 01:16:52,600 --> 01:17:00,290 One way is you could just assume that all of the photons higher 1721 01:17:00,290 --> 01:17:05,400 in energy than the gap are absorbed and lead to a switch. 1722 01:17:05,400 --> 01:17:08,030 And if you do that, then the fraction of the molecules 1723 01:17:08,030 --> 01:17:11,190 in the cis state, if you let them be x, 1724 01:17:11,190 --> 01:17:12,980 you can show that it's just going 1725 01:17:12,980 --> 01:17:15,740 to be a simple integral over the solar spectrum, 1726 01:17:15,740 --> 01:17:20,728 that this I function, up to the gap times x. 1727 01:17:20,728 --> 01:17:22,270 That's how many are in the cis state. 1728 01:17:22,270 --> 01:17:23,940 Gesundheit. 1729 01:17:23,940 --> 01:17:28,260 [NON-ENGLISH] Equals the number that are in the trans state, 1730 01:17:28,260 --> 01:17:32,850 1 minus x, times the integral over the number of photons that 1731 01:17:32,850 --> 01:17:36,770 convert the trans. 1732 01:17:36,770 --> 01:17:37,390 OK? 1733 01:17:37,390 --> 01:17:39,640 That's just stationary-- that's just 1734 01:17:39,640 --> 01:17:42,190 telling you that the change in the concentration of cis 1735 01:17:42,190 --> 01:17:42,850 is the same. 1736 01:17:42,850 --> 01:17:47,060 It's like a reaction kinetics equation, 1737 01:17:47,060 --> 01:17:51,040 the rate of going from one state to another times 1738 01:17:51,040 --> 01:17:53,950 the number in that state equals the same as the other way. 1739 01:17:53,950 --> 01:17:55,180 That's all we've done here. 1740 01:17:55,180 --> 01:17:58,570 But it gets more interesting if you use the density of states, 1741 01:17:58,570 --> 01:18:02,550 because now, you have the absorption-- 1742 01:18:02,550 --> 01:18:03,960 what I'm calling the absorption. 1743 01:18:03,960 --> 01:18:05,970 Again, it's a crude approximation 1744 01:18:05,970 --> 01:18:08,620 for the absorption, but let's just call it that-- 1745 01:18:08,620 --> 01:18:15,160 of the cis state as a function of the wavelength, 1746 01:18:15,160 --> 01:18:20,280 convoluted with, or times, the solar spectrum. 1747 01:18:20,280 --> 01:18:23,550 Where you have states in both is where it matters. 1748 01:18:23,550 --> 01:18:24,510 Right? 1749 01:18:24,510 --> 01:18:28,200 Where you have states in both is where you hit the integral, 1750 01:18:28,200 --> 01:18:30,030 and it's when those are taken together 1751 01:18:30,030 --> 01:18:33,150 that you can calculate more accurately than just 1752 01:18:33,150 --> 01:18:34,440 using the gap. 1753 01:18:34,440 --> 01:18:38,700 You can calculate the photo-stationary yield, 1754 01:18:38,700 --> 01:18:41,070 and you get this all from those energy levels, 1755 01:18:41,070 --> 01:18:44,010 those beautiful energy levels that we started 1756 01:18:44,010 --> 01:18:45,840 this lecture talking about. 1757 01:18:45,840 --> 01:18:46,350 OK? 1758 01:18:46,350 --> 01:18:52,050 That yield is so important, because it can kill your-- 1759 01:18:52,050 --> 01:18:53,880 great idea for improving delta H can get 1760 01:18:53,880 --> 01:18:55,450 killed if the yield isn't good. 1761 01:18:55,450 --> 01:18:55,950 OK? 1762 01:18:59,280 --> 01:19:01,710 Maybe I'll spend 10 minutes on hydrogen storage. 1763 01:19:01,710 --> 01:19:05,190 Nobody raised their hands, but we'll do another poll. 1764 01:19:05,190 --> 01:19:07,590 And we're going to start moving now-- you'll 1765 01:19:07,590 --> 01:19:09,660 have a homework on this. 1766 01:19:09,660 --> 01:19:12,240 It'll be lots of fun, and then on Thursday, we're 1767 01:19:12,240 --> 01:19:14,360 going to move into solids.