1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,964 [SQUEAKING] 2 00:00:01,964 --> 00:00:03,928 [RUSTLING] 3 00:00:03,928 --> 00:00:04,910 [CLICKING] 4 00:00:13,260 --> 00:00:17,282 MARKUS KLUTE: Welcome back to 8.20, Special Relativity. 5 00:00:17,282 --> 00:00:18,990 So in this section, we want to look again 6 00:00:18,990 --> 00:00:23,700 at collisions and study momentum conservation. 7 00:00:23,700 --> 00:00:25,830 And so we have this scenario here 8 00:00:25,830 --> 00:00:30,030 in which we have two balls colliding with velocities uA 9 00:00:30,030 --> 00:00:34,290 and uB, mass mA and mB. 10 00:00:34,290 --> 00:00:35,970 And after the collisions there, the mass 11 00:00:35,970 --> 00:00:38,160 is changed to mC and mD. 12 00:00:38,160 --> 00:00:42,240 And the velocities are uC and uD. 13 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:45,150 Momentum conservation tells you that the product 14 00:00:45,150 --> 00:00:48,970 of the mass and velocities and the sum of the two 15 00:00:48,970 --> 00:00:53,170 particles before and after the collisions is the same. 16 00:00:53,170 --> 00:00:55,550 But now what happens if you boost the system? 17 00:00:55,550 --> 00:00:58,540 If we look at the very same system with the 18 00:00:58,540 --> 00:01:04,629 boosted reference frame, and we can just simplify the case here 19 00:01:04,629 --> 00:01:07,760 by just considering the x direction. 20 00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:09,910 So the question is if momentum is conserved 21 00:01:09,910 --> 00:01:13,960 in a frame s, like the one we're looking here in this picture, 22 00:01:13,960 --> 00:01:18,430 is the momentum also conserved in a moving reference 23 00:01:18,430 --> 00:01:23,650 frame with relative velocity v? 24 00:01:23,650 --> 00:01:27,970 And so you can show this quite easily, that this is actually 25 00:01:27,970 --> 00:01:29,020 not the case, right? 26 00:01:29,020 --> 00:01:30,820 So you write down the velocities. 27 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:37,330 The momentum equation is the same as before 28 00:01:37,330 --> 00:01:38,800 with boosted velocities. 29 00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:40,730 And you find that this is not the case. 30 00:01:40,730 --> 00:01:42,970 You can easily show this by, for example, 31 00:01:42,970 --> 00:01:45,790 setting the right part of this equation to 0, 32 00:01:45,790 --> 00:01:49,060 and see whether or not this equation will 33 00:01:49,060 --> 00:01:50,410 hold true in general. 34 00:01:50,410 --> 00:01:52,690 And it doesn't. 35 00:01:52,690 --> 00:01:56,260 But in the last section, we introduced the new concept 36 00:01:56,260 --> 00:01:57,950 of proper velocity. 37 00:01:57,950 --> 00:02:03,340 So how about redefining momentum through proper velocity 38 00:02:03,340 --> 00:02:08,470 and just saying mA times proper velocity A plus mB times 39 00:02:08,470 --> 00:02:13,720 proper velocity B is equal to mC times proper velocity C, 40 00:02:13,720 --> 00:02:17,350 and so on, and see whether or not we can learn something 41 00:02:17,350 --> 00:02:19,520 from this equation? 42 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:22,340 So why don't we write down this very same equation 43 00:02:22,340 --> 00:02:24,310 and with proper velocity and see whether or not 44 00:02:24,310 --> 00:02:27,146 it's invariant in the Lorentz transformation? 45 00:02:27,146 --> 00:02:27,670 OK. 46 00:02:27,670 --> 00:02:29,860 Again, a good moment to stop the video 47 00:02:29,860 --> 00:02:34,020 and just work out the math by yourself, on your own. 48 00:02:34,020 --> 00:02:35,890 So I did this here. 49 00:02:35,890 --> 00:02:38,060 And I'm just doing this for the x component. 50 00:02:38,060 --> 00:02:39,865 So we have our proper velocity vector, 51 00:02:39,865 --> 00:02:44,560 which is gamma times C, gamma times uX, gamma times uY, 52 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:46,390 and sometimes uZ. 53 00:02:46,390 --> 00:02:49,720 And so the x component is the first component. 54 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:52,900 And in the boosted reference frame, 55 00:02:52,900 --> 00:02:57,610 the proper velocity of the x component in our boosted frame 56 00:02:57,610 --> 00:03:00,910 is gamma times the proper velocity of the particle 57 00:03:00,910 --> 00:03:05,320 A, first component, minus beta, upper velocity 58 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:08,060 of A0's component. 59 00:03:08,060 --> 00:03:09,895 And then you can write your equation. 60 00:03:13,330 --> 00:03:16,210 And this should be our momentum energy, momentum conservation 61 00:03:16,210 --> 00:03:17,220 equation. 62 00:03:17,220 --> 00:03:17,920 OK. 63 00:03:17,920 --> 00:03:19,810 And the Lorentz transformation? 64 00:03:19,810 --> 00:03:21,568 We find this one here. 65 00:03:21,568 --> 00:03:23,110 And so all we need to do now in order 66 00:03:23,110 --> 00:03:26,410 to show that this is always true, or true in general, 67 00:03:26,410 --> 00:03:33,280 is to reassign, relabel, reorder the individual terms. 68 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,370 And I did this here to make this visible. 69 00:03:36,370 --> 00:03:40,400 You see everything behind, in this bracket behind the beta, 70 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:43,800 is equal to the equation we had before with the minus sign 71 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:45,710 in between, which means it's 0. 72 00:03:45,710 --> 00:03:49,250 And everything we see on the top of the first component, 73 00:03:49,250 --> 00:03:50,480 it also be 0. 74 00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:52,820 That's for the boosted reference frame. 75 00:03:52,820 --> 00:03:55,550 So we see here, and it just shows this for the x component. 76 00:03:55,550 --> 00:03:57,470 You can show this for all components 77 00:03:57,470 --> 00:04:00,580 that momentum is conserved.