WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.997 align:middle line:90%
[SQUEAKING]

00:00:01.997 --> 00:00:03.993 align:middle line:90%
[RUSTLING]

00:00:03.993 --> 00:00:05.490 align:middle line:90%
[CLICKING]

00:00:05.490 --> 00:00:11.145 align:middle line:90%


00:00:11.145 --> 00:00:12.020 align:middle line:90%
PROFESSOR: All right.

00:00:12.020 --> 00:00:17.072 align:middle line:84%
So, so far in this class,
we've introduced the basic idea

00:00:17.072 --> 00:00:19.280 align:middle line:84%
of perception as inferring
the structure of the world

00:00:19.280 --> 00:00:20.520 align:middle line:90%
from sensory input.

00:00:20.520 --> 00:00:23.320 align:middle line:84%
And we spent about the first
third of the class talking

00:00:23.320 --> 00:00:25.840 align:middle line:90%
about the sense of hearing.

00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:28.680 align:middle line:84%
So remember, we started
out talking about the ear

00:00:28.680 --> 00:00:31.260 align:middle line:84%
and how the ear is this
device to measure sound.

00:00:31.260 --> 00:00:32.718 align:middle line:84%
So sound is a
mechanical vibration.

00:00:32.718 --> 00:00:34.510 align:middle line:84%
Your ear turns that
into electrical signals

00:00:34.510 --> 00:00:35.760 align:middle line:90%
that get sent to your brain.

00:00:35.760 --> 00:00:38.010 align:middle line:84%
And then we talked about how
the problem of perception

00:00:38.010 --> 00:00:40.480 align:middle line:84%
is to take those electrical
signals that you're

00:00:40.480 --> 00:00:43.040 align:middle line:84%
getting from your ear, and then
to infer what's happening out

00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:44.200 align:middle line:90%
there in the world.

00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:47.640 align:middle line:84%
So the problem of vision is
really analogous to that.

00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:49.600 align:middle line:84%
And so we're going
to begin by talking

00:00:49.600 --> 00:00:52.920 align:middle line:84%
about the eye and
the retina, which

00:00:52.920 --> 00:00:57.260 align:middle line:84%
is the part of your visual
system that measures light.

00:00:57.260 --> 00:01:00.010 align:middle line:84%
Again, the big picture here
is that things in the world

00:01:00.010 --> 00:01:01.890 align:middle line:84%
give off clues to
their existence.

00:01:01.890 --> 00:01:04.610 align:middle line:84%
Your sensory organs
detect these clues.

00:01:04.610 --> 00:01:07.250 align:middle line:84%
And in vision, the
clues come in the form

00:01:07.250 --> 00:01:09.210 align:middle line:84%
of photons that
reflect off of objects

00:01:09.210 --> 00:01:11.290 align:middle line:90%
and are absorbed by your eye.

00:01:11.290 --> 00:01:13.058 align:middle line:84%
And the task of
perception is to take

00:01:13.058 --> 00:01:14.850 align:middle line:84%
input from your sensory
receptors and infer

00:01:14.850 --> 00:01:16.390 align:middle line:90%
what is out there in the world.

00:01:16.390 --> 00:01:19.470 align:middle line:90%


00:01:19.470 --> 00:01:22.170 align:middle line:90%
So vision relies on light.

00:01:22.170 --> 00:01:24.710 align:middle line:84%
Remember, light is
electromagnetic radiation.

00:01:24.710 --> 00:01:28.010 align:middle line:84%
There's a wide range of
electromagnetic radiation,

00:01:28.010 --> 00:01:30.370 align:middle line:90%
as indicated on this diagram.

00:01:30.370 --> 00:01:34.090 align:middle line:84%
And the part of that
spectrum that you can see

00:01:34.090 --> 00:01:36.610 align:middle line:84%
is a very narrow part
where the wavelengths

00:01:36.610 --> 00:01:41.850 align:middle line:84%
vary from around 400 nanometers
to around 700 nanometers.

00:01:41.850 --> 00:01:45.530 align:middle line:84%
And then on either side there's
ultraviolet and infrared,

00:01:45.530 --> 00:01:48.050 align:middle line:90%
and then lots of other stuff.

00:01:48.050 --> 00:01:48.550 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:01:48.550 --> 00:01:50.930 align:middle line:84%
So this is a big picture
of your visual system,

00:01:50.930 --> 00:01:52.390 align:middle line:90%
sideways view of the brain.

00:01:52.390 --> 00:01:55.330 align:middle line:90%
So we've got your eyes here.

00:01:55.330 --> 00:01:58.090 align:middle line:84%
Light comes in, forms an
image on the back of your eye.

00:01:58.090 --> 00:02:00.750 align:middle line:84%
Electrical signals are
carried by the optic nerve

00:02:00.750 --> 00:02:04.190 align:middle line:84%
to the LGN or lateral
geniculate nucleus, which

00:02:04.190 --> 00:02:07.470 align:middle line:84%
is the part of the thalamus that
carries visual signals, and then

00:02:07.470 --> 00:02:10.789 align:middle line:84%
from there, projects to
the visual cortex, which

00:02:10.789 --> 00:02:14.350 align:middle line:90%
is a large part of your cortex.

00:02:14.350 --> 00:02:17.430 align:middle line:84%
All right, so let's
take a look at the eye.

00:02:17.430 --> 00:02:20.990 align:middle line:84%
So cross-sectional
view of the eye.

00:02:20.990 --> 00:02:25.070 align:middle line:90%
Light enters via the pupil.

00:02:25.070 --> 00:02:28.470 align:middle line:84%
The eye is protected
by the cornea,

00:02:28.470 --> 00:02:32.030 align:middle line:84%
which is this-- it's a
very hard part of the eye.

00:02:32.030 --> 00:02:34.410 align:middle line:84%
But light passes through there,
passes through the pupil,

00:02:34.410 --> 00:02:36.290 align:middle line:90%
which is an aperture.

00:02:36.290 --> 00:02:39.350 align:middle line:84%
So the iris can change
the size of the pupil

00:02:39.350 --> 00:02:41.732 align:middle line:84%
in order to control the
amount of light that gets in.

00:02:41.732 --> 00:02:43.190 align:middle line:84%
And then you've
got the lens, which

00:02:43.190 --> 00:02:47.270 align:middle line:84%
focuses light into an image
on the back of the eye.

00:02:47.270 --> 00:02:50.890 align:middle line:84%
So the back of the eye has
a few different structures,

00:02:50.890 --> 00:02:53.370 align:middle line:84%
and the most important
one is the retina,

00:02:53.370 --> 00:02:55.910 align:middle line:84%
which is this layer
of cells that does

00:02:55.910 --> 00:02:58.000 align:middle line:90%
the transduction for vision.

00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.960 align:middle line:84%
And then those electrical
signals from the retina

00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:04.440 align:middle line:84%
are then carried via the
optic nerve out of the eye.

00:03:04.440 --> 00:03:08.120 align:middle line:90%
This is a slice of the retina.

00:03:08.120 --> 00:03:11.280 align:middle line:84%
So you can see that it's
this big matrix of cells.

00:03:11.280 --> 00:03:14.560 align:middle line:84%
At the back here, we
have photoreceptors.

00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:17.320 align:middle line:84%
And then there's all these
other layers of cells.

00:03:17.320 --> 00:03:19.800 align:middle line:84%
You can see the cell bodies
in some of these layers,

00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:21.200 align:middle line:84%
and then some of
the other layers

00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:26.160 align:middle line:84%
which are primarily
containing axons that connect

00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:28.480 align:middle line:90%
different types of cells.

00:03:28.480 --> 00:03:33.818 align:middle line:84%
And then the output layer of the
retina are the ganglion cells.

00:03:33.818 --> 00:03:35.860 align:middle line:84%
Now, one of the curious
things about the retina--

00:03:35.860 --> 00:03:38.000 align:middle line:84%
and we'll talk more
about this in a moment--

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:41.968 align:middle line:84%
is that it's kind of set up
backwards relative to what

00:03:41.968 --> 00:03:44.260 align:middle line:84%
you would think would be a
sensible engineering design.

00:03:44.260 --> 00:03:47.000 align:middle line:90%
So this is the back of the eye.

00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:53.000 align:middle line:84%
And if you look here, the
light is coming in like this.

00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:55.640 align:middle line:84%
And so naively, you would expect
that what you'd want to do

00:03:55.640 --> 00:03:58.237 align:middle line:84%
is actually put the
photoreceptors here,

00:03:58.237 --> 00:04:00.320 align:middle line:84%
and then have all the other
processing after that.

00:04:00.320 --> 00:04:02.340 align:middle line:84%
The reason being
that, well, in order

00:04:02.340 --> 00:04:04.740 align:middle line:84%
to get to the
photoreceptors, the light

00:04:04.740 --> 00:04:07.500 align:middle line:84%
has to pass through
all this stuff.

00:04:07.500 --> 00:04:10.160 align:middle line:84%
So it's kind of a funny way
to actually set the eye up.

00:04:10.160 --> 00:04:13.750 align:middle line:84%
As far as we know, it's
a fluke of evolution.

00:04:13.750 --> 00:04:15.500 align:middle line:84%
And we'll talk more
about the consequences

00:04:15.500 --> 00:04:16.542 align:middle line:90%
of that in just a second.

00:04:16.542 --> 00:04:18.042 align:middle line:84%
But you can see
from looking at this

00:04:18.042 --> 00:04:20.260 align:middle line:84%
that there's a bunch of
different types of cells

00:04:20.260 --> 00:04:22.375 align:middle line:90%
within the retina.

00:04:22.375 --> 00:04:24.500 align:middle line:84%
And lots of people have
devoted their entire career

00:04:24.500 --> 00:04:26.740 align:middle line:84%
to understanding these
cells, and their connections

00:04:26.740 --> 00:04:27.780 align:middle line:90%
and their function.

00:04:27.780 --> 00:04:30.020 align:middle line:84%
For the purposes of this
class, the main thing

00:04:30.020 --> 00:04:31.700 align:middle line:84%
you should be
aware of is there's

00:04:31.700 --> 00:04:35.080 align:middle line:90%
five main classes of cells.

00:04:35.080 --> 00:04:39.220 align:middle line:84%
So there's the photoreceptors,
which absorb photons

00:04:39.220 --> 00:04:41.940 align:middle line:90%
and generate a voltage.

00:04:41.940 --> 00:04:44.100 align:middle line:84%
You've got bipolar
cells that get input

00:04:44.100 --> 00:04:48.020 align:middle line:84%
from the photoreceptors, as
well as horizontal cells.

00:04:48.020 --> 00:04:50.400 align:middle line:84%
There's amacrine cells and
there's ganglion cells.

00:04:50.400 --> 00:04:54.700 align:middle line:84%
So one respect in which
these types of cells differ

00:04:54.700 --> 00:04:59.710 align:middle line:84%
is that some of the types
don't fire action potentials.

00:04:59.710 --> 00:05:03.830 align:middle line:84%
They just vary their membrane
potential in response to light.

00:05:03.830 --> 00:05:07.870 align:middle line:84%
And the main reason we
think why that's the case

00:05:07.870 --> 00:05:09.590 align:middle line:84%
is that the signals
don't actually

00:05:09.590 --> 00:05:10.610 align:middle line:90%
have to travel very far.

00:05:10.610 --> 00:05:12.287 align:middle line:84%
The connections are
primarily local.

00:05:12.287 --> 00:05:13.870 align:middle line:84%
And remember, one
of the things that's

00:05:13.870 --> 00:05:15.328 align:middle line:84%
very useful about
action potentials

00:05:15.328 --> 00:05:17.630 align:middle line:84%
is it allows you to
send electrical signals

00:05:17.630 --> 00:05:19.110 align:middle line:90%
over long distances.

00:05:19.110 --> 00:05:21.930 align:middle line:84%
So these cell classes
in the retina,

00:05:21.930 --> 00:05:25.330 align:middle line:84%
they primarily just talk to each
other over very local distances.

00:05:25.330 --> 00:05:27.750 align:middle line:84%
And so presumably,
they don't need spikes.

00:05:27.750 --> 00:05:30.750 align:middle line:84%
But the amacrine cells and
the ganglion cells fire action

00:05:30.750 --> 00:05:31.250 align:middle line:90%
potentials.

00:05:31.250 --> 00:05:33.190 align:middle line:84%
The ganglion cells
in particular are,

00:05:33.190 --> 00:05:35.570 align:middle line:84%
as I said, the primary output
cell class of the retina,

00:05:35.570 --> 00:05:39.570 align:middle line:84%
and so they have to send signals
all the way up to the thalamus.

00:05:39.570 --> 00:05:42.190 align:middle line:90%


00:05:42.190 --> 00:05:47.190 align:middle line:84%
So this is a picture that shows
those five primary cell types.

00:05:47.190 --> 00:05:49.488 align:middle line:84%
So the processing kind of
starts with the receptors.

00:05:49.488 --> 00:05:51.030 align:middle line:84%
There's two types
of receptors, which

00:05:51.030 --> 00:05:54.053 align:middle line:84%
we'll talk about in a
second, and then culminates

00:05:54.053 --> 00:05:54.970 align:middle line:90%
in the ganglion cells.

00:05:54.970 --> 00:05:57.208 align:middle line:84%
And as we discussed,
the orientation

00:05:57.208 --> 00:05:59.000 align:middle line:84%
here is very counterintuitive
because light

00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:02.360 align:middle line:84%
is coming in this way and has
to pass through all this stuff.

00:06:02.360 --> 00:06:03.340 align:middle line:90%
Why is that a problem?

00:06:03.340 --> 00:06:05.840 align:middle line:84%
Well, you would think that
all of these cell bodies

00:06:05.840 --> 00:06:08.120 align:middle line:84%
would actually cause
the light to scatter

00:06:08.120 --> 00:06:11.100 align:middle line:84%
and would decrease the
quality of the image.

00:06:11.100 --> 00:06:13.660 align:middle line:90%


00:06:13.660 --> 00:06:15.240 align:middle line:84%
And so some evidence
for this kind

00:06:15.240 --> 00:06:17.940 align:middle line:90%
comes from species comparisons.

00:06:17.940 --> 00:06:22.080 align:middle line:84%
So the eye has evolved
many, many times.

00:06:22.080 --> 00:06:24.520 align:middle line:84%
And so if you look across all
the different species that

00:06:24.520 --> 00:06:28.060 align:middle line:84%
exist, you can see things that
look like eyes in most of them,

00:06:28.060 --> 00:06:31.440 align:middle line:84%
but there will be interesting
differences and similarities.

00:06:31.440 --> 00:06:35.760 align:middle line:84%
So in particular, this
feature of the receptor layer

00:06:35.760 --> 00:06:38.600 align:middle line:84%
is kind of being oriented
backwards is something

00:06:38.600 --> 00:06:41.320 align:middle line:84%
that you see in
vertebrates, but that you

00:06:41.320 --> 00:06:43.017 align:middle line:90%
don't see in cephalopods.

00:06:43.017 --> 00:06:44.600 align:middle line:84%
So cephalopods are
things like squids,

00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:47.300 align:middle line:90%
and octopi and things like that.

00:06:47.300 --> 00:06:50.780 align:middle line:84%
And so you see this structure
that looks like an eye,

00:06:50.780 --> 00:06:53.080 align:middle line:84%
but you can see
that in the octopus,

00:06:53.080 --> 00:06:56.300 align:middle line:84%
the photoreceptors
actually kind come first,

00:06:56.300 --> 00:06:58.820 align:middle line:90%
followed by other stuff.

00:06:58.820 --> 00:06:59.320 align:middle line:90%
All right?

00:06:59.320 --> 00:07:01.740 align:middle line:84%
Whereas in vertebrates,
the photoreceptors

00:07:01.740 --> 00:07:05.100 align:middle line:84%
are kind of at the
back, and then you

00:07:05.100 --> 00:07:09.300 align:middle line:84%
have these cell bodies that all
the light has to travel through.

00:07:09.300 --> 00:07:11.140 align:middle line:84%
And this has actually
major consequences

00:07:11.140 --> 00:07:13.540 align:middle line:84%
for how the optic nerve
exits the eye, which

00:07:13.540 --> 00:07:15.740 align:middle line:90%
we'll talk about in a second.

00:07:15.740 --> 00:07:17.473 align:middle line:84%
So as far as we
can tell, the fact

00:07:17.473 --> 00:07:19.640 align:middle line:84%
that the retina is wired
up backwards is, as I said,

00:07:19.640 --> 00:07:20.980 align:middle line:90%
a fluke of evolution.

00:07:20.980 --> 00:07:24.740 align:middle line:84%
It's some kind of local
minimum that was found.

00:07:24.740 --> 00:07:28.860 align:middle line:84%
And but there are a
couple of adaptations

00:07:28.860 --> 00:07:33.080 align:middle line:84%
that have been added on to this
over the course of evolution,

00:07:33.080 --> 00:07:34.918 align:middle line:84%
as far as we can
tell, that mitigate

00:07:34.918 --> 00:07:35.960 align:middle line:90%
the consequences of this.

00:07:35.960 --> 00:07:40.060 align:middle line:84%
And so one of those is
that at the fovea, which

00:07:40.060 --> 00:07:43.540 align:middle line:84%
is the center of your gaze,
and as we will discuss later

00:07:43.540 --> 00:07:45.740 align:middle line:84%
in this lecture, the
center of your gaze

00:07:45.740 --> 00:07:48.423 align:middle line:84%
is where your spatial
resolution is highest.

00:07:48.423 --> 00:07:50.340 align:middle line:84%
So normally, if you want
to look at something,

00:07:50.340 --> 00:07:52.920 align:middle line:84%
you direct your fovea
to that something.

00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:56.710 align:middle line:84%
And then you can get a
very high resolution image.

00:07:56.710 --> 00:08:01.690 align:middle line:84%
So at the fovea, the cell bodies
and the axons are displaced.

00:08:01.690 --> 00:08:04.710 align:middle line:84%
And this is presumably to
maximize the resolution

00:08:04.710 --> 00:08:08.375 align:middle line:84%
in the part of the eye where
the sampling is densest

00:08:08.375 --> 00:08:09.750 align:middle line:84%
and where you
really want to have

00:08:09.750 --> 00:08:12.270 align:middle line:90%
really good spatial resolution.

00:08:12.270 --> 00:08:14.030 align:middle line:84%
So you can see that
the cell bodies here

00:08:14.030 --> 00:08:15.447 align:middle line:84%
are moved out of
the way, and that

00:08:15.447 --> 00:08:17.630 align:middle line:84%
means that the light doesn't
really get scattered.

00:08:17.630 --> 00:08:22.588 align:middle line:84%
And I guess the idea is that
out here, away from the fovea,

00:08:22.588 --> 00:08:24.630 align:middle line:84%
the little bit of scattering
that kind of happens

00:08:24.630 --> 00:08:26.330 align:middle line:84%
from the cell bodies
is acceptable.

00:08:26.330 --> 00:08:29.550 align:middle line:84%
And also, one of the things that
kind of mitigates this issue

00:08:29.550 --> 00:08:31.950 align:middle line:84%
is the fact that the cell
bodies are pretty translucent.

00:08:31.950 --> 00:08:33.367 align:middle line:84%
So it's not like
they're absorbing

00:08:33.367 --> 00:08:35.909 align:middle line:90%
lots of light themselves.

00:08:35.909 --> 00:08:38.270 align:middle line:84%
Now, the other major
consequence of the fact

00:08:38.270 --> 00:08:41.570 align:middle line:84%
that the retina is hooked up
backwards is what's shown here.

00:08:41.570 --> 00:08:44.290 align:middle line:84%
So the axons of
the ganglion cells,

00:08:44.290 --> 00:08:45.830 align:middle line:84%
which form the
optic nerve, those

00:08:45.830 --> 00:08:48.290 align:middle line:90%
have to exit the eye somewhere.

00:08:48.290 --> 00:08:51.250 align:middle line:84%
And the problem is that
with this being set up

00:08:51.250 --> 00:08:54.850 align:middle line:84%
the way that it is, the
place where they exit the eye

00:08:54.850 --> 00:08:58.230 align:middle line:84%
is going to be a location where
you can't have photoreceptors.

00:08:58.230 --> 00:09:01.030 align:middle line:90%


00:09:01.030 --> 00:09:04.610 align:middle line:84%
So this is a picture showing
the axons from the ganglion

00:09:04.610 --> 00:09:05.882 align:middle line:90%
cell leaving the eye.

00:09:05.882 --> 00:09:07.590 align:middle line:84%
So this is a cross-section
of the retina.

00:09:07.590 --> 00:09:09.890 align:middle line:84%
You can see these
different cell layers here.

00:09:09.890 --> 00:09:12.090 align:middle line:84%
The photoreceptors
would be back here.

00:09:12.090 --> 00:09:14.530 align:middle line:84%
The axons all kind of
converge and then exit the eye

00:09:14.530 --> 00:09:16.610 align:middle line:90%
at this particular location.

00:09:16.610 --> 00:09:19.930 align:middle line:84%
So the consequence
of this is that there

00:09:19.930 --> 00:09:24.090 align:middle line:84%
is a region of the retina where
there are no photoreceptors.

00:09:24.090 --> 00:09:26.290 align:middle line:84%
And the consequence
of that is that there

00:09:26.290 --> 00:09:30.890 align:middle line:84%
is a region of visual space
when your eye is directed

00:09:30.890 --> 00:09:34.018 align:middle line:84%
in a particular place
that you can't see,

00:09:34.018 --> 00:09:35.810 align:middle line:84%
because you don't have
photoreceptors there

00:09:35.810 --> 00:09:37.570 align:middle line:90%
to detect the light.

00:09:37.570 --> 00:09:40.510 align:middle line:84%
So we can demonstrate
this ourselves.

00:09:40.510 --> 00:09:44.330 align:middle line:84%
So we're going to do a
demonstration of the blind spot

00:09:44.330 --> 00:09:45.690 align:middle line:90%
that everybody has.

00:09:45.690 --> 00:09:48.010 align:middle line:84%
And in order to see
this, you're going

00:09:48.010 --> 00:09:50.030 align:middle line:84%
to have to only
look with one eye.

00:09:50.030 --> 00:09:52.640 align:middle line:90%


00:09:52.640 --> 00:09:54.940 align:middle line:84%
So I want you to
close your left eye

00:09:54.940 --> 00:09:58.060 align:middle line:84%
and then fixate your
left index finger.

00:09:58.060 --> 00:09:59.580 align:middle line:90%
So I'm going to do this myself.

00:09:59.580 --> 00:10:00.660 align:middle line:90%
All right?

00:10:00.660 --> 00:10:02.540 align:middle line:84%
You're then going to
place your right index

00:10:02.540 --> 00:10:05.980 align:middle line:84%
finger next to the left
one, and then slowly

00:10:05.980 --> 00:10:09.100 align:middle line:84%
move your right index
finger to the right.

00:10:09.100 --> 00:10:15.740 align:middle line:84%
So again, close your left eye,
and then move that finger away,

00:10:15.740 --> 00:10:18.060 align:middle line:90%
and then-- yep, there we go.

00:10:18.060 --> 00:10:21.620 align:middle line:84%
So you'll reach this
place where you can't see

00:10:21.620 --> 00:10:23.260 align:middle line:90%
the tip of your right finger.

00:10:23.260 --> 00:10:26.180 align:middle line:90%


00:10:26.180 --> 00:10:29.208 align:middle line:90%
Yeah, it's pretty cool.

00:10:29.208 --> 00:10:31.000 align:middle line:84%
So the tip of your
finger should disappear.

00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:33.900 align:middle line:84%
And this is because it
has entered the blind spot

00:10:33.900 --> 00:10:35.820 align:middle line:90%
of your right eye.

00:10:35.820 --> 00:10:40.820 align:middle line:84%
So hopefully, that
works for everybody.

00:10:40.820 --> 00:10:43.783 align:middle line:84%
So this is something that's
happening all the time.

00:10:43.783 --> 00:10:45.200 align:middle line:84%
You're stuck with
this blind spot.

00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.040 align:middle line:84%
The reason that you most you
don't notice this, we think,

00:10:48.040 --> 00:10:51.390 align:middle line:84%
is partly because the
blind spots in the two eyes

00:10:51.390 --> 00:10:54.458 align:middle line:84%
are kind of in different
parts of the visual field.

00:10:54.458 --> 00:10:56.250 align:middle line:84%
So usually, you got
both of your eyes open.

00:10:56.250 --> 00:11:01.390 align:middle line:84%
And so there's one eye that
is detecting most of the stuff

00:11:01.390 --> 00:11:03.670 align:middle line:90%
that you can see.

00:11:03.670 --> 00:11:06.430 align:middle line:84%
And so you have to do these very
careful experiments in order

00:11:06.430 --> 00:11:08.710 align:middle line:90%
to be able to detect this.

00:11:08.710 --> 00:11:11.550 align:middle line:84%
So again, the blind spot
is a consequence, we think,

00:11:11.550 --> 00:11:15.270 align:middle line:84%
of the retina kind of
being set up backwards.

00:11:15.270 --> 00:11:18.130 align:middle line:84%
So let's talk a little bit
about the photoreceptors.

00:11:18.130 --> 00:11:22.110 align:middle line:84%
So the photoreceptors are cells
that contain photo pigments

00:11:22.110 --> 00:11:25.270 align:middle line:84%
that absorb photons,
and that then produce

00:11:25.270 --> 00:11:26.570 align:middle line:90%
a change in membrane potential.

00:11:26.570 --> 00:11:29.870 align:middle line:84%
There's two types of
photoreceptors, the rods

00:11:29.870 --> 00:11:31.270 align:middle line:90%
and the cones.

00:11:31.270 --> 00:11:33.990 align:middle line:84%
They're called this because the
physical shape of the receptor

00:11:33.990 --> 00:11:37.350 align:middle line:90%
is different.

00:11:37.350 --> 00:11:42.590 align:middle line:84%
And they're different
physiologically in lots of ways.

00:11:42.590 --> 00:11:45.510 align:middle line:84%
So one respect in which the
rods and the cones differ

00:11:45.510 --> 00:11:48.390 align:middle line:84%
is that their
density on the retina

00:11:48.390 --> 00:11:52.490 align:middle line:84%
varies quite dramatically with
what we call eccentricity,

00:11:52.490 --> 00:11:54.050 align:middle line:90%
or distance from the fovea.

00:11:54.050 --> 00:11:57.210 align:middle line:84%
So this is a graph that
shows the photoreceptor

00:11:57.210 --> 00:12:02.370 align:middle line:84%
density plotted separately for
rods in blue and cones in red.

00:12:02.370 --> 00:12:05.190 align:middle line:84%
So zero here corresponds
to the fovea.

00:12:05.190 --> 00:12:07.310 align:middle line:90%
That's the center of gaze.

00:12:07.310 --> 00:12:10.810 align:middle line:84%
And then you can either move
out in the nasal direction

00:12:10.810 --> 00:12:14.290 align:middle line:84%
towards the nose or
the temporal direction.

00:12:14.290 --> 00:12:18.610 align:middle line:84%
And what this graph is
showing is that at the fovea,

00:12:18.610 --> 00:12:20.750 align:middle line:84%
the density of cones
is very, very high,

00:12:20.750 --> 00:12:23.570 align:middle line:90%
and there's actually no rods.

00:12:23.570 --> 00:12:26.370 align:middle line:84%
As you move out of the fovea,
the density of the cones

00:12:26.370 --> 00:12:28.250 align:middle line:84%
drops quite a lot,
and the density

00:12:28.250 --> 00:12:31.490 align:middle line:90%
of the rods kind of increases.

00:12:31.490 --> 00:12:39.370 align:middle line:84%
And then these are images
of the retinal mosaic taken

00:12:39.370 --> 00:12:40.570 align:middle line:90%
from these different points.

00:12:40.570 --> 00:12:45.610 align:middle line:84%
And so you can see
that at the fovea,

00:12:45.610 --> 00:12:47.370 align:middle line:84%
you only you see
evidence of only having

00:12:47.370 --> 00:12:49.150 align:middle line:90%
a single type of receptor.

00:12:49.150 --> 00:12:50.900 align:middle line:84%
And then you get out
here in the periphery

00:12:50.900 --> 00:12:56.140 align:middle line:84%
and you can see that there's
two types of receptors.

00:12:56.140 --> 00:12:59.380 align:middle line:84%
All right, the other thing that
you can see on this diagram

00:12:59.380 --> 00:13:01.040 align:middle line:90%
is what's called the optic disk.

00:13:01.040 --> 00:13:03.140 align:middle line:84%
So this is the location
on the retina where

00:13:03.140 --> 00:13:04.820 align:middle line:90%
the optic nerve leaves the eye.

00:13:04.820 --> 00:13:06.860 align:middle line:84%
And there, there are
no photoreceptors.

00:13:06.860 --> 00:13:09.960 align:middle line:90%


00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:13.460 align:middle line:84%
So you're going to hear me
talk a lot about eccentricity.

00:13:13.460 --> 00:13:14.720 align:middle line:90%
So what is eccentricity?

00:13:14.720 --> 00:13:17.300 align:middle line:84%
Again, in vision
science, eccentricity

00:13:17.300 --> 00:13:19.600 align:middle line:90%
is distance from the fovea.

00:13:19.600 --> 00:13:23.160 align:middle line:84%
So we always use the fovea
as a reference point.

00:13:23.160 --> 00:13:26.580 align:middle line:84%
And then typically, we will
measure eccentricity in degrees

00:13:26.580 --> 00:13:29.080 align:middle line:90%
of visual angle from the fovea.

00:13:29.080 --> 00:13:32.780 align:middle line:90%


00:13:32.780 --> 00:13:37.780 align:middle line:84%
So a good rule of thumb is
that one degree of visual angle

00:13:37.780 --> 00:13:44.060 align:middle line:84%
is approximately the width of
a fingertip at arm's length.

00:13:44.060 --> 00:13:48.880 align:middle line:84%
The full moon, which is about
the same size as the sun,

00:13:48.880 --> 00:13:51.640 align:middle line:84%
when considered as an image
on your retina, is about half

00:13:51.640 --> 00:13:57.360 align:middle line:84%
of a degree, and the blind spot
is about 5 degrees, so pretty

00:13:57.360 --> 00:13:57.860 align:middle line:90%
big.

00:13:57.860 --> 00:14:02.500 align:middle line:90%


00:14:02.500 --> 00:14:06.565 align:middle line:84%
So there's these big differences
in the distribution of receptors

00:14:06.565 --> 00:14:08.440 align:middle line:84%
in different parts of
the eye, so that's just

00:14:08.440 --> 00:14:10.638 align:middle line:90%
an empirical fact.

00:14:10.638 --> 00:14:12.680 align:middle line:84%
And there's also big
differences in the responses

00:14:12.680 --> 00:14:14.520 align:middle line:84%
of the different
types of receptors.

00:14:14.520 --> 00:14:18.840 align:middle line:84%
And one place that this shows
up is in dark adaptation.

00:14:18.840 --> 00:14:22.480 align:middle line:84%
And so the big picture
here is that the rods

00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:26.920 align:middle line:84%
are very sensitive to light and
are primarily used in low light

00:14:26.920 --> 00:14:30.040 align:middle line:90%
conditions, so at night.

00:14:30.040 --> 00:14:32.560 align:middle line:84%
The cones are less
sensitive to light

00:14:32.560 --> 00:14:35.200 align:middle line:84%
and are mostly active
during the day.

00:14:35.200 --> 00:14:38.400 align:middle line:84%
So if you go outside
on a bright day,

00:14:38.400 --> 00:14:41.960 align:middle line:84%
the cones will be active and
responsible for your vision,

00:14:41.960 --> 00:14:45.340 align:middle line:84%
and the rods won't
be doing anything.

00:14:45.340 --> 00:14:48.610 align:middle line:84%
And then you go
inside to a dark room,

00:14:48.610 --> 00:14:52.290 align:middle line:84%
and then the rods
will take over.

00:14:52.290 --> 00:14:54.450 align:middle line:84%
But this process is
not instantaneous,

00:14:54.450 --> 00:14:56.790 align:middle line:84%
and it involves a process
of dark adaptation.

00:14:56.790 --> 00:15:01.050 align:middle line:84%
And that's because both types of
receptors adapt, to some extent,

00:15:01.050 --> 00:15:02.570 align:middle line:90%
to the ongoing light.

00:15:02.570 --> 00:15:06.810 align:middle line:84%
So this is the result
of a classic experiment

00:15:06.810 --> 00:15:11.830 align:middle line:84%
that measures the detection
threshold for light.

00:15:11.830 --> 00:15:15.050 align:middle line:84%
So your task is just to say
whether a light is present

00:15:15.050 --> 00:15:16.090 align:middle line:90%
or not.

00:15:16.090 --> 00:15:19.370 align:middle line:84%
You vary the amount of light
that's present and figure out

00:15:19.370 --> 00:15:21.650 align:middle line:84%
the threshold for
telling whether there's

00:15:21.650 --> 00:15:23.150 align:middle line:90%
a light that's present or not.

00:15:23.150 --> 00:15:27.210 align:middle line:84%
And so that threshold
in this experiment

00:15:27.210 --> 00:15:31.290 align:middle line:84%
is measured as a function
of the amount of time

00:15:31.290 --> 00:15:33.590 align:middle line:84%
that you've spent
in a dark room.

00:15:33.590 --> 00:15:35.710 align:middle line:84%
So the idea is, you're
out on the street,

00:15:35.710 --> 00:15:38.690 align:middle line:84%
you go into this dark
room like a movie theater,

00:15:38.690 --> 00:15:40.950 align:middle line:84%
or in this case, this would
have been a room in a lab.

00:15:40.950 --> 00:15:42.867 align:middle line:84%
And then you measure
your detection threshold.

00:15:42.867 --> 00:15:45.010 align:middle line:84%
So everybody has had
the informal experience

00:15:45.010 --> 00:15:47.500 align:middle line:84%
of walking into a movie
theater and initially not being

00:15:47.500 --> 00:15:48.560 align:middle line:90%
able to see very much.

00:15:48.560 --> 00:15:51.580 align:middle line:84%
And then you sit there,
and then over time, you

00:15:51.580 --> 00:15:54.160 align:middle line:84%
can see the seats around you,
and the people around you

00:15:54.160 --> 00:15:55.340 align:middle line:90%
and so forth.

00:15:55.340 --> 00:15:57.740 align:middle line:84%
So that's the process
of dark adaptation.

00:15:57.740 --> 00:15:59.900 align:middle line:84%
So something's changing
in your visual system

00:15:59.900 --> 00:16:02.440 align:middle line:84%
to make it easier to see
in low-light conditions.

00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:04.700 align:middle line:84%
And part of that
are changes that

00:16:04.700 --> 00:16:07.140 align:middle line:84%
are happening at the level
of the photoreceptor.

00:16:07.140 --> 00:16:10.900 align:middle line:84%
Now, if you do this experiment
and you measure the threshold

00:16:10.900 --> 00:16:12.660 align:middle line:84%
as a function of
time, you're going

00:16:12.660 --> 00:16:16.120 align:middle line:84%
to get the purple curve
that's shown here.

00:16:16.120 --> 00:16:18.380 align:middle line:84%
So what happens is that,
initially, your threshold

00:16:18.380 --> 00:16:19.500 align:middle line:90%
is high.

00:16:19.500 --> 00:16:23.740 align:middle line:84%
And then as time goes
on, the threshold drops.

00:16:23.740 --> 00:16:28.340 align:middle line:84%
And then you get to this
point, and it kind of

00:16:28.340 --> 00:16:32.440 align:middle line:84%
starts to drop, again, a
little more aggressively.

00:16:32.440 --> 00:16:35.020 align:middle line:84%
So the curve has
got of funny shape.

00:16:35.020 --> 00:16:38.180 align:middle line:84%
And we believe-- in fact,
there's now lots of evidence--

00:16:38.180 --> 00:16:41.260 align:middle line:84%
that that funny shape comes
from the contributions

00:16:41.260 --> 00:16:43.780 align:middle line:84%
of two types of photoreceptors,
the cones and the rods.

00:16:43.780 --> 00:16:44.280 align:middle line:90%
All right?

00:16:44.280 --> 00:16:48.440 align:middle line:84%
So as I said initially,
in high light levels,

00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:51.840 align:middle line:84%
your cones are the
ones that are active,

00:16:51.840 --> 00:16:54.600 align:middle line:90%
and your rods are saturated.

00:16:54.600 --> 00:16:56.600 align:middle line:84%
And so you walk
into this dark room,

00:16:56.600 --> 00:16:59.120 align:middle line:84%
and the cones are the
photoreceptor class

00:16:59.120 --> 00:17:02.720 align:middle line:84%
that determines your
light sensitivity.

00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.440 align:middle line:84%
Both types of receptors
start adapting,

00:17:05.440 --> 00:17:09.099 align:middle line:84%
but the sensitivity of the rods
is, for this initial period,

00:17:09.099 --> 00:17:11.140 align:middle line:84%
still going to be worse
than that of the cones.

00:17:11.140 --> 00:17:13.240 align:middle line:84%
So the cones adapt a
little bit, but then

00:17:13.240 --> 00:17:17.160 align:middle line:84%
they kind of cap out at
this level of sensitivity.

00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:18.960 align:middle line:90%
That's the best they can do.

00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:22.240 align:middle line:84%
So then the rods
continue to adapt,

00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:26.400 align:middle line:84%
and their sensitivity starts
to exceed that of the cones.

00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:28.960 align:middle line:84%
And the idea is that
your behavioral threshold

00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:32.120 align:middle line:84%
will be determined by whichever
class of photoreceptors

00:17:32.120 --> 00:17:34.260 align:middle line:84%
is more sensitive at
that moment in time.

00:17:34.260 --> 00:17:36.460 align:middle line:84%
And so here, that'll
be the cones,

00:17:36.460 --> 00:17:38.540 align:middle line:84%
and then here, that
will be the rods.

00:17:38.540 --> 00:17:46.330 align:middle line:90%


00:17:46.330 --> 00:17:46.830 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:17:46.830 --> 00:17:49.757 align:middle line:84%
So there are conditions
in which you are primarily

00:17:49.757 --> 00:17:52.090 align:middle line:84%
dependent on rods and conditions
where you are primarily

00:17:52.090 --> 00:17:54.650 align:middle line:90%
dependent on cones.

00:17:54.650 --> 00:17:57.290 align:middle line:84%
And so-called rod
and cone vision

00:17:57.290 --> 00:17:59.310 align:middle line:90%
have a number of differences.

00:17:59.310 --> 00:18:03.310 align:middle line:84%
So in general, rod vision is
more sensitive than cone vision.

00:18:03.310 --> 00:18:04.850 align:middle line:84%
So when you're
reliant on your rods,

00:18:04.850 --> 00:18:07.290 align:middle line:84%
you're better able
to detect light.

00:18:07.290 --> 00:18:09.450 align:middle line:84%
And so some of this
comes from the fact

00:18:09.450 --> 00:18:11.530 align:middle line:84%
that individual
rod photoreceptors

00:18:11.530 --> 00:18:15.690 align:middle line:84%
are more sensitive to light than
individual cone photoreceptors.

00:18:15.690 --> 00:18:18.210 align:middle line:84%
But part of this also
derives from the fact

00:18:18.210 --> 00:18:20.970 align:middle line:84%
that there is higher
convergence from the rods

00:18:20.970 --> 00:18:22.690 align:middle line:90%
to the ganglion cells.

00:18:22.690 --> 00:18:27.770 align:middle line:84%
So remember, photoreceptors
of transduced light

00:18:27.770 --> 00:18:31.290 align:middle line:84%
send their signals to this
set of different cells,

00:18:31.290 --> 00:18:33.810 align:middle line:84%
culminating in the
ganglion cells.

00:18:33.810 --> 00:18:37.470 align:middle line:84%
And so with the rods, there's
a high degree of convergence.

00:18:37.470 --> 00:18:40.530 align:middle line:84%
What that means is that a single
ganglion cell will get input

00:18:40.530 --> 00:18:43.890 align:middle line:90%
from roughly 120 rods.

00:18:43.890 --> 00:18:46.250 align:middle line:84%
So they're pooling signals
from a lot of different rods,

00:18:46.250 --> 00:18:48.167 align:middle line:84%
and that makes them very
sensitive, of course,

00:18:48.167 --> 00:18:51.350 align:middle line:84%
at the cost of
spatial resolution.

00:18:51.350 --> 00:18:55.030 align:middle line:84%
By comparison, the convergence
from the cones to the ganglion

00:18:55.030 --> 00:18:57.290 align:middle line:90%
cells is much less.

00:18:57.290 --> 00:18:59.083 align:middle line:84%
So in the fovea, it's
very often 1 to 1.

00:18:59.083 --> 00:19:00.750 align:middle line:84%
So a single ganglion
cell will get input

00:19:00.750 --> 00:19:02.010 align:middle line:90%
from a single photoreceptor.

00:19:02.010 --> 00:19:03.870 align:middle line:84%
And again, we believe
that's in order

00:19:03.870 --> 00:19:06.830 align:middle line:84%
to maximize spatial
resolution in conditions where

00:19:06.830 --> 00:19:08.650 align:middle line:90%
the light levels are high.

00:19:08.650 --> 00:19:13.190 align:middle line:90%


00:19:13.190 --> 00:19:16.210 align:middle line:84%
All right, so rod vision is
more sensitive than cone vision,

00:19:16.210 --> 00:19:18.450 align:middle line:84%
but this comes at the cost
of acuity, like we said.

00:19:18.450 --> 00:19:21.830 align:middle line:84%
So rod vision has lower
acuity than cone vision.

00:19:21.830 --> 00:19:24.557 align:middle line:84%
Some of this is due
to the convergence.

00:19:24.557 --> 00:19:26.890 align:middle line:84%
And then another difference
is that the rods are slower,

00:19:26.890 --> 00:19:28.723 align:middle line:84%
so they also have a
longer integration time.

00:19:28.723 --> 00:19:31.750 align:middle line:84%
And again, this is a trade
off between, in this case,

00:19:31.750 --> 00:19:34.430 align:middle line:84%
temporal resolution
and sensitivity.

00:19:34.430 --> 00:19:37.270 align:middle line:84%
So integrating over
time maybe increases

00:19:37.270 --> 00:19:40.670 align:middle line:84%
the likelihood, the ability
to detect some photons

00:19:40.670 --> 00:19:44.920 align:middle line:84%
by pooling over time
at the cost of being

00:19:44.920 --> 00:19:50.400 align:middle line:84%
able to distinguish temporal
patterns of stimulation.

00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:53.080 align:middle line:84%
Another big difference
between rods and cones

00:19:53.080 --> 00:19:56.140 align:middle line:84%
is that rods do not
support color vision.

00:19:56.140 --> 00:19:59.160 align:middle line:84%
And the reason for this is that
there's only one type of rod.

00:19:59.160 --> 00:20:02.600 align:middle line:84%
By comparison, there are
three types of cones,

00:20:02.600 --> 00:20:04.800 align:middle line:84%
and the cones thus
allow you to distinguish

00:20:04.800 --> 00:20:06.480 align:middle line:90%
different wavelengths of light.

00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:08.920 align:middle line:84%
So we'll talk a
lot about this when

00:20:08.920 --> 00:20:13.455 align:middle line:84%
we talk about color
vision in a few weeks.

00:20:13.455 --> 00:20:15.080 align:middle line:84%
Another big difference
is that the rods

00:20:15.080 --> 00:20:17.520 align:middle line:90%
are absent from the fovea.

00:20:17.520 --> 00:20:20.960 align:middle line:90%


00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:22.760 align:middle line:84%
And this has the
consequence of something

00:20:22.760 --> 00:20:25.220 align:middle line:84%
called that is known
as Arago's phenomena.

00:20:25.220 --> 00:20:28.800 align:middle line:84%
So if you're outside on a very
dark night, so in conditions

00:20:28.800 --> 00:20:30.520 align:middle line:84%
where you're relying
on your rods,

00:20:30.520 --> 00:20:32.300 align:middle line:84%
and you're looking
up at the stars,

00:20:32.300 --> 00:20:36.040 align:middle line:84%
if you look directly at a star,
you won't be able to see it.

00:20:36.040 --> 00:20:39.120 align:middle line:84%
And that's because you're
using your rods for vision,

00:20:39.120 --> 00:20:42.130 align:middle line:84%
and there are no rods
directly in the fovea.

00:20:42.130 --> 00:20:45.050 align:middle line:84%
So you'll have to look a
little bit away from the star

00:20:45.050 --> 00:20:46.830 align:middle line:90%
in order to be able to see it.

00:20:46.830 --> 00:20:51.278 align:middle line:90%


00:20:51.278 --> 00:20:54.130 align:middle line:84%
So if you measure
sensitivity to light

00:20:54.130 --> 00:20:57.250 align:middle line:84%
as a function of
wavelength, you'll

00:20:57.250 --> 00:20:58.790 align:middle line:84%
see that there are
some differences.

00:20:58.790 --> 00:21:01.930 align:middle line:84%
And the two words
that we're going

00:21:01.930 --> 00:21:04.490 align:middle line:84%
to use here to refer to
conditions in which you

00:21:04.490 --> 00:21:09.570 align:middle line:84%
are reliant on rods and cones
are scotopic and photopic.

00:21:09.570 --> 00:21:15.970 align:middle line:84%
So scotopic refers to conditions
where the light level is low, so

00:21:15.970 --> 00:21:18.410 align:middle line:84%
kind of during the
night most of the time,

00:21:18.410 --> 00:21:20.290 align:middle line:84%
if you're outside
at least, and when

00:21:20.290 --> 00:21:22.030 align:middle line:90%
you're mostly reliant on rods.

00:21:22.030 --> 00:21:26.290 align:middle line:84%
Photopic refers to high light
levels, so daytime vision

00:21:26.290 --> 00:21:28.290 align:middle line:90%
where you're using your cones.

00:21:28.290 --> 00:21:31.130 align:middle line:90%


00:21:31.130 --> 00:21:34.650 align:middle line:84%
So these graphs here
show sensitivity

00:21:34.650 --> 00:21:36.110 align:middle line:90%
as a function of wavelength.

00:21:36.110 --> 00:21:39.073 align:middle line:84%
So sensitivity is 1
over the threshold.

00:21:39.073 --> 00:21:40.490 align:middle line:84%
So if you're very,
very sensitive,

00:21:40.490 --> 00:21:42.870 align:middle line:84%
that means your detection
threshold is low.

00:21:42.870 --> 00:21:45.150 align:middle line:84%
And so in photopic
conditions where

00:21:45.150 --> 00:21:48.790 align:middle line:84%
you're reliant on your
cones, peak sensitivity

00:21:48.790 --> 00:21:51.470 align:middle line:90%
is around 550 nanometers.

00:21:51.470 --> 00:21:54.750 align:middle line:84%
Scotopic vision, by comparison,
has peak sensitivity

00:21:54.750 --> 00:21:56.990 align:middle line:90%
at 505 nanometers.

00:21:56.990 --> 00:21:59.710 align:middle line:84%
And you can see that your
sensitivity to red light

00:21:59.710 --> 00:22:01.490 align:middle line:90%
is basically nonexistent.

00:22:01.490 --> 00:22:06.390 align:middle line:84%
So by red light,
I mean wavelengths

00:22:06.390 --> 00:22:08.210 align:middle line:84%
that are close to
around 700 nanometers,

00:22:08.210 --> 00:22:09.810 align:middle line:90%
so longer wavelength light.

00:22:09.810 --> 00:22:11.990 align:middle line:84%
And we call that red
light, because if you

00:22:11.990 --> 00:22:14.830 align:middle line:84%
look at that in isolation,
all other things being equal,

00:22:14.830 --> 00:22:16.510 align:middle line:90%
it'll appear red.

00:22:16.510 --> 00:22:23.050 align:middle line:84%
And this is just an empirical
fact about the rod sensitivity.

00:22:23.050 --> 00:22:26.698 align:middle line:90%


00:22:26.698 --> 00:22:31.550 align:middle line:84%
So as we mentioned, there
are three types of cones.

00:22:31.550 --> 00:22:33.430 align:middle line:84%
The three types of
cones are distinguished

00:22:33.430 --> 00:22:35.470 align:middle line:90%
by their spectral sensitivity.

00:22:35.470 --> 00:22:38.410 align:middle line:84%
So this is a graph
that plots sensitivity,

00:22:38.410 --> 00:22:39.940 align:middle line:90%
and it's been normalized here.

00:22:39.940 --> 00:22:42.740 align:middle line:84%
So the peak sensitivity is 1
as a function of wavelength.

00:22:42.740 --> 00:22:45.320 align:middle line:84%
And there are three curves
here, each for the three

00:22:45.320 --> 00:22:47.840 align:middle line:90%
types of cone photoreceptors.

00:22:47.840 --> 00:22:50.600 align:middle line:84%
And so those will often be
referred to as the S cones,

00:22:50.600 --> 00:22:52.220 align:middle line:90%
the M cones, and the L cones.

00:22:52.220 --> 00:22:56.080 align:middle line:84%
And so S stands for short
wavelength, M for medium,

00:22:56.080 --> 00:22:59.000 align:middle line:90%
and L for long wavelength.

00:22:59.000 --> 00:23:01.440 align:middle line:84%
And so you can see that
the S cones have their peak

00:23:01.440 --> 00:23:05.400 align:middle line:84%
sensitivity down here at
around 450 nanometers.

00:23:05.400 --> 00:23:08.480 align:middle line:84%
The M cones, it's around
550, and the L cones,

00:23:08.480 --> 00:23:09.940 align:middle line:90%
it's a little bit higher.

00:23:09.940 --> 00:23:13.515 align:middle line:90%


00:23:13.515 --> 00:23:16.820 align:middle line:84%
So an important idea
around photoreceptors,

00:23:16.820 --> 00:23:19.400 align:middle line:84%
which we will return to when
we talk about color vision,

00:23:19.400 --> 00:23:23.080 align:middle line:84%
is what is called the
principle of univariance.

00:23:23.080 --> 00:23:27.200 align:middle line:84%
And the idea is that
the receptor response

00:23:27.200 --> 00:23:31.200 align:middle line:84%
doesn't contain any information
about the wavelength of light.

00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:35.320 align:middle line:84%
So these curves, they
tell you how likely

00:23:35.320 --> 00:23:38.340 align:middle line:84%
a receptor is to absorb a
photon of a given wavelength.

00:23:38.340 --> 00:23:38.840 align:middle line:90%
All right?

00:23:38.840 --> 00:23:41.180 align:middle line:84%
And so when your
sensitivity is very high,

00:23:41.180 --> 00:23:44.740 align:middle line:84%
that effectively means that the
photopigment in the receptor

00:23:44.740 --> 00:23:47.600 align:middle line:84%
is very likely to absorb
that particular wavelength.

00:23:47.600 --> 00:23:53.300 align:middle line:84%
And that means that if you are
firing some number of photons

00:23:53.300 --> 00:23:56.100 align:middle line:84%
per unit time at
that photoreceptor,

00:23:56.100 --> 00:23:58.300 align:middle line:84%
at this particular
wavelength, you're

00:23:58.300 --> 00:24:00.140 align:middle line:84%
going to get a large
response, whereas

00:24:00.140 --> 00:24:04.100 align:middle line:84%
at this particular wavelength,
you'll get a lower response.

00:24:04.100 --> 00:24:07.660 align:middle line:84%
But the concept here is that the
response of the photoreceptor

00:24:07.660 --> 00:24:09.180 align:middle line:90%
is a scalar.

00:24:09.180 --> 00:24:12.080 align:middle line:84%
It can just vary its
membrane potential.

00:24:12.080 --> 00:24:14.660 align:middle line:84%
And the effect of the
wavelength on the photoreceptor

00:24:14.660 --> 00:24:18.380 align:middle line:84%
is just to vary the probability
of absorption, which varies

00:24:18.380 --> 00:24:19.840 align:middle line:90%
the magnitude of the response.

00:24:19.840 --> 00:24:24.860 align:middle line:84%
And the consequence
of that is that you

00:24:24.860 --> 00:24:28.600 align:middle line:84%
can trade off between
wavelength and intensity.

00:24:28.600 --> 00:24:32.260 align:middle line:84%
So in other words, I can take
a low-intensity light that

00:24:32.260 --> 00:24:35.820 align:middle line:84%
is at 450 nanometers and
present that to the S cone

00:24:35.820 --> 00:24:39.870 align:middle line:84%
and get an identical response
than if I have a 425 nanometer

00:24:39.870 --> 00:24:42.270 align:middle line:84%
light that is at a
higher intensity.

00:24:42.270 --> 00:24:45.678 align:middle line:84%
So the consequence of that is
that a single photoreceptor

00:24:45.678 --> 00:24:47.470 align:middle line:84%
on its own doesn't
really directly give you

00:24:47.470 --> 00:24:49.230 align:middle line:84%
any information
about wavelength.

00:24:49.230 --> 00:24:51.910 align:middle line:84%
And that's why you actually
need more than one receptor type

00:24:51.910 --> 00:24:53.827 align:middle line:84%
if you actually want to
be able to distinguish

00:24:53.827 --> 00:24:54.790 align:middle line:90%
different wavelengths.

00:24:54.790 --> 00:24:56.450 align:middle line:84%
So that's the principle
of univariance.

00:24:56.450 --> 00:24:59.550 align:middle line:84%
There's just one
dimension along which

00:24:59.550 --> 00:25:01.490 align:middle line:84%
the response of the
receptor varies.

00:25:01.490 --> 00:25:04.350 align:middle line:90%


00:25:04.350 --> 00:25:04.850 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:25:04.850 --> 00:25:07.310 align:middle line:84%
So one interesting
empirical fact

00:25:07.310 --> 00:25:10.270 align:middle line:84%
is that there's a fair amount
of individual variation

00:25:10.270 --> 00:25:15.190 align:middle line:84%
in the nature of the receptor
mosaic on the retina.

00:25:15.190 --> 00:25:20.830 align:middle line:84%
So these are pictures that were
generated with a method called

00:25:20.830 --> 00:25:25.070 align:middle line:84%
adaptive optics, whereby you
can look inside someone's eye

00:25:25.070 --> 00:25:27.810 align:middle line:90%
and image the cone mosaic.

00:25:27.810 --> 00:25:30.230 align:middle line:84%
So this was introduced
back in 1999

00:25:30.230 --> 00:25:32.910 align:middle line:90%
by David Williams at Rochester.

00:25:32.910 --> 00:25:34.430 align:middle line:84%
And these are two
different images

00:25:34.430 --> 00:25:38.000 align:middle line:84%
of the cone mosaic from
two different individuals.

00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:40.600 align:middle line:84%
And the point is just that
they look kind of different.

00:25:40.600 --> 00:25:43.220 align:middle line:84%
The distribution of the
receptors is not identical.

00:25:43.220 --> 00:25:46.720 align:middle line:84%
And this probably
indicates that there

00:25:46.720 --> 00:25:50.560 align:middle line:84%
would be individual differences
in the nature of color vision.

00:25:50.560 --> 00:25:55.880 align:middle line:84%
But exactly what those would
be is, I think, not yet clear.

00:25:55.880 --> 00:25:57.640 align:middle line:90%
So those are photoreceptors.

00:25:57.640 --> 00:25:59.720 align:middle line:84%
The other kind of class
of cells that we're

00:25:59.720 --> 00:26:03.180 align:middle line:84%
going to talk a fair bit about
today are ganglion cells.

00:26:03.180 --> 00:26:06.240 align:middle line:84%
So remember, this is the
type of cell that provides

00:26:06.240 --> 00:26:08.320 align:middle line:90%
the output from the retina.

00:26:08.320 --> 00:26:12.640 align:middle line:84%
And there are two main
types of ganglion cells

00:26:12.640 --> 00:26:15.120 align:middle line:84%
that are defined anatomically,
and they're called

00:26:15.120 --> 00:26:17.820 align:middle line:90%
midget cells and parasol cells.

00:26:17.820 --> 00:26:20.366 align:middle line:90%


00:26:20.366 --> 00:26:22.720 align:middle line:84%
So this is a picture
on the bottom

00:26:22.720 --> 00:26:27.660 align:middle line:84%
of the dendritic field of
each type of ganglion cell,

00:26:27.660 --> 00:26:28.880 align:middle line:90%
so an example of each.

00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:32.040 align:middle line:84%
So remember, the
dendrites in a neuron

00:26:32.040 --> 00:26:34.460 align:middle line:84%
are the place where they
collect input right.

00:26:34.460 --> 00:26:37.460 align:middle line:90%
So axon is the kind of output--

00:26:37.460 --> 00:26:39.160 align:middle line:84%
provides the output
of the neuron.

00:26:39.160 --> 00:26:41.500 align:middle line:90%
The dendrites collect the input.

00:26:41.500 --> 00:26:43.100 align:middle line:84%
And so the dendrites
in this case

00:26:43.100 --> 00:26:45.020 align:middle line:84%
are distributed
over space in order

00:26:45.020 --> 00:26:47.913 align:middle line:84%
to get input from
photoreceptors that are

00:26:47.913 --> 00:26:49.080 align:middle line:90%
at different parts of space.

00:26:49.080 --> 00:26:51.080 align:middle line:84%
They're not usually directly
connected to photoreceptors.

00:26:51.080 --> 00:26:52.100 align:middle line:84%
They're getting input
from other types

00:26:52.100 --> 00:26:53.808 align:middle line:84%
of cells that are, in
turn, getting input

00:26:53.808 --> 00:26:55.000 align:middle line:90%
from photoreceptors.

00:26:55.000 --> 00:26:58.140 align:middle line:84%
But the spatial
distribution reflects

00:26:58.140 --> 00:27:01.220 align:middle line:84%
the region of the retinal
image from which they're

00:27:01.220 --> 00:27:01.960 align:middle line:90%
getting input.

00:27:01.960 --> 00:27:03.660 align:middle line:84%
And you can see
that the midget cell

00:27:03.660 --> 00:27:06.180 align:middle line:84%
has a small dendritic
field, indicating

00:27:06.180 --> 00:27:08.140 align:middle line:84%
that it is collecting
input from a very

00:27:08.140 --> 00:27:09.740 align:middle line:90%
small region of the image.

00:27:09.740 --> 00:27:11.940 align:middle line:84%
And the parasol cell has
a large dendritic field,

00:27:11.940 --> 00:27:13.857 align:middle line:84%
indicating it's collecting
input from a larger

00:27:13.857 --> 00:27:15.100 align:middle line:90%
region of the image.

00:27:15.100 --> 00:27:15.600 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:27:15.600 --> 00:27:18.140 align:middle line:90%


00:27:18.140 --> 00:27:20.940 align:middle line:84%
So parasol cells
and midget cells

00:27:20.940 --> 00:27:23.600 align:middle line:84%
differ in a bunch of
their response properties.

00:27:23.600 --> 00:27:25.960 align:middle line:84%
So parasol cells are what
are called achromatic,

00:27:25.960 --> 00:27:29.980 align:middle line:84%
so they tend to respond
equally to all wavelengths,

00:27:29.980 --> 00:27:32.860 align:middle line:84%
because they pool
responses across cones.

00:27:32.860 --> 00:27:35.110 align:middle line:84%
They tend to prefer
first stimuli that

00:27:35.110 --> 00:27:37.150 align:middle line:90%
change a lot over time.

00:27:37.150 --> 00:27:41.190 align:middle line:84%
Midget cells are often sensitive
to both luminance and color.

00:27:41.190 --> 00:27:44.270 align:middle line:84%
That's often because
they'll receive input

00:27:44.270 --> 00:27:47.550 align:middle line:84%
from particular types
of cones, and to be

00:27:47.550 --> 00:27:51.830 align:middle line:84%
less sensitive to temperature
changes and stimuli.

00:27:51.830 --> 00:27:56.190 align:middle line:84%
So these two classes
of ganglion cells

00:27:56.190 --> 00:28:00.130 align:middle line:84%
project to the lateral
geniculate nucleus, or LGN,

00:28:00.130 --> 00:28:02.110 align:middle line:84%
which is the part of
the thalamus that's

00:28:02.110 --> 00:28:03.630 align:middle line:90%
involved in vision.

00:28:03.630 --> 00:28:05.710 align:middle line:84%
And the lateral
geniculate nucleus

00:28:05.710 --> 00:28:08.447 align:middle line:84%
itself contains two
main classes of cells.

00:28:08.447 --> 00:28:10.530 align:middle line:84%
We now know there are some
other classes, as well,

00:28:10.530 --> 00:28:12.710 align:middle line:90%
but there's two primary ones.

00:28:12.710 --> 00:28:13.870 align:middle line:90%
All right.

00:28:13.870 --> 00:28:15.510 align:middle line:84%
And the classes of
cells in the LGN

00:28:15.510 --> 00:28:18.910 align:middle line:84%
are called parvocellular
and magnocellular.

00:28:18.910 --> 00:28:21.637 align:middle line:84%
Now, the nomenclature
here is quite unfortunate

00:28:21.637 --> 00:28:23.470 align:middle line:84%
and makes this a little
bit hard to remember

00:28:23.470 --> 00:28:27.630 align:middle line:84%
because the parasol cells
in the ganglion cell

00:28:27.630 --> 00:28:30.510 align:middle line:84%
layer of the retina project
to the magnocellular

00:28:30.510 --> 00:28:32.510 align:middle line:90%
layers of the LGN.

00:28:32.510 --> 00:28:35.690 align:middle line:84%
The midget cells in the retina
project to the parvocellular

00:28:35.690 --> 00:28:36.830 align:middle line:90%
layers of the LGN.

00:28:36.830 --> 00:28:38.770 align:middle line:84%
So it's kind of the
opposite of what would

00:28:38.770 --> 00:28:40.350 align:middle line:90%
be convenient to remember.

00:28:40.350 --> 00:28:43.225 align:middle line:90%


00:28:43.225 --> 00:28:47.010 align:middle line:84%
Now, for both cell types, the
size of the dendritic field,

00:28:47.010 --> 00:28:49.730 align:middle line:84%
and thus what we call
the receptive field, so

00:28:49.730 --> 00:28:53.170 align:middle line:84%
the region of space to
which the neuron responds,

00:28:53.170 --> 00:28:54.630 align:middle line:90%
increases with eccentricity.

00:28:54.630 --> 00:28:56.930 align:middle line:84%
Remember, eccentricity is
distance from the fovea.

00:28:56.930 --> 00:28:59.310 align:middle line:84%
And so this is a
diagram that shows this.

00:28:59.310 --> 00:29:04.970 align:middle line:84%
So what this is plotting is the
receptive field's diameter--

00:29:04.970 --> 00:29:08.370 align:middle line:84%
so it's the region of space
to which the neuron responds--

00:29:08.370 --> 00:29:10.750 align:middle line:84%
as a function of
retinal eccentricity.

00:29:10.750 --> 00:29:13.970 align:middle line:84%
So this is the result of an
experiment where you stick

00:29:13.970 --> 00:29:15.110 align:middle line:90%
an electrode in the retina.

00:29:15.110 --> 00:29:20.370 align:middle line:84%
You're recording the responses
of a ganglion cell presenting

00:29:20.370 --> 00:29:22.450 align:middle line:84%
light stimuli,
and then measuring

00:29:22.450 --> 00:29:26.790 align:middle line:84%
the region of the image that
evokes a response in the neuron.

00:29:26.790 --> 00:29:30.290 align:middle line:84%
And so that's the quantity
that's plotted on the y-axis.

00:29:30.290 --> 00:29:32.260 align:middle line:84%
And then you do this
at different retinal

00:29:32.260 --> 00:29:33.743 align:middle line:90%
eccentricities.

00:29:33.743 --> 00:29:35.660 align:middle line:84%
And so the point here,
there's two main things

00:29:35.660 --> 00:29:39.100 align:middle line:90%
that you should note from this.

00:29:39.100 --> 00:29:41.400 align:middle line:84%
One is that when you're
close to the fovea,

00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:44.140 align:middle line:84%
the receptive field
size is small.

00:29:44.140 --> 00:29:46.660 align:middle line:84%
And that's consistent
with this general idea

00:29:46.660 --> 00:29:50.900 align:middle line:84%
that the fovea is where you have
really high-resolution vision.

00:29:50.900 --> 00:29:54.918 align:middle line:84%
So remember, there's
lots of cones there.

00:29:54.918 --> 00:29:56.460 align:middle line:84%
You keep the receptive
field small so

00:29:56.460 --> 00:29:59.660 align:middle line:84%
that you can distinguish
different fine grained patterns

00:29:59.660 --> 00:30:01.540 align:middle line:90%
there.

00:30:01.540 --> 00:30:04.940 align:middle line:84%
As you move from the fovea
out to the periphery,

00:30:04.940 --> 00:30:08.500 align:middle line:84%
so increasing eccentricity,
the receptive field size

00:30:08.500 --> 00:30:10.580 align:middle line:90%
tends to increase.

00:30:10.580 --> 00:30:13.140 align:middle line:84%
But you can also see that
the receptive fields,

00:30:13.140 --> 00:30:15.840 align:middle line:90%
they fall in these two lines.

00:30:15.840 --> 00:30:19.600 align:middle line:84%
And these two lines correspond
to the midget cells--

00:30:19.600 --> 00:30:22.300 align:middle line:84%
that's the lower
of the two lines--

00:30:22.300 --> 00:30:23.900 align:middle line:90%
and the parasol cell.

00:30:23.900 --> 00:30:25.440 align:middle line:84%
That's the upper
of the two lines.

00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:28.260 align:middle line:84%
So the parasol cells
at a given eccentricity

00:30:28.260 --> 00:30:31.400 align:middle line:84%
have bigger receptive fields
than the midget cells.

00:30:31.400 --> 00:30:35.190 align:middle line:84%
But in both cases, the receptive
field grows with eccentricity.

00:30:35.190 --> 00:30:38.830 align:middle line:84%
And so this phenomenon here,
whereby receptive field size

00:30:38.830 --> 00:30:40.410 align:middle line:84%
increases with
retinal eccentricity,

00:30:40.410 --> 00:30:42.350 align:middle line:84%
this is a very general
organizing principle

00:30:42.350 --> 00:30:43.910 align:middle line:90%
within the visual system.

00:30:43.910 --> 00:30:48.230 align:middle line:84%
So receptive fields tend
to be small in the fovea

00:30:48.230 --> 00:30:49.770 align:middle line:84%
and then larger
in the periphery.

00:30:49.770 --> 00:30:53.470 align:middle line:90%


00:30:53.470 --> 00:30:56.550 align:middle line:84%
So this is an eye
chart that was designed

00:30:56.550 --> 00:30:59.950 align:middle line:84%
by Stuart Anstis, a
vision scientist, that

00:30:59.950 --> 00:31:03.590 align:middle line:84%
is intended to compensate
for changes in resolution

00:31:03.590 --> 00:31:04.490 align:middle line:90%
with eccentricity.

00:31:04.490 --> 00:31:06.270 align:middle line:84%
And so the idea
of this eye chart

00:31:06.270 --> 00:31:09.950 align:middle line:84%
is that if you look
at the center dot,

00:31:09.950 --> 00:31:13.700 align:middle line:84%
then all of the letters should
be equally recognizable.

00:31:13.700 --> 00:31:15.950 align:middle line:84%
And the reason for this is
that the size of the letter

00:31:15.950 --> 00:31:18.650 align:middle line:84%
has been scaled up
with eccentricity.

00:31:18.650 --> 00:31:21.470 align:middle line:84%
So the ones that are closer to
the fovea, those are smaller.

00:31:21.470 --> 00:31:24.090 align:middle line:84%
The ones that are out in
the periphery are larger.

00:31:24.090 --> 00:31:26.443 align:middle line:90%
So the resolution falls.

00:31:26.443 --> 00:31:28.110 align:middle line:84%
So the spatial
resolution of your vision

00:31:28.110 --> 00:31:31.730 align:middle line:84%
falls in proportion to the
distance of your fovea.

00:31:31.730 --> 00:31:35.672 align:middle line:84%
And this is some evidence that
those phenomena that we're

00:31:35.672 --> 00:31:37.130 align:middle line:84%
seeing in receptive
fields actually

00:31:37.130 --> 00:31:41.850 align:middle line:84%
have consequences
for what you can see.

00:31:41.850 --> 00:31:45.250 align:middle line:84%
So major organizing principle
of the visual system

00:31:45.250 --> 00:31:48.330 align:middle line:84%
is the foveal
periphery distinction.

00:31:48.330 --> 00:31:51.890 align:middle line:84%
And it's an interesting question
as to why the visual system is

00:31:51.890 --> 00:31:53.290 align:middle line:90%
set up the way that it is.

00:31:53.290 --> 00:31:57.810 align:middle line:84%
And so as we have discussed at
several earlier points in this

00:31:57.810 --> 00:32:01.370 align:middle line:84%
class, one of the ways that
we can answer these "why"

00:32:01.370 --> 00:32:05.650 align:middle line:84%
questions is by building
computational models that are

00:32:05.650 --> 00:32:07.210 align:middle line:84%
optimized for
different conditions,

00:32:07.210 --> 00:32:10.518 align:middle line:84%
and investigating the conditions
in which this optimized system

00:32:10.518 --> 00:32:12.810 align:middle line:84%
ends up finding some of the
same solutions that you see

00:32:12.810 --> 00:32:13.970 align:middle line:90%
in biology.

00:32:13.970 --> 00:32:16.090 align:middle line:84%
And so there's a
paper that I like

00:32:16.090 --> 00:32:18.130 align:middle line:84%
a lot that came
out a few years ago

00:32:18.130 --> 00:32:21.830 align:middle line:84%
that did this for the problem
of retinal image sampling.

00:32:21.830 --> 00:32:24.330 align:middle line:84%
So the paper is
posing this question

00:32:24.330 --> 00:32:29.980 align:middle line:84%
of why we have this foveal
image sampling strategy.

00:32:29.980 --> 00:32:33.260 align:middle line:84%
This is work by Brian Chung, and
Eric Weiss and Bruno Olshausen.

00:32:33.260 --> 00:32:38.380 align:middle line:84%
So I'll just read this little
excerpt from the paper.

00:32:38.380 --> 00:32:42.660 align:middle line:84%
So they write, "The human retina
contains 1.5 million ganglion

00:32:42.660 --> 00:32:46.020 align:middle line:84%
cells, whose axons form the
sole output of the retina.

00:32:46.020 --> 00:32:48.975 align:middle line:84%
These essentially constitute
about 300,000 distinct samples

00:32:48.975 --> 00:32:51.100 align:middle line:84%
of the image, due to the
multiplicity of cell types

00:32:51.100 --> 00:32:53.960 align:middle line:84%
coding different aspects, such
as on versus off channels,"

00:32:53.960 --> 00:32:56.540 align:middle line:84%
which we're going to
talk about in a moment.

00:32:56.540 --> 00:33:01.020 align:middle line:84%
"If these were packed uniformly
at highest resolution,

00:33:01.020 --> 00:33:05.140 align:middle line:84%
they would subtend an image area
spanning just 5 by 5 degrees.

00:33:05.140 --> 00:33:07.660 align:middle line:84%
Thus, we would have high
resolution but essentially

00:33:07.660 --> 00:33:09.060 align:middle line:90%
tunnel vision.

00:33:09.060 --> 00:33:11.700 align:middle line:84%
Alternatively, if they were
spread out uniformly over

00:33:11.700 --> 00:33:13.620 align:middle line:84%
the entire monocular
visual field,

00:33:13.620 --> 00:33:17.840 align:middle line:84%
spanning roughly 150 degrees, we
would have wide field coverage,

00:33:17.840 --> 00:33:20.660 align:middle line:84%
but with very blurry vision,
with each sample subtending

00:33:20.660 --> 00:33:23.620 align:middle line:84%
a quarter of a degree, which
would make even the largest

00:33:23.620 --> 00:33:25.800 align:middle line:84%
letters on a
Snellen eye chart--"

00:33:25.800 --> 00:33:29.280 align:middle line:84%
that's the kind of standard eye
chart for diagnosing vision--

00:33:29.280 --> 00:33:30.800 align:middle line:90%
"illegible.

00:33:30.800 --> 00:33:34.360 align:middle line:84%
Thus, the primate solution,
which is to have a fovea,

00:33:34.360 --> 00:33:37.560 align:middle line:84%
makes intuitive sense as a way
to achieve the best of both

00:33:37.560 --> 00:33:38.600 align:middle line:90%
of these worlds.

00:33:38.600 --> 00:33:41.600 align:middle line:84%
However, we are still lacking
a quantitative demonstration

00:33:41.600 --> 00:33:43.560 align:middle line:84%
that such a sampling
strategy emerges

00:33:43.560 --> 00:33:45.440 align:middle line:84%
as the optimal
design for subserving

00:33:45.440 --> 00:33:49.160 align:middle line:90%
some set of visual tasks.

00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:52.160 align:middle line:84%
We explore whether what is
the optimal retinal sampling

00:33:52.160 --> 00:33:54.780 align:middle line:84%
lattice for an overt
attentional system,

00:33:54.780 --> 00:33:56.200 align:middle line:84%
performing a simple
visual search

00:33:56.200 --> 00:33:58.960 align:middle line:84%
task requiring the
classification of an object.

00:33:58.960 --> 00:34:01.240 align:middle line:84%
We propose a learnable
retinal sampling lattice

00:34:01.240 --> 00:34:04.920 align:middle line:84%
to explore what properties
are best suited for this task.

00:34:04.920 --> 00:34:07.680 align:middle line:84%
While evolutionary pressure has
tuned the retinal configurations

00:34:07.680 --> 00:34:11.199 align:middle line:84%
found in the primate retina, we
instead utilize gradient descent

00:34:11.199 --> 00:34:15.880 align:middle line:84%
optimization for in-silico
model by constructing a fully

00:34:15.880 --> 00:34:17.880 align:middle line:84%
differentiable, dynamically
controllable model

00:34:17.880 --> 00:34:20.460 align:middle line:90%
of attention."

00:34:20.460 --> 00:34:22.719 align:middle line:90%
So here's the idea.

00:34:22.719 --> 00:34:26.980 align:middle line:84%
They've got this system
that has a receptor lattice.

00:34:26.980 --> 00:34:28.570 align:middle line:84%
So there's some
number of receptors

00:34:28.570 --> 00:34:30.130 align:middle line:90%
that can sample an image.

00:34:30.130 --> 00:34:34.570 align:middle line:84%
And each receptor has
a particular position

00:34:34.570 --> 00:34:37.090 align:middle line:90%
and a particular width.

00:34:37.090 --> 00:34:41.850 align:middle line:84%
So there's this kernel that
has these learnable parameters,

00:34:41.850 --> 00:34:43.830 align:middle line:84%
and there's a whole
bunch of these.

00:34:43.830 --> 00:34:46.170 align:middle line:84%
And the idea is
that they are going

00:34:46.170 --> 00:34:49.969 align:middle line:84%
to optimize the position
and width of the receptors

00:34:49.969 --> 00:34:53.909 align:middle line:84%
on this retina
for a vision task.

00:34:53.909 --> 00:34:57.050 align:middle line:84%
And in this case,
the vision task

00:34:57.050 --> 00:35:02.450 align:middle line:84%
is to find and identify the
digit on a cluttered background.

00:35:02.450 --> 00:35:07.910 align:middle line:84%
So these are examples of
stimuli from this task.

00:35:07.910 --> 00:35:09.670 align:middle line:84%
So you can see this
one has a four.

00:35:09.670 --> 00:35:10.930 align:middle line:90%
This has a one.

00:35:10.930 --> 00:35:12.170 align:middle line:90%
There's a nine.

00:35:12.170 --> 00:35:14.810 align:middle line:84%
So they're in different
places, and there's

00:35:14.810 --> 00:35:20.550 align:middle line:84%
some other junk that's kind of
added in to make the task hard.

00:35:20.550 --> 00:35:23.330 align:middle line:84%
So the system has to
solve this problem.

00:35:23.330 --> 00:35:26.110 align:middle line:84%
And they're training the system
up to solve this problem,

00:35:26.110 --> 00:35:32.860 align:middle line:84%
but allowing the system to
optimize its receptor lattice.

00:35:32.860 --> 00:35:36.060 align:middle line:84%
And they additionally introduced
these other constraints

00:35:36.060 --> 00:35:37.220 align:middle line:90%
on the problem.

00:35:37.220 --> 00:35:41.780 align:middle line:84%
So in one version of the
system that they trained up,

00:35:41.780 --> 00:35:44.440 align:middle line:84%
the system was allowed
to translate its retina,

00:35:44.440 --> 00:35:46.653 align:middle line:84%
so essentially, to
make eye movements,

00:35:46.653 --> 00:35:48.820 align:middle line:84%
to position the receptor
lattice at different places

00:35:48.820 --> 00:35:51.440 align:middle line:90%
within the image.

00:35:51.440 --> 00:35:53.540 align:middle line:84%
And then in another
condition, it

00:35:53.540 --> 00:35:55.040 align:middle line:84%
was allowed to
translate its retina,

00:35:55.040 --> 00:35:57.440 align:middle line:84%
but it could also zoom
the retinal lattice.

00:35:57.440 --> 00:35:59.900 align:middle line:84%
This is like the kind of thing
you can do with your phone,

00:35:59.900 --> 00:36:03.070 align:middle line:84%
but which the biological visual
system doesn't actually do.

00:36:03.070 --> 00:36:04.320 align:middle line:90%
We don't have a zoom function.

00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:05.760 align:middle line:90%
We can just translate.

00:36:05.760 --> 00:36:08.780 align:middle line:90%


00:36:08.780 --> 00:36:12.180 align:middle line:84%
And so what they found was
that in the condition where

00:36:12.180 --> 00:36:15.060 align:middle line:84%
the retina could be
translated around,

00:36:15.060 --> 00:36:18.340 align:middle line:84%
eccentricity dependence of
the sampling in the retina

00:36:18.340 --> 00:36:20.900 align:middle line:90%
emerged as an optimal solution.

00:36:20.900 --> 00:36:26.520 align:middle line:84%
So these are showing the
settings of the receptor lattice

00:36:26.520 --> 00:36:29.760 align:middle line:84%
over different
amounts of training,

00:36:29.760 --> 00:36:31.680 align:middle line:84%
so optimization
for this problem.

00:36:31.680 --> 00:36:33.580 align:middle line:84%
So this is like
the initialization.

00:36:33.580 --> 00:36:36.440 align:middle line:84%
They initialize these
things as uniformly spaced.

00:36:36.440 --> 00:36:39.240 align:middle line:84%
And then you can see that over
the course of the optimization,

00:36:39.240 --> 00:36:42.920 align:middle line:84%
what happens is that
some of the receptors

00:36:42.920 --> 00:36:47.600 align:middle line:84%
get moved kind of close together
in this one part of the sampling

00:36:47.600 --> 00:36:50.865 align:middle line:84%
lattice, and they also
get very small right.

00:36:50.865 --> 00:36:52.240 align:middle line:84%
So that's like
the system is kind

00:36:52.240 --> 00:36:57.560 align:middle line:84%
of evolving this strategy where
there's a whole bunch of very

00:36:57.560 --> 00:37:00.200 align:middle line:84%
small receptive fields that are
packed into one particular part

00:37:00.200 --> 00:37:02.680 align:middle line:90%
of the sampling lattice.

00:37:02.680 --> 00:37:05.365 align:middle line:90%


00:37:05.365 --> 00:37:13.280 align:middle line:84%
And so they quantified this by
plotting the receptive field

00:37:13.280 --> 00:37:17.000 align:middle line:84%
size as a function of
eccentricity, and so in cases

00:37:17.000 --> 00:37:19.900 align:middle line:84%
where the model could
translate its retina.

00:37:19.900 --> 00:37:23.400 align:middle line:84%
So these are two solutions that
it found, and you see this kind

00:37:23.400 --> 00:37:25.370 align:middle line:90%
of eccentricity dependence.

00:37:25.370 --> 00:37:29.250 align:middle line:84%
Whereas in the alternative
problem constraint

00:37:29.250 --> 00:37:32.447 align:middle line:84%
of being able to zoom in
addition to translate,

00:37:32.447 --> 00:37:34.030 align:middle line:84%
the solution they
found was different.

00:37:34.030 --> 00:37:36.370 align:middle line:84%
There was much less
of a fovea, and you

00:37:36.370 --> 00:37:40.670 align:middle line:84%
see much less of this
eccentricity dependence.

00:37:40.670 --> 00:37:43.730 align:middle line:84%
So here are examples of the
model actually performing

00:37:43.730 --> 00:37:44.730 align:middle line:90%
the task.

00:37:44.730 --> 00:37:48.350 align:middle line:84%
So this is one
trial of this task,

00:37:48.350 --> 00:37:51.130 align:middle line:84%
and it's just showing
you where the sampling

00:37:51.130 --> 00:37:55.430 align:middle line:84%
lattice is kind of positioned
relative to the digit.

00:37:55.430 --> 00:37:58.170 align:middle line:84%
And the point is that over
time, the sampling lattice

00:37:58.170 --> 00:38:01.370 align:middle line:84%
kind of gets moved so that
the fovea, in this case,

00:38:01.370 --> 00:38:02.910 align:middle line:84%
is kind of centered
on the digit,

00:38:02.910 --> 00:38:10.130 align:middle line:84%
so that it can optimally or
best recognize the digit.

00:38:10.130 --> 00:38:12.450 align:middle line:84%
And this bottom row is what
happens when the thing can

00:38:12.450 --> 00:38:15.130 align:middle line:90%
zoom its retina, as well.

00:38:15.130 --> 00:38:18.410 align:middle line:84%
And there you can see this
uniform receptor lattice,

00:38:18.410 --> 00:38:24.908 align:middle line:84%
and it just kind of shrinks
it down to fit onto the digit.

00:38:24.908 --> 00:38:26.450 align:middle line:84%
So what do we learn
from all of this?

00:38:26.450 --> 00:38:29.950 align:middle line:84%
So the inference that
you should make here

00:38:29.950 --> 00:38:34.350 align:middle line:84%
is that this is evidence
that a fovea is a useful way

00:38:34.350 --> 00:38:37.910 align:middle line:84%
to attain high resolution
vision, given, one,

00:38:37.910 --> 00:38:40.350 align:middle line:84%
a limit on the number of
samples that can be transmitted

00:38:40.350 --> 00:38:42.030 align:middle line:84%
to the brain from
the optic nerve,

00:38:42.030 --> 00:38:43.870 align:middle line:84%
and number two,
the ability to move

00:38:43.870 --> 00:38:47.110 align:middle line:84%
the eyes to position the
fovea at different locations.

00:38:47.110 --> 00:38:50.270 align:middle line:84%
And so it seems that
biological vision

00:38:50.270 --> 00:38:54.430 align:middle line:84%
has evolved this strategy that's
just a good sampling strategy

00:38:54.430 --> 00:38:56.090 align:middle line:90%
for being able to solve tasks.

00:38:56.090 --> 00:38:59.450 align:middle line:84%
So in other words, you have
the ability to move your eyes.

00:38:59.450 --> 00:39:01.950 align:middle line:84%
And then in concert
with that, the retina

00:39:01.950 --> 00:39:04.597 align:middle line:84%
has the receptors packed in
this very, very non-uniform way.

00:39:04.597 --> 00:39:06.430 align:middle line:84%
So there's this one
part of the retina where

00:39:06.430 --> 00:39:07.890 align:middle line:90%
you have really good sampling.

00:39:07.890 --> 00:39:10.670 align:middle line:84%
And if you want to see stuff,
you typically direct your fovea

00:39:10.670 --> 00:39:13.660 align:middle line:90%
to that part of the retina.

00:39:13.660 --> 00:39:24.000 align:middle line:90%