WEBVTT

00:00:16.030 --> 00:00:18.700
STUDENT: Rainbows-- while
we may not notice them,

00:00:18.700 --> 00:00:22.135
there are rainbows all around us
as we go about our daily lives.

00:00:22.135 --> 00:00:23.560
They are hidden
in the reflection

00:00:23.560 --> 00:00:25.630
of soap bubbles,
the shine on a CD,

00:00:25.630 --> 00:00:28.360
and even in oily
puddles on the street.

00:00:28.360 --> 00:00:31.180
In this video, we'll explore
the phenomenon of light wave

00:00:31.180 --> 00:00:33.190
interference and how
it creates the colors

00:00:33.190 --> 00:00:35.980
we see on the surfaces
of thin films.

00:00:35.980 --> 00:00:38.170
Since soap and oil
are usually colorless,

00:00:38.170 --> 00:00:40.210
why do they have iridescence?

00:00:40.210 --> 00:00:42.220
Let's start with the
laws of light reflection

00:00:42.220 --> 00:00:45.130
and refraction, then peruse
through some visual simulations

00:00:45.130 --> 00:00:47.010
of these fundamental principles.

00:00:50.770 --> 00:00:52.480
When waves travel
through space and hit

00:00:52.480 --> 00:00:55.050
an interface or a
surface, some of the wave

00:00:55.050 --> 00:00:57.790
reflects off the surface
and the rest refracts,

00:00:57.790 --> 00:01:01.000
continuing through the new
medium at a different angle.

00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:03.550
When the refracted wave hits
another surface, part of it

00:01:03.550 --> 00:01:06.010
reflects back out of
the medium and combines

00:01:06.010 --> 00:01:10.280
with the first wave or
interferes with the first wave.

00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:11.800
Since the first and
second reflected

00:01:11.800 --> 00:01:16.870
waves travel different
paths, the second wave

00:01:16.870 --> 00:01:20.740
acquires a phase shift in
comparison to the first wave.

00:01:20.740 --> 00:01:23.650
When it adds to the first
wave, this phase shift

00:01:23.650 --> 00:01:25.240
may cause the two
waves to completely

00:01:25.240 --> 00:01:30.820
cancel each other out, resulting
in destructive interference.

00:01:30.820 --> 00:01:34.720
Or if the phases are
perfectly aligned,

00:01:34.720 --> 00:01:38.020
the resultant wave has twice
the amplitude, resulting

00:01:38.020 --> 00:01:41.350
in constructive interference.

00:01:41.350 --> 00:01:44.260
Notice that the resultant wave
has destructive interference

00:01:44.260 --> 00:01:48.860
when the phase shift is about
180 degrees or pi radians.

00:01:48.860 --> 00:01:50.800
And it reaches the
maximum amplitude,

00:01:50.800 --> 00:01:52.690
having constructive
interference,

00:01:52.690 --> 00:01:55.495
when the phase shift is a
multiple of 2 pi radians.

00:02:01.320 --> 00:02:03.960
For light traveling from
one medium or material

00:02:03.960 --> 00:02:07.140
to another medium, for
example, from air to water,

00:02:07.140 --> 00:02:10.919
Snell's law of refraction,
given by this equation here,

00:02:10.919 --> 00:02:14.040
states that the angle at which
light travels through the two

00:02:14.040 --> 00:02:16.350
different mediums is
proportional to the velocities

00:02:16.350 --> 00:02:20.100
of light through the two
mediums, V1 and V2, which

00:02:20.100 --> 00:02:26.430
is inversely proportional to the
refractive indices, N2 and N1.

00:02:26.430 --> 00:02:32.550
This equation can be
simplified to N1 sine theta 1

00:02:32.550 --> 00:02:36.070
equals N2 sine theta 2.

00:02:36.070 --> 00:02:39.030
Snell's law can be
rearranged to represent

00:02:39.030 --> 00:02:42.600
N1, the refractive index
of the first medium,

00:02:42.600 --> 00:02:46.830
in terms of the incident light
angles of the two materials

00:02:46.830 --> 00:02:50.040
and the refractive
index of the thin film.

00:02:50.040 --> 00:02:52.860
This trick will be useful in
some of our later calculations.

00:02:57.410 --> 00:03:00.460
Remember how waves with
shifted phases interfere?

00:03:00.460 --> 00:03:03.850
In this case, the phase shift
is a difference in path length

00:03:03.850 --> 00:03:07.410
that the first reflected
wave and the second travel.

00:03:07.410 --> 00:03:09.040
Geometrically, the
path difference

00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:12.130
between the wave reflected off
the top surface and the wave

00:03:12.130 --> 00:03:14.770
reflected off the bottom
surface of a thin film

00:03:14.770 --> 00:03:16.750
is given by this
equation here, where

00:03:16.750 --> 00:03:22.300
AB, BC, and AD refer to the
line segments in this diagram.

00:03:22.300 --> 00:03:24.550
Using some trigonometry,
the line segment lengths

00:03:24.550 --> 00:03:27.264
can be calculated in terms
of the refractive indices

00:03:27.264 --> 00:03:28.555
and the refracted light angles.

00:03:31.950 --> 00:03:34.842
Now, using Snell floor
to substitute for N1,

00:03:34.842 --> 00:03:36.300
the path difference
between the two

00:03:36.300 --> 00:03:39.150
reflected waves can be expressed
in terms of the thin film

00:03:39.150 --> 00:03:43.627
medium only, only depending
on N2 and theta 2.

00:03:43.627 --> 00:03:45.960
That means for constructive
interference between the two

00:03:45.960 --> 00:03:48.186
waves, the phase
shifts has to be 0

00:03:48.186 --> 00:03:49.560
and the path
difference has to be

00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:51.730
an integer multiple
of the incident lights

00:03:51.730 --> 00:03:54.250
wavelength, lambda.

00:03:54.250 --> 00:03:57.420
When the medium a
wave is traveling into

00:03:57.420 --> 00:03:59.490
has a refractive
index that is greater

00:03:59.490 --> 00:04:02.160
than the index for the medium
that the wave is coming

00:04:02.160 --> 00:04:05.850
from, that is, N2
is greater than N1,

00:04:05.850 --> 00:04:08.220
there is one extra caveat.

00:04:08.220 --> 00:04:11.880
The reflected wave has a
180-degree phase shift.

00:04:11.880 --> 00:04:14.700
In that case, the condition
for constructive interference

00:04:14.700 --> 00:04:17.100
is that the path difference
must be a half integer

00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:21.149
multiple of the incident
light's wavelength.

00:04:21.149 --> 00:04:23.940
For a typical thin film,
which has a higher refractive

00:04:23.940 --> 00:04:26.970
index than its surroundings,
which is usually air,

00:04:26.970 --> 00:04:29.190
this is a condition for
constructive interference

00:04:29.190 --> 00:04:32.040
between waves reflected off
the top and bottom surfaces

00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:32.630
of the film.

00:04:36.580 --> 00:04:39.060
This simulation shows a
wave traveling through air,

00:04:39.060 --> 00:04:42.550
then reflecting off the top and
bottom surfaces of a thin film.

00:04:42.550 --> 00:04:44.690
The bold reflected
waves represents

00:04:44.690 --> 00:04:46.510
the summation of the
waves reflected off

00:04:46.510 --> 00:04:48.280
the top and the
bottom on the film,

00:04:48.280 --> 00:04:49.340
and should grow
largest when there

00:04:49.340 --> 00:04:51.839
is constructive interference
and the two waves' phases align

00:04:51.839 --> 00:04:52.850
line.

00:04:52.850 --> 00:04:56.770
I can change four different
parameters in this situation--

00:04:56.770 --> 00:05:01.330
the thickness of the film,
D, the refractive index

00:05:01.330 --> 00:05:06.760
of the film, the angle
of the incident light

00:05:06.760 --> 00:05:13.020
hitting the surface of
a film, and finally,

00:05:13.020 --> 00:05:15.000
the wavelength of the
light hitting the film.

00:05:19.890 --> 00:05:23.430
Changing all of these parameters
changes the resultant wave that

00:05:23.430 --> 00:05:26.087
reflects back out of the film.

00:05:26.087 --> 00:05:28.170
You might be wondering why
changing the wavelength

00:05:28.170 --> 00:05:29.520
makes the wave different colors.

00:05:32.880 --> 00:05:34.680
That's because the
visible light spectrum

00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:37.440
can be represented by waves of
different wavelengths ranging

00:05:37.440 --> 00:05:40.560
from three 80 nanometers
to 750 nanometers.

00:05:40.560 --> 00:05:42.450
The human eye has
light receptors,

00:05:42.450 --> 00:05:44.760
or cones, that
actually only perceive

00:05:44.760 --> 00:05:47.410
three colors from the
visible spectrum-- red,

00:05:47.410 --> 00:05:48.960
green, and blue.

00:05:48.960 --> 00:05:50.430
The entire visible
spectrum people

00:05:50.430 --> 00:05:53.160
see is really a superposition
of the waves of these three

00:05:53.160 --> 00:05:54.930
colors, which mix
in different ratios

00:05:54.930 --> 00:05:58.170
to provide all the other
colors of the rainbow.

00:05:58.170 --> 00:06:00.690
The light that humans see
making rainbow swirly patterns

00:06:00.690 --> 00:06:03.600
on the surface of soap bubbles
or in the oil sheen on water

00:06:03.600 --> 00:06:05.850
has a minimum wavelength
of 380 nanometers

00:06:05.850 --> 00:06:08.670
and a maximum wavelength of 750.

00:06:08.670 --> 00:06:14.400
Red has a wavelength of about
700 nanometers, green 546,

00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:19.340
and blue 436.

00:06:19.340 --> 00:06:21.140
The strength of each
of these colors,

00:06:21.140 --> 00:06:23.030
or the intensity,
that people perceive

00:06:23.030 --> 00:06:25.970
is proportional to the square
of the wave's amplitude.

00:06:25.970 --> 00:06:29.750
Since the amplitude represents
the energy, E, of a wave,

00:06:29.750 --> 00:06:31.430
intensity is also
a representation

00:06:31.430 --> 00:06:33.350
of the wave's energy density.

00:06:33.350 --> 00:06:35.450
The more intense a wave,
the larger amplitude

00:06:35.450 --> 00:06:38.285
it has, and the more its color
dominates our perception.

00:06:40.960 --> 00:06:42.790
The total color that
we see reflected off

00:06:42.790 --> 00:06:44.776
a point on the film
surface is a combination

00:06:44.776 --> 00:06:46.150
of these three
waves proportional

00:06:46.150 --> 00:06:49.360
to their intensities.

00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:51.070
For example, for
a film thickness

00:06:51.070 --> 00:06:53.740
of 200 nanometers with
refractive index 1.5

00:06:53.740 --> 00:06:56.230
and incident angle
45, we can see

00:06:56.230 --> 00:07:00.880
that there is more blue in
this color than green or red.

00:07:00.880 --> 00:07:02.680
If we try changing
the film thickness to,

00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:11.140
let's say, 400 nanometers,
the refractive index to 2,

00:07:11.140 --> 00:07:13.070
and keep the incident
light angle at 45,

00:07:13.070 --> 00:07:15.320
we can see that green would
be the dominating color.

00:07:20.420 --> 00:07:22.730
For thin films which
have a greater refractive

00:07:22.730 --> 00:07:25.460
index than the air, we can
show the color reflected off

00:07:25.460 --> 00:07:28.670
a thin film as a function
of the film's thickness.

00:07:28.670 --> 00:07:31.670
Likewise, we can see how the
reflective wavelength colors

00:07:31.670 --> 00:07:34.430
vary with the incident
light wave angle.

00:07:34.430 --> 00:07:35.870
Here are two plots
Mathematica has

00:07:35.870 --> 00:07:39.290
generated for a thin film
with refractive index 1.5,

00:07:39.290 --> 00:07:43.490
first with a constant
incident angle of 45 degrees

00:07:43.490 --> 00:07:47.000
and second with a constant
thickness of 200 nanometers.

00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:48.830
Notice that with
varying thicknesses,

00:07:48.830 --> 00:07:51.050
the color shifts
alternate between

00:07:51.050 --> 00:07:53.060
reddish, greenish,
and bluish colors,

00:07:53.060 --> 00:07:54.650
while for varying
angle, the spectrum

00:07:54.650 --> 00:07:56.450
is a more gradual gradient.

00:08:01.590 --> 00:08:05.010
Let's envision a flat thin film
of oil floating on a perfectly

00:08:05.010 --> 00:08:06.750
flat surface of water.

00:08:06.750 --> 00:08:09.450
The refractive indices
of oil, water, and air

00:08:09.450 --> 00:08:14.040
are respectively about
1.5, 1.33, and 1.

00:08:14.040 --> 00:08:16.080
As light reflects off
the top of the oil,

00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:18.120
there is a 180-degree
phase shift

00:08:18.120 --> 00:08:19.860
since the refractive
index of oil

00:08:19.860 --> 00:08:22.140
is greater than the
refractive index of air.

00:08:22.140 --> 00:08:24.630
But there isn't a phase shift
when the wave reflects off

00:08:24.630 --> 00:08:28.280
the bottom interface between
the oil and the water

00:08:28.280 --> 00:08:31.590
because water's refractive
index is less than oil's.

00:08:31.590 --> 00:08:33.960
This interactive
graphic shows how

00:08:33.960 --> 00:08:35.610
an oil firm with
varying thicknesses

00:08:35.610 --> 00:08:37.950
reflects light of a point
source at varying heights

00:08:37.950 --> 00:08:40.799
above the oil's surface.

00:08:40.799 --> 00:08:46.450
We can increase the
height of the light

00:08:46.450 --> 00:08:49.570
to get this iridescence pattern.

00:08:49.570 --> 00:08:53.182
Or we can increase
the film's thickness.

00:08:56.420 --> 00:08:58.520
We can see that with
increasing the light height,

00:08:58.520 --> 00:09:02.014
there is a wider range
of incident light angles,

00:09:02.014 --> 00:09:03.680
whereas when we move
the film thickness,

00:09:03.680 --> 00:09:05.480
there is a wider range of
colors that are produced

00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:06.604
on the surface of the film.

00:09:11.430 --> 00:09:13.200
In reality, the
surface of a puddle

00:09:13.200 --> 00:09:15.960
really isn't completely flat.

00:09:15.960 --> 00:09:19.140
This interactive graphic shows
thin film interference of oil

00:09:19.140 --> 00:09:21.070
on rippling water.

00:09:21.070 --> 00:09:25.450
Again, if we increase the
thickness of the oil film,

00:09:25.450 --> 00:09:27.840
there is a wider
range of colors.

00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:31.842
We can also change the x, y,
and z positions of the light

00:09:31.842 --> 00:09:33.675
and see how the iridescence
pattern changes.

00:09:45.780 --> 00:09:48.570
For a spherical soap bubble,
the refractive index of so

00:09:48.570 --> 00:09:50.250
varies with the
recipe, but it's always

00:09:50.250 --> 00:09:52.530
greater than the
refractive index of air.

00:09:52.530 --> 00:09:55.120
That means that there is also
a phase shift of 180 degrees

00:09:55.120 --> 00:09:57.240
when light hits the outer
surface of the bubble,

00:09:57.240 --> 00:10:00.330
but not when it reflects
off the inner surface.

00:10:00.330 --> 00:10:03.330
This simulation shows the effect
of multiple point source lights

00:10:03.330 --> 00:10:04.890
on a soap bubble.

00:10:04.890 --> 00:10:07.620
Note that in real life, light
sources around a syllable

00:10:07.620 --> 00:10:09.570
usually aren't
just point sources

00:10:09.570 --> 00:10:12.000
and the bubble isn't an
even thickness throughout,

00:10:12.000 --> 00:10:15.480
as is assumed in
this simulation.

00:10:15.480 --> 00:10:17.130
Hence, the color
patterns that we

00:10:17.130 --> 00:10:19.410
see on surfaces of soap
bundles are usually

00:10:19.410 --> 00:10:21.660
far more complex than what
we see in the simulation.

00:10:38.620 --> 00:10:41.710
Special thanks to the 3016 staff
for their help and guidance

00:10:41.710 --> 00:10:45.000
on this project and thanks
for watching my video.