WEBVTT

00:00:00.090 --> 00:00:02.490
The following content is
provided under a Creative

00:00:02.490 --> 00:00:04.059
Commons license.

00:00:04.059 --> 00:00:06.330
Your support will help
MIT OpenCourseWare

00:00:06.330 --> 00:00:10.690
continue to offer high-quality
educational resources for free.

00:00:10.690 --> 00:00:13.320
To make a donation or
view additional materials

00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:17.270
from hundreds of MIT courses,
visit MIT OpenCourseWare

00:00:17.270 --> 00:00:18.390
at ocw.mit.edu.

00:00:21.440 --> 00:00:24.270
PROFESSOR: Previously,
we've shown several ways

00:00:24.270 --> 00:00:27.810
of getting low contrast
fringes in a Michelson

00:00:27.810 --> 00:00:30.010
two-beam interferometer.

00:00:30.010 --> 00:00:32.250
For example, when the
mirrors are shaking,

00:00:32.250 --> 00:00:36.630
you get poor contrast-- when
the intensities in the two arms

00:00:36.630 --> 00:00:40.500
are unequal, when we have
orthogonal polarization

00:00:40.500 --> 00:00:44.580
between the beams and the two
arms of the interferometer.

00:00:44.580 --> 00:00:46.770
In this demonstration,
we're going

00:00:46.770 --> 00:00:50.430
to show another way, and
probably the most common way,

00:00:50.430 --> 00:00:54.480
of getting low contrast fringes
in a two-beam interferometer.

00:00:54.480 --> 00:00:56.880
And here the setup.

00:00:56.880 --> 00:00:59.565
Again, we have a
helium-neon laser here.

00:00:59.565 --> 00:01:04.200
Here's the beam from the laser
being reflected by this mirror

00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:07.860
into an optical isolator made
up of a quarter-wave plate

00:01:07.860 --> 00:01:14.880
and a polarizer to prevent
light going back into the laser.

00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:17.850
The beam leaving the
isolator is here,

00:01:17.850 --> 00:01:22.680
getting reflected by this
mirror into the interferometer.

00:01:22.680 --> 00:01:25.260
Here's one arm of
the interferometer,

00:01:25.260 --> 00:01:28.650
and here is the other
arm of the isolator.

00:01:28.650 --> 00:01:33.090
And the two beams leaving the
isolator will be reflected

00:01:33.090 --> 00:01:37.230
by this mirror into this
lens, and then from the lens

00:01:37.230 --> 00:01:38.890
onto the screen.

00:01:38.890 --> 00:01:42.930
So, now, let's
look at the screen.

00:01:42.930 --> 00:01:50.370
And we see that we have fringes,
and the contrast in the fringes

00:01:50.370 --> 00:01:52.420
look pretty good.

00:01:52.420 --> 00:01:56.730
And you can see, I can
adjust the alignment of one

00:01:56.730 --> 00:01:58.050
of the arms--

00:01:58.050 --> 00:01:59.780
that's what I'm
doing right now--

00:01:59.780 --> 00:02:04.500
to separate the spots and
bring them back together again.

00:02:04.500 --> 00:02:06.450
And then when I
take my hand away,

00:02:06.450 --> 00:02:09.750
you can see I have pretty
good contrast in the fringes.

00:02:09.750 --> 00:02:12.510
You also notice that,
in this arrangement,

00:02:12.510 --> 00:02:16.290
the two arms of the
interferometer are equal.

00:02:16.290 --> 00:02:21.070
And we've indicated
this by the 0 over here.

00:02:21.070 --> 00:02:26.580
So the 0 indicates that this
arm is equal to this arm.

00:02:26.580 --> 00:02:32.945
Now, as I move one arm, let's
say by a few centimeters--

00:02:32.945 --> 00:02:34.320
and, also, you
want to note this,

00:02:34.320 --> 00:02:36.040
that the scale here
is in centimeters.

00:02:36.040 --> 00:02:40.300
This is 10, 30 50, and so on.

00:02:40.300 --> 00:02:42.930
So let's say around
5 centimeters.

00:02:42.930 --> 00:02:45.570
Let's look at the
fringe contrast.

00:02:45.570 --> 00:02:50.260
And we again look
at the fringes,

00:02:50.260 --> 00:02:55.950
and you can see that,
indeed, the contrast

00:02:55.950 --> 00:02:59.710
is a little less
than what it was

00:02:59.710 --> 00:03:01.780
when we had equal path length.

00:03:01.780 --> 00:03:05.320
Let me go a little bit more,
let's say around 10 centimeters

00:03:05.320 --> 00:03:06.460
or so.

00:03:06.460 --> 00:03:08.200
Again, let me
check the alignment

00:03:08.200 --> 00:03:13.670
by adjusting one of the mirrors.

00:03:13.670 --> 00:03:18.400
And you can see that, now,
the contrast is indeed

00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:20.080
getting very poor.

00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:25.660
Let's go even further, let's
say around 30 centimeters path

00:03:25.660 --> 00:03:27.200
length difference.

00:03:27.200 --> 00:03:33.000
Again, here are the two spots.

00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:37.960
And the fringe
contrast is pretty bad.

00:03:37.960 --> 00:03:42.570
Let's go, let's say, around
45 centimeters or so.

00:03:42.570 --> 00:03:46.530
Again, check on the alignment
of the interferometer,

00:03:46.530 --> 00:03:50.460
and, indeed, we don't even
see any fringes at all

00:03:50.460 --> 00:03:53.100
or essentially 0 contrast.

00:03:53.100 --> 00:03:56.370
But let's go on.

00:03:56.370 --> 00:04:02.220
Let's go on, let's say, to
position around 72 centimeters.

00:04:02.220 --> 00:04:05.814
And now, let me
check the alignment.

00:04:05.814 --> 00:04:10.890
And we can see that now we're
beginning to see some fringes.

00:04:10.890 --> 00:04:13.020
So the contrast is not quite 0.

00:04:13.020 --> 00:04:19.206
Let me go further, say,
around 80 or so centimeters.

00:04:19.206 --> 00:04:23.270
Again, check on the alignment.

00:04:23.270 --> 00:04:25.890
A little bit better.

00:04:25.890 --> 00:04:32.690
And we go to 95
or so centimeters.

00:04:32.690 --> 00:04:38.395
And, wow, we see some
very good contrast.

00:04:38.395 --> 00:04:39.920
The contrast has come back.

00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:43.760
In fact, it's just as good as
when we were at equal arms.

00:04:43.760 --> 00:04:51.520
Now, let's go further than 95
centimeters, around maybe 105.

00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:56.360
And let's look, again,
at the fringe contrast.

00:04:56.360 --> 00:04:59.320
You can see that they're
getting poorer again.

00:04:59.320 --> 00:05:06.600
Let's go even further, here,
around 115 centimeter path

00:05:06.600 --> 00:05:09.350
length difference.

00:05:09.350 --> 00:05:14.540
And let me readjust, and see
that the fringes have almost

00:05:14.540 --> 00:05:16.470
disappeared.

00:05:16.470 --> 00:05:19.760
So let's go back and make sure
that we didn't do anything

00:05:19.760 --> 00:05:20.890
wrong before.

00:05:20.890 --> 00:05:24.376
Let me go back to where we had
good fringe contrast, around 95

00:05:24.376 --> 00:05:25.820
centimeters.

00:05:25.820 --> 00:05:33.470
And you can see that we
have excellent contrast.

00:05:33.470 --> 00:05:40.430
And we go to, say,
70 or so centimeters.

00:05:40.430 --> 00:05:42.460
Fringe contrast is pretty bad.

00:05:45.340 --> 00:05:50.290
Go to about 45 or
so centimeters.

00:05:53.038 --> 00:05:54.548
Wow, that's really awful.

00:05:54.548 --> 00:05:55.340
Can't see anything.

00:05:55.340 --> 00:05:58.950
Now, just let me
take this opportunity

00:05:58.950 --> 00:06:02.250
to show you that, indeed,
I do have two beams.

00:06:02.250 --> 00:06:06.880
And I can block, in fact, one
beam, or block the other beam.

00:06:06.880 --> 00:06:09.150
Indeed, I do have two beams
that are superimposed,

00:06:09.150 --> 00:06:16.025
but yet absolutely no
fringes can be seen.

00:06:16.025 --> 00:06:21.300
And then, let me go all
the way to equal arms,

00:06:21.300 --> 00:06:23.320
to the 0 position.

00:06:23.320 --> 00:06:24.600
We adjust the two beams.

00:06:30.570 --> 00:06:34.260
Now, we can see we have good
fringes again, good fringe

00:06:34.260 --> 00:06:35.070
contrast.

00:06:35.070 --> 00:06:38.700
But let me go and make
this arm here even

00:06:38.700 --> 00:06:40.620
shorter than the other arm.

00:06:40.620 --> 00:06:44.370
Let me make it shorter by
about 2 or 3 centimeters.

00:06:47.196 --> 00:06:50.970
You can see that the fringe
contrast is not so wonderful

00:06:50.970 --> 00:06:52.890
as it was at the 0 position.

00:06:52.890 --> 00:06:55.350
Let me go to a path
length difference

00:06:55.350 --> 00:07:02.820
of minus 10 centimeters and
readjust the other mirror.

00:07:02.820 --> 00:07:09.220
And we see that fringe
contrast is very poor.

00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:15.835
So let me go back to
the zero position.

00:07:19.010 --> 00:07:22.390
and look at the fringes.

00:07:22.390 --> 00:07:23.950
Very good.

00:07:23.950 --> 00:07:37.220
And about 45 centimeters, and
we don't have any fringes.

00:07:37.220 --> 00:07:43.830
Now, what could the reason be
for the fringes disappearing?

00:07:43.830 --> 00:07:46.638
This setup is a good setup.

00:07:46.638 --> 00:07:48.180
I think the alignment
is pretty good.

00:07:48.180 --> 00:07:51.360
We're paying careful
attention to the alignment.

00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:53.910
And so, what can it be?

00:07:53.910 --> 00:07:56.820
Certainly not-- it's not
in the interferometer.

00:07:56.820 --> 00:07:59.770
It must be in the light source.

00:07:59.770 --> 00:08:04.500
Now, the light source in this
case is a helium-neon laser,

00:08:04.500 --> 00:08:07.830
and the separation
between the mirrors

00:08:07.830 --> 00:08:12.990
or the length of the cavity
is about 95 centimeters.

00:08:12.990 --> 00:08:16.290
The laser certainly
puts out a lot of light.

00:08:16.290 --> 00:08:18.900
The only thing we don't
know about the laser

00:08:18.900 --> 00:08:21.150
is the spectrum of the light.

00:08:21.150 --> 00:08:22.950
For example, is it
single frequency,

00:08:22.950 --> 00:08:26.280
or is it multiple
frequency, or what?

00:08:26.280 --> 00:08:28.060
Now, what I'm going
to do, I'm going

00:08:28.060 --> 00:08:32.490
to set up an arrangement
that will tell us

00:08:32.490 --> 00:08:34.500
what the spectrum of
the laser light is.

00:08:34.500 --> 00:08:36.850
And when we come back,
we'll have it already,

00:08:36.850 --> 00:08:41.460
and we can show you what the
spectrum of the laser light is.

00:08:41.460 --> 00:08:44.460
Now we've set up the arrangement
for observing the spectrum

00:08:44.460 --> 00:08:47.310
of the laser light.

00:08:47.310 --> 00:08:50.730
The setup is essentially
what we had before.

00:08:50.730 --> 00:08:53.340
Here is the interferometer--

00:08:53.340 --> 00:08:55.080
the two arms of the
interferometer--

00:08:55.080 --> 00:08:59.310
and the fringes, again,
we can see on the screen.

00:08:59.310 --> 00:09:03.030
What we've done to observe the
spectrum of the laser light,

00:09:03.030 --> 00:09:07.440
we've added this beam splitter
over here to reflect some

00:09:07.440 --> 00:09:11.100
of the laser light before
it enters the interferometer

00:09:11.100 --> 00:09:14.730
and reflects it into
this scanning Fabry-Pérot

00:09:14.730 --> 00:09:16.590
interferometer.

00:09:16.590 --> 00:09:21.150
The output of the
interferometer is displayed

00:09:21.150 --> 00:09:25.140
on an oscilloscope over here.

00:09:25.140 --> 00:09:28.920
What we have displayed on the
face of the oscilloscope is one

00:09:28.920 --> 00:09:33.340
complete free spectral range
of the scanning Fabry-Pérot,

00:09:33.340 --> 00:09:36.750
which is about 1
and 1/2 gigahertz,

00:09:36.750 --> 00:09:39.960
corresponding to the
10 centimeter length

00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:42.730
of the scanning Fabry-Pérot.

00:09:42.730 --> 00:09:47.340
Now, if the laser were indeed
oscillating at one frequency,

00:09:47.340 --> 00:09:52.140
we would only see just one peak.

00:09:52.140 --> 00:09:55.540
But we see about
eight or nine peaks,

00:09:55.540 --> 00:09:57.630
which means that the
laser must be oscillating

00:09:57.630 --> 00:10:01.070
at several frequencies.

00:10:01.070 --> 00:10:05.240
Again, from the 1 and 1/2
gigahertz free spectral range,

00:10:05.240 --> 00:10:09.740
we see that the separation
between the frequencies

00:10:09.740 --> 00:10:12.920
of the laser is
about 160 megahertz.

00:10:12.920 --> 00:10:14.780
And this is what we
expect, because this

00:10:14.780 --> 00:10:20.300
corresponds to the 95 centimeter
length of the laser cavity.

00:10:24.030 --> 00:10:28.920
So as you see that the laser is
not a single frequency laser,

00:10:28.920 --> 00:10:30.870
it has many frequencies.

00:10:30.870 --> 00:10:36.090
So maybe the fact that the
contrast in the fringes

00:10:36.090 --> 00:10:41.010
varies so dramatically
with path length difference

00:10:41.010 --> 00:10:44.480
may have something to do with
the spectrum of the laser

00:10:44.480 --> 00:10:44.980
light.

00:10:47.510 --> 00:10:50.500
And I would like you
to think about that.

00:10:50.500 --> 00:10:53.250
But in another
demonstration, we're

00:10:53.250 --> 00:10:56.070
going to bring in a
single frequency laser.

00:10:56.070 --> 00:10:59.250
And, indeed, we're going
to study this problem

00:10:59.250 --> 00:11:01.370
very carefully.