1.252J | Fall 2016 | Graduate

Urban Transportation Planning

Assignments

Weekly Reading and Class Responses

You are required to submit a one-paragraph (no more than 150 words) response to the readings each week by 4pm the night before class. The responses are not meant to be formal, but instead help you engage with the class material and help us lead and focus the class discussion. You should not spend more than 30 minutes each week on the responses, although we expect you will spend significantly more time doing readings. Responses will count towards class participation. Each class period will include a discussion section of the previous week’s readings, and each week, a group of students will be selected to give a short introduction and overview of one to two readings each to help begin the week’s discussion.

Assignment 0: Introduce Yourself

Please submit a short half-page document about yourself, so that the instructors and TA can get to know you better, and help put names to faces. The first assignment is a group assignment, and we want to form groups of mixed skills and interests. This assignment is not graded. In this document, please describe your background; the school you attend; your current program of study and year in the program; and your primary interests in transportation and background in transportation (if any).

Assignment 1

Counting and Observing at Key Intersections

Assignment 2

Re-Designing Massachusetts Avenue

Assignment 3

Assessing the Impacts of Growth in the Lower Mystic

Assignment 4

Planning for Growth in the Lower Mystic

Counting and Observing at Key Intersections

Due: Week 4

Purpose

The first assignment is a group assignment, to go out and observe key street cross sections and intersections nearby in Cambridge. This assignment gives you a chance to observe and think about how people, different travel modes, infrastructure, and neighboring land uses interact in a real, live place. You will not only look and see what is going on, but also start to become familiar with how “little numbers” translate to real-world conditions: what does 800 cars/hour look like vs. 800 people riding the T, and what impact do these differences have on the nature of the urban scene? You should become familiar with basic ideas like level of service, saturation flow rate, capacity, speeds, flow, and mode share (see Meyer and Miller, Chapter 3). We want you to think about how you measure and what you measure, and what impact this has on the transportation planning process and built outcomes.

Logistics

Group Work

This assignment will be done in teams and submitted as group work. You will be divided into teams based on your diversity of skills and backgrounds.

Group 1: Central Square, Massachusetts Ave. at Prospect St., Massachusetts Ave. at Inman St., and Western Ave. at Franklin St.

Group 2: Massachusetts Ave. at Main St. and Sidney St., Massachusetts Ave. at Brookline St.

Group 3: Massachusetts Ave. at Albany St., Massachusetts Ave. at Vassar St., 77 Massachusetts Ave.

Group 4: Cambridge St. at Prospect St., Hampshire St. at Prospect St., Hampshire St. at Cambridge St.

Observation and Data Collection

Each team is to count, by direction and turning movement, automobiles, buses, taxis, TNC vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, trucks, and trains. But you are also to estimate how many people are using these different vehicles, to get a sense of the relative numerical strength of each user group. You are to count at one morning peak hour and one evening hour between 8PM and 9PM. If we have enough students, each individual student should only need to do two hours. You are to count the old fashioned way, just to give you a feel for how reliable the data collected was; but you should also supplement the hand counts with taking a video on your phone, so you can check your count and will have a record that may pick up nuances that you might have missed. Please be sure to count in groups, both because there is too much for one person to successfully count, but also for safety. Especially in evening hours, please be sure that you feel safe and have company.

What to Count

A detailed description of what/where to count for each location is attached (see end). Key intersections have been marked with blue circles, but for context you should make observations of the neighborhood, street network, and traffic flows of a bigger surrounding area (exact scope is up to your judgment, but we recommend radiating out 1-2 blocks). Before you go out and start counting, take a look at the 19 step planning process from lecture 1 and think about what type of data you think would be useful for understanding current conditions and making planning decisions, and how you can best represent and communicate the reality ‘out there’ to your audience.

So that you observe the place from a multi-modal perspective, count all the major transportation modes passing through the site: private vehicles (cars, trucks, motorbikes), taxies and Ubers/Lyfts (if identifiable), transit vehicles, bikes and pedestrians. For buses and trains, a rough estimate of onboard passengers (e.g. “75% full” - for reference, regular MBTA buses have 39 seats, and a policy maximum of 54 total passengers) may be all you have time for. For cars, try and estimate the occupancy. If turning or transfer movements (from one street or mode to another) appear significant, you may wish to gather data on these as well, especially if heavy transfer volumes or blocked turning movements cause backups.

Tips on Counting

Your sites will be complex and there will be a lot going on (that’s why we’ve chosen them)! We recommend:

  • Conducting your traffic counts in two 20-minute intervals, taking the average of the two, and scaling-up to hourly values. Please be sure to obtain at least two samples to guard against sampling error.
  • Dividing up the major routes and directions at your site and count all the travel modes applicable. Depending on how heavy the traffic flow is, you may be able to count multiple modes at the same time.
  • Taking videos (using smartphones or other devices) of the scene, which allows you to count in slower motion, pause, rewind, and re-count if needs be afterwards. (Spoiler: this is how traffic is counted in the real, professional world.)

Deliverables

Having completed your counts and observations, each team needs to write a team report for the location of no more than 12 pages double-spaced (excluding figures, tables, and appendices).

In your report, explicitly address the following:

  1. Site introduction and paper introduction
    • What is the site’s regional context vs. local function?
    • Briefly research history of the intersection
    • How has transportation influenced the development of this site, or vice versa?
    • Stakeholders: Who are the stakeholders and constituencies affected by transportation at this site? Who owns what? Who uses what? Who is exposed to transport pollution or safety hazards?
  2. Analysis (see below for more detail)
    • Major travel patterns: What major travel patterns do you observe? How can you explain these patterns? Think about the generators and attractors of people.
    • Problem areas: What existing and emerging problems do you identify?
  3. Recommendations
    • Do you have any recommendations (very briefly) on how these problems could begin to be addressed?

The format and organization of the document is up to you. Each team will submit one report which should reflect a group effort.

Analysis

Your report should discuss Step 2, 3, and 5 of the 19-step process, and you can spend a little time on suggestions for Step 7 (developing solutions). YOu cannot necessarily do a complete job, but you can identify what other actions and data gathering is necessary to do a complete job.

We expect you to do more than just give a simple summary of the ’little numbers’ that you collected. There is no hard-and-fast way to tabulate and present your data; use whichever methods you feel ar most appropriate. Interpret your data and see what ‘story’ it tells about your site. Think about how different ways of measuring and analyzing can paint a different picture. Questions you might answer in telling this ‘story’:

  • What are the dominant flows for each mode? (i.e. where are most people traveling?)
  • Who and what activities aren’t happening or being measured?
  • How many people use each mode, and how much space/time is allocated to each mode? How can all these users share the space?
  • Do the most numerous users of the street change over different periods of time?
  • What are major conflict points?
  • Which are the most stressful hours, for each group of users?
  • Who is using the curbs?
  • Do some streets really belong to a network of parallel streets, all of which need to be observed?
  • Can problems be solved with a bucket of paint?

Carefully consider how effective diagrams and explanatory text can help answer these questions.

Recitation

Your team should be ready to do a ten minute, informal presentation during recitation. To allow for questions and answers, each group should have twenty minutes, so we can see four to five groups present.

Evaluation

Your paper will be graded (as a group product) based upon the integration and effective use of concepts in the readings, lectures, and discussions. In addition, your paper will be evaluated based upon the clarity of presentation (clear writing, thoughtful analysis, effective argumentation). Additionally:

  • Please limit the written portion of the memo to the equivalent of no more than 12 double-spaced pages.
  • Figures, tables, or illustrations are not required but you are encouraged to use them if you think they will be useful; they will not count towards the page limit.

Re-designing Massachusetts Avenue

Due: Class 8

Introduction

The Cambridge Director of Transportation has asked you, his trusted advisor, to help him plan his strategy with respect to current issues regarding Massachusetts Avenue between Central Square and the Harvard Bridge.

For this assignment, you will have access to the counting reports of the teams at three intersections and locations along Mass. Ave. You should walk and observe, and use the first several steps of the 19 step process as part of your background work in preparing to write the assignment. Pay explicit attention to the first step: “who are you?” and how this impacts the advice you give.

Note that each cross-section and intersection poses unique issues, but that there may be some commonality. Since the same vehicles will need to navigate the entire section, what you propose for your intersection should consider the needs of the rest of the corridor. IN addition to your general arguments, your advisee has asked you to look at a particular intersection in the corridor and make specific recommendations for design and operational changes that demonstrate your holistic approach, particularly regarding improving pedestrian safety and access to adjacent land uses, at one of the following intersections: 1) Mass. Ave. at Prospect St., 2) Mass. Ave. at Sidney St., or 3) Mass. Ave. at Vassar St.

A map of Central Square in Cambridge, MA. Key intersections are highlighted with blue circles.

Download a larger version of the map

Questions to Address

Your assignment is to propose solutions for a re-design of Massachusetts Avenue at one of the four locations along the corridor observed by you and your peers. In doing so, please consider the following questions and use the 19 step process to structure your memo.

  • What should the key objectives be for an overall redesign of Mass. Ave. between Central Square and the Harvard Bridge?
  • How is the width of the street currently allocated? How does that compare to the relative flows of users?
  • What are the problems or conflicts identified by you and your peers at these locations? What is working well?
  • What opportunities do you see to address these issues?
  • Are there any precedents you’re aware of for redesigning a street like Mass. Ave., and what can we learn from those interventions?
  • What, if any, overall corridor policies or approaches do you recommend? How do they support your key objectives
  • Recognizing the numbers of people moving through the corridor in different modes and at different times of day, what design interventions do you propose for your intersection? Consider how what you propose at this intersection relates to the streets radiating out one block in each direction. Note: you should use “little numbers,” not precise calculations, but enough quantitative analysis to gauge the flows by mode, and consequent space needs.
    • How do you propose to address the varying needs for different modes moving through the intersection at different times of day?
    • How do you propose to allocate the width of the street to different users?
    • With what types of interventions do you recommend (including, for example, bike lanes, separated bike lanes, bus lanes, sidewalk bumpouts, re-routing certain modes to parallel streets, etc.)?
    • Do you have recommendations with respect to where left turns should be allowed/prohibited, locations of taxi stands and loading zones, and what should happen to parking?
    • Do you have any recommendations with respect to how the signals should be timed, or allocated to different users?
    • Feel free to use Streetmix, a hand drawing, or other software to communicate your ideas - as well as the resources listed below for ideas of interventions
  • What are the likely impacts - positive and negative - of your proposed design? For what time periods and modes does it work best - and worst?
  • Who are the constituencies that your design will impact, positively and negatively, and how does your design address their potential concerns?

Format: The assignment should be in the form of a memo to Joe Barr, Director of Transportation for the City of Cambridge, and can include images or diagrams if they are useful for conveying your ideas. Please maintain a limit of 6 pages, including graphics.

Discussion Teams: This is an individual assignment, and each of you will write your own memo. However, to expose you to a range of viewpoints and provide a corridor perspective, you will be grouped into teams of 3 for brainstorming and discussion. Each team will have at least one member from each intersection. We recognize that it can be challenging to coordinate schedules for meetings, but try to meet as a team at least once. We are not expecting consistency between what individuals in each team propose. Instead, the idea is just to get you thinking about the upstream and downstream consequences of what you might suggest at one point.

Street Design Resources: These are great resources for getting ideas and guidance for ways to allocate street space, the ideal widths of different elements, and some throughput numbers.

Data and Background Material

Assessing the Impacts of Growth in the Lower Mystic

What: A 15 page (max) double-spaced memo to the Boston Chief of Streets Chris Osgood

Who: Groups of 3

Due: Week 12

Presentations: Recitation, week 13

Background

For the first part of this assignment, you are part of a three-member team advising Chris Oswood, the transportation and Public Works director for Mayor Marty Walsh, on the likely transportation impacts of the Wynn casino in Everett and other development proposals in the area around the transportation corridor from Sullivan Square, the traffic circle, to the Orange Line station and I-93, and the Rutherford Avenue to Prison Point Bridge to City Square, over the Charlestown Bridge to North Station.

The Wynn casino was approved by the state gaming commission, with its roughly 5000-car parking garage, notwithstanding not having completed its Massachusetts Environmental Protection Agency (MEPA) analysis. The MEPA approval by Secretary Matthew Beaton ignored the fact that the analysis by Wynn consultants assumed rebuilding of the decrepit Sullivan Square tunnel, owned by Boston, which the city and neighborhood activists had proposed to eliminate and replace with an at-grade transit oriented development urban grid.

Wynn is now under construction, and the after-the-fact Lower Mystic Regional Working Group (LMRWG) study is underway, with the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) analyzing a large number of possible transportation investments in the corridor. The LMRWG is looking not only at how to deal with the casino traffic generation, but also the Assembly Square redevelopment and densification; the Brickbottom and Inner Belt redevelopment; and the city of Boston’s desire for densification along Rutherford Avenue and around North Station. The city has initiated a public process to evaluate three options for Rutherford Avenue: 1) the earlier no-tunnel, at-grade urban grid; 2) a one-way southbound Rutherford Ave. tunnel; 3) a two-way tunnel under Sullivan Square, with similar cross sections at the Prison Point Bridge.

In addition, several other road and transit projects have been proposed by the surrounding cities and stakeholders. The city of Boston has proposed a new northbound ramp from City Square to I-93 North, to reduce flow northbound on Rutherford Ave. Somerville has required a new U-turn ramp to accept northwest-bound traffic from Sullivan Square to reverse direction and join I-93 to the south, along with recommending the elimination of the HOV lane on I-93, to encourage traffic to stay on I-93. A Better City (ABC) has proposed the introduction of a bus rapid transit (BRT) along the Newburyport commuter rail corridor to connect to the Silver Line BRT in Chelsea to Logan Airport, while others have proposed a new diesel multiple unit (DMU) service from North Station to Sullivan Square, to the casino to Revere and Lynn; a dramatic improvement of the Orange Line signal system; and Everett has proposed a new Orange Line spur to Everett and Malden. There is some potential to get partial funding from Wynn for transit or roadway improvements, and some possibility to apply for funding from the Gaming Commission’s anticipated casino revenues.

Together, your team is to assess the impact of the land use growth projected due to the Wynn casino and surrounding developments on major transportation infrastructure in the area. One member of your team is to attempt a “little numbers”/back of the envelope analysis of the I-93 corridor, with increased traffic generation from the casino and Assembly Square redevelopment. A second member is to consider the impact on the Orange Line, already over-crowded today. The third is to consider the three options for at-grade or tunnel configurations at Sullivan Square circle.

Instructions

In this assignment, you will be exposed to thinking about regional development and travel demand, and how to plan to accomodate multi-modal access. You are asked to attempt a “little numbers” analysis of the impact of the growth in the area, to the best of your ability with the data available. Each member of your group with be primarily responsible for one of the following questions, but you must coordinate amongst yourselves to have an internally consistent and coherent assessment of the three questions. Given the projected and planned-for jobs and housing growth in the Lower Mystic study area:

  1. What is I-93’s basic capacity at different speeds, and how close to capacity is the corridor currently? How much do you estimate traffic will increase on I-93, and what will this do to accessibility?
  2. How much do you estimate demand will increase on the Orange Line and other transit services in the study area? What are the basic capacity constraints, and how close to capacity is the corridor currently?
  3. How will increased demand from the surrounding developments impact the Rutherford Avenue corridor and the city of Boston’s plans for that area

In addition to these three guiding questions, as a group consider using the following steps of the 19-step process and sub-questions in particular to guide your thinking:

  • Step one: who you are as a group, and your relationship to the relevant actors.
  • Step two: scan the environment, review history, identify trends, project future conditions.
    1. Begin by reviewing the documents recommended to organize the relevant numbers for existing conditions, as well as planned growth (such as new housing units, new jobs, new trips generated, and projected mode-share) for each of the plans in the study area.
    2. Evaluate capacity: identify basic capacity constrains and current demand for major transportation infrastructure in the study area, especially the Orange Line, I-93, and the Rutherford Avenue tunnel.
    3. Evaluate connectivity given current and future conditions. What does access to jobs via driving look like under current conditions? What about if I-93 were more congested? What does access to jobs look like via public transit? Consider doing a very basic accessibility/isochrones assessment using Google Maps under congested and uncongested conditions, and CoAXs for transit.
    4. Evaluate mode share: assess whether the projected new trips and mode share are compatible with existing infrastructure. What more share would be compatible with existing and planned transportation infrastructure in the area?
  • Step three: identify relevant actors, primary roles and interests, and culture.
    1. What are the goals of the city of Boston with respect to this area? Who is Chris Osgood and what are his interests?
    2. Who are the other important stakeholders (including but not limited to, the city of Somerville, city of Everett, and MassDOT), and what are their interests? What are the goals of the various redevelopment efforts?
  • Steps five and six: Define problems and identify opportunities.
    1. From your analysis in step 2, what are the primary transportation problems you see arising, and what are the primary opportunities to address them? What alternatives have been proposed thus far?
    2. What would happen if the level of growth predicted transpires, and no investment is made in the area’s transportation infrastructure?

The results of your team’s analysis will be submitted by week 12 and discussed at recitation week 13.

Planning for Growth in the Lower Mystic

What: An 8-page (max) double-spaced memo to the Boston Chief of Streets

Who: Individual assignment

Due: Week 14

Please refer to Assignment 3 for background information on development in the Lower Mystic area

Instructions

After assessing the level of growth projected from the various developments in the Lower Mystic area, the impacts and capacity constraints of major transportation infrastructure in the area, and projected and estimated mode shares, now it’s your turn to propose as individuals how to achieve a transportation plan that can maintain and improve access to jobs and opportunities while supporting the plans and goals of the surrounding cities. In particular, please answer the following questions, building off your assessment in Assigment 3:

  1. What short-term (1-5 years) recommendations would you make to keep I-93, the Orange Line, and Rutherford Avenue operational?
  2. In the long term (5-25 years), what do you think are the most important interventions to make for I-93, the Orange Line and other transit service, and the Rutherford Avenue corridor?
    1. Transit projects could include BRT, DMU service along the commuter rail line, Orange Line upgrades, etc.
    2. For Rutherford Avenue, given the presumption of the Wynn report that the Rutherford Avenue tunnel would continue serving 1,700 trips per day, what do you recommend for the city of Boston? If you don’t recommend keeping the tunnel, how do you recommend serving those 1,700 trips?
  3. How do you recommend paying for your solutions? What are the potential sources, and who has the greatest responsibilities to pay?

To guide your overall thinking about the transportation plan for this area, and to answer the three questions above, consider using the following remaining questions from the 19-step process, if it’s useful to guide your thinking:

  • Step seven: develop solutions.
    1. In addition to the recommendations you make for I-93, transit, and the Rutherford Tunnel, what other improvements or policy changes would you make to support transportation access and a liveable environment in the area? Possibilities include land use recommendations, parking limitations, pedestrian and bicycle access, travel demand management, etc.
  • Step eleven: predict outcomes, benefits, costs.
    1. Can you implement “back of the envelope” projections to indicate whether your solutions could accomodate the level of demand anticipated on the three major pieces of infrastructure identified (I-93, Orange Line, Rutherford Avenue)?
  • Step twelve: consider finance.
    1. How do you recommend financing the improvements you’ve recommended? How much, roughly, is needed, and who should pay? Is this realistic?
  • Step thirteen: build a constituency.
    1. Who is likely to support your recommendations and why? Can you build a coalition to move your recommendations forward?

Your individual recommendation is due week 14.

Background Resources

Lower Mystic Regional Working Group

City of Boston Sullivan Square/Rutherford redevelopment plans

Inner Belt/Brickbottom plans (Somerville)

Wynn Everett SSFEIR (PDF - 1.2MB)

Orange Line -  Focus 40 Orange Line upgrades

Katie McLaughlin’s thesis

MassDOT Everett Transit Action Plan

Course Info

Learning Resource Types
Problem Sets
Lecture Notes
Instructor Insights