21W.777 | Spring 2017 | Undergraduate

Science Writing in Contemporary Society

Syllabus

Course Meeting Times

2 sessions / week, 1.5 hours / session

Prerequisites

None

Course Description

“Lively writing about science and nature depends less on the offering of good answers, I think, than on the offering of good questions.”
- David Quammen

“To write nonfiction, whether ‘science writing’ or any other kind, is an act of intimacy. You are inviting the reader into your world—into your mind, no less."
- Elise Hancock

This class addresses the craft of writing about science in and for contemporary society, both its pleasures and its challenges. We will read essays, reportage, op-eds, and web-based articles on a variety of topics concerning science, technology, medicine and nature. Readings by contemporary writers such as Elizabeth Kolbert, Atul Gawande, and Michael Pollan will serve as examples of the craft and sources of ideas for our own writing. Some themes we may focus on: explaining what is and isn’t science; understanding and communicating contexts; handling controversial topics; keeping “the human element” (Hancock) in sight; shaping longer narratives; appreciating the affordances and limitations of various media for telling stories about science.

The main work of this class is our own writing, which will include revision of each major assignment. Peer review and comments from the instructor will be plentiful. Principal writing assignments include 3 essays and a reading journal. An oral presentation will also be required.

Notes:

  • This is not a technical writing class.
  • This class is normally required for majors in science writing

Overview and Class Policies

Objectives and Assignments

The primary work of this class is to:

  • Develop your skills in writing and speaking clearly and effectively;
  • Help you become aware of your own purposes as writers; and
  • Help you become aware of the audience(s) you are writing for.

More particularly, some of the goals of this class are to teach students to:

  • Create and shape texts in relation to different purposes, audiences, and rhetorical situations
  • Develop strategies for reading analytically, managing and structuring information, drafting, and revising
  • Evaluate sources of information, integrate sources effectively for specific rhetorical purposes, and understand reasons for and systems of source citation in academic writing
  • Understand how to critique other writers’ texts constructively and to use the peer review process to develop their own texts
  • Develop the flexibility in word-choice and sentence construction necessary for conveying complex ideas coherently.

Major assignments. The Major writing assignments for this class are 3 essays, a reading journal, and an oral presentation. The longest of the 3 essays will be revised, with the option to revise the other 2.

Our major assignments and when they are due are outlined in the Assignments section.

In addition, shorter writing assignments will occasionally be given as homework.

Portfolios. At our last class meeting I’ll collect a portfolio of written work for our class—so don’t throw any of your drafts or homework away!

Class participation. Class participation includes attendance, class discussions and workshopping. Discussion is part of the oral work of a communications-intensive class: all students are expected to participate in class discussions.

  • Discussion should demonstrate not just familiarity with assigned readings, but also critical thinking and clear expression of ideas.
  • For good discussions, aim to build on each others’ points, not just jump in with random points.
  • All students are also expected to respond to classmates’ drafts thoughtfully.
  • Class participation will make up 10% of your grade.

Reading Materials. Most class readings will be available via our class site. Some readings will be handouts or available through web links. Print out all readings—preferably before you read them!—and bring them to class so that you can participate actively in class discussions. It is not acceptable to read assignments on your cell phone.

Note: Assignments are posted under “Assignments,” while the readings themselves are posted under “Readings.” There are no required books for this class, but if you have not already read it, I highly recommend Ideas into Words by Elise Hancock.

Hancock, Elise. Ideas into Words: Mastering the Craft of Science Writing. Foreward by Robert Kanigel. First Printing edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003. ISBN: 9780801873300. [Preview with Google Books]

Dictionaries. Mac computers have a decent computer on board (via “Tools”), which you can access by highlighting words in texts you’re reading or writing. Even better is the Dictionary app: on my Mac it’s the New Oxford American Dictionary, and by keeping it on your dashboard, you’ll be able to use it seamlessly. For those of you interested in learning more about words, or for whom English is a second language, I strongly encourage you to have, and use, a good hardcover dictionary.

Course Policies

Attendance. This class is structured more like a workshop or seminar than a lecture class. Therefore, attendance is important: your responsibility in the class is not only to be a writer, but also to read and respond to classmates’ work and to participate in discussions.

  • If you miss more than two classes for any reason, you risk getting a lower grade.
  • If you miss class on a workshop day, it will count as two absences.
  • With six unexcused absences you will be withdrawn from the class.
  • Sleeping in class will be counted as an absence.
  • It is your responsibility to let me know why you are absent and to keep up with assignments when you do miss class.

Lateness is discourteous to your classmates and to your professor. If you are 10 minutes late three times it will count as an absence.

Conferences. Because it’s often more efficient and effective for us to have a conversation about your writing than to communicate via comments on papers, conferences are an important part of our work together. Bring specific questions about your writing, such as how to focus your topic or how to connect the ideas in your essay. You are also welcome to use conference time to continue discussions begun in class or try out ideas sparked by your reading.

MIT students are required to have one conference with me but may have more.

On first drafts, you’ll receive a grade, ample comments from me as well as comments from classmates.

  • Essay 2, the Investigative Essay, must be revised; Essays 1 and 3 may be revised.
  • For the Investigative Essay and any other essay that is graded twice, the first draft will count for 40% of the grade, and the 2nd draft will count for 60% of the grade for that assignment.
  • All work is to be presented at the end of the semester in a Portfolio, including a cover letter

Grading breakdown

ACTIVITIES PERCENTAGES
Science in/and Culture Essay 20%
Investigative Essay 35%
Book Review Essay 25%
Reading Journal 5%
Book Talk 5%
Class participation (includes meaningful participation in workshops) 10%

Late drafts

  • 1st drafts that are late or incomplete* will be penalized by a half grade for each day late.
  • Revision deadline may be negotiated for good cause.

*What I mean by incomplete:

  • For Essays 1 and 3, a draft that is short by more than a full page
  • For the Investigative Essay, a draft that is short by more than 2 full pages, and/or a draft that does not include citations both in the text and in a list of References.

What “A” work likes like

A work is excellent: the content goes beyond the simple and commonplace—it may give readers some news, surprise them, or help them see something familiar in a new way. The writing is confident, energetic, essentially free of error, with the sound of an individual writer’s voice. It is clear—lucidity, lucidity, lucidity! (Hancock) and appropriately researched. It is well focused and organized, and does not settle for the surface layer of the topic. It cites sources consistently and appropriately. It takes the reader into account throughout.

What “B” writing looks like

B work is solid, competent, on the right track. It may be not quite up to “A” level in most aspects, or it may excel in some aspects but fall short in others.

What “C” writing looks like

“C” work satisfies the assignment but is unclear in several places, is unfocused and/or weakly organized, contains some inaccuracies, cites inconsistently, stays on the surface of the topic, settles for clichés rather than fresh and vivid language, and/or contains a significant number of grammar errors. It does not successfully or consistently take readers into account. It lacks a central idea, or the idea is hard for readers to discern.

Grading: the nitty-gritty

Grades are based on a 4-point scale:

A = 4 points
A- = 3.7
B+ = 3.3
B = 3
B- = 2.7
C+ = 2.3
C = 2
C- = 1.7
D = 1
F = 0

Class participation counts for 10% of your final grade. It covers attendance, coming to class prepared, participating in discussion and workshops in class, workshop comments in writing on partners’ drafts. I will assign this grade at the end of the semester.

Course Info

Instructor
As Taught In
Spring 2017
Learning Resource Types
Written Assignments