Course Meeting Times
Lectures: 2 sessions / week, 1.5 hours / session
This is a HASS-D / CI-H class requiring substantial work in analytical writing and in oral presentation. More detail about this will be given below, but here are the basics:
Each student will write 3 essays, minimally 7 double-spaced pages apiece; one of these must be revised after consultation with me.
Each student will deliver 2 ten-minute reports on subjects pertinent to our readings. More details below.
The following schedule shows the reading you should have done by a given day; it's designed to spread your reading fairly evenly across the semester (for example, if four class sessions are devoted to a novel, you should read at least a quarter of the work for each of those sessions). In class, however, I'll go slower over some parts, faster over others. The schedule is subject to change, so if you miss a class, check to make sure what's coming next.
The day before Ses #14, the novelist and short-story author Vikram Chandra will be visiting MIT for a late afternoon seminar and an evening public reading. Students of 21L.012 will read Chandra's story "Kama" (from his collection Love and Longing in Bombay) and are strongly encouraged to attend the seminar and reading.
|10||Cervantes (readings for all 4 classes: pp. 11-479)|
|14||Grimms' tales: "The Frog-King"; "Hansel and Gretel"; "The Fisherman and His Wife"; "Cinderella"; "Little Snow-White"; "Brother Lustig"|
As a HASS-D / CI-H class, 21L012 requires substantial practice in analytical writing and speaking.
- 3 take-home essay exams (minimum 7 double-spaced pages each) on Homer, Cervantes, and Shelley (respectively). Please use Courier 12-point font for all your writing in this class.
- A 4th (and last) essay exam, consisting of a substantially revised version of one of the previous three. Outside of class, you will work with me and with a class partner on your revision; when submitted it must be accompanied by a one-page statement reflecting on what you found necessary to change, what improvements you attempted to make, why, and so forth.
- Two oral reports, approximately 10 minutes each, on topics to be assigned. Your function on the first of these will be to inform your fellow students about a topic relevant to our readings, to do so in the clearest and most concise manner, to show you have selected the most important information to convey, to deliver your report with a professional demeanor and authority. The second report will be a joint presentation with your revision partner about the original and final versions of your revised papers.
- There will be an in-class quiz on Conrad's Heart of Darkness as soon as we have finished discussing that work.
- Written work is due either at the beginning of class or, if on a Friday, before 5 pm at the Literature office. Hard copies, please; electronic versions are acceptable only in special circumstances and if approved by me.
- Extensions may be arranged, but only if you ask for them in advance of the original due date.
- No more than two unexcused absences. Beyond that, you will fail the course.
- If you are sick or have to be away for another legitimate reason, e-mail me.
- I may charge you an unexcused absence if you frequently arrive late or without your book.
- Unannounced quizzes on readings at my discretion.
|Written work (including quiz)||75%|
|Overall helpfulness of attitude and demeanor||5%|
Principles of Assessment
I expect written work of the same caliber as the work required in your other MIT subjects. This means carefully composed and proof-read (no sloppy errors), thorough, well thought-out, sufficiently supplied with supporting material quoted or paraphrased from the text(s). I make no distinctions between "content" and "quality of writing." How you decide to state something, how you assemble an argument, how you construct each and every sentence – these things constitute your argument and are thus indistinguishable from its "content." Also, more richly detailed essays, those that take the trouble to respond very fully to the text and to the questions posed in the assignment, will receive higher marks than those that give minimal or very general responses. I will distribute a sample "A" paper (from another class, of course!) to illustrate the qualities I have described above.
On oral presentations, students will be judged on pertinence, clarity, and organization of the information presented, as well as on delivery style (the "professional demeanor and authority" mentioned above).
Plagiarism—use of another's intellectual work without acknowledgement—is a serious offense. It is the policy of the Literature Faculty that students who plagiarize will receive an F in the subject, and that the instructor will forward the case to the Committee on Discipline. Full acknowledgement for all information obtained from sources outside the classroom must be clearly stated in all written work submitted. All ideas, arguments, and direct phrasings taken from someone else's work must be identified and properly footnoted. Quotations from other sources must be clearly marked as distinct from the student's own work. For further guidance on the proper forms of attribution, consult the style guides available at the MIT's Writing and Communication Center and useful citations links located here.