Description
We will explore the changing political choices and ethical dilemmas of American scientists from the atomic scientists of World War II to biologists in the present wrestling with the questions raised by cloning and other biotechnologies. As well as asking how we would behave if confronted with the same choices, we will try to understand the choices scientists have made by seeing them in their historical and political contexts. Some of the topics covered include: the original development of nuclear weapons and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; the effects of the Cold War on American science; the space shuttle disasters; debates on the use of nuclear power, wind power, and biofuels; abuse of human subjects in psychological and other experiments; deliberations on genetically modified food, the human genome project, human cloning, embryonic stem cell research; and the ethics of archaeological science in light of controversies over museum collections.
Requirements
Course requirements include three 6-7 page papers, and a final exam. Besides lectures, there will be class videos. As far as the class size permits, there will also be considerable class discussion, and you should come prepared to share your thoughts and engage your classmates in debate. That means doing the reading before class; motivational help will be in the form of unannounced reading quizzes during the term.
Regular attendance is required and unexcused absences will be penalized. If you need to miss a class (traveling for interviews, family or health emergencies), please phone or email the instructor ahead of time so your absence can be excused. Absences for religious observance are allowed.
Grading
The final course grade will be determined as follows:
| Activities | Percentages |
|---|---|
| Class participation | 10% |
| Reading quizzes | 10% |
| First paper grade | 20% |
| Second paper grade | 20% |
| Third paper grade | 20% |
| Final exam grade | 20% |
Plagiarism
Finally, a word about plagiarism. The MIT website says this about plagiarism: “Plagiarism is a very serious offense. If it is found that you have plagiarized — deliberately or inadvertently — you may face serious consequences. In some instances, plagiarism has meant that students have had to leave the institutions where they were studying. MIT addresses plagiarism and its consequences in Policies and Procedures, section 10. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to cite your sources - both within the body of your paper and in a bibliography of sources you used at the end of your paper.”
See “Academic Integrity at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology: A Handbook for Students” (July 2007) for an excellent overview of these issues. (PDF)
Calendar
| LEC # | TOPICS | KEY DATES |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | |
| I. Military influence on American science | ||
| 2 | World War II: Hiroshima, Nagasaki | |
| 3 | Manhattan project | |
| 4 |
Science, military research, and the national security state Guest lecturer: Prof. David Kaiser |
|
| 5 | Military influence on American science | |
| 6 |
Apollo space program Guest lecturer: Prof. David Mindell |
|
| II. Risk | ||
| 7 | Space program: Challenger and Columbia | |
| 8 |
Space program: Challenger and Columbia (cont.) Guest lecturer: Prof. Jeffrey Hoffman |
Essay 1 due |
| 9 | Health and environment | |
| 10 | Health and environment (cont.) | |
| 11 | Biotechnology: genetically modified foods | |
| 12 | Biotechnology: stem cell research | |
| 13 | Biotechnology: stem cell research (cont.) | |
| 14 | Biotechnology: cloning | |
| 15 | Biotechnology: market forces | |
| 16 | Biotechnology: genome and health insurance | |
| 17 | Biotechnology: genome and health insurance (cont.) | Essay 2 due |
| III. The environment | ||
| 18 | Climate change research | |
| 19 |
Climate change research (cont.) Guest lecturer: Dr. William Curry, WHOI |
|
| 20 |
Alternatives to fossil fuels Guest lecturer: Mark Rogers, Communications Director, Cape Wind |
|
| IV. Politics, ethics, and social science | ||
| 21 | Experimentation on human subjects | |
| 22 |
Experimentation on human subjects (cont.) Guest lecturer: Prof. David Jones |
|
| 23 |
Archaeological science: politics of antiquities trade and collection Guest lecturers: Katie Getchell and Christine Kondoleon, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston |
|
| 24 | Archaeological science: ethical conflicts and political choices in deep water archeological research | Essay 3 due |
| 25 |
Politics in the public presentation of science Guest lecturer: Raney Aronson-Rath, Senior Producer, WGBH Boston |
|
| 26 | Conclusions: review of term, discuss final exam | |
