11.002J | Fall 2014 | Undergraduate

Making Public Policy

Instructor Insights

Course Overview

This page focuses on the course 11.002J/17.30J Making Public Policy as it was taught by Prof. Christopher Warshaw and Leah Stokes in Fall 2014.

This course aimed to get students thinking about politics and policy as a part of their everyday lives. We treated politics as a struggle among competing advocates trying to persuade others to see the world as they do, working within a context that is structured primarily by institutions and cultural ideas. We began by developing a policymaking framework, understanding ideology, and taking a whirlwind tour of the American political system. Then, we examined six policy issues in depth: health care, gun control, the federal budget, immigration reform, same-sex marriage, and energy and climate change. We concluded the course with a summary class and a student-driven, in-class oral project.

Course Outcomes

Course Goals for Students

  • Acquire substantive knowledge about public policy in the US
  • Develop critical reasoning skills
  • Analyze policy and understand political arguments
  • Improve oral and written communication skills

Instructor Interview

"… we tried not to make lectures a one-way experience."
—Leah Stokes

Below, Leah Stokes describes various aspects of how she and Prof. Chris Warshaw taught 11.002J/17.30J Making Public Policy.

For many students at MIT, public policy, political science, planning, and even social science, more generally, are not their primary fields of study. In order to ensure that students remained engaged throughout the course, we tried not to make lectures a one-way experience. We actively called on students throughout the class, including cold calling to check that they were keeping up with the readings and grasping the main ideas. Furthermore, we embedded interactive class activities in many of the lectures, allowing the students to discuss topics with each other in small groups and to hear different points of views.

Curriculum Information

Prerequisites

No previous coursework required.

Requirements Satisfied

CI-H

HASS

HASS-S

Offered

Every fall semester

Assessment

The students’ grades were based on the following activities:

  • 65% Papers (varying percentages)
  • 10% Final Oral Project
  • 25% Class Participation

Student Information

Enrollment

Limiting the class to between 50 and 60 students is ideal because it would be difficult to have active classroom discussions with a class size larger than this. Having 50 to 60 students also allows the teaching assistants to divide the class into four reasonably-sized recitation sections.

How Student Time Was Spent

During an average week, students were expected to spend 12 hours on the course, roughly divided as follows:

In Class

  • Met 2 times per week for 1.5 hours per session; 26 sessions total; mandatory attendance

Recitation

  • Met 1 time per week for 1 hour per session; 12 sessions total; mandatory attendance

Out of Class

  • Weekly readings, which provided background information and a broader theoretical framework for analyzing policy issues
  • Four papers on specific policy issues featured during the course

Course Team Roles

Instructors (Prof. Chris Warshaw & Leah Stokes)

The instructors ran lecture sessions, trading off based on policy modules and their different backgrounds and areas of expertise.

Teaching Assistant

Two teaching assistants facilitated weekly recitation sessions and managed grading.

Course Info

Learning Resource Types
Written Assignments with Examples
Instructor Insights