17.565 | Spring 2019 | Undergraduate

Israel: History, Politics, Culture, Identity

Assignments

The presentations are done periodically throughout the term and are mainly related to the specific topic discussed during a session. 

Possible Topics 

  • Israel’s political system
  • Israel’s educational systems
  • Israel’s military
  • Globalization and Israel
  • Israel’s municipal and regional systems
  • The post-Zionism debate
  • The Israeli economy
  • Israel’s settlement projects and colonialism
  • How Jewish is the Jewish state?
  • The Holocaust in Israeli identity
  • The Israeli Diaspora
  • Jewish-ethnic groups in Israel
  • The ultra-Orthodox sub-culture in Israel
  • Civil society in Israel [NGOs, etc.]
  • The Palestinian-Arab minority in Israel
  • ‘Ethnic democracy’ versus ’ethnocracy’
  • ‘Jewish and democratic’ versus ‘a state for all its citizens’
  • Israeli popular music as a reflection of the country’s identity
  • Israeli literature and Israeli identity
  • Israel and the Jewish-Diaspora relations
  • The development of Israel’s culinary as an expression of its identity

The final paper is an independent research project on a topic agreed upon between students and the instructor. It should be based on about 6–8 scholarly articles, or on their equivalent (like books’ chapters), and on additional material if needed.

Topic, paper’s outline, main argument, and the bibliography will need to be discussed with the instructor in advance and agreed upon before you begin writing. 

There is no required range of pages for the final paper. Once you feel that you have covered and discussed the topic in all its aspects, as they are presented in your bibliography, and that you have also addressed the main argument as it was agreed upon, then it is a good sign for you to stop writing. However, 8–18 pages, double spaced, font 12 can serve as a good measure stick for the length of the paper.

As mentioned in class more than once, the instructor will also be happy to read draft papers before the final submission.

Possible Topics

  • Israeli Settlements, 1967–2019
  • The Palestinian National Movement
  • The Israeli Occupation
  • How Jewish is the Jewish State?
  • The Holocaust in Israeli Identity
  • The Haredim
  • Jewish Religious Radicalism: The Movement to Build the Third Temple
  • The Israeli Military
  • The Israeli Economy
  • Israel’s Hi-Tech and Startups Industry
  • Israel’s Security Industry
  • Israel’s Aerospace Industry
  • Israel’s Higher Education System
  • The Arab Citizens of Israel
  • Israel’s Popular Music as an Expression of Israeli Identity
  • Israeli Architecture
  • Israeli Literature
  • Israeli Film and Israeli Identity
  • Is Israel a Militaristic State?
  • The Israeli Diaspora
  • US-Israeli Relationships
  • The BDS Movement
  • The American Jewish Community and Israel
  • Or any other topic that you want to explore

Student Examples

“The Establishment, Perpetuation, and Rejection of Normativity in Israeli Cinema” (PDF)

“The Shift in Israeli Identity Towards Nationalism and a More Religious State” (PDF)

These examples appear courtesy of MIT students and are anonymous by request.

Assignment #1: Civil Religion of Statism (Mamlachtiyut)

The period of Statism in Israel roughly corresponds to the first three decades since the establishment of Israel in 1948. Some scholars limit this period to only the first two decades, between the 1948 war and the 1967 war. However, for reasons to be explained in class, we will consider this period as encompassing the years from the 1948 war to the 1973 war (the Yom Kippur War).

We will treat this period as the formative years of Israel, in which its core identity was established, accompanied by the establishment of corresponding political, social, and cultural institutions, as well as by the construction of the state’s main cultural and ideological tenets.

When you think of the questions below, please take these basic outlines into consideration.

  1. Please read Liebman and Don-Yehiya’s excerpts from their book Civil Religion in Israel.
  2. Please sum up in no more than half a page their main argument about Israel’s Civil Religion of Statism.
  3. Then, (a) Please explain the differences between traditional and civil religions; (b) Define the concept of “Statism” in its application to Israel’s formative years (You may also want to incorporate the essence of the above (a) + (b) observations into your half-page summary of Liebman and Don-Yehiya’s main thesis); amd (c) Give three examples of how Israel’s Civil Religion of Statism was disseminated to the general public.
  4. Then, please reflect freely on both Liebman & Don-Yehiya’s thesis and text, and on the excerpt from Moshe Shamir’s novel. Please appraise the two pieces’ relation to the notion of Israel’s Mamlachtiyut.
  5. Please limit your entire paper to no more than two and a half pages, double spaced, font 12.

This assignment is due during Module 2.

Assignment #2: “No More Sabras”

  1. Please read the two mandatory readings: (a) Rubinstein’s scholarly discussion about the decline of the Sabra ideal; and (b) the excerpts from Eli Amir’s autobiographical novel.
  2. Please reflect freely on these two readings. Feel free to comment on the readings themselves or on the issues they address, or on both. Please also try to reflect on the relationships of these two readings, and what they discuss, to Mamlachtiyut (Statism).
  3. If you have questions about the material itself or about the issues discussed in it, please write them down as well. We will try to address these questions and the observations in class.
  4. Please limit your entire paper to no more than one and a half pages, double spaced, font 12.

This assignment is due during Module 4.

Assignment #3: 1948

  1. Please read the mandatory readings (Morris, Rabin, Shapira, Kanafani).
  2. Please summarize Morris’s main argument(s), and support your summary with at least two examples from the article.
  3. Please reflect freely on the issue of 1948 and on the four mandatory readings. The reflections are open but still need to address the 1948 war, its consequences, and the four works we were asked to read about it.
  4. Please limit your entire paper (questions 2 and 3) to no more than four pages, double spaced, font 12.

This assignment is due during Module 6.

Assignment #4: The Role of Emotions

  1.  Please read the mandatory readings and watch the mandatory YouTube episodes for Module 7:
    • Chapter 6 from Bunton’s book
    • The two short (documentary) stories from David Grossman’s 1988 book
    • The two YouTube episodes (linked)
    • The assigned pages from Roger Petersen’s book
  2.  Please sum up Petersen’s main argument in about ¾ of a page (double spaced, font 12).
  3.  Please reflect on Petersen’s thesis (for example, is it convincing? Are there other factors that you believe he does not emphasize enough? etc.). Then, and based on our readings and discussions in class so far, please also appraise whether his approach on the centrality of emotions can be applied to our topic. This can be about the inner cultural and social encounters inside Israeli society, or also about the conflict with the Palestinians. Please try to limit your discussion of this part to about one and a half to two additional pages (on top of the above three quarters of a page).

This assignment is due during Module 7.

Students are expected to be well-versed and familiar with their specific topic of “expertise” and to also be familiar with the other delegations’ narratives.

Core Issues

  1. Jerusalem = The future of the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount. Namely: who will have sovereignty over this site and who will control it? Similarly, who will have control and/or sovereignty over Jerusalem’s Arab and Jewish neighborhoods?
  2. 1948 Refugees = Will they have the right to return to their original homes in Jaffa, Haifa, etc., and to about 450 villages, most of them are now destroyed?
  3. Palestinian State and settlements = Will it be established at all? And if it will, what its future borders will be? And—what will happen to Israeli settlements and their inhabitants that are now located within the future borders of a Palestinian state, once such a state will be established?
  4. Other important issues = security arrangements for both sides, economic cooperation, water rights, air rights, travel between the West Bank and the Gaza, etc.

Each delegation needs to form an overall position towards a possible agreement, one that will not violate its basic interests.

Below, please see some links that you may want to consult for the peace conference. Please be advised that this is just a suggested list and I encourage all to look for other sources of information.

  1. The Jewish Virtual Library’s text presents Israeli and Jewish-American mainstream position on the issue. In addition, please also look for Netanyahu’s speeches (especially his Bar Ilan speech) and the Likud party’s resolutions regarding a future Palestinian state and the settlements.
  2. The Foundation for Middle East Peace tries to present a “balanced” perspective and a range of opinions.
  3. The UN’s “The Question of Palestine” website presents the UN stand, which in general is not so supportive of the Israeli (and US’s) one.
  4. The website of the Negotiations Affairs Department of the PLO contains very useful information regarding the position of the Palestinian Authority about our peace conference’s topics. Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP) is a pro-Palestinian information source.

Important UN Resolutions, Agreements and Proposals

UN Resolutions

General Assembly: 181; 194; 67/19

Security Council: 242, 338; 2334

List of Resolutions

Agreements

The Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty (1979)

Oslo I Accord (1993)

Oslo II Accord (1995)

The Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty (1994)

The Annapolis Conference (2007)

Proposals

President Clinton Parameters (2000)

The Arab League Peace Initiative (2002)

Course Info

Instructor
Departments
As Taught In
Spring 2019