2.019 | Spring 2011 | Undergraduate

Design of Ocean Systems

Labs and Projects

Objective

The objective is to develop a preliminary design of a Floating, Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) vessel. This facility is self-contained and processes, stores, and offloads crude oil products. The vessel operation site is the deep water of Gulf of Mexico. The scope of this project is limited to designing a stable, weathervaning hull, and single-point mooring system. ABS and API guidelines are used to provide structural requirements and safe mooring sizing.

Procedure and Schedule

The whole project is divided into three parts. Part I focuses on ship sizing and hydrostatics and addresses main design areas (a), (b), (c), and (d), shown below. Part II focuses on seakeeping analysis and addresses design area (e). Part III focuses on mooring system design and addresses design areas (f) and (g).

The project is to be completed in team with each individual responsible for the report and discussion of a separate subject. Each team contains 2~3 members. A draft report for each design subject and a final report and presentation for the whole design project are required.

Design Tools and Applications

Three pieces of design software were used for the design project. They are: PARAMARINE™ for hull form design and stability analysis, WAMIT® for sea-keeping performance analysis, and RISER-SIM for mooring system design. Access to this software is restructured; alternative software options for completing this project are A, B, and C.

PARAMARINE: PARAMARINE is software developed by Qinetiq. With the aid of this software most, of the spokes of the ship design spiral were addressed. The design was based on various rules such as the pertinent for FPSOs classification rules of ABS, API, MARPOL, etc. (see Design Project References below). The rules were presented to the students in parallel with the software instructions. The key procedures in the application of PARAMARINE for the project are:

  • Initially the software was used to develop the hull form of the FPSO. The students were taught how to create a hull and fair the lines. In order to assess the fairness of the hull the lines drawings were generated with PARAMARINE: profile, body plan, and half-breadth were created.
  • Then, the internal subdivision was designed based on the calculations performed in a homework assignment. Decks and transverse and longitudinal bulkheads were added to the design.
  • Subsequently the tank layout was created. Major tanks (such as oil and ballast tanks) were generated following the internal subdivisions created. Capacities were calculated to make sure that they met the payload requirements. Major building blocks were added to the design, the most important of which were the turret mooring system, the process facility, and the accommodation. At this stage, the students were taught how to produce 2D drawings that would enhance the presentation of their design.
  • After completing the geometry of the vessel hydrostatic characteristics, curves were calculated for a number of different drafts and trim angles. Subsequently, various loading conditions were defined. Based on these loading conditions, cases of intact and damaged stability were analyzed: three different damaged stability cases were analyzed for each loading condition, and various criteria for both intact and damaged stability were examined in order to make sure that the stability requirements were satisfied.
  • The next step was to perform a longitudinal strength analysis of the design. Load distribution was estimated for calm water, sagging and hogging conditions. Shear forces and bending moments were calculated. The structural elements that comprise the ship structure were then defined, ensuring that the design satisfied the criteria for maximum stress. A one-year operating condition and a one hundred-years surviving condition were considered. Finally, a midship section was generated.
  • The final work done with PARAMARINE was a design for production analysis. Production blocks, sub-assemblies and individual parts were used to form a hierarchy representing the actual building process of a shipyard.

WAMIT: Though PARAMARINE has the capability of sea-keeping analysis for floating ships, it does not provide the prediction of wave drift loads on the ship, which is needed in the design of mooring system. (Nevertheless, the students were taught on the use of PARAMARINE for sea-keeping analysis). For this project, thus, sea-keeping performance of the FPSO designed was analyzed by WAMIT, which has been evolving as a standard tool for sea-keeping analysis in the offshore industry. WAMIT was run on a Linux machine in the Athena computing environment of MIT. The students could either directly or remotely access the software. In different loading, operation, and surviving conditions, this analysis tool provides results for hydrodynamic coefficients, RAOs, and RMS motions of the FPSO.

RISER-SIM: This software was used to perform the analysis of a mooring line in dynamic ocean environment. It provides a prediction of line configuration and tension distribution along the line under various loading conditions. From this analysis, students obtained the loading-excursion relation of the mooring system, which is essential information for optimizing the mooring design.

Design Requirements

Field performance period: 20 years

Daily production: ~ 150, 000 bbls

Storage capacity: ~ 2,000,000 bbls

Offloading routine: ~ 10 days

Water depth: ~1000 meters

Operation condition: 1-year storm (wind/current/wave)

Survival condition: 100-year storm (wind/current/wave)

Operation condition (1-year return period):

  • Wind speed: 15.0 m/s
  • Current speed: 1.2 m/s
  • Significant wave height (Hs): 4.0 m
  • Peak wave period (Tp): 10.0 s

Survival condition (100-year return period):

  • Wind speed: 40.0 m/s
  • Current speed: 1.5 m/s
  • Significant wave height (Hs): 12.0 m
  • Peak wave period (Tp): 14.0 s

Main Design Areas

  1. General arrangement and overall hull/system design
  2. Weight, buoyancy and stability
  3. Local and global loading
  4. General strength and structural design
  5. Hydrodynamic loading and seakeeping
  6. Wind/current loads, wave drift and slowly-varying loads
  7. Mooring and station keeping

Design Project References

“Guide for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations.” American Bureau of Shipping, 2010. (PDF - 3.1MB)

“Guide for ‘Dynamic Loading Approach’ for Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Installations.” American Bureau of Shipping, 2010. (PDF)

Sections 5.1 to 5.4 of “Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers.” American Bureau of Shipping, 2010. (PDF - 7.4MB)

International Maritime Organization. Regulation 22 from MARPOL Consolidated Edition. International Maritime Organization, 2006. ISBN: 9789280142167. (PDF - 13.0MB)

Offshore-Technology.com. “Elf exploration field – Girassol, Luanda, Angola.” Accessed July 12, 2011.

Doumont, Jean-Luc. Part Four, “Effective Graphical Displays.” Trees, Maps, and Theorems. Principiae, 2009. ISBN: 9789081367707.

Objective

To develop a preliminary design on hull form, ship sizing, arrangement of tanks and type of mooring; to compute weight distribution and hydrostatic quantities, to perform intact and damage stability analysis; and to conduct a general strength and structural design.

  1. General Arrangement and Hull/System Design

    1. Choose a proper ship hull form
    2. Choose a proper mooring system
    3. Decide the length, width, and height of the hull
    4. Decide storage tank sizes and properly arrange tanks
    5. Decide ballast tanks and their distributions
    6. Discuss the topside arrangement
  2. Weight, Buoyancy and Stability

    1. Decide weight of lightship, weight of topside, weight of risers/moorings
    2. Decide the total displacement, center of gravity, center of buoyancy, and radius of gyration for roll/pitch/yaw on 0% (with ballast), 50% (without ballast), and 100% (without ballast) loading
    3. Perform intact stability analysis
    4. Perform damage stability analysis with 3 different damages
  3. Local and Global Loading

    1. Compute global loading for ballasted, half and full storage tank cases
  4. General Strength and Structural Design

    1. Compute hog and sag moment to check with design criteria
    2. Compute maximum shear force to check with design criteria
    3. Compute maximum deflection to check with design criteria

Guidance for Part I design

General Arrangement and Hull/System Design

Hull form: start from a tanker to develop an FPSO hull form. The main part of the hull should be like a barge. It should have a tandem-stern (convenient for offloading) and a bow similar to that of a tanker. This type of hull is easy to be built. Resistance is of secondary concern. Good stability is required.

Type of mooring system: Turret-point mooring (12 ~16 steel lines)—interior turret mooring or exterior turret mooring. Interior turret system: easy to maintain, smaller vertical motion (due to pitch), leading to longer ships (i.e. larger deck area). Exterior turret system: not increasing ship length, hard to maintain, larger vertical motion (due to pitch). Moon pool diameter = ~20m.

Ship sizing: Length: ~300m, Beam: ~60m, Depth: ~30m (need enough displacement for storage, enough deck space for topside), Length/Beam smaller than that of transport tankers, hydrodynamic concern (to avoid large responses to wave action, green water on deck, wave slamming).

Single/double hull: Double side, single/double hull on bottom. Ballast tanks, strength requirement, and environment protection.

Tank arrangement: 15~20 storage tanks: 2~3 tanks in the transverse direction (maximum beam/length of tank decided by MARPOL (regulation 24), ABS rule, maximum length less than 50m due to sloshing concern), 2 slop tanks (~2% of storage capacity), 2 fuel tanks, ~2 off-spec tanks, utility space, ballast tanks on two sides (width = 2~3m) (capacity = ~ oil storage capacity/2.4) and/or bottom, 1 collision tank on the bow/stern for trim purpose. (You may also choose to place ballast tanks in the middle of the ship).

Topside: relatively uniform distributed weight (production, accommodation, and helipad), make sure there is enough deck space for topside facilities. Accommodation should be placed at least 33m (100ft) away from process facilities. Minimum distance of process facilities to the main deck = 3m.

Weight, Buoyancy and Stability

Weight of lightship (i.e. steel): 13-16% of displacement (or scaled from existing FPSO)
Weight of topside: 7-8% of displacement (or scaled from existing FPSO)
Weight of risers/moorings: ~10,000 tons
Cargo deadweight (i.e. oil storage): ~ 75% of displacement
Total displacement: TBA

Three loading conditions:
0% (with ballast), 50% (without ballast) and 100% (without ballast) loading
Intact stability analysis: using PARAMARINE™
Damage stability analysis (with various damages): using PARAMARINE

Local and Global Loading

Three cases: ballasted, half and full storage: output by PARAMARINE

General Strength and Structural Design

Using 100-year wave: Consider the worst scenarios for sagging and hogging moment computations and shear force using PARAMARINE. Simple formulae will be provided for computing deflections. Check sagging/hogging bending moment, shear stress, and deflection to satisfy the criteria.

Extreme sagging condition: full load in crude storage tanks coupled with a wave of approximately the ship length with its trough amidships.

Extreme hogging condition: ballast condition coupled with a wave of approximately the ship length with its crest amidship.

Characteristics of the 100-year return period storm for the Gulf of Mexico

CHARACTERISTICS REQUIREMENTS
Wind speed (knots) 80
Current speed (knots) 2.1
Significant wave height (m) 12.2
Maximum wave height (m) 22.8
Wave period (sec) 14

Resources for Part 1

Intro to PARAMARINE (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 1 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 2 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 3 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 4 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 5 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 6 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 7 (PDF)

PARAMARINE Tutorial 8 (PDF)

Objective

To analyze the seakeeping performance of the FPSO you designed. Both 1-year operation and 100-year survival sea conditions need to be considered. The focus is on the performance of heave, pitch, and roll motion of the ship. The analyses need to be carried out for both light ship (0% loading) and full loaded ship (100% loading).

  1. Determine center of gravity, draft, mass, moment of inertia (roll, pitch and yaw)
  2. Estimate the natural frequencies/periods of heave and pitch
  3. Compute added mass, damping coefficients for a range of frequencies (with periods from 5 seconds to 18 seconds)
  4. Compute wave excitations for a range of frequencies (with periods from 5 seconds to 18 seconds) with incident wave heading angles of 0 (following sea) and 90 (beam sea) degrees
  5. Compute RAOs for a range of frequencies (with periods from 5 seconds to 18 seconds) with incident wave heading angles of 0 (following sea) and 90 (beam sea) degrees
  6. Compare your estimated natural frequencies of heave and pitch with that obtained by numerical computation (i.e. shown in RAOs)
  7. Compute motion spectra of the ship and significant motion amplitude in three incident wave headings
  8. Discuss seakeeping performance of the FPSO you designed and offer suggestions for possible improvements in the design from seakeeping point of view

Software

Any frequency-domain seakeeping analysis tool.

Resources

Guidance for Part 3: Mooring System Design (PDF)

Objective

To develop a preliminary mooring system design (for the FPSO you designed) based on the consideration of steady wind/current/wave loads/motions, wave-frequency loads/motions, and slowly-varying loads/motions of the FPSO. Full loaded ship condition (100% loading) in 100-year survival sea environment is considered in the design and analysis.

  1. Under the head sea condition,
    1. determine steady wind, current, and wave drift loads on the FPSO;
    2. determine slowly-varying wave load on the FPSO; and
    3. determine wave-frequency motions of the FPSO
  2. Develop a preliminary design of the mooring system
  3. Compute load-excursion relations
  4. Compute:
    1. steady tension in the cable and steady horizontal displacement of the FPSO;
    2. wave-frequency tension in the cable;
    3. estimate (surge) natural frequency of the FPSO; and
    4. slowly-varying tension in the cable and slowly-varying displacement of the FPSO
  5. Determine:
    1. maximum tension in the cable and safety factor, and
    2. maximum displacement of the FPSO
  6. Assuming one cable is broken, repeat (c), (d), and (e)
  7. Discuss the performance of the designed mooring system and possible improvements for the design

Software

RISER-SIM (developed by MIT Professor Michael Triantafyllou)